Dergiler / İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

In vitro urease and trypsin inhibitory activities of some sulfur compounds

Sayfa
85–91
Yayın Tarihi
2021-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The present outcome suggests that sulfur compounds are potential inhibitors of urease and trypsin activities, and may find importance in medicine and agriculture.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background and Aims: Organosulfur compounds modulate the activities of plurality of metabolic enzymes, especially those that activate (cytochrome P450s) or detoxify (glutathione-S-transferases) carcinogens.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: In the present study, the inhibitory effect of sulfur compounds on the activities urease and trypsin were determined according to the method of Hanif et al. (2012) and Ribeiro et al. (2010), respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The present outcome suggests that sulfur compounds are potential inhibitors of urease and trypsin activities, and may find importance in medicine and agriculture.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Enzyme · inhibitors · sulfur compounds

Abstract

Background and Aims: Organosulfur compounds modulate the activities of plurality of metabolic enzymes, especially those that activate (cytochrome P450s) or detoxify (glutathione-S-transferases) carcinogens. They also inhibit the formation of DNA adducts in different target tissues. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of some sulfur compounds on urease and trypsin activities in vitro. Methods: In the present study, the inhibitory effect of sulfur compounds on the activities urease and trypsin were determined according to the method of Hanif et al. (2012) and Ribeiro et al. (2010), respectively. Results: In comparison to the reference standard thiourea (IC50= 53.81±0.68 μg/mL), S-allyl-L-cysteine (IC50= 0.88±0.01 μg/ mL) and D, L-methionine (IC50= 0.91±0.02 μg/mL) had the highest urease inhibitor activity, corresponding to the lowest IC50 values among the sulfur compounds. Among the sulfur compounds used in this study, D,L-methionine (IC50= 0.13±0.01 mg/ mL) exhibited the lowest IC50 value for trypsin inhibitor, though its activity was less than that of tannic acid which was used as a standard (IC50= 0.06±0.01 mg/mL). Conclusion: The present outcome suggests that sulfur compounds are potential inhibitors of urease and trypsin activities, and may find importance in medicine and agriculture.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DAĞSUYU, E., YANARDAĞ, R. (2021). In vitro urease and trypsin inhibitory activities of some sulfur compounds. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 85–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/161889

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Akhtar, T., Khan, M.A., Iqbal, J., Jones, P.G. & Hameed, S. (2014). A facile one-pot synthesis of 2-arylamino-5-aryloxylalkyl-1,3,4-oxadiazoles and their urease inhibition studies. Chemical Biology & Drug Design, 84, 92-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.12297
  2. Amtul, Z., Kausar, N., Follmer, C., Rozmahel, R.F., Atta-Ur-Rahman, Kazmi, S.A. Choudhary, M.I. (2006). Cysteine based novel noncompetitive inhibitors of urease(s)—Distinctive inhibition susceptibility of microbial and plant ureases. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 14, 6737-6744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2006.05.078
  3. Arshia, A., Khan, A., Khan, K.M. Saad, S. M., Siddiqui, S. J., Perveen, S., & Choudhary, M. I. (2016). Synthesis and urease inhibitory activities of benzophenone semicarbazones/thiosemicarbazones. Medicinal Chemistry Research, 25, 2666–2679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-016-1673-0
  4. Borg T.K. (2004). It's the matrix! ECM, proteases, and cancer. The American Journal of Pathology, 164, 1141–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63201-4
  5. Byrne, M.F. Mitchell, R.M., Stiffler, H., Jowell, P.S., Branch, M.S., Pappas, T.N. Baillie J. (2002). Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 16, 849-854.
  6. Cheng, X.S., Zhang, J.C., You, Z.L., Wang, X., & Hai-Hua Li. (2014). Synthesis, structures, and Helicobacter Pylori urease inhibition of hydroxamate-coordinated oxovanadium complexes with benzohydrazone ligands. Transition Metal Chemistry, 39, 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11243-014-9802-4
  7. Cox, G.M., Mukherjee, J., Cole, G.T., Casadevall, A., & Perfect, J.R. (2000). Urease as a virulence factor in experimental cryptococcosis. Infection and Immunity, 68, 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.68.2.443-448.2000
  8. Czerwonka, G., Arabski, M., Wąsik, S., Jabłońska-Wawrzycka, A., Rogala, P., & Kaca, W. (2014). Morphological changes in Proteus mirabilis O18 biofilm under the influence of a urease inhibitor and a homoserine lactone derivative. Archives of Microbiology, 196, 169-177. doi: 10.1007/s00203-014-0952-8
  9. Evans, S.A., Olson, S.T., & Shore, J. (1982). p-Aminobenzamidine as a fluorescent probe for the active site of serine proteases. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 257, 3014–3017.
  10. Frecer, V., Maliar, T. & Miertus, S. (2000). Protease inhibitors as anticancer drugs: Role of molecular modelling and combinatorial chemistry in drug design. International Journal of Medicine, Biology and the Environment, 28, 161-173.
  11. Hanif, M., Shoaib, K., Saleem, M., Hasan Rama, N., Zaib, S., & Iqbal