KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Production and characterization of polyamide-6 (PA6) and cellulose acetate (CA) based nanofiber membranes by electrospinning method

Dr. Abdullah Gül(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0001-6990-417X
İsmail Tiyek(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK-MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ, TEKSTİL MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ, TEKSTİL MÜHENDİSLİĞİ PR.)0000-0002-1643-8977
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2023-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was observed that the conductivity of the solution decreased with the increase of the CA mixing ratio in the PA6/CA polymer solution and accordingly the fiber diameter became thinner

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Recently, one of the most important nanotechnology products developed is nanostructured membranes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study aims to produce nanofiber membranes to be used as filter material by electrospinning method from Polyamide-6 (PA6)/Cellulose Acetate (CA) polymer mixtures prepared in different mixing ratios (100/0, 90/10, 80/20, 70/30, 60/40, 50/50).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was observed that the conductivity of the solution decreased with the increase of the CA mixing ratio in the PA6/CA polymer solution and accordingly the fiber diameter became thinner
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Nanofiber · membrane · electrospinning

Abstract

Recently, one of the most important nanotechnology products developed is nanostructured membranes. This study aims to produce nanofiber membranes to be used as filter material by electrospinning method from Polyamide-6 (PA6)/Cellulose Acetate (CA) polymer mixtures prepared in different mixing ratios (100/0, 90/10, 80/20, 70/30, 60/40, 50/50). In the study, firstly, preliminary experiments were carried out to determine the optimum electrospinning process parameters for the production of nanofiber membranes from these PA6/CA polymer mixtures. Then, solutions were prepared from these polymer mixtures and nanofiber membranes were produced from these prepared solutions by electrospinning method. Finally; density, electrical conductivity and viscosity measurements of PA6/CA solutions and FTIR, SEM, thickness and strength tests of nanofiber membranes were performed. In addition, the average nanofiber diameters of membranes were calculated. It has been determined that the average diameter of the nanofibers in the structure of membranes produced by electrospinning method is between 150 – 300 nm. From the characteristic peak bands obtained as a result of the FTIR analysis, it was determined that the PA6/CA structure was intact in the nanofiber material. In addition, it was determined that smooth and very fine nanofibers were formed in the materials produced from SEM images. It was observed that the conductivity of the solution decreased with the increase of the CA mixing ratio in the PA6/CA polymer solution and accordingly the fiber diameter became thinner

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gül, D. A., Tiyek, İ. (2023). Production and characterization of polyamide-6 (PA6) and cellulose acetate (CA) based nanofiber membranes by electrospinning method. International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Volume: 7 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.1207544

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (45)

