KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 32 Issue: 3

Comparison of Crop Irrigation Water Requirement Estimation Methods under Drought Conditions in a Semi-Arid Region of Türkiye

Eray Harman(DSİ)0009-0007-4114-2928
Belgin Çakmak(ANKARA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE)0000-0003-3557-8411
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-07-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Where legacy DSI tables must be retained, applying crop-specific correction factors derived here can reduce allocation shortfalls and better align deliveries with climatic demand.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Accurate estimation of seasonal crop water use is critical for irrigation planning in semi-arid regions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study benchmarks net irrigation water requirement (NIWR) and crop evapotranspiration (ETc) for a Central Anatolian scheme (Eskişehir, Türkiye) over 2016–2022 using three approaches: the institutional Blaney–Criddle (General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works-DSI) baseline, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) CROPWAT 8.0 (Penman–Monteith, monthly climate), and SuET (Penman–Monteith, daily climate with locally tuned parameters).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Where legacy DSI tables must be retained, applying crop-specific correction factors derived here can reduce allocation shortfalls and better align deliveries with climatic demand.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2016–2022 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Crop evapotranspiration · Net irrigation water requirement · Blaney–Criddle

Abstract

Accurate estimation of seasonal crop water use is critical for irrigation planning in semi-arid regions. This study benchmarks net irrigation water requirement (NIWR) and crop evapotranspiration (ETc) for a Central Anatolian scheme (Eskişehir, Türkiye) over 2016–2022 using three approaches: the institutional Blaney–Criddle (General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works-DSI) baseline, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) CROPWAT 8.0 (Penman–Monteith, monthly climate), and SuET (Penman–Monteith, daily climate with locally tuned parameters). A drought year was additionally constructed from historically dry seasons to assess stress conditions. Across irrigated crops, DSI systematically calculates less NIWR relative to the PM-based tools: mean biases are ~130–170 mm for wheat, ~190–240 mm for potato/onion/sugar beet, ~230–250 mm for maize, ~300 mm for sunflower/melon, and ~550 mm for alfalfa, with RMSE (Root mean square error) values closely tracking these biases. CROPWAT and SuET display strong cross-method coherence—very high year-wise correlations (r ≈ 0.90–0.99) and crop wise agreement that is strong to moderate for most crops—indicating that both capture interannual climate variability consistently when parameterized with harmonized crop calendars and effective rainfall procedures. Under the drought scenario, both ETc and NIWR increase markedly for high-demand crops, underscoring elevated deficit risk if allocations rely on temperature-only norms. Overall, the findings indicate that the traditional DSI Blaney–Criddle values substantially less calculation actual crop water requirements—particularly in dry years— and that Penman–Monteith–based tools such as CROPWAT and SuET should be systematically integrated into regional irrigation planning to improve water-use efficiency and drought resilience. Where legacy DSI tables must be retained, applying crop-specific correction factors derived here can reduce allocation shortfalls and better align deliveries with climatic demand.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Harman, E., Çakmak, B. (2026). Comparison of Crop Irrigation Water Requirement Estimation Methods under Drought Conditions in a Semi-Arid Region of Türkiye. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Volume: 32 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1827599

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (53)

  1. Abdoulaye O, Lu H, Zhu Y, Alhaj Hamoud Y & Sheteiwy M (2019). The global trend of the net irrigation water requirement of maize from 1960 to 2050. Climate 7(10): 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7100124
  2. Akbaş A (2014). Major drought years over Türkiye. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi 12(2): 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1501/Cogbil_0000000155 (In Turkish).
  3. Al-Hasani A A J & Shahid S (2025). Accurate estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration using modified Penman, Caprio, and Kharrufa models in Iraq. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 151(5). https://doi.org/10.1061/JIDEDH.IRENG-10368
  4. Alsamarray R S, Al-Khafaji M S & Shemal K (2025). Compatibility of crop patterns with climate change for irrigation projects in semi-arid regions: The case study of the Abu Ghraib Project in Iraq. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 15(5), 27519–27529. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.11967
  5. TAGEM-SUET Altınbilek H F & Kızıl Ü (2024). Irrigation scheduling and determination of irrigation water requirement of paddy rice with drip irrigation using model. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.1470239 Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(2), 347–358.
