KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İDEALKENT / 2026 / Sayı: 51

Şehirlerin dijital olgunluğu ve akıllı şehir olgunluğu üzerine sistematik literatür incelemesi ve bir değerlendirme çerçevesi önerisi

Systematic literature review of city digital maturity and smart city maturity, and an assessment framework proposal

Gizem Turcan(IZMIR BAKIRCAY UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5530-7777
Erman Coşkun(BAHCESEHIR UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8712-3246
Sayfa
1–19
Yayın Tarihi
2026-10-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Web of Science Core Collection ve Sco-pus veri tabanlarında yapılan sistematik arama sonucunda, 2015-2026 arama dönemini kapsayan kayıtlardan 2015 ile 2025 yılları arasında yayınlanmış 40 makale tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, şehir dijital olgunluğu ile akıllı şehir olgunluğu literatürlerini bütünleşik bir değerlendirme perspektifi altında incelemektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Web of Science Core Collection ve Sco-pus veri tabanlarında yapılan sistematik arama sonucunda, 2015-2026 arama dönemini kapsayan kayıtlardan 2015 ile 2025 yılları arasında yayınlanmış 40 makale tespit edilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Çalışma, bulgular ışığında mevcut değerlendirme yaklaşımlarını karşılaştırmakta ve şehir düzeyindeki değerlendirmelerin tasarımına rehberlik etmek için kavramsal bir çerçeve sağlamaktadır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2015-2026 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Şehir dijital olgunluğu · akıllı şehir olgunluğu · olgunluk değerlendirmesi

Özet

Bu çalışma, şehir dijital olgunluğu ile akıllı şehir olgunluğu literatürlerini bütünleşik bir değerlendirme perspektifi altında incelemektedir. Web of Science Core Collection ve Sco-pus veri tabanlarında yapılan sistematik arama sonucunda, 2015-2026 arama dönemini kapsayan kayıtlardan 2015 ile 2025 yılları arasında yayınlanmış 40 makale tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmalar, amaçları, türleri, değerlendirme parametreleri, yöntemleri, veri kaynakları ve coğrafi uygulama bağlamları açısından analiz edilmiş, parametreler arasındaki ilişkileri incelemek amacıyla eş-oluşum analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular, olgunluk modeli ve seviye belirleme yaklaşımlarının literatürde baskın olduğunu göstermektedir. Yönetişim, çevre, altyapı, dijitalleşme, vatandaş, güvenlik, veri, teknoloji, hizmet ve bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri ise literatürde en sık kullanılan değerlendirme boyutları arasında yer almakta-dır. Yöntemler bakımından olgunluk matrisleri, ağırlıklandırma, bileşik puanlama ve toplam puanlama yaklaşımları yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Ölçüm yaklaşımlarında kullanılan veri kaynakları çoğunlukla anketlere, uzman görüşlerine, görüşmelere, istatistiksel verilere, resmi raporlara ve standartlara dayanmaktadır. İnceleme ayrıca şehir dijital olgunluğu çalışmalarının ağırlıklı olarak kurumsal dijital kapasitelere, akıllı şehir olgunluğu çalışmaları-nın ise daha geniş kentsel, çevresel ve toplumsal sonuçlara odaklandığını ortaya koymakta-dır. Çalışma, bulgular ışığında mevcut değerlendirme yaklaşımlarını karşılaştırmakta ve şehir düzeyindeki değerlendirmelerin tasarımına rehberlik etmek için kavramsal bir çerçeve sağlamaktadır.

Abstract

This study reviews the literature on city digital maturity and smart city maturity from an integrated assessment perspective. Through a systematic search in the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus databases, 40 papers published between 2015-2025 were identified from records covering the 2015-2026 search period. The selected papers were examined according to their aims, types, assessment parameters, methodology, data sources and geographic context of application. Co-occurrence analysis was conducted to identify relationships between parameters. The findings reveal that maturity models and level determination approaches are dominant in the literature. Dimensions commonly used to assess cities include governance, environment, infrastructure, digitalization, citizenship, security, data, technology, services, and information and communication technologies (ICT). Regarding methods, maturity matrices, weighting, composite scoring, and aggregate scoring approaches are widely used. Data sources used in measurement approaches are mostly relay on surveys, expert opinions, interviews, statistical data, official reports, and standards. The review also shows that city digital maturity studies mostly emphasize institutional digital capacities, while smart city maturity studies focus on broader urban, environmental, and social outcomes. Based on these findings, the study compares existing assessment approaches and proposes a conceptual framework to guide the design of city-level assessments

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Turcan, G., Coşkun, E. (2026). Şehirlerin dijital olgunluğu ve akıllı şehir olgunluğu üzerine sistematik literatür incelemesi ve bir değerlendirme çerçevesi önerisi. İDEALKENT, Sayı: 51, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.2012594

