Dergiler / Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Properties of Command Constructions in TİD

TİD’de Buyurma Yapılarının Özellikleri

Sayfa
161–178
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The only salient marker of commands we have identified is a nonmanual marker: (forward/sideward) head tilt .

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper focuses on the properties of command constructions in Turkish Sign Language (TİD).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The nature and function of manual signs and nonmanual markers in command constructions in TİD are investigated to determine their prosodic, morphological, morphophonological, and syntactic properties.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The only salient marker of commands we have identified is a nonmanual marker: (forward/sideward) head tilt .
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This paper focuses on the properties of command constructions in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). The nature and function of manual signs and nonmanual markers in command constructions in TİD are investigated to determine their prosodic, morphological, morphophonological, and syntactic properties. We show that TİD does not utilize any of the properties reported in the literature as an obligatory marker of commands in some spoken and sign languages. The only salient marker of commands we have identified is a nonmanual marker: (forward/sideward) head tilt .

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Türk İşaret Dili’ndeki (TİD) emir yapıları incelenmektedir. Çalışmada TİD emir yapılarının ezgisel, biçimbirimsel, biçim-sesbilimsel ve sözdizimsel özelliklerini belirlemek amacıyla bu yapıların el ve el-dışı işaretlerinin niteliği ve işlevleri incelenmektedir. Bazı işitsel ve işaret dillerindeki emir yapılarında zorunlu oldukları belirlenmiş olan özelliklerden hiçbirini TİD’in yansıtmadığı gözlemlenmiştir. TİD emir yapılarının en belirgin özelliğinin el-dışı işaret olan öne/yana baş eğmesi olduğu saptanmıştır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZSOY, A. S., WOOD, M. K., NUBALAOĞLU, D., HAKGÜDER, E. (2018). Properties of Command Constructions in TİD. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 161–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/173400

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Açan, Z. (2007). A linguistic analysis on basic sentence types in Turkish Sign Language (TİD) with reference to non-manual activity. PhD dissertation, Hacettepe University. Aikhenvald, A.Y. (2012). Imperatives and commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Alba, C., Aliaga, D., Barberà, G., Frigola, S., & Quer, J. (2013) In search of imperatives in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Paper presented at Workshop on SL Imperatives, WG2 SignGram. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, 30 May 2013.
  3. Bonifacio E., Capiotto, M., Chistè, M., & Quartana, G. (2011). Analisi delle tipologie di imperative nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana. Ms. Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia. Brentari, D., Falk, J., Giannakidou, A., Herrmann, A., Volk, E., & Steinbach, M. (2018). Production and Comprehension of Prosodic Markers in Sign Language Imperatives. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00770 Brynjólfsdóttir, E.G., & Jónsson, J. (2013). Imperatives in ÍTM. Paper presented at Workshop on SL Imperatives, WG2 SignGram. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, 30 May 2013.
  4. Cecchetto, C. (2012). Sentence types. In: Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach and Bencie Woll (eds.) Sign language: An international handbook. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Dikyuva, H. (2011). Aspectual non-manual expressions in TİD. MA Thesis, University of Central Lanchashire (UCLan). Dikyuva, H., & Zeshan, U. (2008). Türk İşaret Dili: Birinci seviye [Turkish Sign Language: Level one]. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
  5. Donati, C., & Branchini, C. (2012). Handout at Workshop on imperatives at COST Work Group 2 meeting. Nijmegen University, 21–23 November 2012.
  6. Donati, C., Barbera, G., Branchini, C., Cecchetto, C., Geraci, C., & Quer, J. (2017). Searching for impreatives in European sign languages. In: D. van Olmen and S. Heimold (eds.) Imperatives and other directive strategies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Dryer, M. S. (2007). Clause types. In: T. Shopen (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume I: Clause structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 224-275.
  7. Gökgöz, K., & Arık, E. (2011). Distributional and syntactic characteristics of nonmanual markers in Turkish Sign Language (Türk İşaret Dili, TİD). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 62, Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, 63–78.
  8. Han, C. (2000). The sructure and interpretation of imperatives: Mood and force in Universal Grammar. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Garland Publishing. Iatridou, S. (2008)