KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1

Sympathetic Ganglion Blocks in the Elderly: Efficacy, Safety, Analgesic Consumption, and Complications

Ahmet Başarı(Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Division of Pain Medicine, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye)
Hanzade Aybüke Ünal-Özer(Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Division of Pain Medicine, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye)
Güngör Enver Özgencil(Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Division of Pain Medicine, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye)
İbrahim Aşık(Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Division of Pain Medicine, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye)
Sayfa
96–102
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although complication rates are noteworthy, safety can be ensured with careful patient selection and follow-up.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Chronic pain management is crucial in geriatric pain management.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 417 patients aged ≥65 years who underwent a sympathetic ganglion block.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although complication rates are noteworthy, safety can be ensured with careful patient selection and follow-up.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Analgesic Agents · Pain · Chronic

Abstract

Aim: Chronic pain management is crucial in geriatric pain management. Sympathetic ganglion blocks are minimally invasive procedures performed in pain conditions associated with the sympathetic system, such as cancer-related, ischemic, and neuropathic pain. Data regarding the effectiveness and safety of these blocks in elderly patients are limited. This study evaluates the effects of sympathetic ganglion blocks on pain intensity, opioid consumption, and complications. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 417 patients aged ≥65 years who underwent a sympathetic ganglion block. Procedures included stellate, thoracic and lumbar sympathetic, celiac, splanchnic, hypogastric, and impar ganglion blocks. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and opioid use was converted to morphine equivalents. Complications were classified as minor or major. Results: Visual analog scale scores significantly decreased from 7.88±0.89 at baseline to 3.98±1.30 at 1 month and 5.76±1.51 at 3 months (p <0.001). Daily opioid consumption was reduced from 90.38±99.45 mg/day to 36.39±33.36 mg/day at 3 months (p <0.001), with the most pronounced decrease in malignant patients. Complications were observed in 35% of patients, primarily minor (e.g., orthostatic hypotension, Horner syndrome), while major complications were rare (e.g., pneumothorax). Conclusion: Sympathetic ganglion blocks effectively reduce pain and opioid use in elderly patients with chronic pain of malignant and nonmalignant origins. Although complication rates are noteworthy, safety can be ensured with careful patient selection and follow-up.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Başarı, A., Ünal-Özer, H. A., Özgencil, G. E., Aşık, İ. (2026). Sympathetic Ganglion Blocks in the Elderly: Efficacy, Safety, Analgesic Consumption, and Complications. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 96–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/1631493

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (30)

