KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2018 / Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Investigation of improvement of thermal and mechanical properties of polypropylene / nano clay composites

Sameer A. Awad0000-0002-9194-719X
Eman M. Khalaf0000-0001-7887-6158
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The degree of crystallinity of PPNC was higher by 27% than pure PP.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This work aims to study the characterizations and modifications of systems based on polypropylene (PP) and nanoclay (NC).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this context, the effects of thermal and mechanical properties of the compsites of nanoclays with different loading of 1, 3, and 6% incorporated in PP matrix were investigated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The degree of crystallinity of PPNC was higher by 27% than pure PP.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Polypropylene · nanoclay · composite

Abstract

This work aims to study the characterizations and modifications of systems based on polypropylene (PP) and nanoclay (NC). In this context, the effects of thermal and mechanical properties of the compsites of nanoclays with different loading of 1, 3, and 6% incorporated in PP matrix were investigated. The influences of thermal and mechanical properties on the preparation of polypropylene/nanoclay (PPNC) composite were investigated. The results of the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that thermal stability increased with higher loadings of nanoclay. The tensile properties of PP and PPNC were also studied. The tensile strength of PP with the higher loading of nanoclay increased by 24.40% compared to that of the pure PP matrix (27.5MPa). The modulus of elasticity of PPNC with higher loading of 6% NC was higher by 17.32% than that of pure PP. The elongation at break of PPNC reduced by 53%, by comparing with pure PP. The Tg of PNCC with higher loading of NC were higher by 8.6%. The degree of crystallinity of PPNC was higher by 27% than pure PP.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Awad, S. A., Khalaf, E. M. (2018). Investigation of improvement of thermal and mechanical properties of polypropylene / nano clay composites. International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Volume: 2 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.430058

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (33)

  1. Hegde, R. R.; Bhat, G. S. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 118 (6), 3141-3155.
  2. Asl, D. H.; Abdouss, M.; Angaji, T. M.; Haji, A. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. 2013, 19 (3), 441-448.
  3. Awad, S.; Khalaf, E. Eng. Technol. J. 2017, 35, 845-848.
  4. Yuan, Q.; Awate, S.; Misra, R. Eur. Polym. J. 2006, 42 (9), 1994-2002.
  5. Awad, S.; Khalaf, E. Usak University J. Eng. Sci. 2018, 1 (1), 38-46.
  6. Hedayatnasab, Z.; Eslami-Farsani, R.; Khalili, S.; Soleimani, N. Fiber Polym. 2013, 14 (10), 1650-1656.
  7. Khalaf, E.; Awad, S. J. Adv. Chem.Sci. 2017, 3(1), 426-427.
  8. Komatsu, L.; Oliani, W.; Lugao, A.; Parra, D. Radiat. Phy. Chem. 2014, 97, 233-238.
  9. Abareshi, M.; Zebarjad, S. M.; Goharshadi, E. K. J. Vinyl. Addit. Technol. 2016, 22 (3), 285-292.
  10. Kumar, V.; Singh, A. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2013, 29 (6), 439-448.
  11. Awad, S. A; Khalaf, E. M. Usak University J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 6 (1/2), 15-25
  12. Soleimani, N.; Khalili, S. M.; Farsani, R. E.; Nasab, Z. H. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2012, 31 (14), 967-976.
  13. Morales, A. R.; Paiva, L. B. d.; Zattarelli, D.; Guimarães, T. R. Polímeros 2012, 22 (1), 54-60.
  14. Stoeffler, K.; Lafleur, P. G.; Perrin-Sarazin, F.; Bureau, M. N.; Denault, J. Compos. A: Appl. Sci. Manufactur. 2011, 42 (8), 916-925.
  15. Awad, S. A.; Khalaf, E. M. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2018, 41 (3), 67.
  16. Yuan, Q.; Misra, R. Polymer 2006, 47 (12), 4421-4428.
  17. Zhu, S.; Chen, J.; Li, H.; Cao, Y. J. Appl.Polym. Sci. 2013, 128 (6), 3876-3885.
  18. Khalaf, E.; Awad, S. Int. J. Mater. Sci. Applications 2016, 5, 297-301.
  19. Sharma, B.; Mahajan, S.; Chhibber, R.; Mehta, R. Procedia Chem. 2012, 4, 39-46.
  20. Picard, E.; Vermogen, A.; Gérard, J.-F.; Espuche, E. J. Member. Sci. 2007, 292 (1-2), 133-144.
  21. Wang, K.; Zhao, P.; Yang, H.; Liang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Du, R.; Fu, Q.; Yu, Z.; Chen, E. Polymer 2006, 47 (20), 7103-7110.
  22. Dimitry, O. I.; Abdeen, Z. I.; Ismail, E.; Saad, A. J. Polym. Res. 2010, 17 (6), 801-813.
  23. Awad, S. A.; Khalaf, E. M. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2018, 0892705718804585.
  24. Xie, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, B.; Qin, H.; Wang, F.; Yang, M. Polym. Int. 2005, 54 (12), 1673-1680.
  25. Hegde, R. R.; Spruiell, J. E.; Bhat, G. S. Polym. Int. 2014, 63 (6), 1112-1121.
  26. Hegde, R. R.; Bhat, G. S.; Spruiell, J. E.; Benson, R. J. Polym. Res. 2013, 20 (12), 323.
  27. Saminathan, K.; Selvakumar, P.; Bhatnagar, N. Polym. Test. 2008, 27 (3), 296-307.
  28. Lertwimolnun, W.; Vergnes, B. Polymer 2005, 46 (10), 3462-3471.
  29. Taşdemir, M.; Caneba, G. T.; Tıwarı, R.; Wang, B. Polymer-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2011, 50 (10), 1064-1070.
  30. Ramsaroop, A.; Kanny, K.; Mohan, T. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2010, 1 (05), 301.
  31. Rane, A.; Abitha, V. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2015, 6 (1), 60-69.
  32. Fitaroni, L. B.; de Lima, J. A.; Cruz, S. A.; Waldman, W. R. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2015, 111, 102-108.
  33. Fitaroni, L. B.; de Lima, J. A.; Cruz, S. A.; Waldman, W. R. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2015, 111, 102-108.