KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Could Bladder Wall Elastography Be Used As An Indicator For The Diagnosys of Bladder Outlet Obstruction By Benign Prostate Hyperplasia?

Recep ERYILMAZ
Rahmi ASLAN
Harun ARSLAN
Murat DEMİR CEM
Saim TÜRKOĞLU
Şeyhmuz ARAZ
Kerem TAKEN
Sayfa
140–145
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The mean age of the patients was 45.6 ± 3.77 The average of bladder anterior wall elasticity 3.39 ± 0.89, Bladder left wall elasticity 2,69 ± 0,82 and Bladder right wall elasticity was 3.69 ± 0.89.The mean prostate size 52.58 ± 24.16 The average of Qmax11.96 ± 4.85 The mean of PMR 77.8 ± 59.6 and mean of prostate elasticity was 2.97 ± 1.1 Urinary bladder wall elasticity with ARFI can be a diagnostic indicator for bladder outlet obstruction due to BPH.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common causes of bladder outlet obstruction in men.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Elastography was performed separately on the anterior, right and left walls of the bladder.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The mean age of the patients was 45.6 ± 3.77 The average of bladder anterior wall elasticity 3.39 ± 0.89, Bladder left wall elasticity 2,69 ± 0,82 and Bladder right wall elasticity was 3.69 ± 0.89.The mean prostate size 52.58 ± 24.16 The average of Qmax11.96 ± 4.85 The mean of PMR 77.8 ± 59.6 and mean of prostate elasticity was 2.97 ± 1.1 Urinary bladder wall elasticity with ARFI can be a diagnostic indicator for bladder outlet obstruction due to BPH.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common causes of bladder outlet obstruction in men. In this study we aimed to evaluate the elasticity of the bladder by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) elastography in BPH patients. Fifty benign prostate patients were included in the study. After evaluation of patients in the outpatient clinic. ARFI elastography was performed with full bladder. Elastography was performed separately on the anterior, right and left walls of the bladder. Then the patient underwent uroflowmetry. The maximum flow rate and post-mix residual values in uroflowmetry were recorded. The mean age of the patients was 45.6 ± 3.77 The average of bladder anterior wall elasticity 3.39 ± 0.89, Bladder left wall elasticity 2,69 ± 0,82 and Bladder right wall elasticity was 3.69 ± 0.89.The mean prostate size 52.58 ± 24.16 The average of Qmax11.96 ± 4.85 The mean of PMR 77.8 ± 59.6 and mean of prostate elasticity was 2.97 ± 1.1 Urinary bladder wall elasticity with ARFI can be a diagnostic indicator for bladder outlet obstruction due to BPH.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERYILMAZ, R., ASLAN, R., ARSLAN, H., CEM, M. D., TÜRKOĞLU, S., ARAZ, Ş., TAKEN, K. (2020). Could Bladder Wall Elastography Be Used As An Indicator For The Diagnosys of Bladder Outlet Obstruction By Benign Prostate Hyperplasia?. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 140–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/156660

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Fu S, Zhang M, Wang Y, Li Q, Tang J. Prostatic elasticity: a new non-invasive parameter to assess bladder outlet obstruction caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (a canine experiment). Urology 2013; 82: 1114- 1119
  2. Ronningen LD. Campbell’s urology, 8th ed. J Urol 2005; 173: 326-326
  3. Jonathan A Guzman, Pranav Sharma, Lisa A Smith, John D Buie, and Werner T de Riese Histological changes of the peripheral zone in small and large prostates and possible clinical implications Res Rep Urol 2019; 11: 77-81
  4. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002; 21: 167-178
  5. Arnolds M, Oelke M. Positioning invasive versus noninvasive urodynamics in the assessment of bladder outlet obstruction. Curr Opin Urol 2009; 19: 55-62
  6. Ku JH, Ko DW, Cho JY, Oh SJ. Correlation between prostatic urethral angle and bladder outlet obstruction index in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology. 2010; 75: 1467-1471
  7. Zhang X, Li G, Wei X, et.al. Resistive index of prostate capsular arteries: a newly identified parameter to diagnose and assess bladder outlet obstruction in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2012; 188: 881- 887
  8. Løvvik A, Yaqub S, Oustad H, Sand TE, Nitti VW. Can noninvasive evaluation of benign prostatic obstruction be optimized? Curr Opin Urol 2012; 22: 1-6
  9. Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications Theranostics 2017; 7: 1303-1329
  10. Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Fink M, Tanter M. Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. Diagnostic and interventional imaging 2013; 94: 487-495
  11. Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2015; 41: 1126-1147
  12. Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2013; 34: 169-184
  13. Guo J, Liang L, Zhou N, Li DY. Quantitative Analysis of Ultrasound Tissue Diffusion Elastography in The Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Prostate Lesions. Urol J 2019; 16: 347-