  1. Teo, W.E.; Ramakrishna, S. Nanotechnology. 2006, 17(2), 89-106.
  2. Gipson, P.; Schreuder-Gibson, H.; Rivin, D. Nanofibers, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2001, 187/188, 469–481.
  3. Lee, K.; Lee, B.; Kim, C.; Kim, H.; Kim, K.; Nah, C. Macromolecular Research. 2005, 13, 441-445.
  4. Pedicini, A.; Farris, R.J. Polymer. 2003, 44, 6857-6862.
  5. Çetin, E.; Tiyek, İ. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 2021, 36(4), 1893-1908.
  6. Kılıç, A.; Oruç, F.; Demir, A. Textile Res. J. 2008, 78(6), 532–539.
  7. Formhals, A. Process and Apparatus for Preparing Artificial Threads. U.S. Patent 1,975,504. 1934.
  8. Danwanichakul, P.; Danwanichakul. D.; Sueviriyapan, N.; Sumruan, B. Nylon 6/Chitosan Nanofibrous Structures for Filtration, In Proceedings of the 1st Mae Fah Luang University International Conference, 2012, 1-18.
  9. Kozanoğlu, G.S. Elektrospinning Yöntemiyle Nanolif Üretim Teknolojisi. Masters Thesis İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, 2006.
  10. Tiyek, İ.; Gündüz, A.; Yalçınkaya, F.; Chaloupek, J. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2019, 19, 7251-7260.
  11. Deitzel, J.; Kleinmeyer, J.; Harris, D.; Tan, N. Polymer. 2001, 42, 261-272.
  12. Yener, F.; Jırsak, O.; Yalçınkaya, B. Tekstil Tekn. Elekt. Derg. 2011.5(2), 26-34.
  13. Nirmala, R.; Nam, K.; Soo-Jin, P.; Yu-Shik, S.; Hak, Y.; Kim, H.; Navamathavan, R. App. Surface Sci. 2010, 256: 6318–6323.
  14. Nylon 6. wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nylon_6. (accessed October 20, 2022).
  15. Kırcı, H.; Ateş, S.; Akgül, M. Fen ve Mühendislik Derg. 2001, 4(2), 119-130.
  16. Ott, E.; Grafflin, M. Adgewandte Chem., 1956, 68(14), 471.
  17. Saleema, H.; Kılıç, A.; Zaidi, S.J. Desalination, 2020, 478(2020) 1-40.
  18. Aslan, M. Membran Teknolojileri, T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, TUÇEV Türkiye Çevre Koruma Vakfı Yayınları. Ankara, 2016.
  19. Li, L.; Bellan, L.M.; Craighead, H.G.; Frey, M.W. Polymer. 2006, 47, 6208-6217.
  20. Li, Q.; Wei, Q.; Wu, N.; Cai, Y.; Gao. W. J. App. Poly. Sci. 2008, 107, 3535–3540.
  21. Polat, Y.; Çalışır, M.; Gungor, M.; Sagirli, M.N.; Atakan, R.; Akgul,, Y.; Demir, A.; Kılıç, A. J. Ind. Text. 2021, 51(5), 821-834.
  22. Lee, K.H.; Kim, K.W.; Pesapane, A., Kim, H.Y.; Rabolt, J.F. Macromolecules. 2008, 41(4), 1494-1498.
  23. Sivakumar, M.; Mohan, D.R.; Rangarajan, R.; J. Memb. Sci. 2006, 268(2), 208-219.
  24. Jayalakshmi, A.; Rajesh, S.; Mohan, D. App. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258(24), 9770-9781.
  25. Shashidhara, G.M.; Guruprasad, K.H.; Varadarajulu, A. European Poly. J. 2002, 38, 611–614.
  26. Joshi, M.K.; Tiwari, A.P.; Maharjan, B.; Won, K.S.; Kim, H.J.; Park, C.H.; Kim, C.S. Carbohydrate Poly. 2016, 147, 104-113.
  27. Liaoa, N.; Unnithana, A.R.; Joshi, M.K.; Tiwari, A.P.; Hong, S.T.; Parka, C.H.; Kim, C.S. Kolloidler ve Yüzeyler A: Fizikokimyasal ve Mühendislik Yönleri. 2015, 469(1), 194-201.
  28. Khaparde, D. Carbohydrate Poly. 2017, 173(1), 338-343.
  29. Mindivan, F. Machines Tech. Mat. 2016, 10(11), 56-59.
  30. Lee, K.H.; Kim, K.W.; Pesapane, A.; Kim, H.Y.; Rabolt, J.F. Macromolecules, 2008, 41(4), 1494-1498.
  31. Kherroub, D.E.; Belbachir, M.; Lamouri, S.; Bouhadjar, L.; Chikh, K. Oriental J. Chem. 2013, 29(4), 1429.
  32. Schneider, B.; Schmidt, P.; Wichterle, O. Collection of Czechoslovak Chem. Com. 1962, 27(8), 1749-1759.
  33. Meşeli, H. Alifatik Naylon 6 Liflerinin Karbon Lif Üretiminde Hammadde Olarak Değerlendirilmesi ve Karakterize Edilmesi. Masters Thesis Kayseri Erciyes University, Kayseri, 2014.
  34. Karacan, I.; Meşeli, H. J. Indust. Text. 2018, 47(6), 1185-1211.
  35. Sudiarti, T.; Wahyuningrum, D.; Bundjali, B.; Arcana, I.M. Materials Sci. Eng. 2016, 223, 120.
  36. Song, J.; Liu, M.; Yang, Z.; Xu, S.; Cheng, B.; Fei, P. e-Polymers. 2017, 17(4), 333-340.
  37. Hassan, H.S.; Elkady, M.F.; Farghali, A.A.; Salem, A.M.; Abd El-Hamid, A.I. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 78, 307–316.
  38. Cao, Y.; Wu, J.; Meng, T.; Zhang, J.; He, J.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y. Carbohydrate Poly. 2007, 69, 665-672.
  39. He, X. Membranes. 2017, 7(27), 1-9.
  40. Fei, P.; Liao, L.; Chen, B.; Song, J. Analytical Methods. 2017, 9, 6194-6201.
  41. Selvakumar, M.; Bhat, D.K. J. App. Poly. Sci. 2008, 110, 594–602.
  42. Chattopadhyay, S.; Hatton, T.A.; Rutledge, G.C.; J. Mat. Sci. 2016, 51(1), 204-217.
  43. Huang, L.; McCutcheon, J.R. J. Memb. Sci. 2014, 457, 162-169.
  44. Baji, A.; Mai, Y.W.; Wong, S.C.; Abtahi, M.; Chen, P. Comp. Sci. and Tech. 2010,70(5), 703-718.
  45. Kırcı, H.; Ateş, S.; Akgül, M. Fen ve Mühendislik Derg. 2001, 4(2), 119-130.