Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2019 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

The Turkish Physics Teachers’ Views of the ‘Radiation’ Subject in the Current Textbooks

Sayfa
290–298
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Furthermore, a new physics curriculum ought to be interactively developed by the help of the teachers.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Radiation has become an important issue due to an increase in human-made radiation sources and a rapid improvement in technology.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study is to elicit the Turkish physics teachers’ views of the ‘radiation’ subject in the current textbooks.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Furthermore, a new physics curriculum ought to be interactively developed by the help of the teachers.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Radiation has become an important issue due to an increase in human-made radiation sources and a rapid improvement in technology. The aim of this study is to elicit the Turkish physics teachers’ views of the ‘radiation’ subject in the current textbooks. To collect data, semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve teachers working in different high schools. The data were presented using tables with quatotions. The findings showed that the teachers were mostly familiar with the ‘radiation’ subject in the textbooks. They stated that the curriculum insufficiently involved the ‘radiation’ subject. Further, they addressed that the textbooks minimally referred to the subject since the university entrance examination does not cover the radiation-related questions. Teachers also depicted that they had limited subject matter knowledge of radiation and found it difficult for teaching their students. Moreover, they thought that integrating more radiation subjects into the current textbooks would be beneficial for them and their students. The current study suggests that the scope of the ‘radiation’ subject in the textbooks should be extended. Furthermore, a new physics curriculum ought to be interactively developed by the help of the teachers.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARACA, S., ŞİMŞEK, Ö. (2019). The Turkish Physics Teachers’ Views of the ‘Radiation’ Subject in the Current Textbooks. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 290–298. https://ajindex.com/articles/166663

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Ahmed, C.N.C, Shaharim, S.A.and Abdullah M.F.N.L. (2017). Teacher-student interactions, learning commitment, learning environment and their relationship with student learning comfort. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 57-72.
  2. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi,
  3. Turkey. Aydın, A. (2004). Çeşitli ülkelerin orta öğretim kimya derslerinin müfredatlarının karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi ve türkiye için yeni bir kimya müfredat önerisi. Doctora Theses. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara,
  4. Turkey. Balta, N.(2018)High School Teachers’ Understandingof Blackbody Radiation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 23-43.
  5. Colclough, N.D., Lock, R., and Soares, A. (2010). Pre-service teachers' subject knowledge of and attitudes about radioactivity and ionising radiation. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 423-446.
  6. Cooper, S., Yeo, S., and Zadnik, M., (2003). Australian students’ views on nuclear issues: Does teaching alter prior beliefs. Physics Education, 38(2), 123-129.
  7. Eijkelhof, H., Kortland, K., and Loo, F. V. (1984). Nuclear Weapons - A Suitable Topic for the Classroom? Physics Education, 19, 11-15.
  8. Eijkelhof, H. (1996). Radiation risk and science education. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 68, 273-278.
  9. Erden, M. (1998). Eğitimde program değerlendirme. 3. Baskı. Ankara:
  10. Anı Yayıncılık, Turkey. Fukutoku, Y.(2010). Fact-finding survey on teachers’ radiation literacyand radiation education in elementary and middle schools in Kagoshima Prefecture. Japanese Society of Radiation Safety Management, 9, 58–68.
  11. Hafele A. (2011). Exploring students thinking of atoms and radiation with the atom builder simülator. Paper present at the Proceedings The National Conference, Newyork, USA. Henriksen, E. K., Jorde, D. (2001). High school students’ understanding of radiation and the environment: Can museums play a role? Science Education, 85(2), 189-206.
  12. Ince, E., Sesen, B. A., and Kirbaslar, F. G.(2012). Investigation of undergraduate students’ understanding of radiation and radioactivity. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B-Social and Educational Studies, 4, 993-1004. Libarkin,J. C., Asghar, A., Crockett, C., and Sadler, P. (2011). Invisible misconceptions: student understanding of ultraviolet and infrared radiation. Astronomy Education Review,10, 1. Lucas, A. M. (1987). Public knowledge of radiation. Biologist