KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences / 2026 / Sayı: 62

COVID-19, Yanlış Bilgi ve İletişim Çalışmaları: İnfodemi Üzerine Sistematik Bir Gözden Geçirme

COVID-19, Misinformation and Communication Studies: A Systematic Review of the Infodemic

Oğuz Kuş(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İLETİŞİM FAKÜLTESİ, HALKLA İLİŞKİLER VE TANITIM BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-2593-4980
İlknur Doğu Öztürk(DOĞUŞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6459-0845
Sayfa
67–90
Yayın Tarihi
2022-07-26
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

İletişim alanında gerçekleştirilen bilimsel çalışmalara en çok İletişim ve Sağlık Bilimleri alanlarında yapılan bilimsel çalışmalarda atıf yapıldığı gözlemlenmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma COVID-19 salgınında yanlış bilginin yayılma hızını, hızlı dönüşen yapısını ve etkilerini göz önünde bulundurarak; bir sistematik gözden geçirme aracılığıyla infodemiye yönelik bilgi birikimini yapılandırmayı ve onu çok boyutlu bir şekilde keşfetmeyi amaçlamaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Ayrıca, infodemi konusu çerçevesinde iletişim disiplini ve diğer disiplinlerin etkileşimini ortaya koymak çalışmanın amaçları arasındadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:İletişim alanında gerçekleştirilen bilimsel çalışmalara en çok İletişim ve Sağlık Bilimleri alanlarında yapılan bilimsel çalışmalarda atıf yapıldığı gözlemlenmiştir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:COVID-19 · infodemi · yanlış bilgi

Özet

Bu çalışma COVID-19 salgınında yanlış bilginin yayılma hızını, hızlı dönüşen yapısını ve etkilerini göz önünde bulundurarak; bir sistematik gözden geçirme aracılığıyla infodemiye yönelik bilgi birikimini yapılandırmayı ve onu çok boyutlu bir şekilde keşfetmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca, infodemi konusu çerçevesinde iletişim disiplini ve diğer disiplinlerin etkileşimini ortaya koymak çalışmanın amaçları arasındadır. Bu çalışma kapsamında değerlendirilen araştırmalar, sistematik gözden geçirmeye dahil etmek üzere uluslararası ölçekte tanınan bilimsel veritabanları Web of Science Core Collection ve Google Scholar’da iki aşamalı bir süreç ile aranmış ve 46 çalışma sistematik gözden geçirmeye dahil edilmiştir. Tümevarımcı bir araştırma perspektifiyle gerçekleştirilen sistematik gözden geçirme sonucunda COVID-19 salgını sürecinde yanlış bilgiyi ortaya çıkaran sebepler ve etkileri; bireysel, resmi ve gayrı-resmi aktörlerin yanlış bilgi ile mücadele yöntemleri; yanlış bilgi ile mücadelede kültürel faktörler; yasal önlemler ve geleneksel medya, yeni medya ve diğer doğrulama oluşumlarına yönelik tavsiyeler elde edilmiştir. İletişim alanında gerçekleştirilen bilimsel çalışmalara en çok İletişim ve Sağlık Bilimleri alanlarında yapılan bilimsel çalışmalarda atıf yapıldığı gözlemlenmiştir. Yanlış bilgi ile mücadele konusu ana odak noktası olan iletişim çalışmalarının farklı alanlardaki araştırmalar tarafından sistematik gözden geçirmedeki diğer çalışmalara kıyasla daha fazla alıntılandığı gözlemlenmiştir.

Abstract

This study aims to structure the available body of knowledge relating to the infodemic by means of a systematic review and explore it in a multidimensional manner by taking into account the speed of the propagation of misinformation, its fast-changing nature and effects. The study also aims to present the interaction between the field of communication and other fields of study within the framework of the ongoing infodemic. The studies for systematic review were gathered from internationally known scientific databases, namely the Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar, over two stages. A total of 46 studies were included in this systematic review. This study utilized an inductive research approach for systematic review. Using this approach, the authors’ identified the reasons for the propagation of misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic in these papers. The authors also identified the effects of this misinformation, the methods of individuals, official and non-official actors to combat misinformation, the cultural factors and legal measures for combating misinformation, and the recommendations related to traditional media, the new media and other verification structures. The studies conducted in the field of communication were predominantly cited in studies conducted within Communication and Health & Health Care Sciences fields. A notable observation made in this study was that studies which focused on combating misinformation were cited more than other studies reviewed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kuş, O., Öztürk, İ. D. (2022). COVID-19, Yanlış Bilgi ve İletişim Çalışmaları: İnfodemi Üzerine Sistematik Bir Gözden Geçirme. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, Sayı: 62, 67–90. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1028131

