KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 35 Sayı: 1

Türkiye’de Hekimlerin Kötü Haber Vermeye Yönelik Tutumları

Attitudes Toward Breaking Bad News Among Physicians in Türkiye

Şeyma Begüm Harmancı(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0794-2503
Erkin Sarı(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, PSİKOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ, PSİKOLOJİ PR.)0000-0002-2162-5558
Muhammed Emin Harmancı(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0009-6998-7820
Sayfa
40–54
Yayın Tarihi
2026-04-20
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular: Analizler sonucunda 1 madde düşük faktör yükü, 2 madde de çoklu doğrusal bağlantıyı azaltmak amacıyla çıkarılmış ve 12 maddelik 2 boyutlu (kötü haberlerin verilmesine yönelik tutumlar, kötü haber vermeye ilişkin eğitim almaya dair tutumlar) Türkçe formun veriye iyi bir uyum sağladığı görülmüştür.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Amaç: Tıbbi iletişimde kötü haber, hastanın geleceğine dair bakışını önemli ölçüde değiştirebilecek bilgiler olarak tanımlanır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Ayrıca, kötü haber verme tutumları ve bu konudaki beceriler hekimler arasında farklılık gösterebilir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular: Analizler sonucunda 1 madde düşük faktör yükü, 2 madde de çoklu doğrusal bağlantıyı azaltmak amacıyla çıkarılmış ve 12 maddelik 2 boyutlu (kötü haberlerin verilmesine yönelik tutumlar, kötü haber vermeye ilişkin eğitim almaya dair tutumlar) Türkçe formun veriye iyi bir uyum sağladığı görülmüştür.
🔬Tür:Deneysel Tarla Denemesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:gerçeği açıklama · kötü haber iletimi · öz yeterlik

Özet

Amaç: Tıbbi iletişimde kötü haber, hastanın geleceğine dair bakışını önemli ölçüde değiştirebilecek bilgiler olarak tanımlanır. Hekimler, bu tür haberleri sıklıkla ileten kişiler olup, bu süreç hem hastalar hem de hekimler için duygusal açıdan zorlayıcı olabilir. Ayrıca, kötü haber verme tutumları ve bu konudaki beceriler hekimler arasında farklılık gösterebilir. Bu çalışmada hekimlerin kötü haber vermeye ilişkin tutumlarını incelemeye yönelik geliştirilen 15 maddelik Kötü Haber Verme Tutumları Ölçeği’nin (KHVTÖ) Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması yapılmış ve hekimlerin kötü haber vermeye ilişkin tutumlarının belirleyicileri anlaşılmak istenmiştir. Yöntem: Çalışma kapsamında Selçuk Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi’nde görev yapmakta olan 203 hekime ve ileri sınıf Tıp Fakültesi öğrencisine (111 kadın, 92 erkek) ulaşılmıştır. Bulgular: Analizler sonucunda 1 madde düşük faktör yükü, 2 madde de çoklu doğrusal bağlantıyı azaltmak amacıyla çıkarılmış ve 12 maddelik 2 boyutlu (kötü haberlerin verilmesine yönelik tutumlar, kötü haber vermeye ilişkin eğitim almaya dair tutumlar) Türkçe formun veriye iyi bir uyum sağladığı görülmüştür. İki boyutun iç tutarlılık katsayıları (Cronbach α=,81 ve ,82) da ölçeğin Türkçe formunun güvenilir olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliğini incelemek adına ilişkili olabileceği düşünülen ölçüm yöntemleriyle ilişkisi incelenmiş ve ölçeğin kişilerarası iletişim yetkinliği ve genel öz yeterlik ile pozitif yönde, algılanan stres ile ise negatif yönde ilişkili olduğu görülmüştür. Bu bulgular ölçeğin Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm yöntemi olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Sonuç: Sonuçlar hekimlerin kötü haber vermeye ilişkin tutumlarına, bu tutumları teşvik eden ve önünde engel oluşturan faktörlerin anlaşılmasına ışık tutmaktadır.

Abstract

Objective: In medical communication, bad news is conceptualized as any information that can significantly alter patient’s outlook on their future. Physicians are often the ones responsible for delivering such news, and this process can be emotionally challenging for both patients and doctors. Moreover, attitudes toward breaking bad news and the skills involved in doing so may vary among physicians. This study’s main aim is to investigate physicians’ attitudes toward delivering bad news through conducting the Turkish validity and reliability analysis of the 15-item Breaking Bad News Attitudes Scale (BBNAS). The study also sought to identify the key predictors of physicians’ attitudes on breaking bad news. Method: A total of 203 physicians and senior medical students (111 women, 92 men) working at Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine participated in the research. Results: As a result of the analyses, one item was removed due to low factor loading, and two items were excluded to reduce multicollinearity. The final 12-item Turkish version, consisting of two dimensions (SPIKES Adherence and BBN Training) demonstrated a good model fit. Internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach’s α=.81 and .82) for the two dimensions indicated that the Turkish form of the scale is reliable. To assess construct validity, correlations were examined with related measures. The scale was found to be positively associated with interpersonal communication competence and general self-efficacy and negatively associated with perceived stress. This study’s results indicated that the Turkish form of BBNAS is a valid and reliable measure for evaluating medical doctors’ breaking bad news attitudes. Conclusion: The results shed light on physicians’ attitudes toward breaking bad news and on the factors that facilitate or hinder these attitudes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Harmancı, Ş. B., Sarı, E., Harmancı, M. E. (2026). Türkiye’de Hekimlerin Kötü Haber Vermeye Yönelik Tutumları. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 1, 40–54. https://doi.org/10.17942/sted.1817404

