KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Politeknik Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 29 Sayı: 4

Parafin Esaslı Faz Değişim Malzemelerinin Erime Performansı Üzerinde Nanoparçacık Türünün Etkisi: Sayısal Çalışma

Effect of Nanoparticle Type on the Melting Performance of Paraffin-Based Phase Change Materials: A Numerical Study

İrem Karaaslan(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3363-5435
Furkan Buğra Öztaşkın(GAZI UNIVERSITY, GAZİ VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0003-0977-2376
Tayfun Menlik(GAZI UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY)0000-0003-0970-6600
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-07-12
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ayrıca hibrit FDM, GNP katkılı FDM'ye göre %16.9 daha iyi performans gösterirken, NiFe2O4 katkılı FDM'nin erime süresi GNP katkılı FDM'ye göre %41.5 daha kısa bulunmuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmada, saf parafin (RT58) ile hacimce %4 grafen (GNP), hacimce %4 nikel demir oksit (NiFe2O4) ve hacimce %2 GNP + %2 NiFe2O4 içeren hibrit nano-katkılı faz değiştiren malzemelerin (FDM) erime davranışı sayısal olarak incelenmiştir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Üstün ısı transfer özellikleri nedeniyle literatürde yaygın olarak kullanılan GNP referans nanoparçacık olarak seçilmiş, NiFe2O4 ise gizli ısı depolama sistemlerinin termal performansını artırmaya yönelik alternatif bir nanoparçacık olarak değerlendirilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ayrıca hibrit FDM, GNP katkılı FDM'ye göre %16.9 daha iyi performans gösterirken, NiFe2O4 katkılı FDM'nin erime süresi GNP katkılı FDM'ye göre %41.5 daha kısa bulunmuştur.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Gizli ısı depolama · faz değişim malzemesi · grafen

Özet

Bu çalışmada, saf parafin (RT58) ile hacimce %4 grafen (GNP), hacimce %4 nikel demir oksit (NiFe2O4) ve hacimce %2 GNP + %2 NiFe2O4 içeren hibrit nano-katkılı faz değiştiren malzemelerin (FDM) erime davranışı sayısal olarak incelenmiştir. Üstün ısı transfer özellikleri nedeniyle literatürde yaygın olarak kullanılan GNP referans nanoparçacık olarak seçilmiş, NiFe2O4 ise gizli ısı depolama sistemlerinin termal performansını artırmaya yönelik alternatif bir nanoparçacık olarak değerlendirilmiştir. İki boyutlu zamana bağlı analizler, ANSYS Fluent 18.2 yazılımında entalpi-gözeneklilik yöntemi kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Duvar sıcaklığı ve nanoparçacık türünün erime karakteristikleri üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiştir. Duvar sıcaklığının 360 K'den 370 K'ye yükseltilmesi, saf parafinin toplam erime süresini %65.7 oranında azaltmıştır. Nanoparçacıkların karşılaştırılması için referans durum olarak 365 K duvar sıcaklığı seçilmiştir. Saf parafine kıyasla, erime süresi GNP, hibrit ve NiFe2O4 katkılı FDM'lerde sırasıyla %38.1, %48.6 ve %63.8 oranlarında azalmıştır. Ayrıca hibrit FDM, GNP katkılı FDM'ye göre %16.9 daha iyi performans gösterirken, NiFe2O4 katkılı FDM'nin erime süresi GNP katkılı FDM'ye göre %41.5 daha kısa bulunmuştur.

