Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

Effect of irrigation regimes on carbon isotope discrimination, yield and irrigation water productivity of wheat

Sayfa
50–58
Yayın Tarihi
2017-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Moreover, limited irrigation such as treatment I4 at 4.8% level produced only optimum yield reduction and had the potential for saving approximately 50% of irrigation water.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The present research study was carried out during the years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 to identify the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination (δ) of grain and leaf, yield of winter wheat, and irrigation water productivity (IWP) under different water conditions in a semiarid climate.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The field experiments were conducted with four different irrigation treatments (I1: rainfed: I2: irrigate when calculated soil water depletion is 60 mm below field capacity (full irrigation); I3: two irrigations maximum, one at tillering and another at grain filling; I4: no irrigation after establishment until heading, after which irrigate when soil water depletion is 60 mm below field capacity).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Moreover, limited irrigation such as treatment I4 at 4.8% level produced only optimum yield reduction and had the potential for saving approximately 50% of irrigation water.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2009-2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Carbon isotope discrimination · irrigation water productivity · winter wheat

Abstract

The present research study was carried out during the years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 to identify the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination (δ) of grain and leaf, yield of winter wheat, and irrigation water productivity (IWP) under different water conditions in a semiarid climate. The field experiments were conducted with four different irrigation treatments (I1: rainfed: I2: irrigate when calculated soil water depletion is 60 mm below field capacity (full irrigation); I3: two irrigations maximum, one at tillering and another at grain filling; I4: no irrigation after establishment until heading, after which irrigate when soil water depletion is 60 mm below field capacity). The leaf (δL) and the grain (δG) carbon isotope discriminations, biomass, and grain yield (GY) were measured in the experiments and the harvest index (HI) and IWP were calculated. At the end of the study, taking a 2-year average, GY and HI were found to be 3.35 t ha-1, 4.53 t ha-1, 4.13 t ha-1, and 4.37 t ha-1 and 29%, 31%, 31%, and 32%, respectively, according to the treatments. The results showed a significant positive linear correlation between δ and GY. These results highlight that grain δ at the pre-anthesis stage could be beneficial for predicting yield under well-irrigated conditions. The highest IWP value was obtained from I4 treatment. δ-IWP and GY-IWP were negatively correlated. IWP can be indicated as an advantage in deciding about limited irrigation regimes for wheat production in arid areas. The results of the present study show that full irrigation treatment (I2) could be recommended in areas with no water shortage conditions. Moreover, limited irrigation such as treatment I4 at 4.8% level produced only optimum yield reduction and had the potential for saving approximately 50% of irrigation water.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KALE, S., SÖNMEZ, B., MADENOĞLU, S., AVAĞ, K., TÜRKER, U., ÇAYCI, G., KÜTÜK, A. C. (2017). Effect of irrigation regimes on carbon isotope discrimination, yield and irrigation water productivity of wheat. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 50–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/179496

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...