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (52)

  1. Buckman R. How to Break Bad News: A Guide for Health Professionals. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins Press; 1992.
  2. Bousquet G, Orri M, Winterman S, Brugière C, Verneuil L et al. Breaking bad news in oncology: A metasynthesis. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2015;33(22):2437-43.
  3. Gebhardt C, Gorba C, Oechsle K, Vehling S, Koch U et al. Breaking bad news to cancer patients: Content, communication preferences and psychological distress. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie 2017;67(7):312-21.
  4. van Osch M, Sep M, van Vliet LM, van Dulmen S, Bensing JM. Reducing patients’ anxiety and uncertainty, and improving recall in bad news consultations. Health Psychology 2014;33(11):1382-90.
  5. Orlander JD, Fincke BG, Hermanns D, Johnson GA. Medical residents’ first clearly remembered experiences of giving bad news. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2002;17(11):825-40.
  6. Francis L, Robertson N. Healthcare practitioners’ experiences of breaking bad news: A critical interpretative meta synthesis. Patient Education and Counseling 2023;107:107574.
  7. Harrison ME, Walling A. What do we know about giving bad news? A review. Clinical Pediatrics 2010;49(7):619-26.
  8. Hulsman RL, Pranger S, Koot S, Fabriek M, Karemaker JM et al. How stressful is doctor-patient communication? Physiological and psychological stress of medical students in simulated history taking and bad-news consultations. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2010;77(1):26-34.
  9. Dönmez ÇF, Kara R, Muslu K, Johnston B. Nurses’ experiences of end-of-life communication with children who have life-threatening conditions in paediatric intensive care units: A qualitative descriptive study. BMC Palliative Care. 2026;25(1):47.
  10. van der Velden NCA, Meijers MC, Han PKJ, van Laarhoven HWM, Smets EMA, Henselmans I. The effect of prognostic communication on patient outcomes in palliative cancer care: A systematic review. Current Treatment Options in Oncology. 2020;21(5):40.
  11. Shaw JM, Brown RF, Dunn SM. A qualitative study of stress and coping responses in doctors breaking bad news. Patient Education and Counseling 2013;91(2):243-8.
  12. Studer RK, Danuser B, Gomez P. Physicians’ psychophysiological stress reaction in medical communication of bad news: A critical literature review. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2017;120:14-22.
  13. Krieger T, Kamm-Thonwart R, Daebritz T, Dittmer K. In the end, it is the word that remains: Communicating bad news in pediatric oncology. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2026;34(3):173.
  14. Brouwer MA, Maeckelberghe ELM, van der Heide A, Hein IM, Verhagen EAAE. Breaking bad news: What parents would like you to know. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2021;106(3):276-81.
  15. Toivonen AK, Lindblom-Ylänne S, Louhiala P, Pyörälä E. Medical students’ reflections on emotions concerning breaking bad news. Patient Education and Counseling 2017;100(10):1903-9.
  16. Yıldız İçigen A, Metin Gemici EZ. Nursing care behaviours and challenges faced during truth-telling: A phenomenological study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2026;32(2):e70396.
  17. Back AL, Curtis JR. Communicating bad news. Western Journal of Medicine 2002;176(3):177-80.
  18. Gold R, Gold A. Delivering bad news: attitudes, feelings, and practice characteristics among speech-language pathologists. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2018;27(1):108-22.
  19. Gessesse A, Haile J, Woldearegay A. Exploring effective communication strategies employed by physicians in delivering bad news in Ethiopian state hospitals. Patient Related Outcome Measures 2023;14:409-25.
  20. Ptacek JT, Ptacek JJ, Ellison NM. “I’m Sorry To Tell You…” Physicians’ reports of breaking bad news. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2001;24(2):205-17.
  21. Thirioux B, Birault F, Jaafari N. Empathy is a protective factor of burnout in physicians: New neuro-phenomenological hypotheses regarding empathy and sympathy in care relationship. Frontiers in Psychology 2016;7:1-14.
  22. Mărginean C, Safta AC, Szekely T-B, Szabo A-D, Albu S, László N, Budin C. Communication competence and behavioral challenges in breaking bad news: A single-center study of Romanian medical residents. BMC Medical Education. 2026;26(1):298.
  23. Tranberg M, Brodin EM. Physicians’ lived experience of breaking bad news in clinical practice: Five essentials of a relational process. Qualitative Health Research. 2023;33(14):1349-59.
  24. Arnold RM, Back AL, Barnato AE, Prendergast TJ, Emlet LL, Karpov I, White PH, Nelson JE. The Critical Care Communication project: Improving fellows’ communication skills. Journal of Critical Care 2015;30(2):250-4.
  25. Fujimori M, Shirai Y, Asai M, Kubota K, Katsumata N et al. Effect of communication skills training program for oncologists based on patient preferences for communication when receiving bad news: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2014;32(20):2166-72.