Abstract

This study numerically investigated the melting behavior of pure paraffin (RT58) and nanoparticle-enhanced phase change materials (PCMs) containing 4 vol.% GNP, 4 vol.% NiFe2O4, and a hybrid mixture consisting of 2 vol.% graphene (GNP) and 2 vol.% nickel ferrite (NiFe2O4). GNP, which has been widely recognized for its superior heat transfer characteristics, was selected as a benchmark additive, whereas NiFe2O4 was investigated as a potential alternative nanoparticle for enhancing the thermal performance of latent heat storage systems.Two-dimensional transient simulations were performed using the enthalpy-porosity method implemented in ANSYS Fluent 18.2. The influence of wall temperature and nanoparticle type on melting characteristics was analyzed. Increasing the wall temperature from 360 K to 370 K reduced the melting time of pure paraffin by 65.7%. Based on these results, a wall temperature of 365 K was selected as the reference condition for nanoparticle comparisons. Relative to pure paraffin, the melting time decreased by 38.1%, 48.6%, and 63.8% for GNP-, hybrid-, and NiFe2O4-enhanced PCMs, respectively. Furthermore, the hybrid PCM outperformed the GNP-enhanced PCM by 16.9%, whereas the NiFe2O4-enhanced PCM provided a 41.5% shorter melting duration than the GNP-enhanced PCM.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Karaaslan, İ., Öztaşkın, F. B., Menlik, T. (2026). Parafin Esaslı Faz Değişim Malzemelerinin Erime Performansı Üzerinde Nanoparçacık Türünün Etkisi: Sayısal Çalışma. Politeknik Dergisi, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 4. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.1972120

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (32)

