KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Comparison of Problem Posing Skills of Gifted and Non-gifted Primary School Students

Tuba Aydoğdu İskenderoğlu(TRABZON ÜNİVERSİTESİ;FATİH EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-6282-9100
Ergün Yurtbakan(Science and Art Center)0000-0001-8811-6320
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2023-03-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

At the end of the study; while there was no statistical significance between gifted and non-gifted primary school students in free and semi-structured problem posing, it was found that non-gifted primary school students were statistically significantly better than gifted primary school students in structured problem posing.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to compare the problem posing skills of gifted and non-gifted primary school students.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The participants who were selected by convenient sampling consisted of 24 gifted and 24 non-gifted students attending from East of Blacksea region of Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:At the end of the study; while there was no statistical significance between gifted and non-gifted primary school students in free and semi-structured problem posing, it was found that non-gifted primary school students were statistically significantly better than gifted primary school students in structured problem posing.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Gifted and non-gifted · Primary school students · Problem posing

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the problem posing skills of gifted and non-gifted primary school students. As a quantitative research method, relational survey model was used for the research. The participants who were selected by convenient sampling consisted of 24 gifted and 24 non-gifted students attending from East of Blacksea region of Turkey. The data in the study were collected with an open-ended problem posing test which was developed by the researchers. This test consisting of 3 situations requiring free, semi-structured and structured problem posing. The data were evaluated according to the problem posing test evaluation form which was developed by the researchers. At the end of the study; while there was no statistical significance between gifted and non-gifted primary school students in free and semi-structured problem posing, it was found that non-gifted primary school students were statistically significantly better than gifted primary school students in structured problem posing.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İskenderoğlu, T. A., Yurtbakan, E. (2023). Comparison of Problem Posing Skills of Gifted and Non-gifted Primary School Students. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, Volume: 10 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1185364

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (66)

