KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uluslararası Toplumsal Bilimler Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4

ULUS–FEMİNİZM İLİŞKİSİ BAĞLAMINDA BREZİLYA, POLONYA VE HİNDİSTAN’DA KADIN HAREKETLERİ İLE POPÜLİST MİLLİYETÇİLİK ARASINDAKİ KARŞILAŞMANIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

AN EVALUATION OF THE ENCOUNTER BETWEEN WOMEN’S MOVEMENTS AND POPULIST NATIONALISM IN BRAZIL, POLAND, AND INDIA WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE NATION–FEMINISM RELATIONSHIP

Muhammed Ramazan Demirci(GİRESUN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6726-7370
Sayfa
395–418
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu bağlamda çalışma, feminist direnişin popülist rejimler altında ulusun kimliğini yeniden tanımlama potansiyelini görünür kılarak toplumsal cinsiyet ve milliyetçilik literatürüne kuramsal bir katkı sunmaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu makale, feminist hareketlerin popülist-milliyetçi rejimlerle karşılaşma biçimlerini ve bu rejimlerin toplumsal cinsiyet temelli ulus tahayyüllerine yönelik direniş stratejilerini incelemektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Polonya, Hindistan ve Brezilya örneklerinden yola çıkarak, kadın bedeninin, haklarının ve toplumsal rollerinin milliyetçi söylemlerin merkezine nasıl yerleştirildiği analiz edilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu bağlamda çalışma, feminist direnişin popülist rejimler altında ulusun kimliğini yeniden tanımlama potansiyelini görünür kılarak toplumsal cinsiyet ve milliyetçilik literatürüne kuramsal bir katkı sunmaktadır.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Feminizm · Milliyetçilik · Popülizm

Özet

Bu makale, feminist hareketlerin popülist-milliyetçi rejimlerle karşılaşma biçimlerini ve bu rejimlerin toplumsal cinsiyet temelli ulus tahayyüllerine yönelik direniş stratejilerini incelemektedir. Polonya, Hindistan ve Brezilya örneklerinden yola çıkarak, kadın bedeninin, haklarının ve toplumsal rollerinin milliyetçi söylemlerin merkezine nasıl yerleştirildiği analiz edilmiştir. Eleştirel söylem analizi ve feminist kuram çerçevesinde yürütülen çalışma, feminist direnişin yalnızca tepki temelli değil, aynı zamanda ulusal aidiyetin sınırlarını dönüştüren yeniden kurucu bir nitelik taşıdığını ortaya koymaktadır. Kadın hareketleri, dışlayıcı ve heteronormatif yurttaşlık tanımlarına karşı laiklik, eşitlik ve çoğulculuk temelinde alternatif ulus tahayyülleri geliştirmektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışma, feminist direnişin popülist rejimler altında ulusun kimliğini yeniden tanımlama potansiyelini görünür kılarak toplumsal cinsiyet ve milliyetçilik literatürüne kuramsal bir katkı sunmaktadır.

Abstract

This article examines how feminist movements confront populist-nationalist regimes and the strategies they develop in response to gendered imaginaries of the nation. Drawing on the cases of Poland, India, and Brazil, it analyzes how women’s bodies, rights, and social roles are positioned at the center of populist-nationalist discourses. Employing critical discourse analysis and feminist theory, the study suggests that feminist resistance may be understood not only as reactive but also as reconstructive in nature—capable of reshaping the boundaries of populist-national belonging. Women’s movements develop alternative populist-nationalist imaginaries based on secularism, equality, and pluralism, challenging exclusionary and heteronormative definitions of citizenship. In this regard, the article makes a theoretical contribution to the literature on gender and nationalism, particularly populist nationalism, by revealing the potential of feminist resistance to redefine populist-national identity under populist regimes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Demirci, M. R. (2025). ULUS–FEMİNİZM İLİŞKİSİ BAĞLAMINDA BREZİLYA, POLONYA VE HİNDİSTAN’DA KADIN HAREKETLERİ İLE POPÜLİST MİLLİYETÇİLİK ARASINDAKİ KARŞILAŞMANIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Uluslararası Toplumsal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 395–418. https://ajindex.com/articles/1606369

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (78)

