KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Muhasebe Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 70

Finansal Muhasebe Konusunda Web of Science Veri Tabanında Yer Alan Yayınların Bilimsel Haritalamada Vosviewer Haritalama Teknikleri ile Analizi

Analysis of Publications on Financial Accounting in Web of Science Database with Vosviewer Mapping Techniques and Bibliometric Analysis Method

Feden Koç(Uşak University, Logistic Department)0000-0003-4413-5188
Sevinç Gülseçen(İstanbul University, Informatics Department)0000-0001-8537-7111
Sayfa
17–37
Yayın Tarihi
2024-03-07
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu bağlamda çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular finansal muhasebe konusunda en etkili yazarın Thomas Stober, en etkili ülkenin ABD, en çok atıf yapılan yayının “Audit Committee, Board Of Director Characteristics, And Earnings Management” başlıklı yayın ile Klein (2002) olduğunu ve en fazla atıf yapılan kaynağın Accounting Horizons dergisi olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmada, VOSviewer haritalama teknikleri ve geleneksel bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi kullanılarak, Web of Science veri tabanında belirli kriterlere göre sınırlandırılan “Financial Accounting” konulu 1.009 yayının analiz edilmesi amaçlanmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu bağlamda çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular finansal muhasebe konusunda en etkili yazarın Thomas Stober, en etkili ülkenin ABD, en çok atıf yapılan yayının “Audit Committee, Board Of Director Characteristics, And Earnings Management” başlıklı yayın ile Klein (2002) olduğunu ve en fazla atıf yapılan kaynağın Accounting Horizons dergisi olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ayrıca finansal muhasebe ile en güçlü bağlantıya sahip kurumların ABD’ de bulunan Carolina Üniversitesi, Michigan Üniversitesi, Duke Üniversitesi ve MIT olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2002 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Finansal Muhasebe · VOSviewer Haritalama Teknikleri · Metin Madenciliği

Özet

Bu çalışmada, VOSviewer haritalama teknikleri ve geleneksel bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi kullanılarak, Web of Science veri tabanında belirli kriterlere göre sınırlandırılan “Financial Accounting” konulu 1.009 yayının analiz edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu bağlamda çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular finansal muhasebe konusunda en etkili yazarın Thomas Stober, en etkili ülkenin ABD, en çok atıf yapılan yayının “Audit Committee, Board Of Director Characteristics, And Earnings Management” başlıklı yayın ile Klein (2002) olduğunu ve en fazla atıf yapılan kaynağın Accounting Horizons dergisi olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca finansal muhasebe ile en güçlü bağlantıya sahip kurumların ABD’ de bulunan Carolina Üniversitesi, Michigan Üniversitesi, Duke Üniversitesi ve MIT olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze 1,009 publications on “Financial Accounting” limited according to certain criteria in the Web of Science database, using the VOSviewer software program and the traditional bibliometric analysis method. In this context, the findings of the study are that the most influential author on financial accounting is Thomas Stober, the most influential country is the USA, the most cited publication is April Klein (2002), with the publication titled “Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, And Earnings Management”, and the most cited source is the Accounting Horizons magazine. In addition, it was concluded that the institutions with the strongest connection with financial accounting are Carolina University, Michigan University, Duke University and MIT in the USA. In addition, as a result of analyzing the numerical trend of online books published in the field of financial accounting using the Google Books Ngram online analysis program within the scope of the study, it was concluded that the number of books published in the field of financial accounting reached its highest level in 2003 and followed a steady decline from 2003 to 2014.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Koç, F., Gülseçen, S. (2024). Finansal Muhasebe Konusunda Web of Science Veri Tabanında Yer Alan Yayınların Bilimsel Haritalamada Vosviewer Haritalama Teknikleri ile Analizi. Muhasebe Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 70, 17–37. https://doi.org/10.26650/MED.1328607

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (25)

