Dergiler / Physics and Astronomy Reports / 2026 / Volume: 2 Issue: 1

Effect of Annealing on Electronic Transport in Modulation-doped In0.32Ga0.68As/GaAs Quantum Well Structures

Adal Rajhi(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SCIENCE, DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS)0009-0009-1229-6965
Mustafa Aydın(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SCIENCE, DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS)0000-0002-1002-6007
Ömer Dönmez(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SCIENCE, DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS)0000-0002-7635-3991
Fahrettin Sarcan(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SCIENCE, DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS)0000-0002-8860-4321
Ayşe Erol(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SCIENCE, DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS)0000-0003-4196-1791
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2024-06-11
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Additionally, thermal annealing increases the effective electron mass while decreasing electron concentration.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, electronic transport properties of n-type modulation-doped In0.32Ga0.68As/GaAs quantum well (QW) quasi 2D structures and the effects of post-growth rapid thermal annealing and growth temperature are determined.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Electron Hall mobility and carrier concentration of In0.32Ga0.68As/GaAs QW were determined using the Hall effect measurement at a temperature range between 4.2 K and 300 K.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Additionally, thermal annealing increases the effective electron mass while decreasing electron concentration.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:In0.32Ga0.68As/GaAs · 2D structures · modulation doped structures

Abstract

In this study, electronic transport properties of n-type modulation-doped In0.32Ga0.68As/GaAs quantum well (QW) quasi 2D structures and the effects of post-growth rapid thermal annealing and growth temperature are determined. Electron Hall mobility and carrier concentration of In0.32Ga0.68As/GaAs QW were determined using the Hall effect measurement at a temperature range between 4.2 K and 300 K. While the low-temperature electron mobility has temperature-independent behavior, electron mobility at high-temperatures deteriorates drastically. However, for low-temperature growth samples, electron mobility shows a slight increase at lower temperatures. The effects of annealing and growth temperature on electronic transport properties are investigated and compared in terms of carrier mobility, carried density, effective mass and scattering mechanisms. To determine the dominant scattering mechanisms in the 2D structures of In0.32Ga0.68As/GaAs, temperature-dependent Hall mobility results are fitted using an analytical model, considering all possible scattering mechanisms (interface roughness, alloy disorder, acoustic phonon, polar optical phonon and remote ionized impurity scattering) in the 2D samples. Magnetotransport (MR) measurements were carried out between 4.2 K and 50 K and the effective mass, Fermi level, and 2D carrier density were calculated by analyzing amplitudes of temperature dependence Shubnikov de Haas (SdH) oscillations. Our results indicate that the effects of annealing at 700◦C-600s reduce interface roughness and alloy disorder scattering, thereby enhancing electron mobility. Post-growth thermal annealing improved electron mobility. Also, annealing increases the effect mass and causes a reduction in the electron concentrations of the InGaAs/GaAs QW systems. Additionally, thermal annealing increases the effective electron mass while decreasing electron concentration.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Rajhi, A., Aydın, M., Dönmez, Ö., Sarcan, F., Erol, A. (2024). Effect of Annealing on Electronic Transport in Modulation-doped In0.32Ga0.68As/GaAs Quantum Well Structures. Physics and Astronomy Reports, Volume: 2 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.26650/PAR.2024.00004

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (21)

  1. Aldridge H., Lind A. G., Bomberger C. C., Puzyrev Y., Zide J. M., Pantelides S. T., Law M. E., Jones K. S., 2017, Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 62, 171 google scholar
  2. Ardali S., Taganov S., Erol A., Tiras E., 2021, Physica E: Low-Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 125, 114344 google scholar
  3. Balkan N., Çelik H., Vickers A. J., Cankurtaran M., 1995, Physical Review B, 52, 17210 google scholar
  4. Coleridge P. T., 1990, Semiconductor Science and Technology, 5, 961 google scholar
  5. Dahl D., 2002, Solid State Communications, 124, 825 google scholar
  6. Disseix P., Leymarie J., Vasson A., Monier C., Grandjean N., Leroux M., Massies J., 1997, Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 55, 2406 google scholar
  7. Donmez O., et al., 2014, Semiconductor Science and Technology, 29 google scholar
  8. Donmez O., et al., 2020, Semiconductor Science and Technology, 35, 10 google scholar
  9. Donmez O., et al., 2021, Semiconductor Science and Technology, 36, 11 google scholar
  10. Feng G., Yoshimoto M., Oe K., Chayahara A., Horino Y., 2005, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 2: Letters, 44, 3 google scholar
  11. Joncour M., Charasse M., Burgeat J., 1985, Journal of Applied Physics, 58, 3373 google scholar
  12. Kosogov A. O., et al., 1996, Applied Physics Letters, 69, 3072 google scholar
  13. Kuphal E., 1984, Journal of Crystal Growth, 67, 441 google scholar
  14. Li W., et al., 2019, Journal of Applied Physics, 125 google scholar
  15. Lin A., Doty M. F., Bryant G. W., 2019, Phys. Rev. B, 99, 075308 google scholar
  16. Maspero R., Sweeney S. J., Florescu M., 2017, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, 29, 075001 google scholar
  17. Matthews J. W., Blakeslee A., 1974, Journal of Crystal Growth, 27, 118 google scholar
  18. Muraki K., Fukatsu S., Shiraki Y., Ito R., 1992, Applied Physics Let-ters, 61, 557 google scholar
  19. Petropoulos J. P., Zhong Y., Zide J. M., 2011, Applied Physics Letters, 99 google scholar
  20. Toyoshima H., Niwa T., Yamazaki J., Okamoto A., 1993, Applied Physics Letters, 63, 821 google scholar
  21. Zanato D., Gokden S., Balkan N., Ridley B. K., Schaff W. J., 2004, Semiconductor Science and Technology, 19, 427 google scholar