KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Medical Records / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Using Deep Learning Algorithms to Predict Dental Implant Brands from Panoramic Radiographs

İsmail Taşdemir(KARAMANOĞLU MEHMETBEY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0110-1412
Veysel İçen(KARAMANOGLU MEHMETBEY UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-3112-8528
Türkay Kölüş(KARAMANOGLU MEHMETBEY UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0840-7126
Sayfa
8–11
Yayın Tarihi
2025-01-15
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, to use this system routinely in clinical practice, it is necessary to create libraries by conducting studies that include many different implant systems and a large number of images.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim of this study is to predict dental implant brands from panoramic radiographs using deep learning algorithms.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Radiographs were grouped into three different implant brands, with a minimum of 250 dental implants from each brand.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, to use this system routinely in clinical practice, it is necessary to create libraries by conducting studies that include many different implant systems and a large number of images.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Deep learning · dental implant · artificial intelligence

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to predict dental implant brands from panoramic radiographs using deep learning algorithms. Material and Method: Panoramic radiographs of patients previously undergoing dental implant procedures were retrospectively screened. Radiographs were grouped into three different implant brands, with a minimum of 250 dental implants from each brand. The obtained radiographs were divided into three groups: training, validation, and test sets, with an equal distribution of implant brands in each group. 70% of the implants were used for training, 20% for validation, and 10% for the test dataset. Trained models were tested on the previously separated test set that was not used in the deep learning model training to determine the implant brand. Results: A total of 882 implants were evaluated in 220 panoramic radiographs. The study found that the accuracy of the implants tested in the deep learning model was 75% and the sensitivity was 78.26%. The accuracy of the model was 94.73%. The F1 score, which is a parameter frequently used in comparing artificial intelligence models with each other, was found to be 85.71%. Conclusion: The results of this study show that implants can be identified from panoramic radiographic images using deep learning algorithms. However, to use this system routinely in clinical practice, it is necessary to create libraries by conducting studies that include many different implant systems and a large number of images.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Taşdemir, İ., İçen, V., Kölüş, T. (2025). Using Deep Learning Algorithms to Predict Dental Implant Brands from Panoramic Radiographs. Medical Records, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 8–11. https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1524857

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (27)

  1. Shulman L, Driskell T. Dental implants: a historical perspective. Implants in dentistry Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1997:6.
  2. Boven G, Raghoebar G, Vissink A, Meijer H. Improving masticatory performance, bite force, nutritional state and patient's satisfaction with implant overdentures: a systematic review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42:220-33.
  3. Kanehira Y, Arai K, Kanehira T, et al. Oral health-related quality of life in patients with implant treatment. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9:476-81.
  4. Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, et al. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;88:579-96.
  5. Hashim D, Cionca N, Combescure C, Mombelli A. The diagnosis of peri‐implantitis: a systematic review on the predictive value of bleeding on probing. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:276-93.
  6. Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang HL. Peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45:S246-66.
  7. Howe M-S, Keys W, Richards D. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: a systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. Journal of dentistry. 2019;84:9-21.
  8. Alghamdi HS, Jansen JA. The development and future of dental implants. Dent Mater J. 2020;39:167-72.
  9. Takahashi T, Nozaki K, Gonda T, et al. Identification of dental implants using deep learning—pilot study. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6:53.
  10. Sukegawa S, Yoshii K, Hara T, et al. Deep neural networks for dental implant system classification. Biomolecules. 2020;10:984.
  11. Liao SM. Ethics of Artificial intelligence. In: Taylor j, Yudkowsky E, LaVictoire P, Critch A. Alignment for advanced machine learning systems. New York: Oxford University Press. 2016:342-82.
  12. Hamet P, Tremblay J. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism. 2017;69:S36-40.
  13. Holzinger A, Langs G, Denk H, et al. Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2019;9:e1312.
  14. Schwendicke Fa, Samek W, Krois J. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: chances and challenges. J Dent Res. 2020;99:769-74.
  15. Yamaguchi S, Lee C, Karaer O, et al. Predicting the debonding of CAD/CAM composite resin crowns with AI. J Dent Res. 2019;98:1234-8.
  16. Takahashi T, Nozaki K, Gonda T, Ikebe K. A system for designing removable partial dentures using artificial intelligence. Part 1. Classification of partially edentulous arches using a convolutional neural network. J Prosthodont Res. 2021;65:115-8.
  17. Hwang J-J, Jung Y-H, Cho B-H, Heo M-S. An overview of deep learning in the field of dentistry. Imaging Sci Dent. 2019;49:1-7.
  18. Szolovits P, Patil RS, Schwartz WB. Artificial intelligence in medical diagnosis. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:80-7.
  19. Patel BN, Rosenberg L, Willcox G, et al. Human–machine partnership with artificial intelligence for chest radiograph diagnosis. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:111. Erratum in: NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:129.
  20. Park W, Schwendicke F, Krois J, et al. Identification of dental implant systems using a large-scale multicenter data set. J Dent Res. 2023;102:727-33.
  21. Lee JH, Kim DH, Jeong SN. Diagnosis of cystic lesions using panoramic and cone beam computed tomographic images based on deep learning neural network. Oral Dis. 2020;26:152-8.
  22. Kurtulus IL, Lubbad M, Yilmaz OMD, et al. A robust deep learning model for the classification of dental implant brands. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024:101818.
  23. Chaurasia A, Namachivayam A, Koca-Ünsal RB, Lee J-H. Deep-learning performance in identifying and classifying dental implant systems from dental imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024;54:3-12.
  24. Hadj Saïd M, Le Roux M-K, Catherine J-H, Lan R. Development of an artificial intelligence model to identify a dental implant from a radiograph. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35:1077-82.
  25. Alakus TB, Turkoglu I. Comparison of deep learning approaches to predict COVID-19 infection. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020;140:110120.
  26. Shahbazian M, Vandewoude C, Wyatt J, Jacobs R. Comparative assessment of panoramic radiography and CBCT imaging for radiodiagnostics in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:293-300.
  27. Liao SM. Ethics of Artificial intelligence. In: Taylor j, Yudkowsky E, LaVictoire P, Critch A. Alignment for advanced machine learning systems. New York: Oxford University Press. 2016:342-82.