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (48)

  1. Abdou, S. A., & Asif, M. (2024, March). Readiness Level Assessment of Smart Cities: case Study of London. In 2024 International Conference on Open Innovation and Digital Transformation (OIDT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/OIDT59407.2024.11082693
  2. Afonso, R. A., dos Santos Brito, K., do Nascimento, C. H., Garcia, V. C. & Álvaro, A. (2015, May). Brazilian smart cities: using a maturity model to measure and compare inequality in cities. In Proceedings of the 16th annual international conference on digital government research (pp. 230-238). https://doi.org/10.1145/2757401.2757426
  3. Aljowder, T., Ali, M., & Kurnia, S. (2023). Development of a maturity model for assessing smart cities: A focus area maturity model. Smart Cities, 6(4), 2150-2175. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6040099
  4. Anschuetz, C., Ebner, K., & Smolnik, S. (2024). Size does matter: A maturity model for the special needs of small and medium-sized smart cities. Cities, 150, 104998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104998
  5. Aragão, F. V., Chiroli, D. M. D. G., Zola, F. C., Aragão, E. V., Marinho, L. H. N., Correa, A. L. C., & Colmenero, J. C. (2023). Smart cities maturity model—A multicriteria approach. Sustainability, 15(8), 6695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086695
  6. Aristovnik, A., Ravšelj, D., & Murko, E. (2024). Decoding the digital landscape: An empirically validated model for assessing digitalisation across public administration levels. Administrative Sciences, 14(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030041
  7. Bayraktar, H., Bayar, D. Y., Kara, B., & Bilgin, G. (2020). Leveraging maturity assessment to choose the right applications for smart cities: Turkey’s approach. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 44, 137-142. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-4-W3-2020-137-2020
  8. Benbya, H., Nan, N., Tanriverdi, H., & Yoo, Y. (2020). Complexity and information systems research in the emerging digital world. MIS Quarterly, 44(1), 1-18.
  9. Bouzguenda, I., Alalouch, C., & Fava, N. (2020). Examining digital participatory planning: Maturity assessment in a Small Dutch city. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121706
  10. Brodny, J., & Tutak, M. (2023). Assessing the level of digital maturity in the Three Seas Initiative countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122462
  11. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
  12. Correia, D., Teixeira, L., & Marques, J. (2020). Triangular pyramid trunk: The three axes of the smart city assessment tool. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 241(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP200071
  13. Debeljak, A., & Dečman M. (2022). Digital transformation of Slovenian urban municipalities: A quantitative report on the impact of municipality population size on digital maturity. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2022-0012
  14. Firmanyah, H. S., Supangkat, S. H., Arman, A. A., & Adhitya, R. (2017a, September). Searching smart city in Indonesia through maturity model analysis:(Case study in 10 cities). In 2017 International Conference on ICT For Smart Society (ICISS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  15. Firmanyah, H. S., Supangkat, S. H., Arman, A. A., & Ariani, Y. (2017b, November). Identifying component for building smart city maturity model through document based weighting and city problem in Indonesia. In 2017 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  16. Fujimoto, T., Kutami, M., Yamamoto, J., & Zhou, Y. (2018, September). A study on application and effective use of evaluation method of smart community infrastructure using maturity model. In 2018 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC2.2018.8656973
  17. Hajduk, S. (2020). Using multivariate statistical methods to assess the urban smartness on the example of selected European cities. PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0240260. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240260
  18. Haller, S., Neuroni, A. C., Fraefel, M., & Sakamura, K. (2018, May). Perspectives on smart cities strategies: sketching a framework and testing first uses. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (pp. 1-6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209310
  19. Hassan, W., & Duarte, A. E. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: a few suggestions. Current Problems in Cardiology, 49(8), 102640.
  20. Jacques, E. D. A., Neuenfeldt Júnior, A., De Paris, S., Gutierrez, R., & Siluk, J. (2025). Urban Maturity Performance Measurement System Through Smart City Actions. Sustainability, 17(11), 5199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115199
  21. Juniawan, M. A., Sandhyaduhita, P., Purwandari, B., Yudhoatmojo, S. B., & Dewi, M. A. A. (2017, October). Smart government assessment using Scottish Smart City Maturity Model: a case study of Depok city. In 2017 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS) (pp. 99-104). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS.2017.8355018
  22. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26.
  23. Koekemoer, S., & Von Solms, R. (2022, May). A smart city maturity assessment model for South African municipalities. In 2022 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa) (pp. 1-9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/IST-Africa56635.2022.9845565
  24. Korachi, Z., & Bounabat, B. (2018, October). Data driven maturity model for assessing smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Smart Digital Environment (pp. 140-147). https://doi.org/10.1145/3289100.3289123
