KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3

EKONOMİK POLİTİKA BELİRSİZLİĞİ YÜKSELDİĞİNDE: BORSA İSTANBUL’DAN SEKTÖREL HİSSE SENEDİ PİYASASI BULGULARI

WHEN ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY RISES: SECTORAL STOCK MARKET EVIDENCE FROM BORSA ISTANBUL

Çağdaş Gündüz(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2068-4951
Sayfa
1582–1607
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, politika belirsizliğinin, olumsuz makroekonomik koşullarla birlikte, risk primlerini artırarak ve yatırım beklentilerini zayıflatarak sektörel değerlemeler üzerinde baskı oluşturduğunu göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, Türkiye’ye özgü ekonomik politika belirsizliğinin (TEPU) Borsa İstanbul'daki sektörel hisse senedi getirileri üzerindeki etkisini, Ocak 2006 – Aralık 2024 dönemine ait aylık verilerle beş sektörel endeks (finans-XUMAL, sanayi-XUSIN, turizm-XTRZM, ulaştırma-XULAS, teknoloji-XUTEK) üzerinden incelemektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Literatür ağırlıklı olarak gelişmiş piyasalara ve toplulaştırılmış endekslere odaklanırken, bu çalışma gelişmekte olan bir piyasa için sektörel düzeyde ampirik kanıt sunmakta; analiz, sabit etkiler ve Driscoll-Kraay dirençli standart hatalarla tahmin edilen panel veri yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilmektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, politika belirsizliğinin, olumsuz makroekonomik koşullarla birlikte, risk primlerini artırarak ve yatırım beklentilerini zayıflatarak sektörel değerlemeler üzerinde baskı oluşturduğunu göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Ekonomik Politika Belirsizliği · Borsa İstanbul · Sektörel Getiriler

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’ye özgü ekonomik politika belirsizliğinin (TEPU) Borsa İstanbul'daki sektörel hisse senedi getirileri üzerindeki etkisini, Ocak 2006 – Aralık 2024 dönemine ait aylık verilerle beş sektörel endeks (finans-XUMAL, sanayi-XUSIN, turizm-XTRZM, ulaştırma-XULAS, teknoloji-XUTEK) üzerinden incelemektedir. Literatür ağırlıklı olarak gelişmiş piyasalara ve toplulaştırılmış endekslere odaklanırken, bu çalışma gelişmekte olan bir piyasa için sektörel düzeyde ampirik kanıt sunmakta; analiz, sabit etkiler ve Driscoll-Kraay dirençli standart hatalarla tahmin edilen panel veri yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilmektedir. TEPU’nun sektörel getiriler üzerindeki tek değişkenli etkisi negatif fakat istatistiksel olarak anlamsız bulunmuştur. Yurt içi makroekonomik kontroller (faiz oranı, döviz kuru, enflasyon) ve küresel ekonomik politika belirsizliği (durağan hale getirilmiş fark biçiminde GEPU) modele eklendiğinde, TEPU %5 düzeyinde anlamlı negatif bir etki göstermekte; kontrol değişkenleri arasında döviz kuru değer kaybı en güçlü belirleyici olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Sektör-TEPU etkileşim testi, TEPU etkisinde sektörler arası anlamlı bir farklılaşma bulunmadığını, dolayısıyla belirsizliğin sektöre özgü değil genel/sistemik bir risk faktörü olarak işlediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bulgular, politika belirsizliğinin, olumsuz makroekonomik koşullarla birlikte, risk primlerini artırarak ve yatırım beklentilerini zayıflatarak sektörel değerlemeler üzerinde baskı oluşturduğunu göstermektedir. Kısıtlar arasında tek bir belirsizlik göstergesine dayanma ve sınırlı yatay kesit boyutu yer almaktadır.

