KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

YERİNDE VE KLİNİK SİMÜLASYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN KANSER HEMŞİRELİĞİ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN EKSTRAVAZASYON YÖNETİMİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI: RANDOMİZE KONTROLLÜ ÇALIŞMA

COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF THE IN SITU SIMULATION AND SIMULATED CLINICAL IMMERSION METHODS ON CANCER NURSING STUDENTS’ EXTRAVASATION MANAGEMENT: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Vildan Kocatepe(İZMİR DEMOKRASİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6928-6818
Yasemin Uslu(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-5727-3753
Vesile Ünver(ACIBADEM UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-2892-9503
Ayşin Kayış(ACIBADEM UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4254-4861
Ükke Karabacak(ACIBADEM UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-1696-2779
Mehmet Emin Aksoy(ACIBADEM UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-3227-2660
Sayfa
348–359
Yayın Tarihi
2023-09-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Maliyet etkinliği ve imkanlar göz önüde bulundurularak her iki simülasyon yöntemi de kullanılabilir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Yerinde simülasyonun gerçek bir klinik ortamda gerçekleşmesi dolayısıyla iyi bir öğrenme ortamı sağladığı düşünülmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Yerinde ve klinik simülasyon yöntemlerinin kanser hemşireliği öğrencilerinin ekstravazasyon yönetimi üzerine etkisinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla gerçekleştirildi.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Maliyet etkinliği ve imkanlar göz önüde bulundurularak her iki simülasyon yöntemi de kullanılabilir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Simülasyon · yerinde simülasyon · klinik benzetimli simülasyon

Özet

Yerinde simülasyonun gerçek bir klinik ortamda gerçekleşmesi dolayısıyla iyi bir öğrenme ortamı sağladığı düşünülmektedir. Yerinde ve klinik simülasyon yöntemlerinin kanser hemşireliği öğrencilerinin ekstravazasyon yönetimi üzerine etkisinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla gerçekleştirildi. Araştırma, randomize kontrollü öntest-sontest karşılaştırmalı desende yürütüldü. Katılımcılar, simüle edilmiş Klinik Simülasyon Grubuna (n=19) veya Yerinde Simülasyon Grubuna (n=24) rastgele atandı. Çalışma verileri Ekstravazasyon Yönetimi Bilgi Testi, Öğrenci Memnuniyeti ve Kendine Güven Ölçeği, Durumluk Kaygı Envanteri ve Objektif Yapılandırılmış Klinik Değerlendirme kullanılarak toplandı. Klinik Simülasyon ve Yerinde Simülasyon gruplarındaki katılımcıların uygulama öncesi ve sonrası bilgi düzeyi ve kaygı puan ortalamaları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptanmadı (p˃.05). Her iki grupta uygulama sonrası memnuniyet ve özgüven puan ortalamaları benzerdi. Her iki simülasyon tabanlı öğrenme ortamında da öğrencilerin bilgi, beceri, kaygı, özgüven ve doyumları benzerdi. Yerinde simülasyonun hemşirelik eğitiminde kullanılması önerilebilir. Maliyet etkinliği ve imkanlar göz önüde bulundurularak her iki simülasyon yöntemi de kullanılabilir.

Abstract

In situ simulation is thought to offer a good learning environment due to the fact that it is carried out in real clinical practice. This study was performed to compare the effect of in situ simulation and simulated clinical immersion environment on cancer nursing students extravasation management. The study was carried out with a randomized controlled pretest-posttest comparative design. The participants were randomly assigned to either the simulated clinical immersion group (n=19) or the in situ simulation group (n=24). The study data were collected using Extravasation Management Knowledge Test, Objective Structured Clinical Assessment, Students’ Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Scale and the State Anxiety Inventory. The pre-posttest mean scores for the knowledge level and anxiety mean scores of the participants in the simulated clinical immersion group and the in situ group were not statistically significant (p˃.05). The satisfaction and self-confidence scale mean scores and the skill levels of the students in both settings were similar after the implementation (p˃.05). The students' knowledge, skills, anxiety, self-confidence and satisfaction were similar in both simulation-based learning environments. In situ simulation can be recommended for use in nursing education. Considering cost-effectiveness and resources, both simulation methods can be used.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kocatepe, V., Uslu, Y., Ünver, V., Kayış, A., Karabacak, Ü., Aksoy, M. E. (2023). YERİNDE VE KLİNİK SİMÜLASYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN KANSER HEMŞİRELİĞİ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN EKSTRAVAZASYON YÖNETİMİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI: RANDOMİZE KONTROLLÜ ÇALIŞMA. Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 348–359. https://doi.org/10.52538/iduhes.1327570