  1. Abu-Elwan, R. (2002). Effectıveness of problem posing strategies on prospective mathematics teachers’ problem solving performance. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 25(1), 56-69.
  2. Aktan, O. (2020). Investigation of primary school mathematics curriculum lesson acquisitions according to renewed Bloom taxonomy. PAU Journal of Education, 48, 15-36. doi: 10.9779/pauefd.523545
  3. Alzahrani, A. A. (2021). Exploring differences in mathematical creative potential and problem-posing in gifted and non-gifted middle school students. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/4162
  4. Arıkan, E. E., & Ünal, H. (2013). The analysis of mathematical problem posing skill of elementary second grade students. Amasya Education Journal, 2(2), 305-325.
  5. Atalay, Ö., & Güveli, Ö. (2017). Examination of problem posing abilities using computer animations on fractions in the 4th grade students. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(2), 192-220.
  6. Bevan, D., & Capraro, M. M. (2021). Posing creative problems: A study of elementary students’ mathematics understanding. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0654. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11109
  7. Bulut, F., & Serin, M. K. (2020). The relationship between story writing and problem posing skills of the 4th grade primary school students. Education & Technology, 2(1), 16-28.
  8. Bulut, A. S., Yıldız, A. & Baltacı, S. (2020). A Comparison of mathematics learning approaches of gifted and non-gifted students. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 11(2), 461-491.
  9. Cai, J., Hwang, S., Jiang, C., & Silber, S. (2015). Problem posing research in mathematics: some answered and unanswered questions. In F. M. Singer, N. Ellerton & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614- 6258-3_1
  10. Can, D., & Yıldız, H. N. (2021). An analysis of primary school students’ problem posing skills including addition and subtraction operations. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Education Journal, 21(2), 416-433. https://dx.doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2021.21.62826-779433
  11. Chapman, O. (2006). Classroom practices for context of mathematics word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 211- 230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-7834-1
  12. Christidamayani, A. P., & Kristanto, Y. D. (2020). The effects of problem posing learning model on students’ learning achievement and motivation. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 2(2), 100-108.
  13. Çarkçı, İ. (2016). Examining the problems posed by 4th grade primary school students for different problem posing situations (Unpublished master's thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.
  14. Çetin, A., & Doğan, A. (2018). Problems that mathematics teachers encounter in science and art centers. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 19(4), 615-641. doi:10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.370355
  15. Çitil, M. (2018). Evaluation of gifted students’ education policy in Turkey. Journal of National Education, 1, 143-172.
  16. Dae-Hyun, P. ve Jinhee, Y. (2010). Problem posing mathematically gifted middle school students:A case study. Journal of Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics School Mathematics, 12(3), 259-271.
  17. Daher, W. & Anabousy, A. (2018). Creativity of pre-service teachers in problem posing. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2929-2945.
  18. Dölek, S., & Çalışkan, M. (2018). Investigation of problem solving and posing activities of primary school fourth grade students. TAY Journal, 2(2), 130-147.
  19. English, L. D. (1997). The development of fifth-grade children’s problem- posing abilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 34(3), 183–217.
  20. Erdoğan, F., & Gül, N. (2020). An investigation of mathematical problem posing skills of gifted students. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 10(3), 655-696. http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.022
  21. Espinoza, J., Lupiáñez J. L., & Segovia, I. (2013). Características del talento matemático asociadas a la invención de problemas. Revista Científica, número especial octubre 2013, 190-195.
  22. Espinoza, J., Lupiáñez, J. L., & Segovia, I. (2016). The posing of arithmetic problems by mathematically talented students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 14(2), 368-392.
  23. Gavin, M. K., & Casa, T. M. (2012). Nurturing young student mathematicians. Gifted Education International, 29(2), 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429412447711
  24. Gürel, R. & Yetkin-özdemir, İ. E. (2019). Investigation of gifted and non-gifted middle school students’ mathematics anxiety levels. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 52, 261-286.
  25. Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners, grades 3-12. ABD: Free Spirit Publishing.
  26. Holton, D., & Gaffney, M. (1994). Teaching talented students. In J. Neyland (Eds.), Mathematics education: A handbook for teacher, (pp. 397- 409). Wellington, New Zealand: Wellington College of Education.
  27. İnan, E. (2019). An activity sample of differentiated maths programme for the gifted students. Journal of Science Harmony, 2(2), 15-23.
  28. Karasar, N. (2011). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
  29. Kartal, E. (2017). Examining the skills of solving and posing symbolic, numerical and verbal problems of fourth grade students (Unpublished master's thesis). Eskisehir Osmangazi University.
  30. Kılıç, Ç., (2011). Examining the problem posing studies included in the primary education mathematics lesson (1-5 grades) curriculum. Journal of Mersin University Faculty of Education, 7(2), 54-65.
  31. Kim C., & Hodges, C. B. (2012). Effects of an emotion control treatment on academic emotions, motivation and achievement in an online mathematics course. Instr Sci, 40, 173–192.
  32. Koçak, R., & İçmenoğlu, E. (2016). Emotional intelligence and creativity as predictors of life satisfaction among gifted students. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(37), 73-85.
  33. Kwon, H., & Capraro, M. M. (2021). Nurturing problem posing in young children: using multiple representation within students’ realworld ınterest. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0648. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11066