  1. Ali, S. S. (2024). The veil of resistance in Shaheen Bagh: Muslim women’s activism and the differential solidarity networks. Social Identities, 30(6), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2024.2415560
  2. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
  3. Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1989). Woman–nation–state. Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Bacchetta, P. (2004). Gender in the Hindu nation: RSS women as ideologues. Women Unlimited.
  5. Banerjee, S. (2005). Make me a man!: Masculinity, Hinduism, and nationalism in India. State University of New York Press.
  6. BBC. (2020). Poland abortion: Top court bans almost all terminations. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54642108 (Accessed: 04 February 2025).
  7. Bhasin, S. (2020, September 25). “PM Modi Also My Son”: Bilkis, Shaheen Bagh’s Dadi Who Made TIME 100 List. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/pm-modi-like-my-son-shaheen-bagh-bilkis-dadi-on-time-list-of-100-most-influential-people-of-2020-2300816 (Accessed: 29 April 2025).
  8. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
  9. Catalano, T., & Waugh, L. R. (2020). Critical discourse analysis, critical discourse studies and beyond. Springer.
  10. Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Chatterjee, P. (1993). The nation and its fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories. Princeton University Press.
  12. Chopra, D. (2021). The resistance strikes back: Women’s protest strategies against backlash in India. Gender & Development, 29(2–3), 467–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2021.1981698
  13. de Mello, C. P. N., & Pagel, G. C. (2021). The insurgent potency of hashtags #ChegadeFiuFiu [No More Catcalls], #PrimeiroAssédio [First Harassment] and #EleNão [Not Him]. Perspectivas, 24(2), 587–626. https://doi.org/10.29146/ecopos.v24i2.27597
  14. Della Porta, D. (2008). Comparative analysis: Case-oriented versus variable-oriented research. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective (pp. 198–222). Cambridge University Press.
  15. Enloe, C. (1989). Bananas, beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. University of California Press.
  16. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  17. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  18. Farris, S. R. (2017). In the name of women’s rights: The rise of femonationalism. Duke University Press.
  19. Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Cornell University Press.
  20. Graff, A., & Korolczuk, E. (2022). Anti-gender politics in the populist moment. Routledge.
  21. Gwiazda, A. (2020). Right-wing populism and feminist politics: The case of Law and Justice in Poland. International Political Science Review, 42(5), 580–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120948917
  22. Hall, B. (2019). Gendering resistance to right-wing populism: Black protest and a new wave of feminist activism in Poland? American Behavioral Scientist, 63(10), 1497–1515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219831731
  23. Hansen, T. B. (1999). The saffron wave: Democracy and Hindu nationalism in modern India. Princeton University Press.
  24. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
  25. Harding, S. (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. Routledge.
  26. Hobsbawm, E. J. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  27. Hooks, B. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center (2nd ed.). Pluto Press.
  28. Human Rights Watch. (2020, April 9). Shoot the traitors: Discrimination against Muslims under India’s new citizenship policy. https://www.hrw.org/report/2020/04/09/shoot-traitors/discrimination-against-muslims-under-indias-new-citizenship-policy (Accessed: 19 April 2025).
  29. Hunter, W., & Power, T. J. (2019). Bolsonaro and Brazil’s illiberal backlash. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0005
  30. IPSOS. (2023). Data dive: How women and men feel about abortion issues. https://www.ipsos.com/en/data-dive-how-women-and-men-feel-about-abortion-issues (Accessed: 04 March 2025).
  31. Jaffrelot, C. (2007). Hindu nationalism: A reader. Princeton University Press.
  32. Jaffrelot, C. (2019). Modi’s India: Hindu nationalism and the rise of ethnic democracy. Princeton University Press.
  33. Kadiwal, L. (2021). Feminists against fascism: The Indian female Muslim protest in India. Education Sciences, 11, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120793
  34. Kapur, R. (2005). Erotic justice: Law and the new politics of postcolonialism. GlassHouse Press.
  35. Korolczuk, E. (2016). Explaining mass protests against abortion ban in Poland: The power of connective action. Zoon Politikon, 7, 91–113. https://doi.org/10.19247/ZOON201605
  36. Korolczuk, E., & Graff, A. (2018). Gender as “Ebola from Brussels”: The anti-colonial frame and the rise of illiberal populism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(4), 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1086/696691
  37. Kováts, E. (2017). The emergence of powerful anti-gender movements in Europe and the crisis of liberal democracy. In M. Köttig, R. Bitzan & A. Petö (Eds.), Gender and far right politics in Europe (pp. 175–189). Palgrave Macmillan.
  38. Król, A., & Pustułka, P. (2018). Women on strike: Mobilizing against reproductive injustice in Poland. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 20(3), 366–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1460214
  39. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  40. Lazar, M. M. (2005). Politicizing gender in discourse: Feminist critical discourse analysis as political perspective and praxis. In M. M. Lazar (Ed.), Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse (pp. 1–28). Palgrave.
  41. Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816
  42. Lazar, M. M. (2014). Feminist critical discourse analysis. In S. Ehrlich, M. Meyerhoff, & J. Holmes (Eds.), The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (2nd ed., pp. 180–199). Wiley Blackwell.