  6. Arslan O (2020). Changes in crop and irrigation water requirements in Niğde. International Scientific and Vocational Studies Journal 4(1): 68–74
  7. Bayraktar S S & Küçükbayrak M (2025). Sustainability in the agricultural sector and the importance of agricultural irrigation. [Sustainability in agriculture and the importance of agricultural irrigation]. TYB Akademi, 43, 154–168 (In Turkish).
  8. Benavides J, Hernández-Plaza E, Mateos L & Fereres E (2021). A global analysis of irrigation scheme water supplies in relation to requirements. Agricultural Water Management, 243, 106457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106457
  9. Beyribey M, Çakmak B, Sönmez F K & Oğuz M (1997). Comparison of irrigation water requirement in irrigation schemes using the Blaney Criddle and Penman–Monteith methods. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3(1): 74–78. https://izlik.org/JA28ND47TP (In Turkish).
  10. Bokke A S & Shoro KE (2020). Impact of effective rainfall on net irrigation water requirement: The case of Ethiopia. Water Science 34(1): 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/11104929.2020.1749780
  11. Çaycı G, Heng L K, Öztürk H S, Sürek D, Kütük C & Sağlam M (2009). Crop yield and water use efficiency in a semi-arid region of Türkiye. Soil and Tillage Research 103(1): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.09.004
  12. Coşkun M & Turan A (2016). The comparison of the forms of land capability classification of Atalay and USA in Eskişehir Province (Türkiye). Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection 4: 72–92. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2016.413005
  13. Çakmak B & Torun E (2023). Evaluation of agricultural water footprint in irrigation schemes of the Konya Closed Basin. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi 27(2): 239–252. (In Turkish).
  14. Çamalan G, Akgündüz A S, Çetin S & Arabacı H (2019). Analysis of drought events in Türkiye using the SPEI drought index. In: Proceedings of the 10th National Hydrology Congress, 9–12 October 2019, Ankara, Türkiye: General Directorate of Meteorology. (In Turkish).
  15. Darouich H, Karfoul R, Ramos T B, Moustafa A, Shaheen B & Pereira L S (2021). Crop water requirements and crop coefficients for jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius L.) using the SIMDualKc model and assessing irrigation strategies for the Syrian Akkar region. Agricultural Water Management 255: 107038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107038
  16. Deveci H & Konukcu F (2024). Modeling the effect of climate change on evapotranspiration in the Thrace Region. Atmosphere 15(10): 1188. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15101188
  17. Dikici M & Burgan H (2025). Exploring the effect of meteorological and hydrological trends on groundwater drought index: The case of Seyhan Basin. Ecohydrology 18(6): e70110. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.70110
  18. Dercas N, Tziatzios GA, Sidiropoulos P, Sarchani S, Faraslis I, Belaud G, Daudin K, Spiliotopoulos M, Sakellariou S, Alpanakis N, Bourazanis G & Dalezios N (2025). Monitoring satellite-based crop irrigation water requirements for maize, cotton and hay in distinct Mediterranean regions. Agricultural Water Management 319: 109719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109719
  19. DSI (State Hydraulic Works) (2026). Eskişehir Irrigation Rehabilitation Project – Planning Report. State Hydraulic Works (DSI), 3rd Regional Directorate, Eskişehir, Türkiye. (In Turkish).
  20. Etedali H R, Gorginpaveh F, Elbeltagi A (2025). Estimation of actual evapotranspiration and water requirements of strategic crops under different stresses. Scientific Reports 15: 7778. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92481-z
  21. Ewaid S H, Abed S A & Al-Ansari N (2019). Crop water requirements and irrigation schedules for some major crops in southern Iraq. Water 11(4): 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040756
  22. FAO (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. https://www.fao.org/4/x0490e/x0490e00.htm (Accessed 24 Apr 2025).
