Dergiler / ENT Updates / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

An Effective Option for the Repair of Facial Defects: V-Y Advancement Flaps and Modifications

Sayfa
284–291
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

They enable various modifications and the elevation of multiple flaps.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: V-Y advancement flaps are pliable local flaps that can be used in nearly every part of the body with relatively minimal technical difficulty.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The results of 38 patients who underwent 53 V-Y advancement flap facial reconstructions were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:They enable various modifications and the elevation of multiple flaps.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: V-Y advancement flaps are pliable local flaps that can be used in nearly every part of the body with relatively minimal technical difficulty. These flaps provide the best color and quality match, especially in the facial region. With effective planning, donor site morbidity can be acceptable, even on the face. Methods: The results of 38 patients who underwent 53 V-Y advancement flap facial reconstructions were analyzed retrospectively. The defects were evaluated according to their anatomical region, etiology, postoperative complications, and final aesthetic results. Results: V-Y advancement flaps were used for defects that were either not amenable to primary repair or had a high risk of cosmetic distortion. The defects were located in the cheek (9 patients), nasolabial fold (7 patients), nose (6 patients), forehead (5 patients), preauricular area (3 patients), infraorbital region (3 patients), lower lip (1 patients), gingivobuccal sulcus (2 patients), and medial canthal region (2 patients). In 32 patients, the primary pathology was malignant tumor (22 basal cell carcinomas, 9 epidermoid carcinomas, 1 malignant eccrine poroma). Etiologies of the other patients’ defects were benign tumors (n=2), traumatic wounds (n=2), and contractures (n=2). Conclusions: Despite the widespread use of V-Y flaps in surgical practice, the technique continues to demonstrate additional advantages, particularly in facial reconstruction. They are not only applicable for medium and small defects, but can be used for all defects with sufficient surrounding tissue. They enable various modifications and the elevation of multiple flaps.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEREBAŞINLIOĞLU, H., YILMAZ, S., UZUNOGLU, K. I. (2020). An Effective Option for the Repair of Facial Defects: V-Y Advancement Flaps and Modifications. ENT Updates, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 284–291. https://ajindex.com/articles/150764

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Rao JK, Shende KS. Overview of Local Flaps of the Face for Reconstruction of Cutaneous Malignancies: Single Institutional Experience of Seventy Cases. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2016;9:220-5
  2. Venkataramakrishnan V, Mohan D, Villafane O. Perforator based V-Y advancement flaps in the leg. Br J Plast Surg 1998;51:431-5
  3. Akan IM, Ulusoy MG, Bilen BT, Kapucu MR. Modified bilateral advancement flap: the slide-in flap. Ann Plast Surg 1999;42:545-8
  4. Emmett AJ. The closure of defects by using adjacent triangular flaps with subcutaneous pedicles. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;59:45-52
  5. Ulusoy MG, Akan IM, Sensöz O, Ozdemir R. Bilateral, extended V-Y advancement flap. Ann Plast Surg 2001;46:5-8
  6. Ichioka S, Okabe K, Tsuji S, Ohura N, Nakatsuka T. Distal perforator-based fasciocutaneous V-Y flap for treatment of sacral pressure ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:906-9
  7. Kimyai-Asadi A, Goldberg LH. Island pedicle flap. Dermatol Clin 2005;23:113-27
  8. Sugg KB, Cederna PS, Brown DL. The V-Y advancement flap is equivalent to the Mustardé flap for ectropion prevention in the reconstruction of moderate-size lid-cheek junction defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:28-36
  9. Menick FJ. Defects of the nose, lip, and cheek: rebuilding the composite defect. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:887-98
  10. Kalus R, Zamora S. Aesthetic considerations in facial reconstructive surgery: the V-Y flap revisited. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1996;20:83-6
  11. Chang JW, Lim JH, Lee JH. Reconstruction of midface defects using local flaps: an algorithm for appropriate flap choice. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:18021
  12. Hintschich C. Correction of entropion and ectropion. Dev Ophthalmol 2008;41:85-102
  13. Robinson JK. Suspension sutures in facial reconstruction. Dermatol Surg 2003;29:386-93
  14. Harris GJ, Perez N. Anchored flaps in post-Mohs reconstruction of the lower eyelid, cheek, and lateral canthus: avoiding eyelid distortion. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;19:5-13
  15. Hudson DA, Quarmby C, Ndobe E. A suture suspension technique to prevent ectropion after flap transposition from the neck to the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:1692-5
  16. Salasche SJ, Jarchow R, Feldman BD, Devine-Rust MJ, Adnot J. The suspension suture. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1987;13:973-8
  17. Hayano SM, Whipple KM, Korn BS, Kikkawa DO. Principles of Periocular Reconstruction following Excision of Cutaneous Malignancy. J Skin Cancer 2012;2012:438502
  18. Czyz CN, Cahill KV, Foster JA, Michels KS, Clark CM, Rich