Abstract

This study examines the impact of Türkiye-specific economic policy uncertainty (TEPU) on sectoral stock returns in Borsa Istanbul, using monthly data from January 2006 to December 2024 across five sector indices: financial (XUMAL), industrial (XUSIN), tourism (XTRZM), transportation (XULAS), and technology (XUTEK). While existing literature largely focuses on developed markets and aggregate indices, this study contributes sector-level evidence from an emerging market using a panel data framework estimated with fixed effects and Driscoll-Kraay standard errors. The univariate effect of TEPU on sectoral returns is negative but statistically insignificant. Once domestic macroeconomic controls (interest rate, exchange rate, inflation) and global economic policy uncertainty (GEPU, specified in stationary first-differenced form) are included, TEPU exerts a negative effect significant at the 5% level, with exchange rate depreciation the strongest determinant among the controls. Sector-TEPU interaction test finds no significant sectoral heterogeneity in TEPU’s effect, indicating that policy uncertainty operates as a broadly systemic rather than sector-specific risk factor. The findings suggest that policy uncertainty, with unfavorable macroeconomic conditions, exerts downward pressure on sectoral valuations through higher risk premiums, weaker investment expectations, and rising financing costs. Limitations include reliance on a single domestic uncertainty proxy and a limited cross-sectional dimension constraining power to detect sectoral heterogeneity.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gündüz, Ç. (2026). EKONOMİK POLİTİKA BELİRSİZLİĞİ YÜKSELDİĞİNDE: BORSA İSTANBUL’DAN SEKTÖREL HİSSE SENEDİ PİYASASI BULGULARI. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3, 1582–1607. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1898832

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (75)

