KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Sporcularda Bacak Hacmi, Kütlesi, Hamstring/Quadriceps Oranı ile Anaerobik Performans ve İzokinetik Bacak Kuvveti Arasındaki İlişki

The Association among Leg Volume, Leg Mass and H/Q Ratio with Anaerobic Performance and Isokinetic Knee Strength in Athletes

Ali ÖZKAN
Ayşe KİNİŞLER
Sayfa
90–102
Yayın Tarihi
2010-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu sonuçlara ek olarak sol BH ile OG (r= .564; p < 0.05), sol 60º.s-1 KDF (r=.788; p < 0.01) ve sol BK ile OG (r= .731; p < 0.01), arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunurken sol 60º.s-1 H/Q ile RMG (r=.666; p < 0.01), ROG (r=-.635; p < 0.05), sağ 60º.s-1 KDF (r=-.749; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDF

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma farklı spor dallarındaki sporcularda bacak hacmi, kütlesi, hamstring/quadriceps oranı ile anaerobik performans ve izokinetik bacak kuvveti arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Çalışmaya basketbol (n= 12), voleybol (n=14) ve futbol (n=15) branşlarında toplam 41 erkek sporcu gönüllü olarak katılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu sonuçlara ek olarak sol BH ile OG (r= .564; p < 0.05), sol 60º.s-1 KDF (r=.788; p < 0.01) ve sol BK ile OG (r= .731; p < 0.01), arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunurken sol 60º.s-1 H/Q ile RMG (r=.666; p < 0.01), ROG (r=-.635; p < 0.05), sağ 60º.s-1 KDF (r=-.749; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDF
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Bacak hacmi-kütlesi · H/Q oranı · Anaerobik performans