  34. Leana-Taşçılar, M. Z. ve Cinan, S. (2012). Üstün-zekâlı ve normal-zekâlı çocuklarda yönetsel işlevler: londra kulesi testi [Administrative functions in gifted and normal-intelligent children: Tower of London test]. Studies in Psychology, 32(1), 13-30.
  35. Maker, C. J., & Nielson, A. B. (1995). Teaching models in education of the gifted (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
  36. Manuel, D., & Freiman, V. (2017). Differentiating instruction using a virtual environment: a study of mathematical problem posing among gifted and talented learners. Global Education Review, 4(1), 78-97.
  37. Maria, R. (2014). Gifted children and their problems. Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 297-301.
  38. Mingus, T., & Grassl, R. (1999). What constitutes a nurturing environment for the growth of mathematically gifted students? School Sciences and Mathematics, 99(6), 286-293.
  39. Nardone, C. F., & Lee, R. G. (2011). Critical inquiry across the disciplines: Stategies for student generated problem posing. College Teaching, 59(1), 13-22.
  40. Özçakır-Sümen, Ö. (2021). Investigation of fourth grade students’ problem posing skills. Journal of Erzincan University Faculty of Education, 23(2), 378-393.
  41. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 325–344.
  42. Peng, A., Cao, L., & Yu, B. (2021). Reciprocal learning in mathematics problem posing and problem solving: an ınteractive study between canadian and chinese elementary school students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), 1-13.
  43. Plunkett, M., & Kronborg, L. (2011). Learning to be a teacher of the gifted: The importance of examining opinions and challenging misconceptions. Gifted and Talented International, 26(1-2), 31-46.
  44. Rizvi, N. F. (2004). Prospective teachers ability to pose word problems. International Journal For Mathematics Teaching And Learning, 12, 1-22.
  45. Roznowski, M., Hong, S., & Reith, J. (2000). A Further Look at Youth Intellectual Giftedness And Its Correlates: Values, Interests, Performance, And Behavior. Intelligence, (28), pp. 87–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(99)00032-X.
  46. Rudnitsky, A., Etheredge, S., Freeman, S. J. M., & Gilbert, T. (1995). Learning to solve addition and subtraction word problems through a structure-plus-writing approach. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(5), 467-486.
  47. Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the learning of mathematics, 14(1), 19-28.
  48. Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N., & Cai, J. (2013). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: New questions and directions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 1–7.
  49. Sowell, E. J., Zeigler, A. J., Bergwell, L., & Cartwright, R. M. (1990). Identification and description of mathematically gifted students: A review of empirical research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 147-154.
  50. Stuart T., & Beste, A. (2011). Farklı olduğumu biliyordum: Üstün yeteneklileri anlayabilmek. Ankara: Kök yayıncılık.
  51. Tertemiz-Işık, N. (2017). İlkokul öğrencilerinin dört işlem becerisine dayalı kurdukları problemlerin incelenmesi [Examining the problems posed by primary school students based on four operation skills]. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(1), 1-25.
  52. Toheri, Winarso, W., & Abdul Haqq, A. (2020). Where exactly for enhance critical and creative thinking: The use of problem posing or contextual learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 877-887. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujer.9.2.877
  53. Tomlinson, C. A., & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools & classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  54. Upu, H. (2003). Problem posing dan problem solving dalam pembelajaran matematika. Bandung: Pustaka Ramadhan.
  55. Vaivre-Douret, L. (2011). Developmental and cognitive characteristics of “High-level potentialities” (highly gifted) children. International Journal of Pediatrics, Article ID: 420297.
  56. Wang, H. Y., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). Matematikte üstün yetenekli öğrenciler ile ortalama öğrenciler arasında proje tabanlı bilgisayar programlama etkinliklerinin etkilerinin karşılaştırılması. J. Bilgisayar Eğitim, 3, 33–45.
  57. Worrell, F., Subotnik, R., Dixon, D., & Dixson, D. (2019). Gifted students. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 551-576.
  58. Yetim-Karaca, S., & Türk, T. (2020). The evaluation of secondary school mathematics curriculum according to teachers' views in terms of education of gifted students. Türk Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 241-279.
  59. Yıldırım, D. T. (2016). Üstün yetenekliler için değerler eğitimi dersinin önemi [The importance of values education for the gifted students]. Current Research in Education, 2(2), 99-120.
  60. Yıldız, A., Baltacı, S., Kurak, Y., & Güven, B. (2012). Examining the usage of problem-solving strategies by the eighth grade gifted and non-gifted students. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 25(1), 123-143.
  61. Yurtbakan, E., & Aydoğdu-İskenderoğlu, T. (2022). The effect of organization and reading comprehension skills of primary school fourth grade students on mathematical problem solving and posing skills. Manas Journal of Social Studies, 11(3), 958-972.
  62. Yurtbakan, E., & Aydoğdu-İskenderoğlu, T. (2020). The effect of dialogic reading on primary school 4th grade students’ mathematics motivation and problem posing skills. Journal of Erzincan University Faculty of Education, 22(2), 348-370.
  63. Yurtbakan, E. Aydoğdu İskenderoğlu, T., & Sesli E. (2016). The views of the classroom teachers on enhancing the students’ success of mathematics. Journal of Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Education, 35(2), 101-119.
  64. Bulut, A. S., Yıldız, A. & Baltacı, S. (2020). A Comparison of mathematics learning approaches of gifted and non-gifted students. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 11(2), 461-491.
  65. Christidamayani, A. P., & Kristanto, Y. D. (2020). The effects of problem posing learning model on students’ learning achievement and motivation. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 2(2), 100-108.
  66. Özçakır-Sümen, Ö. (2021). Investigation of fourth grade students’ problem posing skills. Journal of Erzincan University Faculty of Education, 23(2), 378-393.