  1. Al-Thaqeb, S. A., & Algharabali, B. G. (2019). Economic policy uncertainty: A literature review. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 20, e00133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2019.e00133
  2. Antonakakis, N., Chatziantoniou, I., & Filis, G. (2013). Dynamic co-movements of stock market returns, implied volatility and policy uncertainty. Economic Letters, 120(1), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.04.004
  3. Arouri, M., Rault, C., & Teulon, F. (2014). Economic policy uncertainty, oil price shocks and GCC stock markets, IPAG Business School Working Paper Series 2014-547.
  4. Arouri, M., Estay, C., Rault, C., & Roubaud, D. (2016). Economic policy uncertainty and stock markets: long-run evidence from the US. Finance Research Letters, 18, 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.04.011
  5. Aye, G. C., Balcilar, M., Demirer, R., & Gupta, R. (2018). Firm-level political risk and asymmetric volatility. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 18, e00110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2018.e00110
  6. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
  7. Baltagi, B. H., & Wu, P. X. (1999). Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15, 814–823.
  8. Bernanke, B. S. (1983). Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885568
  9. Bhargava, A., Franzni, L., & Narendranathan, W. (1982). Serial correlation and fixed effect models. The Review of Economic Studies, 49, 533–549.
  10. Bloom, N. (2009). The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica, 77(3), 623-685. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6248
  11. Bossman, A., Gubareva, M., & Teplova, T. (2023). Economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, market sentiment, and regional stocks: Asymmetric analyses of the EU sectors. Eurasian Economic Review, 13(3), 321–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00234-y
  12. Boutchkova, M., Doshi, H., Durnev, A., & Molchanov, A. (2012). Precarious politics and return volatility. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(4), 1111–1154. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr100
  13. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
  14. Brogaard, J., & Detzel, A. (2015). The asset-pricing implications of government economic policy uncertainty. Management Science, 61(1), 3–18. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2075375
  15. Carriere-Swallow, Y., & Cespedes, L. F. (2013). The impact of uncertainty shocks in emerging economies. Journal of International Economics, 90(2), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.03.003
  16. Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye (TCMB). (2026). Indicative exchange rates. Retrieved from https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/kurlar/kurlar_tr.html. Accessed 07.07.2026
  17. Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye (TCMB). (2026). EVDS data central. Retrieved from https://evds3.tcmb.gov.tr/tumSeriler/550202/bie_bispolfaiz. Accessed 07.07.2026
  18. Chang, T., Chen, W. Y., Gupta, R. & Nguyen, D. K. (2015). Are stock prices related to the political uncertainty index in OECD countries? Evidence from the bootstrap panel causality test. Economic Systems, 39(2), 288-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2014.10.005
  19. Chen, J., Jiang, F. and Tong, G. (2017). Economic policy uncertainty in China and stock market expected returns. Accounting and Finance, 57(5), 1265-1286. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12338
  20. Chen, N.-F., Roll, R., & Ross, S. A. (1986). Economic forces and the stock market. The Journal of Business, 59(3), 383–403.
  21. Choi, S.-Y. (2024). Sectoral responses to economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk in the US stock market. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 76, 100874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2024.100874
  22. Christou, C., Cunado, J., Gupta, R. & Hassapis, C. (2017). Economic policy uncertainty and stock market returns in PacificRim countries: Evidence based on a Bayesian panel VAR model. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 40, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2017.03.001
  23. Dakhlaoui, I. & Aloui, C. (2016). The interactive relationship between the US economic policy uncertainty and BRIC stock markets. International Economics, 146, 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2015.12.002
  24. Das, D., & Kumar, S. B. (2018). International economic policy uncertainty and stock prices revisited: Multiple and Partial wavelet approach. Economics Letters, 164, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.013
  25. Davis, S. J. (2016). An index of global economic policy uncertainty (NBER Working Paper No. 22740). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22740
  26. Debata, B., & Mahakud, J. (2018). Economic policy uncertainty and stock market liquidity. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 10(1), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-09-2017-0088
  27. Demir, E., & Ersan, O. (2018). The impact of economic policy uncertainty on stock returns of Turkish tourism companies. Current Issues in Tourism, 21(8), 847-855. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1217195
  28. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560.
  29. Economic Policy Uncertainty (n.d). Retrieved from https://www.policyuncertainty.com/. Accessed 12.01.2026.
  30. Fang, L., Chen, B., Yu, H., & Xiong, C. (2017). The effect of economic policy uncertainty on the long-run correlation between crude oil and the US stock markets. Finance Research Letters, 4, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.07.007
  31. Fernandez-Villaverde, J., Guerron-Quintana, P., Kuester, K., & Rubio-Ramírez, J. (2015). Fiscal volatility shocks and economic activity. The American Economic Review, 105(11), 3352–3384.
  32. Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32, 675-701.
  33. Gao, X., Ren, Y. & Li, X. (2019). The interdependence of global oil price, China’s stock price and economic policy uncertainty. Australian Economic Papers, 58(4), 398-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12160
  34. Ghani, M., & Ghani, U. (2024). Economic policy uncertainty and emerging stock market volatility. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 31(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-023-09410-1
  35. Ghani, M., Guo, Q., Ma, F., & Li, T. (2022). Forecasting Pakistan stock market volatility: Evidence from economic variables and the uncertainty index. International Review of Economics & Finance, 80(3), 1180–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.04.003
  36. Greene, W. (2000). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
  37. Gulen, H., & Ion, M. (2015). Policy uncertainty and corporate investment. Review of Financial Studies, 29(3), 523–564. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv050
  38. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification test in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271.
  39. Holmes, M. J., & Maghrebi, N. (2016). Financial market impact on the real economy: An assessment of asymmetries and volatility linkages between the stock market and unemployment rate. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 13, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2015.10.003
  40. Im, H. J., Park, H., & Zhao, G. (2017). Uncertainty and the value of cash holdings. Economics Letters, 155, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.03.005
