Dergiler / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 652

INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND PRODUCTIVITY CHANGE IN THE TURKISH MANUFACTURING SECTOR

TÜRKİYE İMALAT SEKTÖRÜNDE ULUSLARARASI TEKNOLOJİ DİFÜZYONU VE VERİMLİLİKDEĞİŞİMİ

Sayfa
39–63
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is also found that increases in the market concentration rate, the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), results in more rapid increases in productivity.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Most new technologies are created in developed countries.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Using panel data from manufacturing sectors from 2009 to 2014, this study examines the impact of various channels of technology diffusion, R&D, and human capital on labour productivity change in Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is also found that increases in the market concentration rate, the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), results in more rapid increases in productivity.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Most new technologies are created in developed countries. In developing countries, contacts with the outside world, research and development (R&D), human capital, and technology diffusion play important roles in increasing innovation and productivity. Using panel data from manufacturing sectors from 2009 to 2014, this study examines the impact of various channels of technology diffusion, R&D, and human capital on labour productivity change in Turkey. According to the estimation results, the technology gap has had a positive effect on productivity change. This suggests a rapid adaptation to technology, and it may be a sign of future convergence with the technological frontier. Export intensity, improves technology transfer rate. Increase in export intensity is found to increase productivity change for the following year; and, increase in import penetration on productivity change is found to be positive in the current year and in the subsequent years. The impacts of foreign direct investments (FDI), tangible investments, R&D intensity, and human capital are found to be insignificant, while the impact of interaction of human capital with the technology gap is negative and significant. It is also found that increases in the market concentration rate, the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), results in more rapid increases in productivity.

Abstract

Çoğu yeni teknoloji geliĢmiĢ ülkelerde yaratılmaktadır. GeliĢmekte olan ülkelerde, dıĢ dünya ile temaslar, araĢtırma ve geliĢtirme (Ar-Ge), beĢeri sermaye ve teknoloji difüzyonu, inovasyon ve verimliliğin artmasında önemli rol oynamaktadır. Bu çalıĢma, 2009-2014 yılları arasında Türkiye imalat sektörü panel verilerini kullanarak çeĢitli teknoloji difüzyonu kanalları, Ar-Ge ve beĢeri sermayenin iĢgücü verimliliğindeki değiĢmeye etkilerini incelemektedir. Tahmin sonuçlarına göre, teknolojik açığın verimlilik değiĢimine etkisi pozitiftir. Bu, teknolojiye hızlı bir Ģekilde uyum sağlandığını ve gelecekte teknoloji sınırına yakınlaĢmanın gerçekleĢebileceğini göstermektedir. Ġhracat yoğunluğu, teknoloji transfer hızını artırmaktadır. Ġhracat yoğunluğundaki artıĢın, bir sonraki yılda verimliliği arttırdığı; ithalat yoğunluğundaki artıĢın verimlilik değiĢimine etkisinin de cari yılda ve sonraki yıllarda pozitif olduğu görülmüĢtür. Doğrudan yabancı yatırımların, maddi yatırımların, Ar-Ge yoğunluğunun ve beĢeri sermayenin etkileri anlamsızken; beĢeri sermaye ile teknoloji açığı etkileĢiminin verimliliğe etkisi, negatif ve anlamlıdır. Ayrıca, piyasa yoğunluğundaki, Herfindahl-Hirschman Endeksi (HHI) artıĢlarının verimlilikte daha hızlı artıĢlara neden olduğu bulunmuĢtur.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZŞAHİN, G. (2020). INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND PRODUCTIVITY CHANGE IN THE TURKISH MANUFACTURING SECTOR. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 652, 39–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/157026

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. BENHABIB, Jess and Mark M. SPIEGEL; (1994), "The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country Data", Journal of Monetary Economics, 34 (2), pp. 143-174.
  2. BENHABIB, Jess and Mark M. SPIEGEL; (2005), "Human Capital and Technology Diffusion", Handbook of Economic Growth, 1, pp. 935-966.
  3. BERNARD, Andrew B. and J. Bradford JENSEN; (1999), “Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?” Journal of International Economics, 47, pp. 1–25.
  4. BERNARD, Andrew B. and Charles I. JONES; (1996a), “Productivity Across Industries and Countries: Time Series Theory and Evidence”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, 78 (1), pp. 135–146.
  5. BERNARD, Andrew B. and Charles I. JONES; (1996b), “Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement Across Industries and Countries”. The American Economic Review, 86 (5), pp. 1216–1238.
  6. CAMERON, Gavin, James PROUDMAN and Stephen REDDING; (2005), “Technological Convergence, R&D, Trade and Productivity Growth”, European Economic Review, 49, pp. 775-807.
  7. CLERIDES, Sofronis K., Saul LACH and James R. TYBOUT; (1998), “Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113 (3), pp. 903–947.
  8. COE, David T. and Elhanan HELPMAN; (1995), “International R&D Spillovers”, European Economic Review, 39 (5), pp. 859-887.
  9. EATON, Jonathan and Samuel KORTUM; (2001), “Trade in Capital Goods”, European Economic Review, 45 (7), pp. 1195–1235. EUROSTAT; (2020), “Glossary: High-tech classification of manufacturing industries”, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:High-tech_classification_of_manufacturing_industries, 23.02.2020.
  10. FOSFURI, Andrea, Massimo MOTTA and Thomas RØNDE; (2001), “Foreign Direct Investment and Spillovers Through Workers‟ Mobility”, Journal of International Economics, 53 (1), pp. 205–22.
  11. GROSSMAN, Gene M. and Elhanan HELPMAN; (1991), “Trade, Knowledge Spillovers and Growth”, European Economic Review, 35, pp. 517-26.
  12. KELLER, Wolfgang; (2004), “International Technology Diffusion”, Journal of Economic Literature, 42 (3), pp.752-782.
  13. KUTAN, Ali M. and Taner M. YIGIT; (2009), "European Integration, Productivity Growth and Real Convergence: Evidence from the New Member States", Economic Systems, 33 (2), pp. 127-137.
  14. LENGER, Aykut and Erol TAYMAZ; (2006), “To Innovate or to Transfer: A Study on Spillovers and Foreign Firms in Turkey”, Journal of Evolutionary E