  1. Kong F. Aging trend of the world. In: Hoshi T, Kodama S, editors. The structure of healthy life determinants. Vol 18. International perspectives on aging. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 15-28.
  2. American Geriatrics Society Panel on Pharmacological Management of Persistent Pain in Older Persons. Pharmacological management of persistent pain in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(8):1331–1346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02376.x
  3. Borsheski R, Johnson QL. Pain management in the geriatric population. Mo Med. 2014;111(6):508–511.
  4. Helme RD, Gibson SJ. The epidemiology of pain in elderly people. Clin Geriatr Med. 2001;17(3):417–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0690(05)70078-1
  5. Abdulla A, Adams N, Bone M, Elliott AM, Gaffin J, Jones D, et al. Guidance on the management of pain in older people. Age Ageing. 2013;42 Suppl 1:i1-i57. https://doi.org/10.1093/ ageing/afs200
  6. Rastogi R, Meek BD. Management of chronic pain in elderly, frail patients: finding a suitable, personalized method of control. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:37–46. https://doi.org/10.2147/ CIA.S30165
  7. Tetzlaff JE. Cousins and Bridenbaugh’s neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and pain medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(7):e51. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0230
  8. Gunduz OH, Kenis-Coskun O. Ganglion blocks as a treatment of pain: current perspectives. J Pain Res. 2017;10:2815–2826.https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S134775
  9. Mercadante S, Klepstad P, Kurita GP, Sjøgren P, Giarratano A; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Sympathetic blocks for visceral cancer pain management: a systematic review and EAPC recommendations. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015;96(3):577–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.07.014
  10. Nie Y, Song R, Chen W, Qin Z, Zhang J, Tang J. Effects of stellate ganglion block on cerebrovascular vasodilation in elderly patients and patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(1):131–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew157
  11. Chen YQ, Jin XJ, Liu ZF, Zhu MF. Effects of stellate ganglion block on cardiovascular reaction and heart rate variability in elderly patients during anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2015;27(2):140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.06.012
  12. Khosla A, Adeyefa O, Nasir S. Successful treatment of radiationinduced proctitis pain by blockade of the ganglion impar in an elderly patient with prostate cancer: a case report. Pain Med.2013;14(5):662–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12065
  13. Higuera O, Ghanem I, Nasimi R, Prieto I, Koren L, Feliu J. Management of pancreatic cancer in the elderly. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(2):764–775. https://doi.org/10.3748/ wjg.v22.i2.764
  14. Souter KJ, Fitzgibbon D. Equianalgesic dose guidelines for long-term opioid use -theoretical and practical considerations. Semin Anesth. 2004;23:271–280. https://doi.org/10.1053/j. sane.2004.06.001
  15. Deer TR, Pope JE, Lamer TJ, Provenzano D, editors. Deer’s treatment of pain: an illustrated guide for practitioners. Cham:Springer; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12281-2
  16. Christiansen S, Erdek M. Neurolytic sympathetic blocks. In:Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, et al., editors. Handbook of pain management. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018. p. 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-40196-8.00071-1
  17. Bedran H. Neurolytic agents: mechanism and usage in pain medicine. In: Collantes Celador E, Rudiger J, Tameem A, editors. Oxford handbook of anesthesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2022. p. 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198799443.003.0011
  18. Abd-Elsayed A, Rushmer T. Neurolytic and nonneurolyticblocks in pain management. In: Abd-Elsayed A, editor. Advanced anesthesia review. New York: Oxford University Press; 2023. p. 215-228.
  19. Phuphanich ME, Convery QW, Nanda UK, Pangarkar S. Sympathetic blocks for sympathetic pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2022;33(3):465–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pmr.2022.02.002
  20. Vorenkamp K, Yi P, Kemp A. Sympathetic blocks for visceral pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2022;33(2):475–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2022.01.010
  21. Kwon HJ, Jang K, Leem JG, Shin JW, Kim DH, Choi SS. Factors associated with successful response to neurolytic celiac plexus block in patients with upper abdominal cancer-related pain: a retrospective study. Korean J Pain. 2021;34(4):479–486. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2021.34.4.479
  22. Liou H, Kong MJ, Alzubaidi S, Knuttinen MG, Patel IJ, Kriegshauser JS. Single-center review of celiac plexus/retrocrural splanchnic nerve block for non-cancer related pain. Acad Radiol. 2021;28(5):623–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.03.005
  23. Aleanakian R, Chung BY, Feldmann RE, Benrath J. Effectiveness, safety, and predictive potential in ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion blockades for the treatment of sympathetically maintained pain. Pain Pract. 2020;20(5):570–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12892
  24. Wi Y, Laksono RM, Asmoro AA, Isngadi I, Laksono BH, Jaya W. Pain management with ganglion impar block in adenocarcinoma recti. Solo J Anesthesiol Pain Crit Care. 2024;4(1):689–696.https://doi.org/10.20961/soja.v4i1.68927
  25. Persico AL, Wegrzyn EL. Geriatric pain pharmacotherapy. In: Herndon CM, editor. Pain. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2022. p. 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197542873.003.0046
  26. Smith HS, Bruckenthal P. Implications of opioid analgesia for medically complicated patients. Drugs Aging. 2010;27(5):417–433. https://doi.org/10.2165/11536540-000000000-00000
  27. Dhanani NM, Almonte WA, Engle MP. Sympathetic nervous system blocks for the treatment of cancer pain. In: Handbook of cancer pain management. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 243-260.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99684-4_17
  28. Murphy PA, Kreling B, Kathryn E, Stevens M, Lynn J, Dulac JD. Description of the SUPPORT intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(5 Suppl):S120-S125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03125.x
  29. Kim E, Lim JA, Choi CH, Lee SY, Kwak S, Kim J. Assessment of the changes in cardiac sympathetic nervous activity using pupil size changes measured in seated patients whose stellate ganglion is blocked by interscalene brachial plexus block. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023;76(2):116–127. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.22324
  30. Gupta R, Madanat L, Jindal V, Gaikazian S. Celiac plexus block complications: a case report and review of the literature. J Palliat Med. 2021;24(1):45–50. https://doi.org/10.1089/ jpm.2020.0530