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (35)

  1. Abe, Y., Kawahara, C., Yamashina, A., and Tsuboi, R. (2013). Repeated scenario simulation to improve competency in critical care: a new approach for nursing education. Am J Crit Care, 22(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2013229
  2. Auerbach, M., Roney, L., Aysseh, A., Gawel, M., Koziel, J., Barre, K., Caty, M.G., Santucci, K. (2014). In situ pediatric trauma simulation: Assessing the impact and feasibility of an interdisciplinary pediatric in situ trauma care quality improvement simulation program. Pediatr Emerg Care, 30(12), 884-891. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000000297
  3. Berragan, L. (2011). Simulation: an effective pedagogical approach for nursing? Nurse Educ Today, 31(7), 660-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.019
  4. Bierer, J., Memu, E., Leeper, R., Fortin, D., Fréchette, E., Inculet, R., and Malthaner, R. (2018). development of an in-situ thoracic surgery crisis simulation focused on non-technical skill training. Ann Thorac Surg, 106(1), 287-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.058
  5. Brydges, R., Carnahan, H., Dubrowski, A., Pollex, H., and Mallette, C. (2012). Evaluating the influence of goal setting on intravenous catheterization skill acquisition and transfer in a hybrid simulation training context. Simul Healthc, 7(4), 236-242. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e31825993f2
  6. Committee, I. S. (2016). INACSL Standards of Best Practice: Simulation SM Simulation Glossary. Clin Simul Nurs, 12, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.012
  7. Connor, T. H., and McDiarmid, M. A. (2006). Preventing occupational exposures to antineoplastic drugs in health care settings. CA Cancer J Clin, 56(6), 354-365. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.56.6.354
  8. Couto, T. B., Kerrey, B. T., Taylor, R. G., FitzGerald, M., and Geis, G. L. (2015). Teamwork skills in actual, in situ, and in-center pediatric emergencies: performance levels across settings and perceptions of comparative educational impact. Simul Healthc, 10(2), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000081
  9. Diehl-Svrjcek, B. C., Dawson, B., and Duncan, L. L. (2007). Infusion nursing: aspects of practice liability. J Infus Nurs, 30(5), 274-279. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAN.0000292569.24645.41
  10. Dychter, S. S., Gold, D. A., Carson, D., and Haller, M. (2012). Intravenous therapy: a review of complications and economic considerations of peripheral access. J Infus Nurs, 35(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0b013e31824237ce
  11. Francoeur, C., Shea, S., Ruddy, M., Fontela, P., Bhanji, F., Razack, S., Gottesman, R. Di Genova, T. (2018). It takes a village to move a hospital: Simulation improves intensive care team preparedness for a move to a new site. Hosp Pediatr, 8(3), 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2017-0112
  12. Grierson, L. E. M. (2014). Information processing, specificity of practice, and the transfer of learning: considerations for reconsidering fidelity. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 19(2), 281-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9504-x
  13. Hicks, F., Coke, L., and Li, S. (2009). The Effect of high-fidelity simulation on nursing students’ knowledge and performance: A Pilot Study. National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN®).
  14. Jeffries, P., and McNelis, A. (2010). Evaluation. In: W. Nehring and F. Lashley (Eds.), High fidelity patient simulation in nursing education. John and Bartlett Publishers, Boston, pp. 405-420
  15. Jeffries, P., and Rizzolo, M. A. (2006). Designing and implementing models for the innovative use of usingsimulation to teach nursing care of Ill adults and children: A national, multi-site, multi-method study. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
  16. Judd, B. K., Alison, J. A., Waters, D., and Gordon, C. J. (2016). Comparison of psychophysiological stress in physiotherapy students undertaking simulation and hospital-based clinical education. Simulation in Healthcare, 11(4), 271-277. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000155
  17. Keleekai, N., Schuster, C., Murray, C., King, M., Stahl, B., Labrozzi, L., Gallucci, S., LeClair M.W., Glover, K. (2016). Improving nurses' peripheral intravenous catheter insertion knowledge, confidence, and skills using a simulation-based blended learning program: a randomized trial. Simul Healthc, 11(6), 376. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000186
  18. Khalaila, R. (2014). Simulation in nursing education: An evaluation of students' outcomes at their first clinical practice combined with simulations. Nurse Educ Today, 34(2), 252-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.08.015
