KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / GRID - Mimarlık Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Şantiyelerin Covid-19 pandemisine uyumu: Türk inşaat sektörü için Güvenli Şantiye Sertifikası

Adaptation of construction sites to Covid-19 pandemic: Safe construction site certificate for Turkish construction sector

Arzuhan Gültekin(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1246-6468
Alperen Sarı(ANKARA MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0360-8727
Sayfa
301–324
Yayın Tarihi
2022-07-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuç olarak, COVID-19 pandemisi önlemlerinin bazı şantiyelerde uygulanmadığı, bazılarında ise çok düşük düzeyde uygulandığı belirlenmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmanın amacı, şantiyelerde COVID-19 pandemisine yönelik alınacak önlemlerin belirlenmesi, bu önlemlerin incelenen şantiyelerdeki uygulanma durumunun analiz edilmesi ve şantiyelerin daha sağlıklı hale getirilmesi için bir Güvenli Şantiye Belgesi önerisi hazırlanmasıdır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Söz konusu amaç çerçevesinde, Türkiye’de 15 ilde yer alan konut şantiyelerinde 38 şantiye şefine e-posta yoluyla anket yapılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuç olarak, COVID-19 pandemisi önlemlerinin bazı şantiyelerde uygulanmadığı, bazılarında ise çok düşük düzeyde uygulandığı belirlenmiştir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Şantiye · İnşaat işçisi · Türk inşaat sektörü

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, şantiyelerde COVID-19 pandemisine yönelik alınacak önlemlerin belirlenmesi, bu önlemlerin incelenen şantiyelerdeki uygulanma durumunun analiz edilmesi ve şantiyelerin daha sağlıklı hale getirilmesi için bir Güvenli Şantiye Belgesi önerisi hazırlanmasıdır. Söz konusu amaç çerçevesinde, Türkiye’de 15 ilde yer alan konut şantiyelerinde 38 şantiye şefine e-posta yoluyla anket yapılmıştır. Açık uçlu yarı yapılandırılmış anket soruları aracılığıyla şantiyelerin uygulama sahası, yönetim ofisleri, yatakhaneler ve yemekhanelerinde alınan COVID-19 pandemi önlemleri sorgulanmıştır. Verilerin toplanması ve analizi için içerik analizi yöntemi ve fenomenolojik yaklaşımdan yararlanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, COVID-19 pandemisi önlemlerinin bazı şantiyelerde uygulanmadığı, bazılarında ise çok düşük düzeyde uygulandığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, aynı şantiyede bulunan farklı tesislerde önlem birliği sağlanamadığı ve önlemlerin kişisel ölçekte kaldığı saptanmıştır. Analiz sonucunda belirlenen yetersizliklerin giderilerek şantiyelerin sağlıklı hale getirilmesi için Türk inşaat sektörünün ve şantiyelerin dinamiklerini dikkate alan bir Güvenli Şantiye Sertifikası önerilmiştir.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the measures against the COVID-19 pandemic at construction sites, analyze the implementability of these measures at selected construction sites, and propose a Safe Construction Site Certificate to improve the health of construction sites. Within the context of these aims, a questionnaire was sent through email to 38 site chiefs at residential construction sites in 15 Turkish cities. Using open-ended, semi-structured questions, the COVID-19 pandemic measures taken in the construction work areas, administrative offices, dormitories, and dining halls of construction sites were examined. For the purposes of data collection and analysis, content analysis method and phenomenological approach were employed. It was determined that the COVID-19 pandemic measures were not implemented at certain construction sites, while they were inadequately implemented at others. In addition, it was discovered that the unity of measures could not be achieved in different facilities of the same construction sites and remained on an individual scale. Consequently, to build healthier construction sites by removing the inadequacies identified by the analysis and taking into account the dynamics of the Turkish construction sector and construction sites, a Safe Construction Site Certificate was proposed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gültekin, A., Sarı, A. (2022). Şantiyelerin Covid-19 pandemisine uyumu: Türk inşaat sektörü için Güvenli Şantiye Sertifikası. GRID - Mimarlık Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 301–324. https://doi.org/10.37246/grid.1084132

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (56)

