KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Energy and Smart Grid / 2024 / Volume: 9 Issue: 1

MODELLING AND EXERGETIC TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A SYSTEM FOR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION FROM EMPTY BANANA FRUIT BUNCH

Akpaduado John(Federal University of Petroleum Resources, Effurun, Nigeria)0000-0002-8220-7093
Joseph Oyekale(Federal university of petroleum resources Effurun Delta State Nigeria)0000-0003-4018-4660
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2024-12-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Further studies may concentrate on how to reduce CO through regulated temperature and pressure differences so as to increase the quantity of hydrogen production.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:One of the most effective and reliable methods for generating hydrogen fuel using biomass is the gasification method.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study investigated the feasibility of hydrogen from Empty Banana Fruit Bunch (EBFB) biomass and the energetic techno-economic analyses of biomass gasification plant with a developed system simulation model aspen plus simulator V11.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Further studies may concentrate on how to reduce CO through regulated temperature and pressure differences so as to increase the quantity of hydrogen production.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Biomass gasification · sensitivity analysis · empty banana fruit bunch

Abstract

One of the most effective and reliable methods for generating hydrogen fuel using biomass is the gasification method. However, utilization of different biomass feedstock has the ability to withstand production of syngas which can be utilized for several applications. The study investigated the feasibility of hydrogen from Empty Banana Fruit Bunch (EBFB) biomass and the energetic techno-economic analyses of biomass gasification plant with a developed system simulation model aspen plus simulator V11. Five chemical reactions were used in production process and were simulated in ASPEN Plus simulator through biomass gasification method which aimed in removing C, CO, CO2, CH4, and H2O to convert them into hydrogen gas. However, the total exergy out divided by the total exergy in gives exergy efficiency. Hence, total exergy out subtracted from total exergy in depicts exergy destruction. The exego-economic method utilized in the exergo-economic analyses is the Specific Cost method (SPECO). The results affirmed that 80.465 kg/hr of H2 can be produced from 2000 kg/hr of empty banana fruit bunch at every 39.92 k.mol/hr mole flow of EBFB. However, at a temperature below 900 0C CO decreases, CO2 increases. Above 1000 0C, CO increases hence decreases CO2 emission. The system total exergy in, total exergy out, percentage exergy efficiency, and exergy destruction are 4534.77 kJ/kg, 3857.295 kJ/kg, 0.8506 %, and 677.475 kJ/kg. Hence, system exergy stream cost rate, component-related cost rate, component-related cost difference, and component exergoeconomic factor are 407527.644$/h 1555.57$/h, 0.5679%, and 0.9089% respectively. Further studies may concentrate on how to reduce CO through regulated temperature and pressure differences so as to increase the quantity of hydrogen production.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

John, A., Oyekale, J. (2024). MODELLING AND EXERGETIC TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A SYSTEM FOR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION FROM EMPTY BANANA FRUIT BUNCH. International Journal of Energy and Smart Grid, Volume: 9 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.55088/ijesg.1449194

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (28)

