Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5

Exogenous cysteine alleviates mercury stress by promoting antioxidant defence in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings

Sayfa
506–516
Yayın Tarihi
2020-10-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results of the study indicated that exogenous Cys improved resistance to Hg-stress in maize seedlings by activating antioxidant defence system.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Mercury (Hg) is one of the most important environmental pollutants that negatively affects plant growth and development.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For this purpose, a hydroponic experiment was set up to investigate the effect of HgCI2 (100 μM) and in combination with Cys (200 μM) on plant growth, total chlorophyll content, reactive oxygen species, antioxidant enzyme activities, and mRNA expression levels of some antioxidant genes in maize seedlings.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results of the study indicated that exogenous Cys improved resistance to Hg-stress in maize seedlings by activating antioxidant defence system.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Antioxidant · cysteine · gene expression

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) is one of the most important environmental pollutants that negatively affects plant growth and development. Cysteine (Cys) plays an important role in plant response to various environmental stress factors. In the present study, the alleviation of Hg stress through exogenous Cys treatment to maize seedlings was evaluated. For this purpose, a hydroponic experiment was set up to investigate the effect of HgCI2 (100 μM) and in combination with Cys (200 μM) on plant growth, total chlorophyll content, reactive oxygen species, antioxidant enzyme activities, and mRNA expression levels of some antioxidant genes in maize seedlings. The results showed that HgCI2 treatment significantly decreased both root and shoot growth and total chlorophyll content, also increased the malondialdehyde (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and superoxide levels (O2.–) in maize seedlings. After treatment with 200 μM exogenous Cys combined with 100 μM HgCl2, root and shoot growth and total chlorophyll content increased and the concentration of MDA, H2O2, O2 .– in seedlings notably decreased and catalase (CAT), glutathione reductase (GR), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and peroxidase (POD) activities in seedlings increased significantly. In addition, HgCI2 treatment alone or combination with Cys markedly increased the root and leaf Hg content. The higher amounts of Hg accumulated in the roots of the seedlings. Furthermore, qRT-PCR results showed that the mRNA levels of CAT, GR, and SOD genes were up-regulated at HgCI2 + Cys treatment groups compared to the HgCI2 treatment alone. The results of the study indicated that exogenous Cys improved resistance to Hg-stress in maize seedlings by activating antioxidant defence system.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYSİN, F., KARAMAN, A., YİLMAZ, A., AKSAKAL, O., GEZGİNCİOGLU, E., KOHNEHSHAHRİ, S. M. (2020). Exogenous cysteine alleviates mercury stress by promoting antioxidant defence in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5, 506–516. https://ajindex.com/articles/179411

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Agarwal S, 2004, BIOL PLANTARUM, V48, P555, DOI 10.1023/B:BIOP.0000047152.07878.e7 Aksakal O, 2017, PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI, V16, P246, DOI 10.1039/c6pp00412a Alayat A., 2014, Annual Research & Review in Biology, V4, P3835, DOI 10.9734/ARRB/2014/10641 Asada K, 2006, PLANT PHYSIOL, V141, P391, DOI 10.1104/pp.106.082040 BATES LS, 1973, PLANT SOIL, V39, P205, DOI 10.1007/BF00018060 Benavides María P., 2005, Braz. J. Plant Physiol., V17, P21, DOI 10.1590/S1677-04202005000100003 Boening DW, 2000,
  2. CHEMOSPHERE, V40, P1335, DOI 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00283-0 Cargnelutti D, 2006,
  3. CHEMOSPHERE, V65, P999, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.037 Chen J, 2012,
  4. BIOMETALS, V25, P847, DOI 10.1007/s10534-012-9560-8 Cho UH, 2000, PLANT SCI, V156, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00227-2 Clemens S, 2006,
  5. BIOCHIMIE, V88, P1707, DOI 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.07.003 Cui WT, 2014, ECOTOX ENVIRON SAFE, V105, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.009 Dickinson BC, 2011, NAT CHEM BIOL, V7, P504, DOI [10.1038/NCHEMBIO.607, 10.1038/nchembio.607] DRAPER HH, 1990, METHOD ENZYMOL, V186, P421 ELSTNER EF, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V70, P616, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90488-7 Erdal S, 2016, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V132, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.08.014 FOYER CH, 1976,
  6. PLANTA, V133, P21, DOI 10.1007/BF00386001 Gill SS, 2010, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V48, P909, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 Goldman LR, 2001,
  7. PEDIATRICS, V108, P197, DOI 10.1542/peds.108.1.197 Gong YP, 2001, BOT BULL ACAD SINICA, V42, P259 Gontia-Mishra I, 2016, J PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V35, P1000, DOI 10.1007/s00344-016-9598-x Hodges DM, 1996, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V98, P685, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb06672.x Hossain M, 2012, HANDBOOK OF ACCOUNTING AND DEVELOPMENT, P120 Hsu YT, 2004, PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V42, P227, DOI 10.1023/B:GROW.0000026514.98385.5c Hylander LD, 2006, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V368, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.11.029 Jarup L, 2003, BRIT MED BULL, V68, P167, DOI 10.1093/bmb/ldg032 John R, 2008, PLANT SOIL ENVIRON, V54, P262, DOI 10.17221/2787-PSE Klaassen CD, 1999, ANNU REV PHARMACOL, V39, P267, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.39.1.267 Lamhamdi M, 2013, SAUDI J BIOL SCI, V20, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.09.001 Laspina NV, 2005, PLANT SCI, V169, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.02.007 Lopes MS, 2013,
  8. METALLOMICS, V5, P1305, DOI 10.1039/c3mt00084b Mahbub KR, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V74, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.004 Mantri N, 2012, ABIOTIC STRESS RESPONSES IN PLANTS: METABOLISM, PRODUCTIVITY AND SUSTAINABILITY, P1, DOI 10.1007/97