  1. Agyekum, K., Kukah, A. S., & Amudjie, J. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on the construction industry in Ghana: The case of some selected firms. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 1726-0531. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-11-2020-0476
  2. AHLA. (2022). Safe Stay. Retrieved March 5, 2022, from https://www.ahla.com/safestay
  3. Alsharef, A., Banerjee, S., Uddin, S. M., Albert, A., & Jaselskis, E. (2021). Early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the United States construction industry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041559
  4. Amoah, C., & Simpeh, F. (2021). Implementation challenges of COVID-19 safety measures at construction sites in South Africa. Journal of Facilities Management, 19(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-08-2020-0061
  5. Avice, T. (2020). COVID-19: Lessons from a construction site, can we apply one industry safety protocol to another? Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 13(3), 433–437. https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-200808
  6. Awan, M. I., Shamim, A., & Ahn, J. (2021). Implementing ‘cleanliness is half of faith’ in re-designing tourists, experiences and salvaging the hotel industry in Malaysia during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(3), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2020-0229
  7. Bernstein, J., Richter, A. W., & Throckmorton, N. A. (2020). COVID-19: A View from the Labor Market. https://www.dallasfed.org/-/media/documents/research/papers/2020/wp2010.pdf
  8. Bloomberg. ( 2020). Coronavirus Could Cost the Global Economy $2.7 Trillion. Here’s How. Retrieved March 5, 2022, from https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-coronavirus-pandemic-global-economic-risk/
  9. Blumberg, B., Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2014). Business Research Methods. London, McGraw Hill.
  10. Buniya, M. K., Othman, I., Durdyev, S., Sunindijo, R. Y., Ismail, S., & Kineber, A. F. (2021a). Safety Program Elements in the Construction Industry: The Case of Iraq. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020411
  11. Buniya, M. K., Othman, I., Sunindijo, R. Y., Kashwani, G., Durdyev, S., Ismail, S., Antwi-Afari, M. F., & Li, H. (2021b). Critical success factors of safety program implementation in construction projects in Iraq. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168469
  12. CDC. (2021). Community, Work, and School. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved March 5, 2022, from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/workplaces-businesses/index.html
  13. Chakraborty, I., & Maity, P. (2020). COVID-19 outbreak: Migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention. Science of The Total Environment, 728, 138882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138882
  14. Chowdhry, S., Jacobs, A.-K., & Kamin, K. (2020). A crisis in times of crisis: Combating COVID-19 under sanctions in Iran. Kiel Policy Brief.
  15. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. California, SAGE Publications.
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. London, SAGE Publications.
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). Los Angeles, SAGE Publications.
  18. Eaves, S., Gyi, D. E., & Gibb, A. G. F. (2016). Building healthy construction workers: Their views on health, wellbeing and better workplace design. Applied Ergonomics, 54, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.004
  19. Ebekozien, A., & Aigbavboa, C. (2021). COVID-19 recovery for the Nigerian construction sites: The role of the fourth industrial revolution technologies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69, 102803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102803
  20. EC. (2022). EU Digital COVID Certificate. Retrieved March 5, 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/coronavirus-response/safe-covid-19-vaccines-europeans/eu-digital-covid-certificate_en
  21. Foo, L.-P., Chin, M.-Y., Tan, K.-L., & Phuah, K.-T. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on tourism industry in Malaysia. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(19), 2735–2739. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1777951
  22. Giang, D. T. H., & Sui Pheng, L. (2011). Role of construction in economic development: Review of key concepts in the past 40 years. Habitat International, 35(1), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.06.003
  23. Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  24. Guo, S.-J. (2002). Identification and resolution of work space conflicts in building construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(4), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:4(287)
  25. Hanafiah, M. H., Md, Z. N. A., Azinuddin, M., & Mior, S. N. S. (2021). I’m afraid to travel! Investigating the effect of perceived health risk on Malaysian travellers’ post-pandemic perception and future travel intention. Journal of Tourism Futures, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-10-2021-0235
  26. Huang, Y.-H., Sung, C.-Y., Chen, W. T., & Liu, S.-S. (2021). Relationships between social support, social status perception, social identity, work stress, and safety behavior of construction site management personnel. Sustainability, 13(6), 3184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063184
  27. ILO. (2017). Global Estimates of Modern Slavery: Forced Labour and Forced Marriage. Retrieved May 9, 2022, from https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_575479/lang--en/index.htm
  28. IMF. (2020). World Economic Outlook, April 2020: The Great Lockdown. Retrieved March 5, 2022, from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/04/14/World-Economic-Outlook-April-2020-The-Great-Lockdown-49306