  1. Al, U., & Tonta, Y. (2004). Citation analysis: sources cited in dissertations completed at hacettepe university department of librarianship. Information World, 5(1), 19-47. google scholar
  2. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An r-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-75. google scholar
  3. Bornmann, L., Stefaner, M., de Moya Anegon, F., & Mutz, R. (2014). Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualisation of results from multi-level models. Online Information Review, 38(1), 43-58. doi:10.1108/OIR-12-2012-0214 google scholar
  4. De Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44(3), 283-317. doi:10.1177/0007650305278086 google scholar
  5. Demir, H., & Erigüç, G. (2018). Examination of management thought system with a bibliometric analysis. Business and People Journal, 5(2), 91-114. google scholar
  6. Eck, N. J. V., & Waltman, L. (2014). Measuring scholarly impact: methods and practice. in Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., & Wolfram, D. (Eds.). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (pp. 285-320). Cham: Springer International Publishing. google scholar
  7. Eck, N. J. V., & Waltman, L. (2021). VOSviewer Manual. Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.17. pp. 1-54. google scholar
  8. Ellegaard, O. (2018). The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics 116, 181-202. doi:10.1007/ s11192-018-2765-z. google scholar
  9. Gaitan-Angulo, M., Jenny, C. D., Amelec, V., Jenny-Paola, L.-G. & Paula Alejandra, R.-G. (2018). Data mining and big data, lecture notes in computer science. in Y. Tan, Y. Shi, and Q. Tang (Eds.). Bibliometric Analysis of Social Innovation and Complexity (Databases Scopus andDialnet 2007-2017). (pp. 23-30). Cham: Springer International Publishing. google scholar
  10. Google Books Ngram Viewer. (2021, December 31). Google Books Ngram Viewer. Access address https://books.google.com/ngrams google scholar
  11. Kumari, R. & Naresh, G. (2023). Adoption of international financial reporting standards and its effect on quality of financial reporting - a bibliometric study. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting. 15(3), 255-281. doi:10.1504/IJMFA.2023.131760 google scholar
  12. Kurutkan, M., N. & Orhan, F. (Ed.). (2018a). Analysis of Health Policy With Scientific Mapping Techniques. İksad Publishing House, (Chapter 2). google scholar
  13. Kurutkan, M. N. & Orhan F., (2018b). Bibliometric Analysis of Quality Principles by Visual Mapping Technique. Sage Publishing. Ankara google scholar
  14. Li, Y., Xu, Z., Wang, X. &Wang, X. (2020). A bibliometric analysis on deep learning during 2007-2019. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 11(12), 2807-26. doi: 10.1007/s13042-020-01152-0. google scholar
  15. Marına, A.-G. (2021). Accountıng harmonization with IFRS: A bibliometrıc analysis using vosviewer software. Revista Economica, 73(4), 28-40. google scholar
  16. Merigo, J. M., Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2015). A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014. Journal ofBusiness Research, 68(12), 2645-2653. google scholar
  17. Merigo, J. M., & Yang, J.-B. (2017). Accounting research: a bibliometric analysis: accounting research: a bibliometric analysis. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 71-100. doi: 10.1111/auar.12109. google scholar
  18. Mokhtari, H., & Saberi, M. K. (2019). Bibliometric analysis and visualization of the journal of artificial societies and social simulation (JASSS) between 2000 and 2018. Webology, (16), 166-83. doi: 10.14704/WEB/V16I1/a185. google scholar
  19. Monteiro, A. & Cepeda, C. (2021). Accounting information systems: Scientific production and trends in research. Systems, 9(67), 1-25. doi:10.3390/systems9030067. google scholar
  20. Sinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping, edited by R.-J. Bryan J. and D. K. Rudolf R. Sinkovics. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 327-50. doi: 10.1108/IMR-10-2014-0341. google scholar
  21. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 165-269. google scholar
  22. Yu, Y., Zhang, Z., Gu, Z., Zhong, H., Zha, Q., Yang, L., Zhu, C., & Chen, E. (2020). A bibliometric analysis using vosviewer of publications on covid-19. Annals of Trafslation Medicine, 8(3), 816. google scholar
  23. Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-72. doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629. google scholar
  24. Gaitan-Angulo, M., Jenny, C. D., Amelec, V., Jenny-Paola, L.-G. & Paula Alejandra, R.-G. (2018). Data mining and big data, lecture notes in computer science. in Y. Tan, Y. Shi, and Q. Tang (Eds.). Bibliometric Analysis of Social Innovation and Complexity (Databases Scopus andDialnet 2007-2017). (pp. 23-30). Cham: Springer International Publishing. google scholar
  25. Kurutkan, M. N. & Orhan F., (2018b). Bibliometric Analysis of Quality Principles by Visual Mapping Technique. Sage Publishing. Ankara google scholar