Dergiler / Anadolu Orman Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 13

Üst toprak özelliklerinde bakıya bağlı farklılıklar: Limne Deresi Havzası örneği (Tekirdağ, Türkiye)

Aspect-related differences in topsoil properties: A case study in the Limne River Basin (Tekirdağ, Türkiye)

Emre Özşahin(TEKİRDAĞ NAMIK KEMAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8169-6908
Mikayil Öztürk(TEKİRDAĞ NAMIK KEMAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0009-6482-108X
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-10-25
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular Kuzeye bakan alanlarda kum içeriği daha düşük (%43,87’ye karşı %54,51; düzeltilmiş p = 0,035), silt (%32,78’e karşı %21,09; düzeltilmiş p = 0,014) ve TOM (%7,59’a karşı %4,48; düzeltilmiş p = 0,039) daha yüksek bulunmuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Giriş ve Hedefler Bu çalışmada, Limne Deresi Havzasında yükselti bakımından eşleştirilmiş kuzeye ve güneye bakan yamaçların 0–20 cm üst toprak özellikleri karşılaştırılmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Yöntemler On eşleştirilmiş bloktan 20 kompozit örnek alınmış; tane boyu dağılımı, pH, toprak organik maddesi (TOM), elektriksel iletkenlik (EC) ve kalsiyum karbonat eşdeğeri (CCE) belirlenmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular Kuzeye bakan alanlarda kum içeriği daha düşük (%43,87’ye karşı %54,51; düzeltilmiş p = 0,035), silt (%32,78’e karşı %21,09; düzeltilmiş p = 0,014) ve TOM (%7,59’a karşı %4,48; düzeltilmiş p = 0,039) daha yüksek bulunmuştur.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Bakı · eşleştirilmiş tasarım · tane boyu dağılımı

Özet

Giriş ve Hedefler Bu çalışmada, Limne Deresi Havzasında yükselti bakımından eşleştirilmiş kuzeye ve güneye bakan yamaçların 0–20 cm üst toprak özellikleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Yöntemler On eşleştirilmiş bloktan 20 kompozit örnek alınmış; tane boyu dağılımı, pH, toprak organik maddesi (TOM), elektriksel iletkenlik (EC) ve kalsiyum karbonat eşdeğeri (CCE) belirlenmiştir. Farklılıklar kesin eşleştirilmiş permütasyon testi, bootstrap güven aralığı, etki büyüklüğü ve Holm düzeltmesiyle değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular Kuzeye bakan alanlarda kum içeriği daha düşük (%43,87’ye karşı %54,51; düzeltilmiş p = 0,035), silt (%32,78’e karşı %21,09; düzeltilmiş p = 0,014) ve TOM (%7,59’a karşı %4,48; düzeltilmiş p = 0,039) daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Kil, pH, EC ve CCE için anlamlı farklılık belirlenmemiştir. Kuzey örneklerinin yedisi tın, üçü killi tın; güney örneklerinin yedisi kumlu killi tın, diğerleri kumlu tın, tın ve killi tın olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Sonuçlar Yamaçlar tane boyu dağılımı, tekstür sınıfı ve TOM bakımından farklılaşmış; ancak bitki örtüsü, eğim ve olası litolojik farklılıklar nedeniyle sonuçlar bakının bağımsız nedensel etkisi olarak yorumlanmamıştır.

Abstract

Background and aims This study compared the properties of 0–20 cm topsoil between elevation-matched north- and south-facing hillslopes in the Limne River Basin. Methods Twenty composite samples were collected from ten matched blocks and analyzed for particle-size distribution, pH, soil organic matter (SOM), electrical conductivity (EC), and calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE). Differences were evaluated using exact paired randomization tests, bootstrap confidence intervals, effect sizes, and Holm correction. Results North-facing sites had less sand (43.87% vs. 54.51%; adjusted p = 0.035) and more silt (32.78% vs. 21.09%; adjusted p = 0.014) and SOM (7.59% vs. 4.48%; adjusted p = 0.039). The clay, pH, EC, and CCE levels did not differ significantly. Seven northern samples were loam and three were clay loam, whereas seven southern samples were sandy clay loam, and the others were sandy loam, loam, and clay loam. Conclusions The hillslopes differed in particle-size distribution, textural-class distribution, and SOM; however, because vegetation, slope gradient, and potentially lithology also varied, the results were not interpreted as the independent causal effect of aspect.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Özşahin, E., Öztürk, M. (2026). Üst toprak özelliklerinde bakıya bağlı farklılıklar: Limne Deresi Havzası örneği (Tekirdağ, Türkiye). Anadolu Orman Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 13. https://doi.org/10.53516/ajfr.1996163