Özet

Bu çalışma farklı spor dallarındaki sporcularda bacak hacmi, kütlesi, hamstring/quadriceps oranı ile anaerobik performans ve izokinetik bacak kuvveti arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya basketbol (n= 12), voleybol (n=14) ve futbol (n=15) branşlarında toplam 41 erkek sporcu gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Sporcuların bacak hacmi Frustum yöntemi ile, bacak kütlesi ise Hanavan yöntemi ile belirlenmiştir. Anaerobik performansın belirlenmesinde Wingate anaerobik güç ve kapasite testi kullanılırken izokinetik kuvvetin belirlenmesinde konsantrik diz fleksiyon ve ekstansiyon kuvvetleri ve H/Q oranı için 60º ve 300º’lik hızlar kullanılmıştır. Yapılan Pearson Çarpımlar Moment Korelasyon sonucunda futbolcularda sağ 60º.s-1 H/Q ile ROG (r=-.552; p < 0.05), sağ 60º.s-1 KDE (r=-.586; p < 0.05), sağ 300º.s-1 KDE (r=-.589; p < 0.05) ve sağ 60º.s-1 KDF (r=-.558; p < 0.05) arasında anlamlı ilişki bulunurken, sol 60º.s-1 H/Q oranı ile ROG (r=-.561; p < 0.05), sağ 60º.s-1 KDF (r=-.698; p < 0.01), sağ 300º.s-1 KDF (r=.622; p < 0.05), sol 60º.s-1 KDE (r=-.613; p < 0.05) arasında bulunmuştur. Benzer bir ilişki de sağ 300º.s-1 H/Q oranı ile sağ 60º.s1 KDF (r=-.537; p < 0.05) belirlenirken sol 300º.s-1 H/Q oranı ile sol 60º.s-1 KDF (r=-.528; p < 0.05) arasında bulunmuştur. Basketbolcularda ise sağ BH ile MG (r=.738; p < 0.01), RMG (r=.650; p < 0.05), sağ 300º.s-1 KDF (r=.697; p < 0.01), sol 60º.s-1 KDE (r=.766; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDE (r=.818; p < 0.01) ve sol 300º.s-1 KDF (r=.748; p < 0.01) arasında anlamlı ilişki bulunurken, benzer bir ilişki de sağ BK ile MG (r=.618; p < 0.05) , sol 60º.s-1 KDE (r=.766; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDE (r=.866; p < 0.01), sağ 300º.s-1 KDF (r=.840; p < 0.01) ve sol 300º.s-1 KDF (r=.832; p < 0.01 arasında bulunmuştur. Ayrıca sağ 60º.s-1 H/Q ile ROG (r=.671; p < 0.05), sağ 60º.s-1 KDE (r=.757; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDE (r=.647; p < 0.05), sağ 60º.s-1 KDF (r=.913; p < 0.01), sol 60º.s-1 KDF (r=.591; p < 0.05) ve sol 300º.s-1 KDF (r=-.640; p < 0.05) anlamlı bir ilişki bulunurken sağ 300º.s-1 H/Q ile MG (r=-.579; p < 0.05), sol 300º.s-1 KDE (r=-.690; p < 0.05), sağ 60º.s-1 KDF (r=-.624; p < 0.05), sağ 300º.s-1 KDF (r=- .940; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDF (r=-.739; p < 0.01) arasında bulunmuştur. Sol BH ile MG (r=.633; p < 0.05), RMG (r=- .576; p < 0.05), sol 60º.s-1 KDE (r=.757; p < 0.01), sol 60º.s-1 KDE (r=.757; p < 0.01), 300º.s-1 KDE (r=.866; p < 0.01), sağ 300º.s-1 KDF (r=.753; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDF (r= -.818; p < 0.05) arasında anlamlı ilişki bulunurken, sol BK ile MG (r=.669; p < 0.05), sol 300º.s-1 KDE (r=.855; p < 0.01), sağ 60º.s-1 KDE (r=.673; p < 0.01), sağ 300º.s-1 KDF (r= .837; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDF (r= .841; p < 0.01) arasında anlamlı bir ilişki belirlenmiştir. Benzer şekilde sol 60º.s-1 H/Q oranı ile MG (r=-.663; p < 0.01), RMG (r=.857; p < 0.01), ROG (r=- .849; p < 0.01), sağ 60º.s-1 KDE (r=.620; p < 0.01), sol 60º.s-1 KDE (r=.809; p < 0.01), sağ 60º.s-1 KDF (r=-.727; p < 0.01) arasında anlamlı ilişki belirlenirken sol 300º.s-1 H/Q oranı ile sol 60º.s-1 KDF (r=-.611; p < 0.05), sağ 300º.s-1 KDF (r= -.854; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDF (r= -.625; p < 0.05) arasında belirlenmiştir. Voleybolculara bakıldığında ise sağ BH ile OG (r=.568; p < 0.05) ve sol 60º.s-1 KDF (r=.721; p < 0.01) arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunurken sağ 60º.s-1 H/Q ile sağ 60º.s-1 KDE (r=.971; p < 0.01), sağ 300º.s-1 KDE (r= .845; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDE (r= .559; p < 0.05) arasında bulunmuştur. Benzer şekilde sağ 300º.s-1 H/Q ile sağ 60º.s-1 KDE (r=.575; p < 0.05), sağ 300º.s-1 KDE (r= .766; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDE (r=.855; p < 0.01), sağ 60º.s-1 KDF (r= -.777; p < 0.01) arasında anlamlı ilişki belirlenirken sağ 300º.s-1 H/Q ile sağ 60º.s-1 KDE (r= -.575; p < 0.05), sağ 300º.s-1 KDE (r= .766; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDE (r=.855; p < 0.01), sağ 60º.s-1 KDF (r=-.777; p < 0.01) arasında anlamlı ilişki belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlara ek olarak sol BH ile OG (r= .564; p < 0.05), sol 60º.s-1 KDF (r=.788; p < 0.01) ve sol BK ile OG (r= .731; p < 0.01), arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunurken sol 60º.s-1 H/Q ile RMG (r=.666; p < 0.01), ROG (r=-.635; p < 0.05), sağ 60º.s-1 KDF (r=-.749; p < 0.01), sol 300º.s-1 KDF

