KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Production of hydrogen-rich syngas via gasification of refuse derived fuel within the scope of renewable energy

Şeyma Mercan(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA, LİSANSÜSTÜ EĞİTİM ENSTİTÜSÜ, ÇEVRE MÜHENDİSLİĞİ (DR))0000-0001-8385-9846
Atakan Öngen(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY-CERRAHPASA, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING)0000-0002-9043-7382
Sayfa
64–70
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-25
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, the gasification process is a suitable method for obtaining high-quality syngas from RDF materials that has a high calorific value.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The main challenge facing the globe is the rapid increase in population, energy consumption, and waste production.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It was employed at 700°C, 800°C, and 900°C with a dry air rate of 0.05 l/min.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, the gasification process is a suitable method for obtaining high-quality syngas from RDF materials that has a high calorific value.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Energy Recover · gasification · Refuse Derived Fuel

Abstract

The main challenge facing the globe is the rapid increase in population, energy consumption, and waste production. As a result, gasification might be regarded a favorable, cost-effective, and eco-friendly solution to this issue. In this study was carried out using an updraft fixed bed circulating gasifier transforming refuse derived fuel (RDF) into syngas. It was employed at 700°C, 800°C, and 900°C with a dry air rate of 0.05 l/min. The effect of temperature on syngas, which is the product of gasification, was observed. The maximum heating value of produced syngas was observed about 2900 kcal/m3 at 900 ˚C. As a result of the gasification process; conducted under optimum conditions, the concentrations of H2, CH4, CO were found to be approximately 45, 20, and 20 %, respectively. In conclusion, the gasification process is a suitable method for obtaining high-quality syngas from RDF materials that has a high calorific value.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Mercan, Ş., Öngen, A. (2022). Production of hydrogen-rich syngas via gasification of refuse derived fuel within the scope of renewable energy. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 64–70. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1088741

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (31)

  1. de Souza Melaré, A. V., González, S. M., Faceli, K., & Casadei, V. (2017). Technologies and decision support systems to aid solid-waste management: a systematic review. Waste management, 59, 567-584.
  2. IEA. World energy outlook. 2020. p. 1-25. Report, no. October2020.
  3. Gungor, B., & Dincer, I. (2022). A renewable energy based waste-to-energy system with hydrogen options. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.
  4. Korai, M. S., Mahar, R. B., & Uqaili, M. A. (2017). The feasibility of municipal solid waste for energy generation and its existing management practices in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 338-353.
  5. Paleologos, E. K., Caratelli, P., & El Amrousi, M. (2016). Waste-to-energy: An opportunity for a new industrial typology in Abu Dhabi. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 1260-1266.
  6. Rios, M. L. V., González, A. M., Lora, E. E. S., & del Olmo, O. A. A. (2018). Reduction of tar generated during biomass gasification: A review. Biomass and bioenergy, 108, 345-370.
  7. Ferreira, C. R., Infiesta, L. R., Monteiro, V. A., Starling, M. C. V., da Silva Júnior, W. M., Borges, V. L., & Trovó, A. G. (2021). Gasification of municipal refuse-derived fuel as an alternative to waste disposal: process efficiency and thermochemical analysis. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 149, 885-893.
  8. Zwart, R., Boerrigter, H., Deurwaarder, E., van der Meijden, C., & van Paasen, S. (2006). Production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from biomass, Report for Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN). Available onlion: www. ecn. nl/publications.
  9. Dejtrakulwong, C., & Patumsawad, S. (2014). Four zones modeling of the downdraft biomass gasification process: effects of moisture content and air to fuel ratio. Energy Procedia, 52, 142-149.
  10. Deng, N., Li, D., Zhang, Q., Zhang, A., Cai, R., & Zhang, B. (2019). Simulation analysis of municipal solid waste pyrolysis and gasification based on Aspen plus. Frontiers in Energy, 13(1), 64-70.
  11. Panepinto, D., Blengini, G. A., & Genon, G. (2015). Economic and environmental comparison between two scenarios of waste management: MBT vs thermal treatment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 97, 16-23.
  12. Lee, U., Dong, J., & Chung, J. N. (2018). Experimental investigation of sewage sludge solid waste conversion to syngas using high temperature steam gasification. Energy Conversion and Management, 158, 430-436.
  13. Yasar, A., Sadiq, K., Tabinda, A. B., Ghaffar, A., Rasheed, R., & Iqbal, A. (2021). Gasification of mixed waste at high temperature to enhance the syngas efficiency and reduce gaseous emissions and tar production. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 1-10. DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2021.1950237.
  14. ASTM D5373-16, “Standard Test Methods for Determination of Carbon, Hydrogen and Nitrogen in Analysis Samples of Coal and Carbon in Analysis Samples of Coal and Coke”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2016).
  15. ASTM D5865-13, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and Coke, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013
  16. Ozcan, H. K., Ongen, A., & Pangaliyev, Y. (2016). An experimental study of recoverable products from waste tire pyrolysis. Global NEST Journal, 18(3), 582-590.
  17. Ongen, A., Ozcan, H. K., & Arayıcı, S. (2013). An evaluation of tannery industry wastewater treatment sludge gasification by artificial neural network modeling. Journal of hazardous materials, 263, 361-366.
  18. Ozbas, E. E., Aksu, D., Ongen, A., Aydin, M. A., & Ozcan, H. K. (2019). Hydrogen production via biomass gasification, and modeling by supervised machine learning algorithms. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(32), 17260-17268.
  19. ASTM D3172-13. (2021). Standard Practice for Proximate Analysis of Coal and Coke, ASTM International.
  20. ASTM D3175-11, Standard Test Method for Volatile Matter in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke.
  21. ASTM D3174-11, Standard Test Method for Ash in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke from Coal.
  22. ASTM D3172-13, 2021, Standard practice for proximate analysis of coal and coke, https://www.astm.org
  23. Zhai, M., Liu, J., Wang, Z., Guo, L., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., & Sun, J. (2017). Gasification characteristics of sawdust char at a high-temperature steam atmosphere. Energy, 128, 509-518.
  24. Irfan, M., Li, A., Zhang, L., Wang, M., Chen, C., & Khushk, S. (2019). Production of hydrogen enriched syngas from municipal solid waste gasification with waste marble powder as a catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(16), 8051-8061.
  25. Baláš, M., Lisý, M., & Štelcl, O. (2012). The effect of temperature on the gasification process. doi:10.14311/1572.
  26. Kirsanovs, V., Zandeckis, A., Blumberga, D., & Veidenbergs, I. (2014, June). The influence of process temperature, equivalence ratio and fuel moisture content on gasification process: A review. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems—ECOS, Turku, Finland.
  27. Pan, A., Yu, L., & Yang, Q. (2019). Characteristics and forecasting of municipal solid waste generation in China. Sustainability, 11(5), 1433.
  28. Chen, S., Meng, A., Long, Y., Zhou, H., Li, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2015). TGA pyrolysis and gasification of combustible municipal solid waste. Journal of the energy institute, 88(3), 332-343.
  29. URL1, https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/fuels-higher-calorific-values-d_169.html
  30. URL2, https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/fuels-higher-calorific-values-d_169.html
  31. URL3, https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/carbon-monoxide-density-specific-weight-temperature-pressure-d_2092.html