Dergiler / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 6

Clinical presentation patterns and tumor characteristics of pituitary adenomas: a 10-year experience from a tertiary endocrinology center

Hüseyin Karaaslan(HARRAN UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0000-0002-1271-6298
Faruk Elyiğit(Bursa City Hospital, Ministry of Health)0000-0002-0820-5284
Tevfik Sabuncu(HARRAN UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0000-0001-6504-5355
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Recognition of these subtype-specific patterns may support the clinical evaluation of individuals with PAs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aims: Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are among the most common intracranial neoplasms and exhibit a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations depending on hormonal activity and tumor size.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: This retrospective study included 522 individuals aged ≥16 years diagnosed with PAs between 2013 and 2023.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Recognition of these subtype-specific patterns may support the clinical evaluation of individuals with PAs.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Pituitary neoplasms · signs and symptoms · tumor burden

Abstract

Aims: Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are among the most common intracranial neoplasms and exhibit a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations depending on hormonal activity and tumor size. This study evaluated the demographic characteristics, tumor size distribution, and clinical presentation patterns of individuals with PAs at a tertiary endocrinology center. Methods: This retrospective study included 522 individuals aged ≥16 years diagnosed with PAs between 2013 and 2023. Demographic characteristics, presenting symptoms, adenoma subtype, and tumor size were extracted from medical records and analyzed. Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 31.3±12.0 years, and 75.1% of the cohort were female. Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) (48.9%) and prolactinomas (44.8%) were the most common adenoma subtypes, whereas acromegaly (4.4%), Cushing's disease (1.7%), and TSH-secreting adenomas (0.2%) were uncommon. Microadenomas predominated overall (81.6%), particularly in NFPAs (85.9%), prolactinomas (82.5%), and Cushing's disease (88.9%), whereas macroadenomas were more frequent in acromegaly (74.0%). Females predominated in most subtypes, whereas acromegaly showed a male predominance (60.9%). Hypogonadal symptoms were the most frequently recorded presenting complaints, documented in 88.9% of individuals with prolactinomas and 58.4% of those with NFPAs. Galactorrhea was recorded in 37.6% of females with prolactinomas. Complaints potentially related to mass effect were most frequent in NFPAs (19.6%) and acromegaly (17.4%). Asymptomatic or nonspecific presentations were most common in NFPAs (22.0%). Conclusion: NFPAs and prolactinomas were the predominant PA subtypes. Clinical presentation and tumor size distribution varied considerably across adenoma subtypes. Recognition of these subtype-specific patterns may support the clinical evaluation of individuals with PAs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Karaaslan, H., Elyiğit, F., Sabuncu, T. (2026). Clinical presentation patterns and tumor characteristics of pituitary adenomas: a 10-year experience from a tertiary endocrinology center. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 6. https://ajindex.com/articles/1667853

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (19)

  1. Melmed S, Kaiser UB, Lopes MB, et al. Clinical biology of the pituitary adenoma. Endocr Rev. 2022;43(6):1003-1037. doi:10.1210/endrev/bnac010
  2. Gittleman H, Ostrom QT, Farah PD, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of pituitary tumors in the United States, 2004-2009. J Neurosurg. 2014; 121(3):527-535. doi:10.3171/2014.5.JNS131819
  3. Melmed S. Pituitary-tumor endocrinopathies. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(10):937-950. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1810772
  4. Asa SL, Mete O, Perry A, Osamura RY. Overview of the 2022 WHO classification of pituitary tumors. Endocr Pathol. 2022;33(1):6-26. doi:10.1007/s12022-022-09703-7
  5. Sivakumar W, Chamoun R, Nguyen V, Couldwell WT. Incidental pituitary adenomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;31(6):E18. doi:10.3171/2011.9.FOCUS11217
  6. Raappana A, Koivukangas J, Ebeling T, Pirilä T. Incidence of pituitary adenomas in Northern Finland in 1992-2007. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(9):4268-4275. doi:10.1210/jc.2010-0537
  7. Araujo-Castro M, Berrocal VR, Pascual-Corrales E. Pituitary tumors: epidemiology and clinical presentation spectrum. Hormones (Athens). 2020;19(2):145-155. doi:10.1007/s42000-019-00168-8
  8. Graffeo CS, Yagnik KJ, Carlstrom LP, et al. Pituitary adenoma incidence, management trends, and long-term outcomes: a 30-year population-based analysis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2022;97(10):1861-1871. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.03.017
  9. Chin SO. Epidemiology of functioning pituitary adenomas. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2020;35(2):237-242. doi:10.3803/EnM.2020.35.2.237
  10. Tritos NA, Miller KK. Diagnosis and management of pituitary adenomas: a review. JAMA. 2023;329(16):1386-1398. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.5444
  11. Agustsson TT, Baldvinsdottir T, Jonasson JG, et al. The epidemiology of pituitary adenomas in Iceland, 1955-2012: a nationwide population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(5):655-664. doi:10.1530/EJE-15-0189
  12. Kwancharoen R, Deerochanawong C, Peerapatdit T, Salvatori R. Pituitary adenomas registry in Thailand. J Clin Neurosci. 2023;115:138-147. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2023.07.026
  13. Al Futaisi AM, Al Marzouqi AM, Al Abri MA, Al Riyami MZ. Pituitary adenoma prevalence and characteristics of Omani patients: a single center experience. Oman Med J. 2024;39(1):e589. doi:10.5001/omj.2024.44
  14. Katznelson L, Laws ER Jr, Melmed S, et al. Acromegaly: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(11): 3933-3951. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-2700
  15. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, et al. The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(5):1526-1540. doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0125
  16. Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(2):273-288. doi:10.1210/jc.2010-1692
  17. Freda PU, Bruce JN, Khandji AG, et al. Presenting features in 269 patients with clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas enrolled in a prospective study. J Endocr Soc. 2020;4(4):bvaa021. doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaa021
  18. Tresoldi AS, Carosi G, Betella N, et al. Clinically nonfunctioning pituitary incidentalomas: characteristics and natural history. Neuroendocrinology. 2020;110(7-8):595-603. doi:10.1159/000503256
  19. Fleseriu M, Gurnell M, McCormack A, et al. Pituitary incidentaloma: a Pituitary Society International Consensus Guideline Statement. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2025;21(10):638-655. doi:10.1038/s41574-025-01134-8