Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Analysis of genetic variation in an important pest, Tuta absoluta, and its microbiota with a new bacterial endosymbiont

Sayfa
111–123
Yayın Tarihi
2021-02-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings of high genetic homogeneity among T. absoluta populations with high prevalence of Wolbachia and Pantoea infections seem to imply that both bacterial infections have less impact on the mtDNA variations.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Tomato leaf miner is an aggressive and invasive pest that causes serious damage in tomato production, resulting in up to 100% yield losses during serious outbreaks.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The management of tomato leaf miner with synthetic pesticides is difficult due to its leaf mining habit, short life span, high reproductive rates, and insecticide resistance problem.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings of high genetic homogeneity among T. absoluta populations with high prevalence of Wolbachia and Pantoea infections seem to imply that both bacterial infections have less impact on the mtDNA variations.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:164 samples
⚙️Değişkenler:Endosymbionts · genetic variation · mitochondrial DNA

Abstract

Tomato leaf miner is an aggressive and invasive pest that causes serious damage in tomato production, resulting in up to 100% yield losses during serious outbreaks. The management of tomato leaf miner with synthetic pesticides is difficult due to its leaf mining habit, short life span, high reproductive rates, and insecticide resistance problem. In this study, sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (mtCOI) gene of Tuta absoluta specimens were analyzed and compared with the available COI sequence data members from GenBank. All the specimens of tomato leaf miner were clustered together in a single group with a high support value, suggesting the presence of a homogeneity in the T. absoluta specimens. Furthermore, 164 samples were analyzed in order to detect the prevalence of Arsenophonus, Cardinium, Hamiltonella, Pantoea, Spiroplasma,and Wolbachia infection in T. absoluta populations. PCR analysis revealed 100% prevalence of Wolbachia and Pantoea; however, no other symbiotic bacterial infections were observed in T. absoluta populations. Finally, Wolbachia wsp, Pantoea 16S ribosomal RNA genes, and mtDNA COI haplotypes were analyzed in order to estimate the mitochondrial effects of these endosymbionts on the population structure of tomato leaf miner. The findings of high genetic homogeneity among T. absoluta populations with high prevalence of Wolbachia and Pantoea infections seem to imply that both bacterial infections have less impact on the mtDNA variations.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MEHRKHOU, F., GUZ, N., KORKMAZ, E. M., CAGATAY, N. S. (2021). Analysis of genetic variation in an important pest, Tuta absoluta, and its microbiota with a new bacterial endosymbiont. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 111–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/179576

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Ahmed MZ, 2016, BMC EVOL BIOL, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12862-016-0660-x Baldo L, 2006, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V72, P7098, DOI 10.1128/AEM.00731-06 Ballard JWO, 1996,
  2. GENETICS, V144, P1519 Barati R, 2018, J ECON ENTOMOL, V111, P1551, DOI 10.1093/jee/toy134 Bennett GM, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P10169, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1421388112 Bettaibi A, 2016, J GENET, V93, pE110, DOI 10.1007/s12041-013-0310-7 Bozorov TA, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-41368-x Braig HR, 1998, J BACTERIOL, V180, P2373, DOI 10.1128/JB.180.9.2373-2378.1998 Broderick NA, 2004, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V70, P293, DOI 10.1128/AEM.70.1.293-300.2004 Carvalho GA, 2018, J APPL ENTOMOL, V142, P905, DOI 10.1111/jen.12531 Charlat S, 2009, BMC EVOL BIOL, V9, DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-64 Chen J, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep28484 Chevasco V, 2012, CONSERV GENET RESOUR, V4, P159, DOI 10.1007/s12686-011-9498-0 Chiel E, 2007, B ENTOMOL RES, V97, P407, DOI 10.1017/S0007485307005159 Choi JY, 2015, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V7, P2362, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evv158 Cifuentes D, 2011, PEST MANAG SCI, V67, P1155, DOI 10.1002/ps.2166 Doyle J.J., 1987, PHYTOCHEM B BOT SOC, V19, P11 Duman M, 2015, BIOCHEM SYST ECOL, V59, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.bse.2015.01.003 Duplouy A, 2018,
  3. PEERJ, V6, DOI 10.7717/peerj.4629 Duric Zorica, 2014, Polish Journal of Entomology, V83, P121, DOI 10.2478/pjen-2014-0009 EPPO, 2005, EPPO B. Feldhaar H, 2011, ECOL ENTOMOL, V36, P533, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01318.x Flores LV, 2003, BAG-J BASIC APPL GEN, V15, P47 Fujii Y, 2001, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V268, P855, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2001.1593 Glowska E, 2015, INFECT GENET EVOL, V30, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.12.019 Graham RI, 2012, BMC EVOL BIOL, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-204 Guedes RNC, 2019, J PEST SCI, V92, P1329, DOI 10.1007/s10340-019-01086-9 Guillemaud T, 2015, SCI REP-UK, V5, DOI 10.1038/srep08371 Guindon S, 2010, SYST BIOL, V59, P307, DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 Gurung K, 2019, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V167, P156, DOI 10.1111/eea.12768 Guz N, 2020, CURR MICROBIOL, V77, P1525, DOI 10.1007/s00284-020-01969-6 Guz N, 2013, BIOCHEM SYST ECOL, V48, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.bse.2012.12.010 Hagenblad J, 2015, BMC GENET, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12863-015-0242-8 Hammer TJ, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0086995 Hassan M.N., 2009, INT PEST CONTROL, V51, P85 Hawley DM, 2006, MOL ECOL, V15, P263, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02767.x He C, 2013, J INSECT SCI, V13, DOI 10.1673/031.013.16501 Hebert Paul D. N., 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society