Dergiler / Medical Records / 2026 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3

Investigation of the Opinions of the First-Year Students of Dentistry Who Go to Online Education on Anatomy Education After the Kahramanmaraş Earthquake

Adem Tokpınar(ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-7661-9588
Sayfa
603–7
Yayın Tarihi
2023-09-18
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Since the anatomy course has too many subjects, the subject contents are difficult to learn, and it is also a basic course, it is important to conduct theoretical and practical lessons face-to-face instead of online.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim of the study was to examine the opinions of first-year dentistry students who switched to online education after the Kahramanmaraş earthquake on anatomy education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Material and Methods: A total of 82 students, 38 males and 44 females, participated in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Since the anatomy course has too many subjects, the subject contents are difficult to learn, and it is also a basic course, it is important to conduct theoretical and practical lessons face-to-face instead of online.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Earthquake · online education · anatomy

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to examine the opinions of first-year dentistry students who switched to online education after the Kahramanmaraş earthquake on anatomy education. Material and Methods: A total of 82 students, 38 males and 44 females, participated in the study. The questionnaire consisting of 14 questions was applied online. The questionnaire was Likert-type and calculated as flat coded questions (completely disagree 1 point, disagree 2 points, no idea 3 points, agree 4 points, completely agree 5 points). The questions were calculated as reverse coded because they expressed negativity. There were 13 questions in the questionnaire, except for the open-ended and gender-reporting question, and the highest score was 65 and the lowest score was 13. Results: The expected frequency of completely agree is 15.3 (40.2%), while the observed frequency is 21 (55.3%). Statistically, there is a difference between expected and observed values (p<0.05). In the question "I participated in anatomy courses taught online", the expected frequency of completely agree was 1 (2.3%) while the observed frequency was 0 (0%). Statistically, there is a difference between expected and observed values (p<0.05). Conclusion: Since the anatomy course has too many subjects, the subject contents are difficult to learn, and it is also a basic course, it is important to conduct theoretical and practical lessons face-to-face instead of online.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tokpınar, A., Yılmaz, S., Yılmaz, H., Değermenci, M. (2023). Investigation of the Opinions of the First-Year Students of Dentistry Who Go to Online Education on Anatomy Education After the Kahramanmaraş Earthquake. Medical Records, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 603–7. https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1318386

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Akkoç RF, Aksu F, Kavaklı A, Ögetürk M. Anatomy education from the perspective of clinician: questionnaire study. Firat Med J. 2021;26:234-8.
  2. Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ. Teaching and learning gross anatomy: dissection, prosection, or “both of the above?”. Clin Anat. 1999;12:110-4.
  3. Karabilgin ÖS, Şahin H. Student ratings in evaluation of teaching effectiveness and educational program. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2006;21:27-33.
  4. Ari I, İrgil E, Kafa İM, Şendemir E. A questionnaire study: anatomy education and student's views. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2003;29:15-8.
  5. Yavuz F, Ertekin T, Elmalı F, Ülger H. Attitudes of pre-clinical and clinical stage medical school students toward using cadaver in anatomy education. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2017;26:227-32.
  6. Uygur R, Çağlar V, Topçu B, Aktaş S, Oğuz Ö. The assessment of the students’ opinions about anatomy education. Int J Basic Clin Med. 2013;1:94-106.
  7. Sindel M, Şenol Y, Gürpınar E. Evaluation of anatomy education by students in Akdeniz University school of medicine. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2008;28:31-6.
  8. Acuner AM, Yalçın M, Ersoy M, et al. Ankara üniversitesi tıp fakültesi anatomi dersine ilişkin öğretme-öğrenme sürecinin değerlendirilmesi. 1999;52:211-8.
  9. Topal AD, Ocak MA. Harmanlanmış öğrenme ortamı ile hazırlanan anatomi dersinin öğrencilerin akademik başarıları üzerindeki etkisi. Educational Technology Theory and Practice. 2014;4:48-62.
  10. Ulucam E, Gokce N, Mesut R. Turkish anatomy education from the foundation of the first modern medical school to today. JISHIM. 2003;2:50-2.
  11. Kulik JA. Student ratings: validity, utility, and controversy. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2002:2001:9-25.
  12. Çan MA. Metaphors for anatomy lesson of students who received anatomy education in faculty of medicine and faculty of dentistry. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2022;21:118-27.
  13. Telli SG, Altun D. The indispensability of online learning after earthquake in Turkiye. Journal of University Research. 2023;6:125-36.
  14. Singal A, Bansal A, Chaudhary P, et al. Anatomy education of medical and dental students during COVID-19 pandemic: a reality check. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021;43:515-21.
  15. Kelsey AH, McCulloch V, Gillingwater TH, et al. Anatomical sciences at the University of Edinburgh: initial experiences of teaching anatomy online. Translational Research in Anatomy. 2020;19:100065.
  16. Turhan B, Yakut Y. The opinions of physiotherapy students on online anatomy education during COVID-19 pandemic. Anatomy. 2020;14:134-8.
  17. Pamay A, Büyükertan M, Balcıoğlu HA. An investigation on the anatomy education at dental faculties in European and North American universities. 2017;13:29:33.