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (62)

  1. Ai, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, H., Liang, C., Xue, S., Liu, G., 2020. Influence of slope aspect on the macro- and micronutrients in Artemisia sacrorum on the Loess Plateau in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 20160-20172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08570-1.
  2. Antonelli, A., Kissling, W.D., Flantua, S.G.A., Bermúdez, M.A., Mulch, A., Muellner-Riehl, A.N., Kreft, H., Linder, H.P., Badgley, C., Fjeldsa, J., Fritz, S.A., Rahbek, C., Herman, F., Hooghiemstra, H., Hoorn, C., 2018. Geological and climatic influences on mountain biodiversity. Nature Geoscience, 11, 718-725. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0236-z.
  3. Begum, F., Bajracharya, R.M., Sharma, S., Sitaula, B.K., 2010. Influence of slope aspect on soil physico-chemical and biological properties in the mid hills of central Nepal. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 17(5), 438-443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2010.499034.
  4. Bennie, J., Huntley, B., Wiltshire, A., Hill, M.O., Baxter, R., 2008. Slope, aspect and climate: spatially explicit and implicit models of topographic microclimate in chalk grassland. Ecological Modelling, 216, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.04.010.
  5. Birkeland, P.W., 1984. Soils and Geomorphology. Oxford University Press, New York.
  6. Black, C.A., 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.1.
  7. Bouyoucos, G.J., 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 43, 434-438. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300090005x.
  8. Burke, I.C., Lauenroth, W.K., Riggle, R., Brannen, P., Madigan, B., Beard, S., 1999. Spatial variability of soil properties in the shortgrass steppe: the relative importance of topography, grazing, microsite, and plant species in controlling spatial patterns. Ecosystems, 2, 422-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100219900091.
  9. Chai, Y., Jiang, S., Guo, W., Qin, M., Pan, J., Bahadur, A., Shi, G., Luo, J., Jin, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., An, L., Feng, H., 2018. The effect of slope aspect on the phylogenetic structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in an alpine ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 126, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.08.016.
  10. Chan, H.C., Chang, C.C., Chen, P.A., Lee, J.T., 2019. Using multinomial logistic regression for prediction of soil depth in an area of complex topography in Taiwan. Catena, 176, 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.01.030.
  11. Chen, M., Ai, S., Yang, Y., Yang, Q., Huang, B., Liu, Z., Ai, X., Ai, Y., 2024. Effects of slope aspect on soil aggregates humus on cut slopes in alpine areas of Southwest China. Catena, 238, 107833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.107833.
  12. Chen, Z.S., Hsieh, C.F., Jiang, F.Y., Hsieh, T.H., Sun, I.F., 1997. Relationships of soil properties to topography and vegetation in a subtropical rain forest in southern Taiwan. Plant Ecology, 132, 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009762704553.
  13. Corwin, D.L., Lesch, S.M., 2005. Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity: I. Survey protocols. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 46(1-3), 103-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.002.
  14. Demir, K., Göl, C., 2022. The effects of slope aspect on litter and top soil properties in Anatolian black pine forests. Anatolian Journal of Forest Research, 8(2), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.53516/ajfr.1180853. (in Turkish).
  15. Dönmez, Y., 1990. The Vegetation Geography of Thrace. Istanbul University Press, Faculty Publication No. 3601, Istanbul (in Turkish). Ekinci, H., 1990. Investigation of the possibilities of organizing the general soil map of Turkey according to Soil Taxonomy in the case of Tekirdag region. Doctoral Thesis, Çukurova University, Adana (in Turkish).
  16. Esri Land Cover, 2025. Esri | Sentinel-2 Land Cover Explorer. Retrieved April 18, 2026, from https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/landcoverexplorer.
  17. Fan, B., Tao, W., Qin, G., Hopkins, I., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Lin, H., Guo, L., 2020. Soil micro-climate variation in relation to slope aspect, position, and curvature in a forested catchment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 290, 107999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107999.
  18. Fatichi, S., Or, D., Walko, R., Vereecken, H., Young, M.H., Ghezzehei, T.A., Hengl, T., Kollet, S., Agam, N., Avissar, R., 2020. Soil structure is an important omission in Earth System Models. Nature Communications, 11, 522. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14411-z.
  19. García-Gamero, V., Vanwalleghem, T., Peña, A., Román-Sánchez, A., Finke, P.A., 2022. Modelling the effect of catena position and hydrology on soil chemical weathering. Soil, 8, 319-335. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-319-2022.
