KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Polimer Elyaf Takviyeli 3D Beton Baskının Mekanik Özellikleri: Bir Derleme

Mechanical Properties of Polymer Fiber Reinforced 3D Concrete Printing: A Review

Berrin Akkuş(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Murat Günaydin(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, KADINHANI MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)
Sayfa
1927–1941
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-16
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ayrıca, lifsiz 3D beton baskıya kıyasla, lifle takviye edilmiş 3D beton baskılar daha yüksek çatlak direnci, mekanik dayanım ve dayanıklılık göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:3D beton baskı, geleneksel inşaat yöntemleri ile inşa edilmesi zor ve karmaşık biçimli yapıları inşa etmek için kullanılan bir yöntemdir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu yöntem, kalıp kullanılmadan ekstrüzyon yoluyla betonu katman katman biriktiren bir işlemdir. 3D beton baskı yöntemi ile düşük maliyetli, verimli ve hızlı bir şekilde üretim yapılabilmektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ayrıca, lifsiz 3D beton baskıya kıyasla, lifle takviye edilmiş 3D beton baskılar daha yüksek çatlak direnci, mekanik dayanım ve dayanıklılık göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:3D baskı · Beton · Polimer takviye

Özet

3D beton baskı, geleneksel inşaat yöntemleri ile inşa edilmesi zor ve karmaşık biçimli yapıları inşa etmek için kullanılan bir yöntemdir. Bu yöntem, kalıp kullanılmadan ekstrüzyon yoluyla betonu katman katman biriktiren bir işlemdir. 3D beton baskı yöntemi ile düşük maliyetli, verimli ve hızlı bir şekilde üretim yapılabilmektedir. Ancak baskı betonun mekanik özelliklerini iyileştirmek ve özellikle düşük sünekliğini artırmak için takviye edilmesi gerekmektedir. Kullanılan geleneksel takviye malzemeleri çelik, karbon, cam ve bazalttır. Geleneksel takviyeler yerine polimer takviyelerin kullanılması maliyeti önemli ölçüde azaltıp performansı artırmaktadır. Bu derlemede; literatürdeki çalışmalar dikkate alınarak, en çok kullanılan polimer liflerden, PE (polietilen), PP (polipropilen) ve PVA (polivinil alkol) takviye edilerek üretilen 3D beton baskıların mekanik özellikleri incelenmiştir. Araştırmalar, lif türü, içeriği ve baskı yönüne bağlı anizotropinin, 3D beton baskının performansını önemli ölçüde etkilediğini belirtmektedir. Ayrıca, lifsiz 3D beton baskıya kıyasla, lifle takviye edilmiş 3D beton baskılar daha yüksek çatlak direnci, mekanik dayanım ve dayanıklılık göstermektedir. Ancak, lif türü ile karışımda kullanılan malzemelerin ve oranlarının seçimi, uygulamanın gereksinimlerine uygun şekilde yapılmalıdır. Gelecekteki araştırmalarda; optimum lif içeriği ile baskı parametreleri arasındaki etkileşimin, lif yönelimi üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi önerilmektedir. Böylece, lifle güçlendirilmiş 3D beton baskı, inşaat sektöründe sürdürülebilir altyapı uygulamaları için potansiyelini en üst düzeye çıkarabilir duruma gelebilecektir.

Abstract

3D concrete printing is a method used to construct complex structures that are difficult to construct using traditional construction methods. This process involves depositing concrete layer by layer through extrusion without the use of molds. 3D concrete printing allows for low-cost, efficient, and rapid production. However, reinforced concrete must be used to improve its mechanical properties, particularly its low ductility. Traditional reinforcement materials include steel, carbon, glass, and basalt. Using polymer reinforcements instead of traditional reinforcements significantly reduces costs and improves performance. This review examines the mechanical properties of 3D concrete prints produced by reinforcing the most commonly used polymer fibers: PE (polyethylene), PP (polypropylene), and PVA (polyvinyl alcohol), based on literature studies. Research indicates that anisotropy due to fiber type, content, and printing direction significantly affects the performance of 3D concrete prints. Furthermore, compared to 3D concrete prints without fibers, fiber-reinforced 3D concrete prints exhibit higher crack resistance, mechanical strength, and durability. However, the selection of fiber type, materials used in the mixture, and their proportions should be tailored to the application's requirements. Future research is recommended to examine the interaction between optimal fiber content and printing parameters and their impact on fiber orientation. This will allow fiber-reinforced 3D concrete printing to maximize its potential for sustainable infrastructure applications in the construction industry.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akkuş, B., Günaydin, M. (2026). Polimer Elyaf Takviyeli 3D Beton Baskının Mekanik Özellikleri: Bir Derleme. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 1927–1941. https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1759971

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (46)

