Dergiler / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Effect of off-axis osteotomy preparation and depth on intraosseous temperature during implant site preparation: an in vitro study

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-25
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These findings suggest that drilling geometry should be carefully considered during implant site preparation to help control temperature elevation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aims: Thermal trauma during implant site preparation may adversely affect bone vitality and compromise osseointegration.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Implant osteotomies were performed at three different off-axis osteotomy angulations (0°, 17°, and 30°) and four measurement depths (0, 9, 11, and 13 mm).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These findings suggest that drilling geometry should be carefully considered during implant site preparation to help control temperature elevation.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Dental implants · osteotomy · intraosseous temperature

Abstract

Aims: Thermal trauma during implant site preparation may adversely affect bone vitality and compromise osseointegration. Drilling parameters such as angulation and depth are considered important factors influencing heat generation in bone during implant surgery. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different off-axis osteotomy angulations and depths on intraosseous temperature changes during implant site preparation. Methods: This in vitro experimental study was conducted using fresh bovine femur cortical bone specimens. Implant osteotomies were performed at three different off-axis osteotomy angulations (0°, 17°, and 30°) and four measurement depths (0, 9, 11, and 13 mm). Temperature changes were recorded using K-type thermocouple sensors positioned 1 mm from the drilling site. Drilling was performed for a standardized duration under constant irrigation. The maximum temperature reached at each depth and angle was recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: The mean intraosseous temperature increased from 35.69°C, 35.68°C, and 35.79°C at baseline to 41.45°C, 41.86°C, and 42.37°C at 13 mm for the 0°, 17°, and 30° groups, respectively. Temperature increased significantly with depth in all groups (p<0.05), except between 11 and 13 mm in the 17° (p=0.091) and 30° (p=0.138) groups. At 11 and 13 mm, temperatures were significantly higher in the 17° and 30° groups than in the 0° group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, increased drilling angulation and depth were found to significantly elevate intraosseous temperature during implant site preparation. These findings suggest that drilling geometry should be carefully considered during implant site preparation to help control temperature elevation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yılmaz, T., Yanık, S. (2026). Effect of off-axis osteotomy preparation and depth on intraosseous temperature during implant site preparation: an in vitro study. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Volume: 7 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1900158

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (26)

  1. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Chuang SK, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(1):102-110.
  2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10(6):387-416. doi:10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4
  3. Gaviria L, Salcido JP, Guda T, Ong JL. Current trends in dental implants. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;40(2):50-60. doi:10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.50
  4. Bacci C, Lucchiari N, Frigo AC, et al. Temperatures generated during implant site preparation with conventional drilling versus single-drill method: an ex-vivo human mandible study. Minerva Stomatol. 2019; 68(6):277-284. doi:10.23736/s0026-4970.19.04142-6
  5. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T, Albrektsson B. Heat caused by drilling cortical bone. Temperature measured in vivo in patients and animals. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984;55(6):629-631. doi:10.3109/17453678408992410
  6. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(1):101-107. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(83)90174-9
  7. Mishra SK, Chowdhary R. Heat generated by dental implant drills during osteotomy-a review: heat generated by dental implant drills. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14(2):131-143. doi:10.1007/s13191-014-0350-6
  8. Bernabeu-Mira JC, Soto-Peñaloza D, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Camacho-Alonso F, Rivas-Ballester R, Peñarrocha-Oltra D. Low-speed drilling without irrigation versus conventional drilling for dental implant osteotomy preparation: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25(7):4251-4267. doi:10.1007/s00784-021-03939-z
  9. Salomó-Coll O, Auriol-Muerza B, Lozano-Carrascal N, Hernández-Alfaro F, Wang HL, Gargallo-Albiol J. Influence of bone density, drill diameter, drilling speed, and irrigation on temperature changes during implant osteotomies: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(3): 1047-1053. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03398-y
  10. Frösch L, Mukaddam K, Filippi A, Zitzmann NU, Kühl S. Comparison of heat generation between guided and conventional implant surgery for single and sequential drilling protocols-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(2):121-130. doi:10.1111/clr.13398
  11. Jang HJ, Yoon JU, Joo JY, Lee JY, Kim HJ. Effects of a simplified drilling protocol at 50 rpm on heat generation under water-free conditions: an in vitro study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2023;53(1):85-95. doi:10.5051/jpis.2201400070
  12. Sharawy M, Misch CE, Weller N, Tehemar S. Heat generation during implant drilling: the significance of motor speed. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60(10):1160-1169. doi:10.1053/joms.2002.34992
  13. Krekmanov L. Placement of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants in patients with severe bone deficiency: a clinical report of procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(5):722-730.
  14. Agliardi EL, Pozzi A, Stappert CF, Benzi R, Romeo D, Gherlone E. Immediate fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: a prospective clinical and radiological study after 3 years of loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(2):292-302. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00482.x
  15. Block MS, Haggerty CJ, Fisher GR. Nongrafting implant options for restoration of the edentulous maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(4): 872-881. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.10.008
  16. Harder S, Egert C, Wenz HJ, Jochens A, Kern M. Influence of the drill material and method of cooling on the development of intrabony temperature during preparation of the site of an implant. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51(1):74-78. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.02.003
  17. Brisman DL. The effect of speed, pressure, and time on bone temperature during the drilling of implant sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.1996;11(1):35-37.
  18. Jáni F, Köhler N, Lempel E, Szabó P, Möhlhenrich SC, Szalma J. Heat generation of autologous bone harvesting drills: an in vitro study. Sci Rep. 2026;16(1):5093. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-35988-3
  19. Chen YC, Hsiao HY, Tu YK, et al. Heat reduction during bone drilling using a two-stage drilling strategy. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):42344. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-26395-1
  20. Davidson SR, James DF. Measurement of thermal conductivity of bovine cortical bone. Med Eng Phys. 2000;22(10):741-747. doi:10.1016/s1350-4533(01)00003-0
  21. Eriksson RA, Albrektsson T, Magnusson B. Assessment of bone viability after heat trauma. A histological, histochemical and vital microscopic study in the rabbit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;18(3):261-268. doi:10.3109/02844318409052849
  22. Hein C, Inceoglu S, Juma D, Zuckerman L. Heat generation during bone drilling: a comparison between industrial and orthopaedic drill bits. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(2):e55-e59. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000723
  23. Karaca F, Aksakal B, Kom M. Influence of orthopaedic drilling parameters on temperature and histopathology of bovine tibia: an in vitro study. Med Eng Phys. 2011;33(10):1221-1227. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.05.013
  24. Möhlhenrich SC, Abouridouane M, Heussen N, Modabber A, Klocke F, Hölzle F. Influence of bone density and implant drill diameter on the resulting axial force and temperature development in implant burs and artificial bone: an in vitro study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;20(2):135-142. doi:10.1007/s10006-015-0536-z
  25. Gehrke SA, Aramburú Júnior JS, Pérez-Albacete Martínez C, Ramirez Fernandez MP, Maté Sánchez de Val JE, Calvo-Guirado JL. The influence of drill length and irrigation system on heat production during osteotomy preparation for dental implants: an ex vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(7):772-778. doi:10.1111/clr.12827
  26. Tur D, Giannis K, Unger E, Mittlböck M, Rausch-Fan X, Strbac GD. Thermal effects of various drill materials during implant site preparation-ceramic vs. stainless steel drills: a comparative in vitro study in a standardised bovine bone model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(2):154-166. doi:10.1111/clr.13685