  29. Jamaludin, S., Azmir, N. A., Mohamad Ayob, A. F., & Zainal, N. (2020). COVID-19 exit strategy: Transitioning towards a new normal. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 59, 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.046
  30. Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical research: Planning and design. Harlow, Pearson.
  31. MacDonald, F., & Durdyev, S. (2021). What Influences Women to Study Architectural, Engineering, or Construction (AEC) Majors? Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 147(2), 05020009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000035
  32. Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571
  33. Murie, F. (2007). Building safety: An international perspective. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 13(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.2007.13.1.5
  34. Ogunnusi, M., Hamma-Adama, M., Salman, H., & Kouider, T. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic: The effects and prospects in the construction industry. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 14(S2). https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/1000407/covid-19-pandemic-the-effects-and-prospects-in-the-construction-industry
  35. Olukolajo, M. A., Oyetunji, A. K., & Oluleye, I. B. (2021). Covid-19 protocols: Assessing construction site workers compliance. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 1726-0531. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-03-2021-0131
  36. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (Tenth edition). Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer Health.
  37. Safman, R. M., & Sobal, J. (2004). Qualitative Sample Extensiveness in Health Education Research. Health Education & Behavior, 31(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198103259185
  38. Sanad, H. M., Ammar, M. A., & Ibrahim, M. E. (2008). Optimal Construction Site Layout Considering Safety and Environmental Aspects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(7), 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:7(536)
  39. Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (Eighth Edition). Harlow, United Kingdom; New York: Pearson.
  40. Schutt, R. K. (2018). Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research (9th edition). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
  41. Selvi, S. J. (2020). COVID-19: An Overview of Economic Waves on Indian Economy. Shanlax International Journal of Economics, 8(3), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.34293/economics.v8i3.3201
  42. SG. (2022). SG Clean. Retrieved March 5, 2022, from https://www.sgclean.gov.sg/
  43. Simpeh, F., & Amoah, C. (2021). Assessment of measures instituted to curb the spread of COVID-19 on construction site. International Journal of Construction Management, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1874678
  44. Simpeh, F., Bamfo-Agyei, E., & Amoah, C. (2021). Barriers to the implementation of COVID-19 safety regulations: Insight from Ghanaian construction sites. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 1726-0531. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-03-2021-0153
  45. Song, X., Xu, J., Shen, C., Pena-Mora, F., & Zeng, Z. (2017). A decision making system for construction temporary facilities layout planning in large-scale construction projects. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(2), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0107-1
  46. Squires, A., & Dorsen, C. (2018). Qualitative Research in Nursing and Health Professions Regulation. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 9(3), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(18)30150-9
  47. Subramaniam, C., Ismail, S., Durdyev, S., Wan Mohd Rani, W. N. M., Bakar, N. F. S. A., & Banaitis, A. (2021). Overcoming the Project Communications Management Breakdown amongst Foreign Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Biophilia Inveigled Construction Projects in Malaysia. Energies, 14(16), 4790. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164790
  48. TSE. (2018). 13811-Hygiene And Sanitation Management System, in Turkish. Retrieved March 5, 2022, from https://www.tse.org.tr/Icerik/DuyuruDetay?DuyuruID=5599
  49. TSE. (2022a). COVID-19 Conformity Assessment Services. Retrieved March 5, 2022, from https://en.tse.org.tr/IcerikDetay?ID=2979&ParentID=2313
  50. TSE. (2022b). TSE COVID-19 Safe Production, Safe Service, My School, Clean and Safe Tourism, in Turkish. Retrieved March 5, 2022, from https://www.tse.org.tr/Icerik/DuyuruDetay?DuyuruID=5922
  51. Umar, T. (2022). The Impact of COVID-19 on the GCC Construction Industry. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), 13(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSSMET.20220301.oa1
  52. Wang, Z., Liu, Z., & Liu, J. (2020). Risk Identification and Responses of Tunnel Construction Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, e6620539. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6620539
  53. WHO. (2020). COVID-19 management in hotels and other entities of the accommodation sector: Interim guidance. Retrieved March 5, 2022, from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/333992/WHO-2019-nCoV-Hotels-2020.3-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  54. WHO. (2022). Turkey: WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard With Vaccination Data. Retrieved March 3, 2022, from https://covid19.who.int/region/euro/country/tr
  55. Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  56. Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (Eighth Edition). Harlow, United Kingdom; New York: Pearson.