  20. Gebrelibanos, T., Assen, M., 2014. Effects of slope aspect and vegetation types on selected soil properties in a dryland Hirmi watershed and adjacent agro-ecosystem, northern highlands of Ethiopia. African Journal of Ecology, 52, 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12118.
  21. Geroy, I.J., Gribb, M.M., Marshall, H.P., Chandler, D.G., Benner, S.G., McNamara, J.P., 2011. Aspect influences on soil water retention and storage. Hydrological Processes, 25, 3836-3842. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8281.
  22. Göl, C., 2022. Influences of slope aspects on soil properties of Anatolian black pine forests in semiarid region of Turkey. Anatolian Journal of Forest Research, 8(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.53516/ajfr.1081634.
  23. Gong, J., Chen, L.D., Fu, B.J., Wei, W., 2007. Integrated effects of slope aspect and land use on soil nutrients in a small catchment in a hilly loess area, China. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(3), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469731.
  24. Google Earth, 2025. [Study Area] [Google Earth satellite image]. Retrieved April 18, 2026, from https://earth.google.com/web/ Hazelton, P., Murphy, B., 2016. Interpreting Soil Test Results: What Do All the Numbers Mean? CSIRO Publishing, Clayton South. https://doi.org/10.1071/9781486303977.
  25. HGM, 2023. Topography Sheet Numbered Bandırma G18-b3, Scale 1:25,000. General Directorate of Mapping, Ankara (in Turkish). Jackson, M.L., 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 1-498.
  26. Jenny, H., 1941. Factors of Soil Formation: A System of Quantitative Pedology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  27. Jiang, C., Zhu, S., Feng, J., Shui, W., 2022. Slope aspect affects the soil microbial communities in karst tiankeng negative landforms. BMC Ecology and Evolution, 22(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-01986-y.
  28. Karaca, S., Sargın, B., Alaboz, P., Dengiz, O., 2023. Determination of soil quality characteristics with multi criteria decision-making analysis-GIS in apple orchards in Van-Edremit District. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 26(2), 393-408. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1074149. (in Turkish).
  29. Kirkby, M.J., Atkinson, K., Lockwood, J., 1990. Aspect, Vegetation Cover and Erosion on Semi-Arid Hillslopes, in: Thornes, J.B. (Ed.), Vegetation and Erosion: Processes and Environments. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 25-39.
  30. Körner, C., Paulsen, J., Spehn, E.M., 2011. A definition of mountains and their bioclimatic belts for global comparisons of biodiversity data. Alpine Botany, 121, 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-011-0094-4.
  31. Landolt, E., Bäumler, B., Erhardt, A., Hegg, O., Klötzli, F., Lämmler, W., Nobis, M., Rudmann-Maurer, K., Schweingruber, F.H., Theurillat, J.P., Urmi, E., Vust, M., Wohlgemuth, T., 2010. Flora Indicativa: Ecological Indicator Values and Biological Attributes of the Flora of Switzerland and the Alps. Haupt Verlag, Bern.
  32. Li, R., Zhang, W., Yang, S., Zhu, M., Kan, S., Chen, J., Ai, X., Ai, Y., 2018. Topographic aspect affects the vegetation restoration and artificial soil quality of rock-cut slopes restored by external-soil spray seeding. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 12109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30651-y.
  33. Liu, R., Pan, Y., Bao, H., Liang, S., Jiang, Y., Tu, H., Nong, J., Huang, W., 2020. Variations in soil physico-chemical properties along slope position gradient in secondary vegetation of the hilly region, Guilin, Southwest China. Sustainability, 12(4), 1303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041303.
  34. Lozano-García, B., Parras-Alcántara, L., Brevik, E.C., 2016. Impact of topographic-aspect and vegetation on soil organic-carbon and nitrogen-budgets in Mediterranean natural-areas. Science of the Total Environment, 544, 963-970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.022.
  35. Måren, I.E., Karki, S., Prajapati, C., Yadav, R.K., Shrestha, B.B., 2015. Facing north or south: does slope aspect impact forest stand characteristics and soil properties in a semiarid trans-Himalayan valley? Journal of Arid Environments, 121, 112-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.06.004.
  36. Marques, M.A., Mora, E., 1992. The influence of aspect on runoff and soil loss in a Mediterranean burnt forest (Spain). Catena, 19, 333-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(92)90007-X.
  37. McKenzie, N.J., Ryan, P.J., 1999. Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation. Geoderma, 89, 67-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00137-2.
  38. MGM, 2024. Tekirdağ official statistics, measurement period 1940-2023. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m=TEKIRDAG (accessed 15.05.2026).
  39. Mohammad, A., 2008. The Effect of Slope Aspect on Soil and Vegetation Characteristics in Southern West Bank. Bethlehem University Journal, 27, 9-25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26448685.
  40. Noroozi, J., Talebi, A., Doostmohammadi, M., Rumpf, S.B., Linder, H.P., Schneeweiss, G.M., 2018. Hotspots within a global biodiversity hotspot - areas of endemism are associated with high mountain ranges. Scientific Reports, 8, 10345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28504-9.
