KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2018 / Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Flow analyses of highly concentrated xhantan gum fluid

Guler Bengusu Tezel(BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0671-208X
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Static yield stress values are much closely dynamic stress values getting from under gravity dynamic flow indicating that supplies undisturbed moleculer structure of XG due to nature of creeping flow.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The concentration effect of Xanthan gum (XG) solutions (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5% w/v) on the rheological flow parameters are examined using stress controlled rheometer and gravity driven flow set-up measurement at 25°C .
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Concentrated XG solutions has yielding behavior obtained by fitting results through Herschel-Bulkley (HB) model with highest regression coefficient R 2 = 0.995 and R 2 = 0.993 respectively by rheometer and set-up measurement.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Static yield stress values are much closely dynamic stress values getting from under gravity dynamic flow indicating that supplies undisturbed moleculer structure of XG due to nature of creeping flow.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Xanthan Gum · Dynamic Yield Stress · Static Yield Stress

Abstract

The concentration effect of Xanthan gum (XG) solutions (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5% w/v) on the rheological flow parameters are examined using stress controlled rheometer and gravity driven flow set-up measurement at 25°C . Concentrated XG solutions has yielding behavior obtained by fitting results through Herschel-Bulkley (HB) model with highest regression coefficient R 2 = 0.995 and R 2 = 0.993 respectively by rheometer and set-up measurement. The results agreed well each other from these measurements. Increasing the concentration of XG solutions promote dynamic and static yield stresses due to increase of entanglement structure density of XG solutions. Also, the magnitudes of c onsistency index, K , have increasing trend with XG concentration as a result of increasing entanglement density of XG structure. Static yield stress values are much closely dynamic stress values getting from under gravity dynamic flow indicating that supplies undisturbed moleculer structure of XG due to nature of creeping flow.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tezel, G. B. (2018). Flow analyses of highly concentrated xhantan gum fluid. International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Volume: 2 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.468529

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Barnes, H. A. J. Non-Newton Fluid 1997, 70, 1-33.
  2. Barnes, H. A.; Hutton J. F.; Walters, K. An introduction to rheology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989.
  3. Bird R.B.; Dai G.C.; Yarusso, B. J. Rev. Chem. Eng.1983, 1, 1-83.
  4. Tanner, R.I. Engineering rheology, 2nd edn. Oxford university press, London, 2000.
  5. Barnes, H.A.; Walters, K. Rheol. Acta 1985,.24, 323-326,
  6. Chhabra, R.P.; Richardson, J.F. Non-Newtonian flow and applied rheology, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2008.
  7. Dullaert, K.; Mewis, J. J. Rheol. 2005, 49, 1213-1230.
  8. Alquraishi, A.A.; Alsewailem, F.D. Carbohyd. Polym. 2012, 88, 859-863.
  9. Anna, S. L.; McKinley, G.H. J. Rheol. 2001, 45 (1), 115-138.
  10. Cuvelier, G.; Launay, B. Carbohyd. Polym. 1986, 6, 321-333.
  11. Lim, T.; Uhl, J. T; Prudhomme, R.K. J. Rheol. 1984, 28, 367-379.
  12. Nguyen, Q.D.; Boger, D.V. Annu. Rev. Fluid 1992, 24, 47-88.
  13. Yapici, K.; Cakmak, K. N.; Ilhan, N.; Uludag, Y. Korea-Aust. Rheol. J. 2014, 26, 1-9
  14. Tozzi, E.J.; Bacca, L.A.; Hartt, W.H.; McCarthy, K.L; McCarthy M. J. J. Rheol. 2012, 56, 1464-1499.
  15. Callaghan, P.T. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1999, 62, 599-670.
  16. Bird, R.B.; Stewart, W. E.; Lightfoot, E. N. Transport phenonema, 1st ed., John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA, 1960.
  17. Bobade, V.; Cheetham, M.; Hashim, J.; Eshtiaghi, N. Water Res. 2018, 134, 86-91.
  18. Barnes, H.A.; Walters, K. Rheol. Acta 1985,.24, 323-326,