  1. Vallese, L. et al. A comprehensive review of thermal energy storage technologies and their applications: Creation of a database. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 225,(2026).
  2. Mabrouk, R., Naji, H., Benim, A. C. & Dhahri, H. A State of the Art Review on Sensible and Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage Processes in Porous Media: Mesoscopic Simulation. Applied Sciences, 12(14), 6995 (2022).
  3. Jouhara, H., Żabnieńska-Góra, A., Khordehgah, N., Ahmad, D. & Lipinski, T. Latent thermal energy storage technologies and applications: A review. International Journal of Thermofluids,5–6, 100039 (2020).
  4. Ding, Y. & Riffat, S. B. Thermochemical energy storage technologies for building applications: a state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 8(2): 106–116 (2013).
  5. Rahman, I. U. et al. Thermal interface materials: A promising solution for passive heat dissipation in electronic appliances. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress,62, 103673 (2025).
  6. Lawag, R. A. & Ali, H. M. Phase change materials for thermal management and energy storage: A review. J. Energy Storage,55, 105602 (2022).
  7. Zalba, B., Marı́n, J. M., Cabeza, L. F. & Mehling, H. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change: materials, heat transfer analysis and applications. Appl. Therm. Eng.,23(3): 251–283 (2003).
  8. Ur Rahman, I. et al. Graphene-Enhanced Composite Phase Change Materials for Battery Thermal Management, Carbon Nanomaterials - Latest Trends in Synthesis, Properties and Applications, (2025).
  9. Al Miaari, A. & Ali, H. M. A recent review on thermal management of photovoltaic panels using phase change material based on thermal conductivity enhancers for sustainable buildings. J. Energy Storage,103, 113936 (2024).
  10. Ulker, N., Bulut, H., Demircan, G. & Kilic, A. Effects of Nano Graphene and Nano Hexagonal Boron Nitride on the Thermal and Structural Properties of Fatty Acid Based Green Eutectic PCM. J. Clust. Sci. 37(1), (2025).
  11. Fan, L.-W. et al. Effects of various carbon nanofillers on the thermal conductivity and energy storage properties of paraffin-based nanocomposite phase change materials. Appl. Energy,110, 163–172 (2013).
  12. Khan, Z. & Ahmad Khan, Z. Experimental and numerical investigations of nano-additives enhanced paraffin in a shell-and-tube heat exchanger: A comparative study. Appl. Therm. Eng.,143: 777–790 (2018).
  13. Nedjem, K., Teggar, M., Ismail, K. A. R. & Nehari, D. Numerical Investigation of Charging and Discharging Processes of a Shell and Tube Nano-Enhanced Latent Thermal Storage Unit. J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl. 12(2), (2020).
  14. Moein-Jahromi, M., Rahmanian-Koushkaki, H., Rahmanian, S. & Pilban Jahromi, S. Evaluation of nanostructured GNP and CuO compositions in PCM-based heat sinks for photovoltaic systems. J. Energy Storage,53, 105240 (2022).
  15. Saraf, S. D., Panda, D. & Gangawane, K. M. Performance analysis of hybrid expanded graphite-NiFe2O4 nanoparticles-enhanced eutectic PCM for thermal energy storage. J. Energy Storage,73, 109188 (2023).
  16. Panda, D. & Gangawane, K. M. Hybrid NiFe2O4-NiCO4CO4 nanoparticles-based eutectic phase change materials for enhancement of thermal efficiency of pin-fin heat sink arrangement. J. Energy Storage,60, 106644 (2023).
  17. Moreira, M., Silva, T., Dias-de-Oliveira, J., Neto, F. & Amaral, C. Numerical modelling of radiant systems and phase change materials in building applications - a review. Appl. Therm. Eng.,234, 121342 (2023).
  18. Khan, S. A., Abdellatif, H. E., Belaadi, A., Arshad, A. & Liu, H. Numerical study of shell and tube thermal energy storage system: Enhancing solidification performance with single-walled carbon nanotubes in phase change material. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer,160, 108338 (2025).
  19. Corcione, M. Empirical correlating equations for predicting the effective thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanofluids. Energy Conversion and Management,52: 789–793,(2011).
  20. Vallese, L. et al. A comprehensive review of thermal energy storage technologies and their applications: Creation of a database. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 225,(2026).
  21. Rahman, I. U. et al. Thermal interface materials: A promising solution for passive heat dissipation in electronic appliances. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress,62, 103673 (2025).
  22. Lawag, R. A. & Ali, H. M. Phase change materials for thermal management and energy storage: A review. J. Energy Storage,55, 105602 (2022).
  23. Zalba, B., Marı́n, J. M., Cabeza, L. F. & Mehling, H. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change: materials, heat transfer analysis and applications. Appl. Therm. Eng.,23(3): 251–283 (2003).
  24. Al Miaari, A. & Ali, H. M. A recent review on thermal management of photovoltaic panels using phase change material based on thermal conductivity enhancers for sustainable buildings. J. Energy Storage,103, 113936 (2024).
  25. Fan, L.-W. et al. Effects of various carbon nanofillers on the thermal conductivity and energy storage properties of paraffin-based nanocomposite phase change materials. Appl. Energy,110, 163–172 (2013).
  26. Khan, Z. & Ahmad Khan, Z. Experimental and numerical investigations of nano-additives enhanced paraffin in a shell-and-tube heat exchanger: A comparative study. Appl. Therm. Eng.,143: 777–790 (2018).
  27. Moein-Jahromi, M., Rahmanian-Koushkaki, H., Rahmanian, S. & Pilban Jahromi, S. Evaluation of nanostructured GNP and CuO compositions in PCM-based heat sinks for photovoltaic systems. J. Energy Storage,53, 105240 (2022).
  28. Saraf, S. D., Panda, D. & Gangawane, K. M. Performance analysis of hybrid expanded graphite-NiFe2O4 nanoparticles-enhanced eutectic PCM for thermal energy storage. J. Energy Storage,73, 109188 (2023).
  29. Panda, D. & Gangawane, K. M. Hybrid NiFe2O4-NiCO4CO4 nanoparticles-based eutectic phase change materials for enhancement of thermal efficiency of pin-fin heat sink arrangement. J. Energy Storage,60, 106644 (2023).
  30. Moreira, M., Silva, T., Dias-de-Oliveira, J., Neto, F. & Amaral, C. Numerical modelling of radiant systems and phase change materials in building applications - a review. Appl. Therm. Eng.,234, 121342 (2023).
  31. Khan, S. A., Abdellatif, H. E., Belaadi, A., Arshad, A. & Liu, H. Numerical study of shell and tube thermal energy storage system: Enhancing solidification performance with single-walled carbon nanotubes in phase change material. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer,160, 108338 (2025).
  32. Corcione, M. Empirical correlating equations for predicting the effective thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanofluids. Energy Conversion and Management,52: 789–793,(2011).