  26. Ruiz Sancho E, Pérez Nieto MÁ, Román FJ, León Mateos L, Sánchez Escamilla F et al. Differences in the communication of cancer diagnoses by different health professionals and the impact of oncologist communication on patients’ emotions. Cancers 2024;16(13):2444.
  27. Villagran M, Goldsmith J, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Baldwin P. Creating COMFORT: A communication-based model for breaking bad news. Communication Education 2010;59(3):220-34.
  28. Messerotti A, Banchelli F, Ferrari S, Barbieri E, Bettelli F et al. Investigating the association between physicians’ self-efficacy regarding communication skills and risk of “burnout.” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2020;18(1):271.
  29. Parle, M, Maguire, P, Heaven, C. The development of a training model to improve health professionals’ skills, self-efficacy and outcome expectancies when communicating with cancer patients. Social Science & Medicine 1997;44(2):231-40.
  30. Kosydar-Bochenek J, Kobak J, Szczupak M, Będkowski JH, Krupa-Nurcek S. Delivering bad news in clinical practice: The role of communication skills and emotional intelligence among Polish healthcare professionals. BMC Medical Education. 2025;26(1):9.
  31. Gagnerie P, Sanges S, Guerreschi P, Wiel E, Lebuffe G et al. Training first-year medical residents to break bad news using healthcare role-play and trainees as simulated patients: Experience of the “ADIAMED” Program from Lille University School of Medicine. La Revue de Médecine Interne. 2023; 44(12):632-40.
  32. Servotte JC, Bragard I, Szyld D, Van Ngoc P, Scholtes B et al. Efficacy of a short role-play training on breaking bad news in the emergency department. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 2019;20(6):893-902.
  33. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 1977;84(2):191-215.
  34. Mansoursamaei M, Ghanbari Jolfaei A, Zandi M, Mansoursamaei A, Salehian R. Self-assessment of residents in breaking bad news; Skills and barriers. BMC Medical Education 2023;23(1):740.
  35. J, Merckaert I, Libert Y, Delvaux N, Etienne A-M et al. The effect of communication skills training on residents’ physiological arousal in a breaking bad news simulated task. Patient Education and Counseling 2013;93(1):40-7.
  36. Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA et al. SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: Application to the patient with cancer. The Oncologist 2000;5(4):302-11.
  37. Kaplan M. SPIKES: A framework for breaking bad news to patients with cancer. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing 2010;14(4):514-6.
  38. İlgili Ö, Onan A, Odabaşı O. Evaluation of skills training in delivery of bad news in the light of SPIKES approach. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi 2019;28(6):410-7.
  39. Salem A, Salem AF. Breaking bad news: Current prospective and practical guideline for muslim countries. Journal of Cancer Education 2013;28(4):790-4.
  40. Tavakol M, Murphy R, Torabi S. Educating doctors about breaking bad news: An Iranian perspective. Journal of Cancer Education 2008;23(4):260-3.
  41. Yurdakul ES, Coskun ZY, Sari O, Coskun AK. Characteristics affecting the attitude and approach of physicians to breaking bad news: Uncertain medical situations. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2024;11(1):490.
  42. dos Santos KL, Gremigni P, Casu G, Zaia V, Montagna E. Development and validation of The Breaking Bad News Attitudes Scale. BMC Medical Education 2021;21(1):196.
  43. Huang Y-C, Lin S-H. An inventory for assessing interpersonal communication competence of college students. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 2018;46(4):385-401.
  44. Çıkrıkçı Ö, Çinpolat E. Adaptation of the Interpersonal Communication Competence Inventory (ICCI) into Turkish. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2021;7(2):757-75.
  45. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 1983;24(4):385-96.
  46. Eskin M, Harlak H, Demirkıran F, Dereboy Ç. The adaptation of The Perceived Stress Scale into Turkish: A reliability and validity analysis. New Symposium Journal 2013;51(3):132-40.
  47. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1995. p.35-7.
  48. Aypay A. The adaptation study of General Self-Efficacy (GSE) Scale to Turkish. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010;11(2):113-32.
  49. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson; 2013.
  50. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York, NY, USA: The Guilford Press; 2016.
  51. Knekta E, Runyon C, Eddy S. One size doesn’t fit all: Using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE-Life Sciences Education 2019;18(1):rm1.
  52. Brown R, Dunn S, Byrnes K, Morris R, Heinrich P, Shaw J. Doctors’ stress responses and poor communication performance in simulated bad-news consultations. Academic Medicine 2009;84(11):1595-602. Table 1. Descriptive Statistics