  1. Ahmed W., Alnajjar F., Zaneldin E., Al-Marzouqi AH., Gochoo M., Khalid S. Implementing FDM 3D printing strategies using natural fibers to produce biomass composite. Materials 2020a; 13(8): 4065.
  2. Ahmed ZY., Bos FP., van Brunschot MCAJ., Salet TAM. On-demand additive manufacturing of functionally graded concrete. Virtual Physical Prototyping 2020b; 15(2): 194-210.
  3. Alami AH., Olabi AG., Ayoub M., Aljaghoub H., Alasad S., Abdelkareem MA. 3D concrete printing: Recent progress, applications, challenges, and role in achieving sustainable development goals. Buildings 2023; 13(4): 924.
  4. Alonso-Canon S., Blanco-Fernandez E., Castro-Fresno D., Yoris‑Nobile AI., Castañon Jano L. Reinforcements in 3D printing concrete structures. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 2023; 23: 25.
  5. Al-Qutaifi S., Nazari A., Bagheri A. Mechanical properties of layered geopolymer structures applicable in concrete 3D-printing. Construction and Building Materials 2018; 176: 690-699.
  6. Arunothayan AR., Nematollahi B., Ranade R., Bong SH., Sanjayan JG., Khayat KH. Fiber orientation effects on ultra-high performance concrete formed by 3D printing. Cement and Concrete Research 2021; 143: 106384.
  7. Błaszczyk K., Smarzewski P. Influence of hybrid fibers on workability, mechanical and dynamic properties of ultra-high performance concrete. Applied Sciences 2025; 15(10): 5716.
  8. Cao M., Xu L., Zhang C. Review on micromechanical design, performance and development tendency of engineered cementitious composite. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society 2015; 43(5): 632–642.
  9. De Schutter G., Lesage K., Mechtcherine V., Nerella VN., Habert G., Agusti-Juan I. Vision of 3D printing with concrete-technical, economic and environmental potentials. Cement and Concrete Research 2018; 112: 25–36.
  10. Ding T., Xiao J., Zou S., Yu J. Flexural properties of 3D printed fibre-reinforced concrete with recycled sand. Construction and Building Materials 2021; 288: 123077.
  11. Ding T., Xiao J., Zou S., Zhou X. Anisotropic behavior in bending of 3D printed concrete reinforced with fibers. Composite Structures 2020; 254: 112808.
  12. El-Sayegh S., Romdhane L., Manjikian S. A critical review of 3D printing in construction: benefits, challenges, and risks. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 2020; 20(2): 1–25.
  13. Hambach M., Rutzen M., Volkmer D. Properties of 3D-printed fiber-reinforced portland cement paste. Cement and Concrete Composites 2017; 79: 62–70.
  14. Jo JH., Jo BW., Cho W., Kim JH. Development of a 3D printer for concrete structures: Laboratory testing of cementitious materials. International Journal of Concrete Structures Materials 2020; 14(1): 13.
  15. Korniejenko K., Łach M., Chou SY., Lin WT., Cheng A., Hebdowska-Krupa M., Gądek S., Mikuła J. Mechanical properties of short fiber-reinforced geopolymers made by casted and 3D printing methods: A comparative study. Materials 2020; 13(3): 579.
  16. Lesovik V., Fediuk R., Amran M., Alaskhanov A., Volodchenko A., Murali G., Uvarov V., Elistratkin M. 3D-printed mortars with combined steel and polypropylene fibers. Fibers 2021; 9(12): 79.
  17. Lim S., Buswell RA., Le TT., Austin SA., Gibb AGF., Thorpe T. Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes. Automation in Construction 2012; 21(1): 262–268.
  18. Liu B., Liu X., Li G., Geng S., Li Z., Weng Y., Qian K. Study on anisotropy of 3D printing PVA fiber reinforced concrete using destructive and non-destructive testing methods. Case Studies in Construction Materials 2022; 17: e01519.
  19. Liu J., Lv C. Properties of 3D-printed polymer fiber-reinforced mortars: A review. Polymers 2022; 14(7): 1315.
  20. Luo S., Li W., Wang D. Study on bending performance of 3D printed PVA fiber reinforced cement-based material. Construction and Building Materials 2024; 433: 136637.
  21. Ma GW., Wang L., Ju Y. State-of-the-art of 3D printing technology of cementitious material-An emerging technique for construction. Science China Technological Sciences 2018; 61(4): 475–95.
  22. Marais H., Christen H., Cho S., De Villiers W., Van Zijl G. Computational assessment of thermal performance of 3D printed concrete wall structures with cavities. Journal of Building Engineering 2021; 41: 102431.
  23. Menna C., Mata-Falcón J., Bos FP., Vantyghem G., Ferrara L., Asprone D., Salet TAM., Kaufmann W. Opportunities and challenges for structural engineering of digitally fabricated concrete. Cement and Concrete Research 2020; 133: 106079.