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine the relationship among leg volume, leg mass and H/Q ratio with anaerobic performance and isokinetic knee strength in athletes from different sport branches. A total of 41 male athletes from basketball (n= 12), volleyball (n=14) and football (n=15) participated in this study voluntarily. Athletes’ leg volume (LV) was determined by Frustum method and leg mass (LM) was determined by Hanavan model. Anaerobic performances of athletes was determined by Wingate anaerobic power test and isokinetic knee strength and H/Q ratio was determined at 600s-1and 3000s-1. In football players significant correlations was obtained between right 60º.s-1 H/Q ratio and relative mean power (RMP) (r=-.552; p<0.05), right 60º.s1 knee extension strength (KES) (r=-.586; p<0.05), right 300º.s-1 KES (r=-.589; p<0.05), right 60º.s-1 knee flexion strength (KFS) (r=-.558; p<0.05). Left 60º.s-1 H/Q was significantly correlated with RMP (r=-.561; p<0.05), right 60º.s-1 KFS (r=-.698; p<0.01), right 300º.s-1 KFS (r=.622; p<0.05), left 60º.s-1 KES (r=-.613; p<0.05). A similar relation was obtained between right 300º.s-1 H/Q and right KFS (r=-.537; p<0.05).Left 300º.s-1 H/Q on the other hand was significantly correlated with left 60º.s-1 KFS(r=-.528; p<0.05). In basketball players significant correlations was obtained between right LV and peak power (PP) (r=.738; p<0.01), relative PP (RPP) (r=.650; p<0.05), right 300º.s-1 KES (r=.697; p<0.01), left 60º.s-1 KES (r=.766; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KES (r=.818; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KFS (r=.748; p<0.01). A similar relation was obtained between right LV and PP (r=.618; p<0.05) left 60º.s-1 KES (r=.766; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KES (r=.866; p<0.01), right 300º.s-1 KFS (r=.840; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KFS (r=.832; p<0.01). On the other hand right 60º.s-1 H/Q was significantly correlated with relative mean power (RMP) (r=.671; p<0.05), right 60º.s-1 KES (r=.727; p<0.01), right 300º.s-1 KES (r=.647; p<0.05), right 60º.s-1 KFS (r=.913; p<0.01), left 60º.s-1 KFS (r=.591; p<0.05), left 300º.s-1 KFS (r=-.640; p<0.05). Right 300º.s-1 H/Q was significantly correlated with PP (r=-.579; p<0.05), left 300º.s-1 KES (r=-.690; p<0.05), right 60º.s-1 KFS (r=-.624; p<0.05), right 300º.s-1 KFS (r=-.940; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KFS (r=-.739; p<0.01). Left LV was significantly correlated with PP(r=.633; p<0.05), RPP(r=-.576; p<0.05), left 60º.s-1 KES (r=.757; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KES (r=.866; p<0.01), right 300º.s-1 KFS (r=.753; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KFS (r= -.818; p<0.05) and Left leg mass (LM) was significantly related with PP (r=.669; p<0.05),left 300º.s-1 KES (r=.855; p<0.01), right 60º.s-1 KES (r=.673; p<0.01), right 300º.s-1 KFS (r= .837; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KFS (r= .841; p<0.01). A similar relation was obtained between left 60º.s-1 H/Q and PP(r=-.663; p<0.01), RPP (r=.857; p<0.01), RMP(r=-.849; p<0.01), right 60º.s-1 KES (r=.620; p<0.01), left 60º.s-1 KES (r=.809; p<0.01), right 60º.s-1 KFS (r=-.727;p<0.01). On the other hand left 300º.s-1 H/Q was significantly correlated with left 60º.s-1 KFS (r=-.611; p<0.05), right 300º.s1 KFs (r= -.854; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KFS (r= -.625; p<0.05). In voleyball players significant correlations was obtained between right LV and MP (r=.568; p<0.05), left 60º.s-1 KFS (r=.721; p<0.01) and right 60º.s-1 H/Q was significantly correlated with right 60º.s-1 KES (r=.971; p<0.01), right 300º.s-1 KES (r= .845; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KES (r= .559; p<0.05). A similar relation was obtained between right 300º.s-1 H/Q and 60º.s-1 KES (r=.575; p<0.05), right300º.s-1 KES (r= .766; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KES (r=.855; p<0.01), right 60º.s-1 KFS (r= -.777; p<0.01). right 300º.s1 H/Q was significantly related with right 60º.s-1 KES (r= -.575; p<0.05), right 300º.s-1 KES (r= .766; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KES (r=.855; p<0.01), right 60º.s-1 KFS (r=-.777; p<0.01). On the other hand left LV was significantly correlated with MP (r= .564; p<0.05), left 60º.s-1 KFS (r=.788; p<0.01) and left LM with MP (r= .731; p<0.01). Left 60º.s1 H/Q was significantly correlated with RPP (r=.666; p<0.01), RMP (r=-.635; p<0.05), right 60º.s-1 KFS (r=-.749; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KFS (r=-.652; p<0.05) and left 300º.s1 H/Q was significantly related with RPP (r=-.679; p<0.05), MP (r= -.547; p<0.05), RMP (r=-.596; p<0.05), left 300º.s KES (r=.704; p<0.01), right 60º.s-1 KFS (r=-.794; p<0.01), left 60º.s-1 KFS (r=-.737; p<0.01), left 300º.s-1 KFS (r=-.644; p<0.05). As a conclusion, leg volume, leg mass and H/Q ratio were found to play important role in anaerobic power and isokinetic knee extension strength in basketball and volleyball players and H/Q ratio were found to play important role in football players.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZKAN, A., KİNİŞLER, A. (2010). Sporcularda Bacak Hacmi, Kütlesi, Hamstring/Quadriceps Oranı ile Anaerobik Performans ve İzokinetik Bacak Kuvveti Arasındaki İlişki. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 90–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/147773