  25. Korachi, Z., & Bounabat, B. (2019, June). Towards a platform for defining and evaluating digital strategies for building smart cities. In 2019 3rd International Conference on Smart Grid and Smart Cities (ICSGSC) (pp. 32-40). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSGSC.2019.00-22
  26. Kumar, P., Pal, A., & Hsieh, S. H. (2022, October). A Review of Smart City Maturity Assessment Models. In International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (pp. 99-107). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32515-1_8
  27. Li, C., Li, Q., & Xia, Z. (2025, April). Enhancing Digital Governance Maturity Evaluation: An Integrated AHP and Entropy Weighting Approach. In Proceedings of the 2025 2nd International Conference on Innovation Management and Information System (pp. 415-421). https://doi.org/10.1145/3745676.3745740
  28. Lloret, Á., Peral, J., Ferrández, A., Auladell, M., & Muñoz, R. (2025). A data-driven framework for digital transformation in smart cities: integrating AI, dashboards, and IoT readiness. Sensors, 25(16), 5179. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25165179
  29. Mariani, I., & Bianchi, I. (2023). Conceptualising digital transformation in cities: A multi-dimensional framework for the analysis of public sector innovation. Sustainability, 15(11), 8741. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118741
  30. Mirsarraf, S. M., Mansouri, A., & Yari, A. (2022). Smart City Assessment: Initiatives of Mashhad Smart City. AUT Journal of Modeling and Simulation, 54(1), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.22060/miscj.2022.21375.5284
  31. Moustaka, V., Maitis, A., Vakali, A., & Anthopoulos, L. G. (2020, April). CityDNA dynamics: a model for smart city maturity and performance benchmarking. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020 (pp. 829-833). https://doi.org/10.1145/3366424.3386584
  32. Mutiarin, D., Yusuf, M., Lega, M., & Habibullah, A. (2024). Agile bureaucracy in the digital age: assessing the public service delivery in Jambi City. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age (IJPADA), 11(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.356405
  33. Nur, M., Batmetan, J. R., & Manggopa, H. K. (2019, February). Smart city maturity level analysis using itil framework. In 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018) (pp. 243-247). Atlantis Press.
  34. Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37.
  35. Orlowski, A. (2021). Smart cities concept-readiness of city Halls as a measure of reaching a smart city perception. Cybernetics and Systems, 52(5), 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2020.1871224
  36. Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2), 183-199.
  37. Renteria, C., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2019, April). Toward an enabler-based digital government maturity framework: A preliminary proposal based on theories of change. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (pp. 408-417).
  38. Rytova, E., Verevka, T., Gutman, S., & Kuznetsov, S. (2020). Assessing the Maturity Level of Saint Petersburg’s Digital Government. International Journal of Technology, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i6.4440
  39. Shaker, H., Mani, J., Vijaya, P., Palanisamy, P., Al Shamli, M., & Aljuboori, A. F. (2024, May). Towards Oman’s Digital Transformation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Smart Government Development Index. In 2024 1st International Conference on Innovative Engineering Sciences and Technological Research (ICIESTR) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIESTR60916.2024.10798126
  40. Sheng, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, W., Shan, Z., Fang, Y., Lyu, W., & Xiong, Z. (2022). High confident evaluation for smart city services. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 950055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.950055
  41. Suliman, A., Rankin, J., & Robak, A. (2019, June). Maturity-based scale for smart cities: A conceptual framework. In Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, the Annual Conference, Laval, QC, Canada.
  42. Suliman, A., Rankin, J., & Robak, A. (2021). CSR maturity model for smart city assessment. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 48(7), 785-802. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2020-0077
  43. Sunindyo, W. D., Gambetta, W., & Herawati, N. A. (2025, October). A Context-Sensitive Roadmap Framework for Digital Government Transformation in Resource-Constrained Regions: The Case of Mimika Regency, Indonesia. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoDSE68111.2025.11351554
  44. Toleikienė, R., Butkus, M., Bartuševičienė, I., & Juknevičienė, V. (2025). Assessing Digital Governance Maturity in the Context of Municipal Resilience: The Triadic Model, Its Dimensions and Interrelations. Administrative Sciences, 15(11), 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15110435
  45. Warnecke, D., Wittstock, R., & Teuteberg, F. (2019). Benchmarking of European smart cities-a maturity model and web-based self-assessment tool. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(4), 654-684. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2018-0057
  46. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii.
  47. Wodecka-Hyjek, A., Kusa, R., & Kafel, T. (2024). Evaluating the current state of Digital Era Governance application in local government units in the Małopolska region. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2024-0002
  48. Zotano, M. A. G., & Bersini, H. (2017). A data-driven approach to assess the potential of smart cities: the case of open data for Brussels capital region. Energy Procedia, 111, 750-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.237