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (58)

  1. Al-Zaman, M. S. (2020). Politics meets healthcare? Religious misinformation in India during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v13i2.8119 google scholar
  2. Ali, S. (2020). Combatting against covid-19 & misinformation: A systematic review. Human Arenas. doi: 10.1007/ s42087-020-00139-1 google scholar
  3. Alias, N. R. (2020). An analysis of the academic literatüre on fake news during covid-19 pandemic. 4(2), 40-48. Retrieved from https://www.jcssr.com.my/index.php/jcssr/article/view/70 google scholar
  4. Alimardani, M. & Elswah, M. (2020). Online temptations: COVID-19 and religious misinformation in the MENA Region. Social Media and Society, 6(3), 4-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948251 google scholar
  5. Arnot, M., Brandl, E., Campbell, O. L. K., Chen, Y., Du, J., Dyble, M.,. Zhang, H. (2020). How evolutionary behavioural sciences can help us understand behaviour in a pandemic. Evolution, Medicine and Public Health, 2020(1), 264-278. https://doi.org/10.1093/EMPH/EOAA038 google scholar
  6. Atehortua, N. A. & Patino, S. (2021). COVID-19, a tale of two pandemics: Novel coronavirus and fake news messaging. Health promotion international, 36(2), 524-534. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa140 google scholar
  7. Bento, A. I., Nguyen, T., Wing, C., Lozano-Rojas, F., Ahn, Y. Y. & Simon, K. (2020). Evidence from internet search data shows information-seeking responses to news of local COVID-19 cases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(21), 11220-11222. google scholar
  8. Binark, M., Arun, Ö., Özsoy, D., Kandemir, B. & Şahinkaya, G. (2022). Information seeking and information evaluation of older adults in the Covid-19 pandemic: Tübitak Sobag Project No: 120k613. Association for Aging Studies Publication. google scholar
  9. Bogomoletc, E. & Lee, N. M. (2021). Frozen meat against COVID-19 misinformation: An analysis of steak-Umm and positive expectancy violations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920959187 google scholar Breakwell, G. M. & Jaspal, R. (2020). Identity change, uncertainty and mistrust in relation to fear and risk of COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, 0(0), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1864011 google scholar Carrapico, H. & Farrand, B. (2020). Discursive continuity and change in the time of Covid-19: the case of EU cybersecurity policy. Journal of European Integration, 42(8), 1111-1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2 020.1853122 google scholar
  10. Cuan-Baltazar, J. Y., Munoz-Perez, M. J., Robledo-Vega, C., Perez-Zepeda, M. F., & Soto-Vega, E. (2020). Misinformation of COVID-19 on the internet: Infodemiology study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.2196/18444 google scholar
  11. Duplaga, M. (2020). The determinants of conspiracy beliefs related to the COVID-19 pandemic in a nationally representative sample of internet users. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217818 google scholar
  12. Duplaga, M. & Grysztar, M. (2021). The Association between future anxiety, health literacy and the perception of the COVID-19 pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare, 9(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9010043 google scholar
  13. EKas, C., & Catalan-Matamoros, D. (2020). Coronavirus in Spain: Fear of ‘official' fake news boosts WhatsApp and alternative sources. Media and Communication, 8(2), 462-466. google scholar
  14. El-Gilany, A. H. (2020). Infodemics of COVID-19 pandemic. Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Dergisi, 18(Special issue), 86-95. google scholar
  15. Facebook Newsroom (2020, March 25). Combating Misinformation. Retrieved from https://about.fb.com/news/ tag/misinformation/ google scholar
  16. Falcone, R. & Sapienza, A. (2020). How COVID-19 changed the information needs of Italian citizens. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17196988 google scholar
  17. Fallis, D. (2014). A functional analysis of disinformation. Proceedings of iConference. Retrieved from https:// www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/15205 google scholar
  18. Fetzer, J. H. (2004). Information: Does it have to be true? Minds and Machines, 14(2), 223-229. https://doi. org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000021682.61365.56 google scholar
  19. Figueira, Â. & Oliveira, L. (2017). The current state of fake news: Challenges and opportunities. Procedia Computer Science, 121, 817-825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.106 google scholar
