Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 5

Effect of precipitation on reducing atmospheric pollutant over Beijing

Sayfa
1443–1453
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Additionally, a longer duration of precipitation results in a higher removal efficiency for PM with large diameters and a longer duration for effective removal.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Precipitation is one of the major mechanisms for removing aerosol particles in the atmosphere.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, the effect of precipitation on reducing particulate matter (PM) is analyzed by using the concentration data of PM2.5 (diameters less than 2.5 μm) during 2008–2017 and PM10 (diameters less than 10 μm) during 2014–2017 and meteorological data in the same period in Beijing, China.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Additionally, a longer duration of precipitation results in a higher removal efficiency for PM with large diameters and a longer duration for effective removal.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2008–2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Precipitation is one of the major mechanisms for removing aerosol particles in the atmosphere. In this study, the effect of precipitation on reducing particulate matter (PM) is analyzed by using the concentration data of PM2.5 (diameters less than 2.5 μm) during 2008–2017 and PM10 (diameters less than 10 μm) during 2014–2017 and meteorological data in the same period in Beijing, China. The results show that there are obvious differences in the removal of PM by different intensity precipitation processes. Drizzle shows a negative removal effect on PM2.5 with an efficiency between −16.5% and −36.5%, while a positive removal effect is found for PMCourse (diameters between 2.5 and 10 μm), and the efficiency varies from 31.7% to 38.4%.The removal effects of other precipitation events (intensity≥light rain) are positive for both PM2.5 and PMCourse, and the efficiency is 19.1–68.5% and 31.7–86.3%, respectively. Generally, the effective removal durations for PM2.5 and PMCourse are 2–9 and 2–10 h, respectively, and the removal effect becomes better as the PM diameters increase. Moreover, the strongest removal effect of precipitation on PM2.5 occurs in autumn while that for PMCourse occurs in spring, and nighttime precipitation has higher removal efficiency and longer removal duration than daytime precipitation. Additionally, a longer duration of precipitation results in a higher removal efficiency for PM with large diameters and a longer duration for effective removal.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ZHENG, Z., LI, Q., CHEN, C., XU, G., LI, J. (2019). Effect of precipitation on reducing atmospheric pollutant over Beijing. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 5, 1443–1453. https://ajindex.com/articles/178204

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Agarwal, A., Mangal, A., Satsangi, A., Lakhani, A., Kumari, K.M., 2017. Characterization, sources and health risk analysis of PM2.5 bound metals during foggy and non-foggy days in sub-urban atmosphere of Agra. Atmos. Res. 197, 121–131.
  2. Andronache, C., 2003. Estimated variability of below-cloud aerosol removal by rainfall for observed aerosol size distributions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3 (1), 131–143.
  3. Bae, S.Y., Park, R.J., Kim, Y.P., Woo, J.H., 2012. Effects of below-cloud scavenging on the regional aerosol budget in East Asia. Atmos. Environ. 58, 14–22.
  4. Bourcier, L., Masson, O., Laj, P., Chausse, P., Pichon, J.M., Paulat, P., Bertrand, G., Sellegri, K., 2012. A new method for assessing the aerosol to rain chemical composition relationships. Atmos. Res. 118, 295–303.
  5. Brook, J.R., 1995. Wet acid deposition episodicity in eastern North America and the influence of deposition episodes on annual deposition amounts. Atmos. Environ. 29 (15), 1795–1807.
  6. Cai, W.J., Li, K., Liao, H., Wang, H.J., Wu, L.X., 2017. Weather conditions conducive to Beijing severe haze more frequent under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 257–263.
  7. Chang, W.Y., Zhan, J.Q., 2017. The association of weather patterns with haze episodes: recognition by PM2.5 oriented circulation classification applied in Xiamen, Southeastern China. Atmos. Res. 197, 425–436.
  8. Chate, D.M., Pranesha, T.S., 2004. Field studies of scavenging of aerosols by rain events. J. Aerosol Sci. 35 (6), 695–706.
  9. Chate, D.M., Devara, P.C.S., 2005. Parametric study of scavenging of atmospheric aerosols of various chemical species during thunderstorm and non-thunderstorm rain events. J. Geophys. Res. 110 (23), D23208. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006406.
  10. Chen, H.P., Wang, H.J., 2015. Haze days in North China and the associated atmospheric circulations based on daily visibility data from 1960 to 2012. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 5895–5909.
  11. Chen, H.P., Wang, H.J., Sun, J.Q., Xu, Y.Y., Yin, Z.C., 2019. Anthropogenic fine particulate matter pollution will be exacerbated in eastern China due to 21st century GHG warming. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 233–243.
  12. Cortina-Januchs, M.G., Maria, G., Quintanilla-Dominguez, J., Vega-Corona, A., Andina, D., 2015. Development of a model for forecasting of PM10 concentrations in Salamanca, Mexico. Atmos. Pollution Res. 6 (4), 626–634.
  13. D'Elia, I., Piersanti, A., Briganti, G., Cappelletti, A., Ciancarella, L., Peschi, E., 2018. Evaluation of mitigation measures for air quality in Italy in 2020 and 2030. At