  23. Garcia D, Rolim J, Cameira M R, Belaud G, Dalezios N R, Karoutsos G, Santos J A & Paredes P (2025). Assessing seasonal forecast performance to predict crop irrigation requirements to support water management decision-making in the Mediterranean region. Agricultural Water Management 313: 109467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109467
  24. General Directorate of Meteorology (2023). Observation data and information requests, Document No: E-94715459-107-225957. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change, General Directorate of Meteorology, 3rd Regional Directorate, Eskişehir. (In Turkish).
  25. Golfam P, Ashofteh P-S & Singh V (2025). Modelling changes in water consumption by agricultural crops under different climate change scenarios. Irrigation and Drainage 74(4): 1595–1608. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.3101 considering effective
  26. Gong X, Zhang H, Ren C, Sun D & Yang J (2020). Optimization allocation of irrigation water resources based on crop water requirement under precipitation https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106264 and uncertainty. Agricultural Water Management 239: 106264.
  27. Han Y, Calabrese S, Du H & Yin J (2024). Evaluating biases in Penman and Penman–Monteith evapotranspiration rates at different timescales. Journal of Hydrology 638: 131534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131534
  28. Harman E & Çakmak B (2025). Evaluation of irrigation efficiency and economic performance: A case study of the Eskişehir Water User Association. Irrigation and Drainage. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.70008
  29. İbrahim Y M (2023). Estimation of crop water requirement for tomato plant in Afgoye-Somalia, using CROPWAT 8.0 model. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture 6(6): 664–670. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1340670
  30. Karaca C, Büyüktaş D, Baştuğ R, Aydinşakir K & Tekelioğlu B (2017a). Determination of the spatial and temporal distribution of reference evapotranspiration under Antalya conditions. Derim 34(2): 158–171. https://doi.org/10.16882/derim.2017.292134 (In Turkish).
  31. Karaca C, Büyüktaş D & Tekelioğlu B (2017b). Comparison of computer software used for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Gaziosmanpaşa Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi 6(Special Issue): 118–128. (In Turkish).
  32. Karaca C, Aydinşakir K, Dinç N, Büyüktaş D, Baştuğ R & Polat B (2018). Comparison of measured and estimated evapotranspiration of pomegranate grown under Mediterranean conditions. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi (Special Issue: 1st International Agricultural Structures and Irrigation Congress): 140–150. (In Turkish).
  33. Koç A & Güner Ü (2005). Re-evaluation of existing irrigation projects according to FAO criteria: The case of Tavas Plain. Journal of Science and Technology of Dumlupınar University 9: 93–106. (In Turkish).
  34. Kum G (2022). Spatial distribution and temporal variation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) in semi-arid areas: The case of Şanlıurfa. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi 80: 87–96. https://doi.org/10.17211/tcd.1116059 (In Turkish).