  19. Kunst, E., Mitchell, M., and Johnston, A. (2017). Using simulation to improve the capability of undergraduate nursing students in mental health care. Nurse Educ Today, 50, 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.012 Kusler-Jensen, J. (2014). Cardiac emergency simulation: drilling for success in the ambulatory setting. AORN journal, 99(3), 385-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2013.09.014
  20. Lapkin, S., Levett-Jones, T., Bellchambers, H., and Fernandez, R. (2010). Effectiveness of patient simulation manikins in teaching clinical reasoning skills to undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review. Clin Simul Nurs, 6(6), e207-e222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.05.005.
  21. Lubbers, J., and Rossman, C. (2017). Satisfaction and self-confidence with nursing clinical simulation: Novice learners, medium-fidelity, and community settings. Nurse Educ Today, 48, 140-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.10.010
  22. Luctkar-Flude, M., Wilson-Keates, B., and Larocque, M. (2012). Evaluating High-fidelity Human Simulators and Standardized Patients in an Undergraduate Nursing Health Assessment Course. Nurse Educ Today, 32(4), 448-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.011
  23. McGuire, K., and Lorenz, R. (2018). Effect of Simulation on Learner Stress as Measured by Cortisol: An Integrative Review. Nurse Educ, 43(1), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000393
  24. McLaughlin, C. M., Wieck, M. M., Barin, E. N., Rake, A., Burke, R. V., Roesly, H. B., Young, L. C., Chang, T. P., Cleek, E.A., Morton, I., Goodhue, C. J., Burd, R. S., Ford, H. R., Upperman, J. S., Jensen A. R. (2018). Impact of simulation-based training on perceived provider confidence in acute multidisciplinary pediatric trauma resuscitation. Pediatr Surg Int, 34(12), 1353-1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4361-y
  25. Murray, C., Grant, M., Howarth, M., and Leigh, J. (2008). The use of simulation as a teaching and learning approach to support practice learning. Nurse Educ Pract, 8(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2007.08.001 Oner Altıok, H., and Ustun, B. (2013). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin stres kaynakları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(2), 747-766.
  26. Reynolds, P. M., MacLaren, R., Mueller, S. W., Fish, D. N., and Kiser, T. H. (2014). Management of extravasation injuries: a focused evaluation of noncytotoxic medications. Pharmacotherapy, 34(6), 617-632. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1396
  27. Shin, S., Park, J., and Kim, J. (2015). Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today, 35(1), 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.009
  28. Sørensen, J. L., Van der Vleuten, C., Lindschou, J., Gluud, C., Østergaard, D., LeBlanc, V., Johansen, M., Eleund, K., Albrechtsen, C.K., Pedersen, B.W., Kjaergaard, H., Weikop, P., Ottosen, B. (2013). 'In situ simulation'versus' off site simulation'in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 14(1), 220. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-220
  29. Sundler, A., Pettersson, A., and Berglund, M. (2015). Undergraduate nursing students' experiences when examining nursing skills in clinical simulation laboratories with high-fidelity patient simulators: a phenomenological research study. Nurse Educ Today, 35(12), 1257-1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.04.008
  30. Tuzer, H., Dinc, L., and Elcin, M. (2016). The effects of using high-fidelity simulators and standardized patients on the thorax, lung, and cardiac examination skills of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today, 45, 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.07.002
  31. Unver, V., Basak, T., Tastan, S., Kok, G., Guvenc, G., Demirtas, A., Ayhan, H., Köse, G., Iyigun, E., and Tosune, N. (2018). Analysis of the effects of high-fidelity simulation on nursing students’ perceptions of their preparedness for disasters. Int Emerg Nurs, 38, 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2018.03.002
  32. Unver, V., Basak, T., Watts, P., Gaioso, V., Moss, J., Tastan, S., Iyigun, E., and Tosun, N. (2017). The reliability and validity of three questionnaires: The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale, Simulation Design Scale, and Educational Practices Questionnaire. Contemp Nurse, 53(1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2017.1282319
  33. Villemure, C., Tanoubi, I., Georgescu, L. M., Dubé, M. A., and Houle, J. (2016). An integrative review of in situ simulation training: Implications for critical care nurses. Can J Crit Care Nurs, 2, 23.
  34. Walker, S. T., Sevdalis, N., McKay, A., Lambden, S., Gautama, S., Aggarwal, R., and Vincent, C. (2013). Unannounced in situ simulations: integrating training and clinical practice. BMJ Qual Saf, 22(6), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000986
  35. Hicks, F., Coke, L., and Li, S. (2009). The Effect of high-fidelity simulation on nursing students’ knowledge and performance: A Pilot Study. National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN®).