Dergiler / HRÜ Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği ve Oral Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Investigation of the Effect of Osteotomies Performed Using the Osseodensification Technique on Heat Generation

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-08-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Due to the limited number of studies in the literature regarding osseodensification and angled drilling, we believe that further clinical and laboratory studies are needed to provide clearer information.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: The aim of our study is to compare the potential temperature differences in bone resulting from angled and straight drilling at different depths using the osseodensification method.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The osseodensification procedure was performed at a 0-degree angle in the first group, a 17-degree angle in the second group, and a 30-degree angle in the third group.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Due to the limited number of studies in the literature regarding osseodensification and angled drilling, we believe that further clinical and laboratory studies are needed to provide clearer information.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Implant · osseodensification · heat generation

Abstract

Background: The aim of our study is to compare the potential temperature differences in bone resulting from angled and straight drilling at different depths using the osseodensification method. Materials and Method: In our study, three different groups were formed to observe the effect of angle and depth on heat generation during osteotomy performed using the osseodensification technique. Each group consisted of four different depths. The osseodensification procedure was performed at a 0-degree angle in the first group, a 17-degree angle in the second group, and a 30-degree angle in the third group. In each group, osteotomies were performed at depths of 0, 9, 11, and 13 mm, respectively, and the resulting temperature values were measured in degrees Celsius. Results: No statistically significant differences in temperature values were observed among the 0°, 17°, and 30° drilling angle groups at depths of 0 mm and 9 mm (p>0.05). However, at drilling depths of 11 mm and 13 mm, the average temperature values in the 0° group were significantly lower than those in the 17° and 30° groups (p<0.05). In all groups, temperature values increased significantly as drilling depth increased. Despite these increases, all recorded temperatures remained below the critical threshold of 47°C associated with thermal bone injury. Conclusions: Based on these results, it was concluded that not only drilling depth but also drilling angle increases the heat generated in the bone. Due to the limited number of studies in the literature regarding osseodensification and angled drilling, we believe that further clinical and laboratory studies are needed to provide clearer information.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yanık, S., Yılmaz, T. (2026). Investigation of the Effect of Osteotomies Performed Using the Osseodensification Technique on Heat Generation. HRÜ Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği ve Oral Araştırmalar Dergisi, Volume: 6 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.61139/ijdor.1932247

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (22)

  1. Gayathri S. Osseodensification Technique – A Novel Bone Preservation Method to Enhance Implant Stability. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 2018;2(12):17-22.
  2. Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama H, Reingewirtz Y, Dubruille JH. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone- dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1998;43(2):192-203.
  3. Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A. Influence of Stepped Osteotomy on Primary Stability of Implants Inserted in Low-Density Bone Sites: An In Vitro Study. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2017;32(1):37-41.
  4. Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. A New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to Increase Bone Density in Low-Density Bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep. Implant Dentistry 2016;25(1):24-31.
  5. Huwais S, Meyer EG. A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32(1):27-36.
  6. Kanathila H, Pangi A. An Insight into the Concept of Osseodensification—Enhancing Implant Stability and Success. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2018;12:1-3.
  7. Mishra SK, Chowdhary R. Heat generated by dental implant drills during osteotomy—a review: heat generated by dental implant drills. Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society 2014;14(2):131-43.
  8. Bernabeu-Mira JC, Soto-Peñaloza D, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Camacho-Alonso F, Rivas-Ballester R, Peñarrocha-Oltra D. Low-speed drilling without irrigation versus conventional drilling for dental implant osteotomy preparation: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Investigations 2021;25(7):4251-67.
  9. Salomó-Coll O, Auriol-Muerza B, Lozano-Carrascal N, Hernández-Alfaro F, Wang H-L, Gargallo‐Albiol J. Influence of bone density, drill diameter, drilling speed, and irrigation on temperature changes during implant osteotomies: an in vitro study. Clinical Oral Investigations 2021;25:1-7.
  10. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1983;50(1):101-7.
  11. Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, Barboza Edos S. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2015;44(3):377-88.
  12. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T, Albrektsson B. Heat generated by drilling cortical bone. Temperature measurements in vivo in patients and animals. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1984;55(6):629-31.
  13. Şener BC, Dergin G, Gursoy B, Kelesoglu E, Slih I. Effects of irrigation temperature on heat control in vitro at different drilling depths. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2009;20(3):294-298.
  14. Davidson SR, James DF. Measurement of thermal conductivity of bovine cortical bone. Medical Engineering & Physics 2000;22(10):741-7.
  15. Möhlhenrich SC, Modabber A, Steiner T, Mitchell DA, Hölzle F. Heat generation and drill wear during dental implant site preparation: systematic review. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015;53(8):679-689.
  16. Laurito D, Lamazza L, Garreffa G, De Biase A. An alternative method to record rising temperatures during dental implant site preparation: a preliminary study using bovine bone. Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità 2010;46(4):405-10.
  17. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1985. p. 199–209.
  18. Işık G, Kafadar İA, Günbay T. The Concept of Osseodensification in the Primary Stability of Dental Implants. Journal of the Faculty of Dentistry, Atatürk University 2021;31(2):316-23.
  19. Bhargava N, Perrotti V, Caponio VCA, Matsubara VH, Patalwala D, Quaranta A. Comparison of heat production and bone architecture changes in the implant site preparation with compressive osteotomes, osseodensification technique, piezoelectric devices, and standard drills: an ex vivo study on porcine ribs. Odontology 2023;111:142-153.
  20. Del Fabbro M, Bellini CM, Romeo D, Francetti L. Tilted implants for the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: a systematic review. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2012;14(4):612-21.
  21. Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B. Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2001;3(1):39-49.
  22. Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Moss SM, Molina GJ. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the maxilla with up to 10 years of follow-up. Journal of the American Dental Association 2011;142(3):310-20.