  24. Nematollahi B., Vijay P., Sanjayan J., Nazari A., Xia M., Naidu Nerella V., Mechtcherine V. Effect of polypropylene fibre addition on properties of geopolymers made by 3D printing for digital construction. Materials 2018; 11(12): 2352.
  25. Nematollahi B., Xia M., Sanjayan J., Vijay P. Effect of type of fiber on inter-layer bond and flexural strengths of extrusion-based 3D printed geopolymer. Materials Science Forum 2018; 939: 155-162
  26. Panda B., Paul S., Tan M. Anisotropic mechanical performance of 3D printed fiber reinforced sustainable construction material. Materials Letters 2017; 209: 146–149.
  27. Panda B., Unluer C., Tan MJ. Investigation of the rheology and strength of geopolymer mixtures for extrusion-based 3D printing. Cement and Concrete Composites 2018; 94: 307–314.
  28. Ramezani A., Modaresi S., Dashti P., GivKashi MR., Moodi F., Ramezanianpour AA. Effects of different types of fibers on fresh and hardened properties of cement and geopolymer-based 3D printed mixtures: A review. Buildings 2023; 13(4): 945.
  29. Ramezanianpour AA., Esmaeili M., Ghahari SA., Najafi MH. Laboratory study on the effect of polypropylene fiber on durability, and physical and mechanical characteristic of concrete for application in sleepers. Constr Build Mater. 2013; 44: 411–418.
  30. Savija B., Lukovic M., Hosseini SAS., Pacheco J., Schlangen E. Corrosion induced cover cracking studied by X-ray computed tomography, nanoindentation, and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS). Materials and Structures 2015; 48(7): 2043-2062.
  31. Savija B., Lukovic M., Pacheco J., Schlangen E. Cracking of the concrete cover due to reinforcement corrosion: A two- dimensional lattice model study. Construction and Building Materials 2013; 44: 626-638.
  32. Shakor P., Nejadi S., Paul G. A study into the effect of different nozzles shapes and fibre-reinforcement in 3D printed mortar. Materials 2019; 12(10): 1708.
  33. Soltan DG., Li VC. A self-reinforced cementitious composite for building-scale 3D printing. Cement and Concrete Composites 2018; 90: 1–13.
  34. Udebunu J., Abdolpour H., Sadowski L. Comprehensive experimental investigation of the mechanical properties and performance enhancement of polyvinyl alcohol fiber-reinforced cement mortar. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 2024; 25(58): 1-14.
  35. Ungureanu D., Onutu C., Taranu N., Vornicu N., Zghibarcea ŞV., Ghiga DA., Spiridon IA. Microstructure and mechanical properties of cost-efficient 3D printed concrete reinforced with polypropylene fibers. Buildings 2023; 13: 2813.
  36. Vlachakis C., Perry M., McAlorum J. 3D printed self-sensing alkali-activated coatings for civil infrastructure. 2021 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 17-20 May 2021, 1-5, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  37. Wang L., Hu Y., Wang Q., Cui T. Shrinkage and cracking performance of PP/PVA fiber-reinforced 3D-printed mortar. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 2023; 35(6): 04023132.
  38. Wangler T., Roussel N., Bos FP., Salet TAM., Flatt RJ. 2019. Digital concrete: A review. Cement and Concrete Research 2019; 123: 105780.
  39. Wu P., Wang J., Wang X. A Critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry. Automation in Construction 2016; 68: 21-31.
  40. Xiao J., Zou S., Ding T., Duan Z., Liu Q. Fiber-reinforced mortar with 100% recycled fine aggregates: A cleaner perspective on 3D printing. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 319: 128720.
  41. Yan C., Banthia N. Shrinkage cracking in polyolefin fiber-reinforced concrete. Materials Journal 2000; 97(4): 432–437.
  42. Ye J., Cui C., Yu J., Yu K., Dong F. Effect of polyethylene fiber content on workability and mechanical-anisotropic properties of 3D printed ultra-high ductile concrete. Construction and Building Materials 2021; 281: 122586.
  43. Yu J., Leung CKY. Impact of 3D printing direction on mechanical performance of strain-hardening cementitious composite (SHCC). RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018.
  44. Zhang D., Yu J., Wu H., Jaworska B., Ellis BR., Li VC. Discontinuous micro-fibers as intrinsic reinforcement for ductile engineered cementitious composites (ECC). Composites Part B: Engineering 2020; 184: 107741.
  45. Zhang J., Wang J., Dong S., Yu X., Han B. A review of the current progress and application of 3D printed concrete. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2019; 125: 105533.
  46. Zhu B., Pan J., Nematollahi B., Zhou Z., Zhang Y., Sanjayan J. Development of 3D printable engineered cementitious composites with ultra-high tensile ductility for digital construction. Materials & Design 2019; 181: 108088.