KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Physics and Astronomy Reports / 2026 / Volume: 1 Issue: 1

Band Profile and Surface Acoustic Wave Attenuation Analysis of Polygonal Cavity-type Piezoelectric Phononic Crystals

Furkan Kuruoğlu(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5314-4441
Nurseli Seda Genç(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY)0009-0001-5301-177X
Ayşe Erol(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-4196-1791
Ahmet Çiçek(BURDUR MEHMET AKİF ERSOY UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7686-0045
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2023-06-20
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Additionally, the ability of the surface acoustic wave attenuation is affected by the phononic crystal shape, and the resonance frequency of the phononic crystals can be adjusted by changing the number of vertices.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, we examined the dispersion profiles and surface acoustic wave attenuation properties of polygonal cavity-type phononic crystals in relation to changes in the number of vertices.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The findings indicate an increase in the number of vertices of phononic crystal results in an increase in local resonance bandgap frequencies and corresponding transmission peaks.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Additionally, the ability of the surface acoustic wave attenuation is affected by the phononic crystal shape, and the resonance frequency of the phononic crystals can be adjusted by changing the number of vertices.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Surface acoustic wave · phononic crystal · metasurface

Abstract

In this study, we examined the dispersion profiles and surface acoustic wave attenuation properties of polygonal cavity-type phononic crystals in relation to changes in the number of vertices. Both band analysis and transmission spectrum calculations are performed using finite element method simulations. The findings indicate an increase in the number of vertices of phononic crystal results in an increase in local resonance bandgap frequencies and corresponding transmission peaks. Furthermore, the phononic crystal bandgap widens from 7.3 MHz to 11.1 MHz as the number of vertices increases from 3 to 14, as demonstrated by the obtained dispersion profiles. Comparable features are observed in the transmission spectra for alternating polygonal cavity-type phononic crystal periodic grooves. Additionally, the ability of the surface acoustic wave attenuation is affected by the phononic crystal shape, and the resonance frequency of the phononic crystals can be adjusted by changing the number of vertices.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kuruoğlu, F., Genç, N. S., Erol, A., Çiçek, A. (2023). Band Profile and Surface Acoustic Wave Attenuation Analysis of Polygonal Cavity-type Piezoelectric Phononic Crystals. Physics and Astronomy Reports, Volume: 1 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.26650/PAR.2023.00003

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (37)

  1. Achaoui Y., Khelif A., Benchabane S., Robert L., Laude V., 2011, Physical Review B, 83, 104201 google scholar
  2. Achaoui Y., Laude V., Benchabane S., Khelif A., 2013, Journal of Applied Physics, 114, 104503 google scholar
  3. Agostini M., Greco G., Cecchini M., 2019, IEEE Access, 7, 70901 google scholar
  4. Ash B. J., Worsfold S. R., Vukusic P., Nash G. R., 2017, Nature Communications, 8, 174 google scholar
  5. Bourquin Y., Wilson R., Zhang Y., Reboud J., Cooper J. M., 2011, Advanced Materials, 23, 1458 google scholar
  6. Cao D., Hu W., Gao Y., Guo X., 2019, Smart Materials and Structures, 28, 085014 google scholar
  7. Collins D. J., Devendran C., Ma Z., Ng J. W., Neild A., Ai Y., 2016, Science Advances, 2, e1600089 google scholar
  8. Gharibi H., Mehaney A., 2021, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 126, 114429 google scholar
  9. Gharibi H., Khaligh A., Bahrami A., Ghavifekr H. B., 2019, Journal of Molecular Liquids, 296, 111878 google scholar
  10. Guo J. C., Zhang Z., 2022, Applied Physics A, 128, 126 google scholar
  11. Guo L., Zhao S., Guo Y., Yang J., Kitipornchai S., 2023, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 240, 107956 google scholar
  12. HekiemN. L. L., Ralib A. A. M., HattarM. A. b. M., Ahmad F., Nordin A. N., Rahim R. A., Za’bah N. F., 2021, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 329, 112792 google scholar
  13. Jin Y., Pennec Y., Bonello B., Honarvar H., Dobrzynski L., Djafari-Rouhani B., Hussein M. I., 2021, Reports on Progress in Physics, 84, 086502 google scholar
  14. Kidakova A., Boroznjak R., Reut J., Öpik A., Saarma M., Syritski V., 2020, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 308, 127708 google scholar
  15. Korozlu N., Biçer A., Sayarcan D., Kaya O. A., Cicek A., 2022, Ultrasonics, 124, 106777 google scholar
  16. Kumar A., Prajesh R., 2022, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, p. 113498 google scholar
  17. Kuruoğlu F., 2022, Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 43, 346 google scholar
  18. Kushwaha M. S., Halevi P., Dobrzynski L., Djafari-Rouhani B., 1993, Physical Review Letters, 71, 2022 google scholar
  19. Kushwaha M. S., Halevi P., Martinez G., Dobrzynski L., Djafari-Rouhani B., 1994, Physical Review B, 49, 2313 google scholar
  20. Li X., Ning S., Liu Z., Yan Z., Luo C., Zhuang Z., 2020, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 361, 112737 google scholar
  21. Mead D., 1996, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 190, 495 google scholar
  22. Muhammad Lim C., Leung A. Y. T., 2021, Acoustics, 3, 25 google scholar
  23. Oh J. H., Lee I. K., Ma P. S., Kim Y. Y., 2011, Applied Physics Letters, 99, 083505 google scholar
  24. Pouya C., Nash G. R., 2021, Communications Materials, 2, 55 google scholar
  25. Qian J., Ren J., Liu Y., Lam R. H. W., Lee J. E.-Y., 2020, Analyst, 145, 7752 google scholar
  26. Schmidt M.-P., Oseev A., Lucklum R., Zubtsov M., Hirsch S., 2016, Microsystem Technologies, 22, 1593 google scholar
  27. Sigalas M., Economou E., 1993, Solid State Communications, 86,141 Su R., et al., 2021a, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, 21, 365 google scholar
  28. Su R., et al., 2021b, IEEE Electron Device Letters, 42, 438 google scholar
  29. Tateno S., Kurimune Y., Matsuo M., Yamanoi K., Nozaki Y., 2021, Physical Review B, 104, L020404 google scholar
  30. Topaltzikis D., et al., 2021, Applied Physics Letters, 118, 133501 google scholar
  31. Ulug B., Kuruoğlu F., Yalçın Y., Erol A., Sarcan F., Şahin A., Cicek A., 2022, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 55, 225303 google scholar
  32. Vasseur J. O., Hladky-Hennion A.-C., Djafari-Rouhani B., Duval F., Dubus B., Pennec Y., Deymier P. A., 2007, Journal of Applied Physics, 101, 114904 google scholar
  33. Wang Y., Wang Y., Liu W., Chen D., Wu C., Xie J., 2019, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 288, 67 google scholar
  34. Xie Y., Mao Z., Bachman H., Li P., Zhang P., Ren L., Wu M., Huang T. J., 2020, Journal of biomechanical engineering, 142 google scholar
  35. Yavuzcetin O., Ozturk B., Xiao D., Sridhar S., 2011, Optical Materials Expres s, 1, 1262 google scholar
  36. Zhang X.-F., Zhang Z.-W., He Y.-L., Liu Y.-X., Li S., Fang J.-Y., Zhang X.-A., Peng G., 2015, Frontiers of Physics, 11 google scholar
  37. Zhang Z.-D., LiuF.-K., YuS.-Y., LuM.-H., Chen Y.-F., 2020, Applied Physics Express, 13, 044002 google scholar