  20. Givas, N. (2020, 20 March). WHO haunted by old tweet saying China found no human transmission of coronavirus. Retrieved from https://nypost.com/2020/03/20/who-haunted-by-old-tweet-saying-china-found-no-human-transmission-of-coronavirus/ google scholar
  21. Grada, A. D. V., & Martı'nez, V. C. (2020). Fake news during the Covid-19 pandemic in Spain: a study through Google Trends. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, (78), 169-182. google scholar
  22. Graham, S. S. (2021). Misinformation ınoculation and literacy support tweetorials on COVID-19. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920958505 google scholar
  23. Haman, M. (2020). The use of Twitter by state leaders and its impact on the public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 6(11), e05540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05540 google scholar
  24. Harmatiy, O. (2020). Media and scientific literacy development within the fFramework of public engagement with Science. Media Education (Mediaobrazovanie), 60(4), 636-644. https://doi.Org/10.13187/me.2020.4.636 google scholar
  25. Hornik, R., Kikut, A., Jesch, E., Woko, C., Siegel, L. & Kim, K. (2021). Association of COVID-19 misinformation with face mask wearing and social distancing in a nationally representative US sample. Health Communication, 36(1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1847437 google scholar
  26. Huang, Y. L., Starbird, K., Orand, M., Stanek, S. A. & Pedersen, H. T. (2015, February). Connected through crisis: Emotional proximity and the spread of misinformation online. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 969-980). google scholar
  27. Kim, H. K., Ahn, J., Atkinson, L., & Kahlor, L. A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 misinformation on information seeking, avoidance, and processing: A multicountry comparative study. Science Communication, 42(5), 586-615. google scholar
  28. King, A. J. & Lazard, A. J. (2020). Advancing visual health communication research to ımprove ınfodemic response. Health Communication, 35(14), 1723-1728. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1838094 google scholar
  29. Koerber, A. (2021). Is ıt fake news or ıs ıt open science? Science communication in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920958506 google scholar
  30. Kolata, G. & Rabin, R. C. (2020, 8 October). ‘Don’t be afraid of Covid,’ Trump says, undermining public health messages. The NewYork Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/05/health/trump-covid-public-health.html google scholar
  31. Kumar, S., West, R., & Leskovec, J. (2016, April). Disinformation on the web: Impact, characteristics, and detection of wikipedia hoaxes. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 591-602). Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2872427.2883085 google scholar
  32. Li, B. & Scott, O. (2020). Fake news travels fast: Exploring misinformation circulated around Wu Lei’s coronavirus case. International Journal of Sport Communication, 13(3), 505-513. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2020-0056 google scholar
  33. Lin, C. A. (2020). A uear like no other: A call to curb the ınfodemic and depoliticize a pandemic crisis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 64(5), 661-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1871185 google scholar
  34. Lovari, A. (2020). Spreading (Dis)trust: Covid-19 misinformation and government intervention in Italy. Media and Communication, 8(2), 458-461. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3219 google scholar
  35. Malhotra, P. (2020). A Relationship-Centered and Culturally Informed Approach to Studying Misinformation on COVID-19. Social Media and Society, 6(3), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948224 google scholar
  36. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pmed.1000097 google scholar
  37. Montesi, M. (2020). Understanding fake news during the Covid-19 health crisis from the perspective of information behaviour: The case of Spain. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 53(3), 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620949653 google scholar
  38. Nemr, C. & Gangmare, W. (2019). Weapons of mass distraction: Foreign State-Sponsored Disinformation in the Digital Age. Retrieved from state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Weapons-of-Mass-Distraction-Foreign-State-Sponsored-Disinformation-in-the-Digital-Age.pdf google scholar
  39. Nguyen, H., & Nguyen, A. (2020). Covid-19 misinformation and the social (Media) amplification of risk: A Vietnamese perspective. Media and Communication, 8(2), 444-447. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3227 google scholar
