KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 8

TÜRKİYE’DE ELEKTRİK TÜKETİMİ VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ARASINDA NEDENSELLİK İLİŞKİSİ

CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN TURKEY

Cengiz AKTAŞ
Veysel YILMAZ
Sayfa
45–54
Yayın Tarihi
2008-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this study it was found that bidirectional causal relationship between electricity consumption and GNP in the short-run, and unidirectional causality running from GNP to electricity consumption exists in the long-run.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Consumption of electricity has been known in many countries to be correlated with economic activities.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The reasons for increase of electricity demand are higher living standards and industrialization.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this study it was found that bidirectional causal relationship between electricity consumption and GNP in the short-run, and unidirectional causality running from GNP to electricity consumption exists in the long-run.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2004 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Elektrik Tüketimi · Ekonomik Büyüme · Nedensellik

Özet

Consumption of electricity has been known in many countries to be correlated with economic activities. The reasons for increase of electricity demand are higher living standards and industrialization. Like in other developing countries, in Turkey, the demand for energy and electricity is growing rapidly due to social and economic developments and increase of the population of the country. In this paper, the Granger causality between electricity consumption EC and Gross National Product GNP is examined for Turkey using annual data covering the period 1970-2004. As economic growth and electricity consumption variables used in empirical analysis have same order of integration I 1 , Granger causality test is employed. In this study it was found that bidirectional causal relationship between electricity consumption and GNP in the short-run, and unidirectional causality running from GNP to electricity consumption exists in the long-run.

Abstract

Consumption of electricity has been known in many countries to be correlated with economic activities. The reasons for increase of electricity demand are higher living standards and industrialization. Like in other developing countries, in Turkey, the demand for energy and electricity is growing rapidly due to social and economic developments and increase of the population of the country. In this paper, the Granger causality between electricity consumption EC and Gross National Product GNP is examined for Turkey using annual data covering the period 1970-2004. As economic growth and electricity consumption variables used in empirical analysis have same order of integration I 1 , Granger causality test is employed. In this study it was found that bidirectional causal relationship between electricity consumption and GNP in the short-run, and unidirectional causality running from GNP to electricity consumption exists in the long-run

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKTAŞ, C., YILMAZ, V. (2008). TÜRKİYE’DE ELEKTRİK TÜKETİMİ VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ARASINDA NEDENSELLİK İLİŞKİSİ. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 8, 45–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/170598

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Adjaye, John A. (2000), “The Relationship Between Energy Consumption, Energy Prices And Economic Growth: Time Series Evidence From Asian Developing Countries”, Energy Economics, No. 22, pp. 615-625.
  2. Akarca, Ali T. and Thomas V. Long (1980), “On The Relationship Between Energy And GNP: A Re-Examination”, Journal of Energy and Development, No. 5, pp. 326-331.
  3. Chang, Tsangyao, Wenshwo Fang and Li-Fang Wen (2001), “Energy Consumption, Employment, Output And Temporal Causality: Evidence From Taivan Based On Cointegration And Error-Correction Modelling Techniques”, Applied Economics, No. 33, pp. 1045- 1056. Dickey, David A., Dennis W. Jansen and Daniel L. Thornton (1991), “A Primer On Cointegration With An Application To Money And Income”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, March/April, pp. 58–78.
  4. Dickey, David A. and Wayne A. Fuller (1979), “Distribution Of The Estimators For Autoregressive Time Series With A Unit Root”, Journal of American Statistical Association, No. 74, pp. 427-431.
  5. Dickey, David A. and Wayne A. Fuller (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics For Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root”, Econometrica, No. 49, pp. 1057-1072.
  6. Dua, Pami and B.L. Pandit (2002), “Interest Rate Determination In India:Domestic And External Factors”, Journal of Policy Modeling, No. 24, pp. 853–875.
  7. Engle, Robert F. and Clive W. J. Granger (1987), “Cointegration And Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, And Testing”, Econometrica, No. 55, pp. 251–276.
  8. Erol, Umit and Eden S.H. Yu (1987), “Time Series Analysis Of The Causal Relationships Between US Energy And Employment”, Resources Energy, No.9, pp. 75-89.
  9. Granger, Clive W.J., (1981), “Some Properties Of Time Series Data And Their Use In Econometric Model Specification”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 15, No.1, pp. 121– 130. Granger, Clive W.J. (1983), “Co-Integrated Variables And Error-Correcting Models”, Economics Department Discussion Paper, University of California, San Diego, pp. 83– 113. Granger, Clive W.J. (1988), “Some Recent Developments In A Concept Of Causality”, Journal of Econometrics, No. 39, pp. 199– 211. Granger, Clive W.J. and Paul Newbold (1974), “Spurious Regressions In Econometrics”, Journal Econometrics, No. 2, pp. 111-120.
  10. Ghosh, Sajal (2002), “Electricity Consumption And Economic Growth In India”, Energy Policy, No. 30, pp. 125–129.
  11. Johansen, Soren (1991), “Estimation And Hypothesis Testing Of Cointegration Vectors In Gaussian Vector Autoregression Models”, Econometrica, No. 59, pp.