KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 2 Issue: 1

Growth and norharmane production of Chroococcus minutus under various stress conditions

Tunay Karan(Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Gaziosmanpasa University, 60240 Tokat, Turkey)0000-0002-9114-8400
Omer Kayir0000-0002-4091-9033
Zekeriya Altuner(Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Gaziosmanpasa University, 60240 Tokat, Turkey)0000-0003-2335-2116
Ramazan Erenler(Gaziosmanpaşa University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Chemistry, 60240, Tokat, Turkey)0000-0002-0505-3190
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2018-03-05
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Most norharmane was produced at pH 7.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Cyanobacterium samples were collected from fresh water of Tokat city in Turkey, and then isolation and cultivation of Chroococcus minutus were achieved successfully.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:TLC (Thin layer chromatography) and HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) analyses revealed that the C. minutus consisted of norharmane as a major product.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Most norharmane was produced at pH 7.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Chroococcus minutus · cyanobacteria · HPLC

Abstract

Cyanobacterium samples were collected from fresh water of Tokat city in Turkey, and then isolation and cultivation of Chroococcus minutus were achieved successfully. TLC (Thin layer chromatography) and HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) analyses revealed that the C. minutus consisted of norharmane as a major product. So amount of norharmane was determined during the growth process. Growth and norharmane production of C. minutus were executed under salt stress and pH stress conditions. The most growth and the highest production of norharmane were detected at 16 th day. Therefore inoculation process was performed at 16 th day. Salt stress was evaluated at 0.5, 1.0, 3.0 and 5.0 M concentrations. The most norharmane was synthesized by C. minutus at 5 M concentration. The norharmane production and the growth were higher at pH 9 than that of the pH 5. Most norharmane was produced at pH 7.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Karan, T., Kayir, O., Altuner, Z., Erenler, R. (2018). Growth and norharmane production of Chroococcus minutus under various stress conditions. International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Volume: 2 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.348526

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (30)

  1. Bano, A.; Siddiqui, P. J. A. Pakistan J. Bot. 2004, 36 (1), 133-143.
  2. Burja, A.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Banaigs, B.; Payri, C.; Burgess, J.; Wright, P. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2002, 48 (2), 207-219.
  3. Goyal, A. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2007, 45 (9), 705-710.
  4. Yoshida, K.; Igarashi, E.; Wakatsuki, E.; Miyamoto, K.; Hirata, K. Plant Sci. 2004, 167 (6), 1335-1341.
  5. Hu, Y. W.; Chen, J. H.; Hu, G. P.; Yu, J. C.; Zhu, X.; Lin, Y. C.; Chen, S. P.; Yuan, J. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13 (1), 202-221.
  6. Molinski, T. F.; Dalisay, D. S.; Lievens, S. L.; Saludes, J. P. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8 (1), 69-85.
  7. Erenler, R.; Pabuccu, K.; Yaglioglu, A. S.; Demirtas, I.; Gul, F. Z. Naturforsch. C 2016, 71 (3-4), 87-92.
  8. Faulkner, D. J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002, 19 (1), 1-48.
  9. Awad, N. E. Phytother. Res. 2000, 14 (8), 641-643.
  10. Chen, J. L.; Gerwick, W. H.; Schatzman, R.; Laney, M. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57 (7), 947-952.
  11. Mao, S. C.; Guo, Y. W.; Shen, X. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16 (11), 2947-2950.
  12. Kubanek, J.; Jensen, P. R.; Keifer, P. A.; Sullards, M. C.; Collins, D. O.; Fenical, W. P Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100 (12), 6916-6921.
  13. Pereira, H. S.; Leao-Ferreira, L. R.; Moussatche, N.; Teixeira, V. L.; Cavalcanti, D. N.; Costa, L. J.; Diaz, R.; Frugulhetti, I. C. P. P. Antivir. Res. 2004, 64 (1), 69-76.
  14. Kim, Y. C.; An, R. B.; Yoon, N. Y.; Nam, T. J.; Choi, J. S. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2005, 28 (12), 1376-1380.
  15. Fisch, K. M.; Bohm, V.; Wright, A. D.; Konig, G. M. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66 (7), 968-975.
  16. Lee, Y. S.; Shin, K. H.; Kim, B. K.; Lee, S. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2004, 27 (11), 1120-1122.
  17. Fuller, R. W.; Cardellina, J. H.; Jurek, J.; Scheuer, P. J.; Alvaradolindner, B.; Mcguire, M.; Gray, G. N.; Steiner, J. R.; Clardy, J.; Menez, E.; Shoemaker, R. H.; Newman, D. J.; Snader, K. M.; Boyd, M. R. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37 (25), 4407-4411.
  18. Schaeffer, D. J.; Krylov, V. S. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2000, 45 (3), 208-227.
  19. Robinson, E. S. J.; Anderson, N. J.; Crosby, J.; Nutt, D. J.; Hudson, A. L. Ann. Ny. Acad. Sci. 2003, 1009, 157-166.
  20. Chiarugi, A.; Dello Sbarba, P.; Paccagnini, A.; Donnini, S.; Filippi, S.; Moroni, F. J. Leukocyte Biol. 2000, 68 (2), 260-266.
  21. Karan, T.; Altuner, Z.; Erenler, R. J. New Results Sci. 2017, 6 (1), 47-52.
  22. Volk, R. B. Microbiol. Res. 2008, 163 (3), 307-313.
  23. John, D. M.; B.A., W.; Brook, A. J. The Freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles. An Identification Guide to Freshwater and Terrestrial Algae. Cambridge University Press: England, 2002.
  24. Mishra, A.; Jha, B. Bioresource Technol. 2009, 100 (13), 3382-3386.
  25. Pelah, D.; Sintov, A.; Cohen, E. World J. Microb. Biot. 2004, 20 (5), 483-486.
  26. Erenler, R.; Telci, I.; Ulutas, M.; Demirtas, I.; Gul, F.; Elmastas, M.; Kayir, O. J. Food Biochem. 2015, 39 (5), 622-630.
  27. Hoffmann, L.; Komarek, J.; Kastovsky, J. Algol. Stud. 2005, 117 (1), 95-115.
  28. Hagemann, M. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35 (1), 87-123.
  29. Gupta, N.; Bhaskar, A. S. B.; Rao, P. V. L. World J. Microb. Biot. 2002, 18 (1), 29-35.
  30. Dias, E.; Pereira, P.; Franca, S. J. Phycol. 2002, 38 (4), 705-712.