  41. Investing (2026). Türkiye - Endeksler. Retrieved from https://tr.investing.com/indices/turkey-indices. Accessed 12.01.2026.
  42. Jens, C. E. (2017). Political uncertainty and investment: Causal evidence from US gubernatorial elections. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(3), 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.01.034
  43. Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2013). Access to capital, investment, and the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.02.014
  44. Kang, W., & Ratti, R. A. (2014). Policy uncertainty in China, oil shocks and stock returns. Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis Working Paper 32/2014.
  45. Kannadhasan, M., & Das, D. (2020). Do Asian emerging stock markets react to international economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk alike? A quantile regression approach. Finance Research Letters, 34, 101276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.024
  46. Kangallı Uyar, S. G., & Uyar. U. (2023). Python ve R uygulamalı iş dünyası için panel veri analizi. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  47. Karanasos, M., & Yfanti, S. (2020). On the macro-drivers of realized volatility: the destabilizing impact of UK policy uncertainty across Europe. The European Journal of Finance, 26(12), 1146-1183. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1732437
  48. Khan, N., Zada, H., Siddiqui, O., & Ullah, E. (2025). Sectoral response to economic policy uncertainty in Japan: Empirical evidence from the cross-quantilogram approach. Computational Economics, 66(6), 4727–4762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-025-10867-7
  49. Kilic, I., & Balli, F. (2024). Measuring economic country-specific uncertainty in Türkiye. Empirical Economics, 67, 1649–1689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02594-z
  50. Kim, H., & Kung, H. (2016). The asset redeployability channel: How uncertainty affects corporate investment. Review of Financial Studies, 30(1), 245–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv076
  51. Ko, J.-H., & Lee, C.-M. (2015). International economic policy uncertainty and stock prices: Wavelet approach. Economics Letters, 134, 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.07.012
  52. Lam, S. S., & Zhang, W. (2014). Does policy uncertainty matter for international equity markets. ACSEP Research Working Paper Series No. 14/02.
  53. Li, X.-M., Zhang, B., & Gao, R. (2015). Economic policy uncertainty shocks and stock–bond correlations: Evidence from the US market. Economics Letters, 132, 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.04.013
  54. Li, X. L., Balcilar, M., Gupta, R. & Chang, T. (2016). The causal relationship between economic policy uncertainty and stock returns in China and India: Evidence from a bootstrap rolling window approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(3), 674-689. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2014.998564
  55. Maquieira, C. P., Espinosa-Méndez, C., & Gahona-Flores, O. (2023). How does economic policy uncertainty (EPU) impact copper-firms stock returns? International evidence. Resources Policy, 81, 103372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103372
  56. Matkovskyy, R., Jalan, A. & Dowling, M. (2020). Effects of economic policy uncertainty shocks on the interdependence between Bitcoin and traditional financial markets. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 77, 150-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.02.004
  57. Mbanyele, W. (2023). Economic policy uncertainty and stock liquidity: the role of board networks in an emerging market. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(1), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2020-0492
  58. Mei, D., Zeng, Q., Zhang, Y., & Hou, W. (2018). Does US Economic Policy Uncertainty matter for European stock markets volatility? Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 512, 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.019
  59. Pan, W. F., Wang, X., & Wang, S. (2022) Measuring economic uncertainty in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(5):1359–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1873764
  60. Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2012). Uncertainty about government policy and stock prices. The Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1219–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01746.x
  61. Peiro, A. (2016). Stock prices and macroeconomic factors: some European evidence. International Review of Economics and Finance, 41, 287-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.08.004
  62. Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053
  63. Phan, H. V., Nguyen, N. H., Nguyen, H. T., & Hegde, S. (2019). Policy uncertainty and firm cash holdings. Journal of Business Research, 95, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.001
  64. Shahzad, S. J. H., Raza, N., Balcilar, M., Ali, S., & Shahbaz, M. (2017). Can economic policy uncertainty and investors sentiment predict commodities returns and volatility? Resources Policy, 53, 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.06.010
  65. Su, Z., Fang, T. & Yin, L. (2019). Understanding stock market volatility: What is the role of US uncertainty? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 48(7), 582-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.07.014
  66. Sum, V. (2012). Economic policy uncertainty and stock market performance: evidence from the European union, Croatia, Norway, Russia, Switzerland, Turkey and Ukraine. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 25, 99-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2094175
  67. Şahinöz, S., & Erdoğan Coşar, E. (2020). Quantifying uncertainty and identifying its impacts on the Turkish economy. Empirica, 47(2), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-018-9424-8
  68. Tastan, H., & Güngör, A. (2019). Macroeconomic fundamentals of Turkey stock market volatility. Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(4), 823–832.
  69. Tatoğlu, F. (2016). Panel veri ekonometrisi. İstanbul: Beta Basım A.Ş.
  70. Tsai, I.-C. (2017). The source of global stock market risk: A viewpoint of economic policy uncertainty. Economic Modelling, 60(1), 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.09.002
  71. Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK). (2026). Consumer price index. Retrieved from https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/tr/press/58294. Accessed 07.07.2026.
  72. Xiong, X., Bian, Y. & Shen, D. (2018). The time-varying correlation between policy uncertainty and stock returns: evidence from China. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 499, 413-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.034
  73. Xu, Y., Wang, J., Chen, Z., & Liang, C. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and stock market returns: New evidence. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 58, 101525, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101525
  74. Yu, X., Huang, Y., & Xiao, K. (2021). Global economic policy uncertainty and stock volatility: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Applied Economics, 24(1), 416–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2021.1953913
  75. Zhang, Y., He, J., He, M., & Li, S. (2023). Geopolitical risk and stock market volatility: A global perspective. Finance Research Letters, 53(1), 103620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103620