  35. Mal S & Sen S (2025). Optimizing agricultural water use: Crop water requirement and irrigation scheduling of tomato and soybean using FAO CropWat 8.0 model in Chandrapur district, Maharashtra, India. Next Research 2(3): 100529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2025.100529
  36. Moriasi D N, Arnold J G, Van Liew M W, Bingner R L, Harmel R D & Veith T L (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE 50(3): 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153
  37. Moseki O, Murray-Hudson M & Kashe K (2019). Crop water and irrigation requirements of Jatropha curcas L. in semi-arid conditions of Botswana: Applying the CROPWAT model. Agricultural Water Management 225: 105754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105754
  38. Muratoğlu A, Bilgen G K, Angin I & Kodal S (2023). Performance analyses of effective rainfall estimation methods for accurate quantification of agricultural water footprint. Water Research 238: 120011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.120011
  39. Omar A A A & Ugas Farah A A (2025). Using the CROPWAT 8.0 model to calculate maize water requirements in Jowhar–Somalia. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5145055
  40. Patwardhan A S, Nieber J L & Johns E L (1990). Effective rainfall estimation methods. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 116(2): 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1990)116:2(182)
  41. Potopová V, Trnka M, Vizina A, Semerádová D, Balek J, Chawdhery M R A, Musiolková M, Pavlík P, Možný M, Štěpánek P & Clothier B (2022). Projection of 21st century irrigation water requirements for sensitive agricultural crop commodities across the Czech Republic. Agricultural Water Management 262: 107337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107337
  42. MAF (Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry) (2025). Water efficiency 2030: Feasibility report. Ankara, Türkiye. (In Turkish). Román A, González-Altozano P, Tugores F, Mancha L A, Llompart M & Martí P (2025). Assessing reference evapotranspiration estimation considering irrigation scheduling intervals. Agriculture 15(24): 2557. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15242557
  43. Rouault P, Courault D, Flamain F, Pouget G, Doussan C, El Hajj M M, Al-Mashharawi S K, McCabe M & Debolini M (2025). Integration of Sentinel-2 data into the SIMETAW model for assessing irrigation water requirements and evapotranspiration. Agricultural Water Management 317: 109637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109637
  44. Serbeş Z A, Okkan U & Aşık Ş (2018). Estimation of net irrigation water requirement under possible climate change scenarios: The case of Menemen Left Bank. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi: 91–101. https://izlik.org/JA36KG98KH (In Turkish).
  45. Sesveren S, Eröz M, Tuncer K, Çankaya F & Küçükaydın E (2025). Calculation of water used for agricultural purposes at the downstream point in hydroelectric power plant projects with TAGEM-SuET software and water transmission: The case of Sarıgüzel HPP. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi 11(2): 221–234. https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.1659097 (In Turkish).
  46. Shayeghi A, Rahmati Ziveh A, Bakhtar A, Teymoori J, Hanel M, Vargas Godoy M R, Markonis Y & AghaKouchak A (2024). Assessing drought impacts on groundwater and agriculture in Iran using high-resolution precipitation and evapotranspiration products. Journal of Hydrology 631: 130828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130828
  47. TAGEM (2021). Sulama Yönetimi ve Bitki Su Tüketimi Hesaplama Sistemi (SUET) Üye Kullanıcı Kılavuzu (Version 1.0). T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, Tarımsal Araştırmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, Türkiye. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/TAGEM/Belgeler/TAGEM_SUET_KullaniciKilavuzu.v.1.0.pdf (In Turkish).
  48. Tanışıklı B & Çakmak B (2023). Evaluation of water management activities at Çorum Water User Association. Turkish Journal of Agriculture – Food Science and Technology 11(5): 994–1000. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i5.994-1000.6115
  49. Taş İ & Kırnak H (2011). Empirical models that can be used to estimate crop water consumption in semi-arid climatic regions. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 8(1): 57–66. https://izlik.org/JA72CJ34ZC (In Turkish).
  50. Uçar Y, Kazaz S, Eraslan İnal F & Baydar H (2017). Empirical models likely to be used to estimate the evapotranspiration of oil rose (Rosa damascena Mill.). Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 12(1): 1–10. https://izlik.org/JA38HU27HH (In Turkish).
  51. Wang F, Chen Y, Li Z, Fang G, Li Y & Xia Z (2019). Assessment of the irrigation water requirement and water supply risk in the Tarim River Basin, Northwest China. Sustainability 11(18): 4941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184941
  52. Wriedt G, van der Velde M, Aloe A & Bouraoui F (2009). Estimating irrigation water requirements in Europe. Journal of Hydrology 373(3 4): 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.05.018
  53. Yerli C (2025). The effects of combined use of pumice and biochar on irrigation water requirements and soil and plant development. Turkish Journal of Agriculture – Food Science and Technology 13(S1): 2493–2502. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v13is1.2493-2502.8125