  1. AlZahrani, A. A., & Dincer, I. Integrated solar-based hydrogen extraction analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(19), 8042–8056. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.103
  2. Amao, Y., Sakai, Y., &Takahara, S. Hydrogen Extraction from Solar via a cellulose biomass with an enzymatic system. Chemical Research Intermediates, 42(11), 7753–7759. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-016-26602
  3. Arzate Salgado, S. Y., Ramírez Zamora, R. M., Zanella, R., Peral, J., Malato, S., & Maldonado, M. I. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Foreign Energy Journal,41(28), 11933–11940. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.039
  4. Bing, L. B., Chandrasekaran, P., Francis Xavier, V. D. C. S., Rajput, H. W., Ann, C. L., Mubarak, N. M., & Lau, S. Y. Hydrogen Extraction through Agricultural Solid Residue in Malaysia utilizing Aspen Plus Engineering Tool. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 11(4), 1403–1419. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0470-z
  5. Boudries, R. Techno-economic Assessment of Solar Hydrogen Production Using CPV-electrolysis Systems. Energy Procedia, 93, 96–101. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.155
  6. Boualati, Y., &Saouli, S. Experimental Study of Hydrogen Production Using Solar Energy in Ouargla (South East Algeria). Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 140(3). 2018. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039332
  7. Brynjarsdottir, H., Scully, S. M., &Orlygsson, J. Hydrogen Extraction through biohydrogen and lignocellulosic biomass. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(34), 14467–14475. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.005
  8. Cabezas, M. D., Franco, J. I., &Fasoli, H. J. Optimization of self-regulated hydrogen production from photovoltaic energy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(17), 10391–10397. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.203
  9. Dimroth, F., Peharz, G., Wittstadt, U., Hacker, B., & Bett, A. W. (n.d.). A PV concentrator using iii-v multi-junction solar cells for hydrogen.
  10. Demirbas, A. Hydrogen through water gasification. Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 32(14), 1342–1354. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567030802654038
  11. Ganeshan, I. S., Manikandan, V. V. S., Ram Sundhar, V., Sajiv, R., Shanthi, C., Kottayil, S. K., & Ramachandran, T.Regulated hydrogen production using a solar-powered electrolyzer. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,41(24), 10322–10326. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.048
  12. Hossain, M. A., Jewaratnam, J., & Ganesan, P. The prospect of hydrogen production through oil palm biomass – A review. In International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (Vol. 41, Issue 38, pp. 16637–16655. 2016. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.104
  13. Kalinci, Y., Hepbasli, A., & Dincer, I. Hydrogen Life Cycle Assessment through Biomass. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(19), 14026–14039. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.06.015
  14. khanmohammadi, S., & Saadat-Targhi, M. Integrated system solar energy through waste food. Energy, 171, 1066–1076. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.096
  15. Chen, J., Lu, Y., Guo, L., Zhang, X., & Xiao, P.Supercritical Hydrogen Extraction via Biomass.International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(13), 7134–7141. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.023
  16. Marcantonio, V., de Falco, M., Capocelli, M., Bocci, E., Colantoni, A., &Villarini, M. Fluidized bed reactor with different separation systems. Foreign Energy, 44(21), 10350–10360. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.121
  17. Ma, Z., Zhang, S. P., Xie, D. Y., & Yan, Y. J.Novel hydrogen extraction via biomass energy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(3), 1274–1279. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.146
  18. Müller, S., Stidl, M., Pröll, T., Rauch, R., &Hofbauer, H. Biomass hydrogen: Large-scale hydrogen production based on a dual fluidized bed steam gasification system. Biorefinery, 1(1), 55–61. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-011-0004-4
  19. Xu, C., Chen, S., Soomro, A., Sun, Z., & Xiang, W.Hydrogen-rich syngas production through gasification of biomass. Journal of the Energy Institute, 91(6), 805–816. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2017.10.014
  20. Zamfirescu, C., & Dincer, I. Assessment of a new integrated solar energy system for hydrogen production. Solar Energy, 107, 700–713. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.05.036
  21. Zhang, L., Li, F., Sun, B., & Zhang, C. Intensified optimization design, and coupled power system. Energies, 12(4). 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12040687
  22. Samuel, O. D., Aigba, P. A., Tran, T. K., Fayaz, H., Pastore, C., Der, O., Erçetin, A., Enweremadu, C. C., & Mustafa, A. Comparison of the Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment of Hydrodynamic Cavitation and Mechanical Stirring Reactors for the Production of Sustainable Hevea brasiliensis Ethyl Ester. Sustainability, 15(23), 16287. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316287
  23. Kitegi, M. S. P., Lare, Y., & Coulibaly, O. Potential for Green Hydrogen Production from Biomass, Solar, and Wind in Togo. Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, 13(02), 17–27. 2022. https://doi.org/10.4236/sgre.2022.132002
  24. Kumar, M., Oyedun, A. O., & Kumar, A. A comparative analysis of hydrogen production from the thermochemical conversion of algal biomass. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(21), 10384–10397. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.220
  25. Li, D., Ishikawa, C., Koike, M., Wang, L., Nakagawa, Y., &Tomishige, K. Renewable Hydrogen-supported Co catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(9),3572–3581. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.057
  26. Liu, Q., Bai, Z., Wang, X., Lei, J., &Jin, H. Investigation of thermodynamic performances for two solar-biomass hybrid combined cycle power generation systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 122, 252–262. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.05.080
  27. Sakr, I. M., Abdelsalam, A. M., & El-Askary, W. A. Electrode demerit on hydrogen extraction via solar. Energy, 140, 625–632. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.019
  28. Salkuyeh, Y. K., Saville, B. A., & MacLean, H. L.Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment hydrogen through biomass. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(20), 9514–9528. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.024