  41. Ollinger, S.V., Smith, M.L., Martin, M.E., Hallett, R.A., Goodale, C.L., Aber, J.D., 2002. Regional variation in foliar chemistry and N cycling among forests of diverse history and composition. Ecology, 83, 339-355. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0339:RVIFCA]2.0.CO;2.
  42. Özşahin, E., 2015a. Tectonic geomorphology of Ganos mount and its surroundings (Tekirdag). The Journal of International Social Research, 8(37), 398-418. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20153710612. (in Turkish).
  43. Özşahin, E., 2015b. Geomorphometric features of Hoşköy River Basin (Tekirdag). The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies (JASSS), International Journal of Social Science, 33(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.9761/JASSS2678. (in Turkish).
  44. Özşahin, E., 2015c. The characteristics of drainage of rivers in the Ganos mount and its surroundings (Tekirdag). The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 35, 139-162. https://doi.org/10.9761/JASSS2920. (in Turkish).
  45. Özşahin, E., Eroğlu, İ., 2018. Land Capability Classification of Tekirdag Province According to Ecological Conditions. Kriter Publishing House, Istanbul (in Turkish). Park, S.J., McSweeney, K., Lowery, B., 2001. Identification of the spatial distribution of soils using a process-based terrain characterization. Geoderma, 103(3-4), 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00042-8.
  46. Rech, J.A., Reeves, R.W., Hendrick, D.M., 2001. The influence of slope aspect on soil weathering processes in the Springerville volcanic field, Arizona. Catena, 43, 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00118-1.
  47. Richards, L.A. (Ed.), 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 60, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
  48. Sağlam, M.T., 1994. Chemical Analysis Methods of Soil and Water. Trakya University, Faculty of Agriculture Publication No. 189, Tekirdağ (in Turkish).
  49. Sariyildiz, T., Anderson, J.M., Kucuk, M., 2005. Effects of tree species and topography on soil chemistry, litter quality, and decomposition in northeast Turkey. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37, 1695-1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.004.
  50. Sarıyıldız, T., Savacı, G., Parlak, S., Gencal, B., 2022. Effects of altitude and slope aspect on soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and soil nutrient concentrations and stocks in Uludağ fir (Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmülleriana Mattf.) stands. Artvin Çoruh University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 23(2), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.17474/artvinofd.1117690. (in Turkish).
  51. Seibert, J., Stendahl, J., Sørensen, R., 2007. Topographical influences on soil properties in boreal forests. Geoderma, 141(1-2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.05.013.
  52. Şentürk, K., Sümengen, M., Terlemez, İ., Karaköse, C., 1998. Geological Maps of Turkey, Bandırma-D4 Sheet, Scale 1:100,000. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Publication No. 64, Ankara (in Turkish).
  53. Singh, S., 2018. Understanding the role of slope aspect in shaping the vegetation attributes and soil properties in montane ecosystems. Tropical Ecology, 59(3), 417-430.
  54. Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993. Soil Survey Manual. USDA Handbook No. 18, Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
  55. Soil Survey Staff, 2022. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 13th ed. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC.
  56. Tsui, C.C., Chen, Z.S., Hsieh, C.F., 2004. Relationships between soil properties and slope position in a lowland rain forest of southern Taiwan. Geoderma, 123, 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.031.
  57. Tüzüner, A., 1990. Handbook of Soil and Water Analysis Laboratories. General Directorate of Rural Services, Ankara (in Turkish).
  58. Walkley, A., 1947. Critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Science, 63, 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194704000-00001.
  59. Yaltırak, C., 1995. Sedimentology and tectonics of the area between Gaziköy and Mürefte (Tekirdağ). Bulletin of the Turkish Association of Petroleum Geologists, 6(1), 93-112 (in Turkish).
  60. Yaltırak, C., 1996. The tectonic history of the Ganos Fault System. Bulletin of the Turkish Association of Petroleum Geologists, 8(1), 137-156 (in Turkish).
  61. Zhang, Q., Fang, R., Deng, C., Zhao, H., Shen, M.H., Wang, Q., 2022. Slope aspect effects on plant community characteristics and soil properties of alpine meadows on Eastern Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Ecological Indicators, 143, 109400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109400.
  62. Zhou, W., Li, C., Zhao, W., Stringer, L.C., Fu, B., 2024. Spatial distributions of soil nutrients affected by land use, topography and their interactions, in the Loess Plateau of China. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 12(1), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.02.005.