  40. PAHO (Pan American Health Organization) (2020). Understanding the Infodemic and Misinformation in the FightAgainst COVID-19. Retrieved from iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/52052/Factsheet-infodemic_eng.pdf?sequence=14 google scholar
  41. Patel, S. S., Moncayo, O. E., Conroy, K. M., Jordan, D. & Erickson, T. B. (2020). The landscape of disinformation on health crisis communication during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ukraine: Hybrid warfare tactics, fake media news and review of evidence. Journal of Science Communication, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.19050202 google scholar
  42. Perez-Curiel, C. & Molpeceres, A. M. V. (2020). Impact of political discourse on the dissemination of hoaxes about covid-19. Influence of misinformation in public and media. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 2020 (78), 65-97. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1469 google scholar
  43. Pine, K. H., Lee, M., Whitman, S. A., Chen, Y. & Henne, K. (2021, May). Making sense of risk ınformation amidst uncertainty: Individuals’ perceived risks associated with the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-15). google scholar
  44. Radu, R. (2020). Fighting the ‘Infodemic’: Legal responses to COVID-19 disinformation. Social Media and Society, 6(3), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948190 google scholar
  45. Rodrigues, U. M. & Xu, J. (2020). Regulation of COVID-19 fake news infodemic in China and India. Media International Australia, 177(1), 125-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20948202 google scholar
  46. Sadeghzadeh, M., Abbasi, M., Khajavi, Y., & Amirazodi, H. (2021). Psychological correlates of anxiety in response to COVID-19 outbreak among Iranian University students. Current Psychology, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12144-020-01237-7 google scholar
  47. Shoaib, M. & Abdullah, F. (2021). COVID-19 backlash: Psycho-social impacts of outbreak in Pakistan. Health Education, 121(3), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-07-2020-0047 google scholar
  48. Soldatova, G., Rasskazova, E., Chigarkova, S., Dementiy, L., Federation, R. & Federation, R. (2020). Click, ıgnore or repost: Subjective assessment of the reliability and relevance of information on COVID-19 in the Infodemic. Media Education (Mediaobrazovanie), 60(4), 745-756. https://doi.org/10.13187/me.2020.4.745 google scholar
  49. Soto-Vasquez, A. D., Gonzalez, A. A., Shi, W., Garcia, N. & Hernandez, J. (2020). COVID-19: Contextualizing Misinformation Flows in a US Latinx Border Community (Media and Communication During COVID-19). Howard Journal of Communications, 0(0), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2020.1860839 google scholar
  50. Starbird, K. & Palen, L. (2011, May). “Voluntweeters” self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1071-1080). google scholar
  51. Starbird, K. (2020). How a crisis researcher makes sense of Covid-19 misinformation. Retrieved from onezero. medium.com/reflecting-on-the-covid-19-infodemic-as-a-crisis-informatics-researcher-ce0656fa4d0a google scholar
  52. Su, Y. (2021). It doesn’t take a village to fall for misinformation: Social media use, discussion heterogeneity preference, worry of the virus, faith in scientists, and COVID-19-related misinformation beliefs. Telematics and Informatics, 58(December 2020), 101547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101547 google scholar
  53. Vraga, E. K., Tully, M. & Bode, L. (2020). Empowering users to respond to misinformation about covid-19. Media and Communication, 8(2), 475-479. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3200 google scholar
  54. Walsh, N.P. (2020, 25 May). Bolsonaro calls coronavirus a little flu inside Brazil’s hospitals, doctors know the horrifying reality. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/23/americas/brazil-coronavirus-hospitals-intl/index.html google scholar
  55. Whittaker, J., Handmer, J. & McLennan, B. (2015). Informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: a literature review. Melbourne, Australia: Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC. google scholar
  56. WHO (2020, 7 July). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Situation Report - 169. Retrieved from who.int/docs/ default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200707-covid-19-sitrep-169.pdf?sfvrsn=c6c69c88_2 google scholar
  57. Xiao, Y. & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971 google scholar
  58. Arnot, M., Brandl, E., Campbell, O. L. K., Chen, Y., Du, J., Dyble, M.,. Zhang, H. (2020). How evolutionary behavioural sciences can help us understand behaviour in a pandemic. Evolution, Medicine and Public Health, 2020(1), 264-278. https://doi.org/10.1093/EMPH/EOAA038 google scholar