Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5

Determination of some physicomechanical and biochemical parameters of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars

Sayfa
439–450
Yayın Tarihi
2020-10-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Such correlations should be taken into consideration in food processing applications and machine design for these hazelnut cultivars.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Hazelnut is one of the most popular nuts consumed by people; it has different cultivars in Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of the current study was to characterize some physicomechanical characteristics, shape features, color, and biochemical properties of 6 standard and 3 local hazelnut cultivars grown in Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Such correlations should be taken into consideration in food processing applications and machine design for these hazelnut cultivars.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:PCA · shape · size

Abstract

Hazelnut is one of the most popular nuts consumed by people; it has different cultivars in Turkey. The aim of the current study was to characterize some physicomechanical characteristics, shape features, color, and biochemical properties of 6 standard and 3 local hazelnut cultivars grown in Turkey. The shape and size properties of the samples were determined using image processing techniques as an alternative to conventional measurement methods. Additionally, principal component analysis (PCA) was used to classify the hazelnut samples in terms of the biochemical parameters of the hazelnut cultivars. According to the findings, the highest crude oil (63.25%) and lowest protein contents (13.63%) were observed in the Kalmkara cultivar. Oleic and linoleic acids were the major fatty acids for all hazelnut samples. While local Devedisi and standard cakildak cultivars had the highest oleic acid levels, the highest linoleic acid level was observed for the Dag findigt cultivar. The cultivars of Fosa had the highest Zn and Mn, while the highest Cu was found in the Tombul cultivar. The greatest surface and projected areas were calculated for the Kara findik and Dag findigi samples, while the greatest hardness value was measured for the Devedisi cultivar. PCA revealed some positive and negative correlations between the physicomechanical and biochemical parameters. The present analyses revealed significant correlations between hardness and internal shell b* values and between Cu content and internal L*. Such correlations should be taken into consideration in food processing applications and machine design for these hazelnut cultivars.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CETİN, N., YAMAN, M., KARAMAN, K., DEMİR, B. (2020). Determination of some physicomechanical and biochemical parameters of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5, 439–450. https://ajindex.com/articles/179397

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Alasalvar C, 2009, FOOD CHEM, V113, P919, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.08.019 Alasalvar C, 2010, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V58, P8674, DOI 10.1021/jf101039f Alibabic V, 2018, TURK J AGRIC FOR, V42, P67, DOI 10.3906/tar-1702-59 Antonucci F, 2012, FOOD BIOPROCESS TECH, V5, P768, DOI 10.1007/s11947-010-0389-2 AOAC, 2000, INT OFF METH AM, V15th. Aydin C, 2003, J FOOD ENG, V60, P315, DOI 10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00053-0 Bahrami ME, 2017, SUGAR TECH, V19, P305, DOI 10.1007/s12355-016-0467-5 Bayrakdar S, 2015, SIG PROCESS COMMUN, P616, DOI 10.1109/SIU.2015.7129899 Brewer MT, 2007, J EXP BOT, V58, P1339, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erl301 Chilliard Y, 2013, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V185, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.08.002 Ciemniewska-Zytkiewicz H, 2015, FOOD CHEM, V168, P615, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.107 Cosmulescu S, 2013, NOT BOT HORTI AGROBO, V41, P250 Costa C, 2011, FOOD BIOPROCESS TECH, V4, P673, DOI 10.1007/s11947-011-0556-0 Demir B, 2018, GRASAS ACEITES, V69, DOI 10.3989/gya.0104181 Demir B, 2019, ERWERBS-OBSTBAU, V61, P245, DOI 10.1007/s10341-019-00423-7 Demir B, 2018, TURK J AGRIC FOR, V42, P216, DOI 10.3906/tar-1801-78 Ercisli S, 2012, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V133, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.10.014 Ercisli S, 2011, NOT BOT HORTI AGROBO, V39, P227 FERNANDEZMARTINEZ J, 1993,
  2. EUPHYTICA, V69, P115, DOI 10.1007/BF00021734 Ferreira JJ, 2010, PLANT BREEDING, V129, P435, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2009.01702.x Firatligil-Durmus E, 2010, J FOOD ENG, V99, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.08.005 George C., 2007, INT J SERVICE LEARNI, V2, P76 Gunduz K, 2018, TURK J AGRIC FOR, V42, P145, DOI 10.3906/tar-1706-65 Guner M, 2003, BIOSYST ENG, V85, P485, DOI 10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00089-8 Hosseinpour A, 2013, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V150, P410, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.11.028 Johnson RC, 1999, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V46, P611, DOI 10.1023/A:1008756600094 Kaleoglu M, 2004, FOOD BIOPROD PROCESS, V82, P201, DOI [10.1205/fbio.82.3.201.44184, 10.1205/096030897531577] Kara M, 2013, J AGR SCI-TARIM BILI, V19, P219, DOI 10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001247 Koksal AH, 2006, FOOD CHEM, V99, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.08.013 Konopka I, 2005, EUR FOOD RES TECHNOL, V220, P11, DOI 10.1007/s00217-004-1037-8 Koyuncu MA, 2005, GRASAS ACEITES, V56, P263 Mahawar MK, 2017, ACTA AGROPH, V24, P217 MCGUIRE RG, 1992,
  3. HORTSCIENCE, V27, P1254, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.27.12.1254 Mertens D, 97503 AOAC INT, P3. Milosevic T, 2017, ACTA SCI POL-HORTORU, V16, P49, DOI 10.24326/asphc.2017.5.6 Mohsenin N.N, 1986, PHYS PROPER