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Armstrong N, Welsman JR, Chia MYH. (2001). Short term power output in relation to growth and maturation. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 35, 118-124.
  2. Astrand PO, Rodahl K, Dahl AH, Stromme BS. (2003) (Der.). Textbook of work phyiology. Australia: Human Kinetics. Baecchle TR, Earle RW. (2000).
  3. Plyometric training. Potach, D. H. & Chu, D. A.(Der.). Essential of Strength Training and Conditioning, Canada: Human Kinetics. Bencke J, Damsgaard R, Saekmose A, Jorgenson P, Jorgenson K, Klauen K. (2002). Anaerobic power and muscle strength characteristics of 11 years old elite and non-elite boys and girls from gymnastics, team handball, tennis and swimming. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 12, 171-178.
  4. Bloomfield J, Ackland TR, Elliot BC. (1994). Applied Anatomy and Biomechanics in Sport. Blackwell Scientific Publications. Caluo M, Rodos G, Vallejo M, Estroch A, Arcas A, Javenre C ve diğ. (2002). Heritability of explosive power and anaerobic capacity in humans. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 86, 218-225.
  5. Coombs R, Garbutt G. (2002). Developments in use of the hamstring/quadriceps ratio for the assessment of muscle balance. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 1, 56-62.
  6. De Ste Croix MBA, Armstrong N, Chia MYH, Welsman JR, Parsons G, Sharpe P. (2000). Changes in short- term power output in 10 to 12–year-olds. Journal of Sports of Sciences, 19, 141-148.
  7. Dore E, Bedu M, França NM, Praagh EV. (2001). Anaerobic cycling performance characteristics in prepubescent, adolescent and young adults females. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 84, 476-481.
  8. Dowsan MN, Nevill ME, Lakomy HK, Hazeldine RJ. (1998). Modelling the relationship between isokinetic muscle strength amd sprint running performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 16, 257-265.
  9. Heyward VH, Stolarczyk LM. (1996). Applied Body Composition Assessment. 2nd ed. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics, 21-43.
  10. Ingulf J, Burgers S. (1990). Effects of training on the anaerobic capacity, department of physiology. National Institute of Occupational Health, Norway. Jackson AS, Pollock ML. (1978). Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. British Journal of Nutrition, 40, 497-504.
  11. Koşar N, Kin İşler A. (2004). Üniversite öğrencilerinin wingate anaerobic performans profili ve cinsiyet farklılıkları. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 15 (1), 25-38.
  12. Kwon YH. (1998) Modified Hanavan Model. 09.02.2006, http://www.kwon3d.com/theory/bspeq/hanavan.html/.
  13. Mayhew JL, Hancook K, Rollisan L, Ball TE, B