  43. Leap, W. L. (2015). Queer linguistics as critical discourse analysis. In H. E. Hamilton, D. Tannen, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 661–680). John Wiley & Sons.
  44. Lempart, M., & Suchanow, K. (2020). Dymisja rządu i co dalej? Czas oddać władzę ludziom, którzy nie chcą żyć w kraju dziadersów. wyborcza.pl. https://wyborcza.pl/7,162657,26540914,czas-oddac-wladze-ludziom-w-tym-mlodym-ktorzy-nie-chca-zyc.html (Accessed: 17 February 2025).
  45. McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial leather: Race, gender, and sexuality in the colonial contest. Routledge.
  46. Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
  47. Mosse, G. L. (1985). Nationalism and sexuality: Respectability and abnormal sexuality in modern Europe. H. Fertig.
  48. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Routledge.
  49. Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
  50. Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press.
  51. Nagel, J. (1998). Masculinity and nationalism: Gender and sexuality in the making of nations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(2), 242–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/014198798330007
  52. Najmabadi, A. (2005). Women with mustaches and men without beards: Gender and sexual anxieties of Iranian modernity. University of California Press.
  53. Narkowicz, K. (2016). Czarny Protest: How Polish women took to the streets. After two decades of feminist pressure, the people took to the streets. But why now? Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/kasia-narkowicz/czarny-protest-how-polish-women-took-to-streets (Accessed: 12 February 2025).
  54. Neumeyer, J. (2021, November 8). Poland’s abortion ban protests changed the country forever. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/11/08/poland-abortion-ban-women-strike-catholic-religion-progressive-politics/ (Accessed: 02 June 2025).
  55. Nigam, D. D. (2022, September 11). Women of Shaheen Bagh: Defending Constitution and Democracy. https://www.newsclick.in/women-shaheen-bagh-defending-constitution-and-democracy (Accessed: 07 March 2025).
  56. Paternotte, D., & Kuhar, R. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. Rowman & Littlefield International.
  57. Paulino, S. C., & Paulino, S. C. (2019). #ELENÃO: Reflexões sobre ciberativismo feminista no Brasil nas eleições presidenciais de 2018. Revista Magistro, 1(19), 1–17. https://granrio.emnuvens.com.br/magistro/article/view/5528
  58. Peterson, V. S. (1999). Political identities/nationalism as heterosexism. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 1(1), 34–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/146167499360031
  59. Rossi, A. Vd. (2018, September 30). #EleNão: A manifestação histórica liderada por mulheres no Brasil vista por quatro ângulos. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-45700013 (Accessed: 09 May 2025).
  60. Saad-Filho, A. (2021). Brazilian democracy facing authoritarian neoliberalism. In M. Williams & V. Satgar (Eds.), Destroying democracy: Neoliberal capitalism and the rise of authoritarian politics (pp. 97–111). Wits University Press.
  61. Sabsay, L. (2016). The political imaginary of sexual freedom: Subjectivity and power in the new sexual democratic turn. Palgrave Macmillan.
  62. Sadurski, W. (2019). Poland’s constitutional breakdown. Oxford University Press.
  63. Salam, Z. U., & Ausaf, U. (2020). Shaheen Bagh: From a protest to a movement. Bloomsbury.
  64. Schmitt, C. (2007). The concept of the political (G. Schwab, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
  65. Schreiner, C. (2024). Feminist mobilisation in authoritarian times: 2022 elections in Brazil. In Stories of feminist mobilisation: How to advance feminist movements worldwide (pp. 62–72). https://www.slu-boell.de/sites/default/files/importedFiles/2024/09/24/221213_stories_of_feminist_mobilisation_final.pdf
  66. Singh, P., & Parihar, G. K. (2023). The Hindutva brand of populist politics and the women question. Political Studies Review, 22(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299221146695
  67. Slattery, G., & Brito, R. (2022, June 30). Downfall of Bolsonaro ally spotlights Brazilian leader’s female voter issue. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/downfall-bolsonaro-ally-spotlights-brazilian-leaders-female-voter-issue-2022-06-30 (Accessed: 02 May 2025).
  68. Slattery, G., & Stargardter, G. (2018, September 30). Brazilian women lead nationwide protests against far-right candidate. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/brazilian-women-lead-nationwide-protests-against-far-right-candidate-idUSKCN1M90E2 (Accessed: 04 May 2025).
  69. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.
  70. Times of India. (2025, March 8). “Women’s blessings my biggest wealth”: PM Modi celebrates Nari Shakti. The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/womens-blessings-my-biggest-wealth-pm-modi-celebrates-nari-shakti/articleshow/118801727.cms (Accessed: 08 March 2025).
  71. van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
  72. Vijayan, P. K. (2020). Gender and Hindu nationalism: Understanding masculine hegemony. Routledge.
  73. Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Macmillan.
  74. Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–13). SAGE Publications.
  75. Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. SAGE.
  76. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods for critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  77. Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and nation. SAGE Publications.
  78. Zuk, P., & Pacześniak, A. (2023). “They attack the family and order”: Right-wing media about feminists and the political consequences of the women’s strike in Poland. Frontiers in Sociology, 7, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.1066409