Dergiler / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Alkali Pretreatment and Analysis Of Biomass Content Of Narlisaray Population and Vezir Type Cannabis Plant

Nesrin Korkmaz(YOZGAT BOZOK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7896-1042
Ahmet Karadağ(TOKAT GAZIOSMANPASA UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-4676-683X
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2024-06-05
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Additionally, SEM images provided clear information regarding the structural changes in Narlısaray and Vezir fibers before and after the lignin removal process.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The cell wall of the hemp plant consists of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin cross-linked to these components.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Examination of elemental trace values revealed that the O:C ratios of Narlısaray and Vezir fibers increased to 0.84 and 0.85, respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Additionally, SEM images provided clear information regarding the structural changes in Narlısaray and Vezir fibers before and after the lignin removal process.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Industrial hemp · lignocellulosic biomass · pretreatment

Abstract

The cell wall of the hemp plant consists of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin cross-linked to these components. In such a structure, lignin is considered an undesirable byproduct in the production of textiles, paper, and biofuels from hemp. Therefore, the removal of lignin is essential for the industrial utilization of cellulose from hemp. In this study, lignin removal processes were conducted for the first time on the (native to Anatolia) Narlısaray population and the registered Vezir hemp. Alkaline (NaOH) treatment was preferred for pre-treatment due to its relatively low cost, lower energy requirements, and reduced risk factors. Structural changes before and after alkaline pre-treatment were compared using FT-IR spectra, SEM, and EDX analyses of the biomass. Examination of elemental trace values revealed that the O:C ratios of Narlısaray and Vezir fibers increased to 0.84 and 0.85, respectively. The increase in the O:C ratio indicated the removal of lignin, while the nearly identical ratios suggested that the lignin cross-linking energies in both local hemp fibers were almost the same. Additionally, SEM images provided clear information regarding the structural changes in Narlısaray and Vezir fibers before and after the lignin removal process.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Şahan, Ö. D., Korkmaz, N., Karadağ, A. (2024). Alkali Pretreatment and Analysis Of Biomass Content Of Narlisaray Population and Vezir Type Cannabis Plant. International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Volume: 8 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.1328410

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (22)

  1. Schultes, R. E. Nat. Hist. 1973, 82(7), 59.
  2. Zimniewska, M. Materials. 2002, 15(5), 1901.
  3. Schumacher, A. G. D.; Pequito, S.; Pazour, J. J Clean Prod. 2020, 268, 122180.
  4. Amode, N. S.; Jeetah, P. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2021, 12, 1781-1802.
  5. Tulaphol, S.; Sun, Z.; Sathitsuksanoh, N. Advances in Bioenergy. 2021, 6(1), 301-338.
  6. Ehrensing, D. T. Feasibility of industrial hemp production in the United States Pacific Northwest, Station Bulletin 681; Oregon State University: Corvallis, OR, USA, 1998.
  7. Kraenzel, D. G.; Petry, T. A.; Nelson, B.; Anderson, M. J.; Mathern, D.; Todd, R. Industrial hemp as an alternative crop in North Dakota, North Dakota State University: Fargo, ND, USA, 1998.
  8. Ceyhan, V.; Türkten, H.; Yıldırım, Ç.; Canan, S. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 176, 114354.
  9. Crônier, D.; Monties, B.; Chabbert, B. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2005, 53(21), 8279-8289.
  10. Thomsen, A.B.; Rasmussen, S.; Bohn, V.; Vad Nielsen, K.; Thygesen, A. Hemp Raw Materials: The effect of cultivar, growth contitions and pretreatment on the chemical composition of the fibres, Risø DTU-National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy: Roskilde, Denmark, 2005.
  11. Preikss, I.; Skujans, J.; Adamovics, A.; Iljins, U. Chem. Engineer Trans. 2013, 32, 1639–1643.
  12. Parvez, A. M.; Lewis, J. D.; Afzal, M. T. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2021, 141, 110784.
  13. Arora, A.; Nandal, P.; Singh, J.; Verma, M. L. Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 2020, 3, 308-318.
  14. Barta, Z.; Oliva, J. M.; Ballesteros, I.; Dienes, D.; Ballesteros, M.; Réczey, K. Chem Biochem Eng Q. 2010, 24(3), 331-339.
  15. Kuglarz, M.; Alvarado-Morales, M.; Karakashev, D.; Angelidaki, I. Bioresource Technol. 2016, 200, 639-647.
  16. Gunnarsson, I. B.; Kuglarz, M.; Karakashev, D.; Angelidaki, I. Bioresource Technol. 2015, 182, 58-66.
  17. Zhao, J.; Xu, Y.; Wang, W.; Griffin, J.; Wang, D. Bioresource Technol. 2020, 309, 123383.
  18. Zhao, J.; Xu, Y.; Wang, W.; Griffin, J.; Roozeboom, K.; Wang, D. Fuel. 2020, 281, 118725.
  19. Ji, A.; Jia, L.; Kumar, D.; Yoo, C. G. Fermentation. 2021. 7(1), 6.
  20. Pakarinen, A.; Zhang, J.; Brock, T.; Maijala, P.; Viikari, L. Bioresource Technol. 2012, 107, 275-281.
  21. Rajkumar, S.; Tjong, J.; Nayak, S. K.; Sain, M. J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 2015, 34(10), 807-818.
  22. Kabir, M. M.; Wang, H.; Lau, K. T; Cardona, F. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 276, 13-23.