KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Seroprevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in Stray Dogs in İstanbul and İzmir

Taraneh ÖNCEL
Gülay VURAL
Sayfa
785–789
Yayın Tarihi
2005-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There was no seropositivity among stray dogs in İzmir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Three hundred eighty stray dogs (232 female and 148 male) from İstanbul and İzmir were tested with antigen detecting ELISA for Dirofilaria immitis infection.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Blood samples were collected between November 2002 and April 2003.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There was no seropositivity among stray dogs in İzmir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2002 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Dirofilaria immitis · ELISA · dog

Özet

Three hundred eighty stray dogs (232 female and 148 male) from İstanbul and İzmir were tested with antigen detecting ELISA for Dirofilaria immitis infection. Blood samples were collected between November 2002 and April 2003. D. immitis infection was found in 4 dogs tested. Seroprevalence among these dogs in İstanbul was 1.52%. Seroprevalence was the highest (2.22%) in the 3-6-year-old age group, followed by 1.02% in the 1-3-year-old age group. However, there was no significant difference between these age groups (P > 0.05). No significant difference between male and female dog groups was observed in İstanbul (P > 0.05). There was no seropositivity among stray dogs in İzmir.

Abstract

Three hundred eighty stray dogs (232 female and 148 male) from İstanbul and İzmir were tested with antigen detecting ELISA for Dirofilaria immitis infection. Blood samples were collected between November 2002 and April 2003. D. immitis infection was found in 4 dogs tested. Seroprevalence among these dogs in İstanbul was 1.52%. Seroprevalence was the highest (2.22%) in the 3-6-year-old age group, followed by 1.02% in the 1-3-year-old age group. However, there was no significant difference between these age groups (P > 0.05). No significant difference between male and female dog groups was observed in İstanbul (P > 0.05). There was no seropositivity among stray dogs in İzmir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖNCEL, T., VURAL, G. (2005). Seroprevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in Stray Dogs in İstanbul and İzmir. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 785–789. https://ajindex.com/articles/146346

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Güralp, N.: Helmintoloji. 2nd ed. Ankara.
  2. Üniv. Basımevi, Ankara. 1981; 505-510.
  3. Taflan, E.: Elazığ ve yöresindeki köpeklerde filaria’ların yayılıflı. Doğa Bilim Derg., 1983; 7: 63-70. Coflkun, fi.Z., Tınar, R., Akyol, Ç.V., Aydın. L., Demir, S.: Doğal enfekte köpeklerde ivermektinin etkisi. Uludağ Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 1992; 11: 121- 128. mikrofilerlerine Sarnıç, H., Alkan, M.: Köpeklerde dirofilariasis immitis olguları ve insan sağlığı yönünden önemi. T. Parazitol. Derg., 1986; 9: 169- 174. Zeybek, H.: Ankara yöresi köpeklerinde Dirofilaria immitis olguları. Etlik. Vet. Mikrob. Derg., 1989; 6: 1-9.
  4. Cantoray, R., Dik, B., Gülbahçe, S.: Konya’da dört köpekte saptanan Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy, 1856) olgusu. Veterinarium, 1990; 1: 32-34.
  5. Tınar, R., Coflkun, fi.Z., Doğan, H., Akyol, Ç.V., Aydın, L.: Bursa yöresi köpeklerinde görülen helmint türleri ve bunların yayılıflı. T. Parazitol. Derg., 1989; 13: 113-120.
  6. Taflan, E.: Elazığ kırsal yöre köpeklerinde helmintlerin yayılıflı ve insan sağlığı yönünden önemi. Doğa Bilim Derg., 1984; 8: 160- 167. Pamukçu, A.M., Ertürk, E.: 1933-1960 yılları arasında Ankara ve yöresinde köpeklerde görülen hastalıklara toplu bir bakıfl. Ankara. Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 1961; 8: 323-346.
  7. Öge, H., Doğanay, A., Öge, S., Yıldırım, A.: Prevalence and distribution of Dirofilaria immitis in domestic dogs from Ankara and vicinity in Turkey. Dtsch. Tierärztl. Wochenschr., 2003; 110: 69-72.
  8. Hoover, J.P., Campbell, G.A., Fox, J.C., Claypool, P.L., Mullins, S.B.: Comparison of eight diagnostic blood tests for heartworm infection in dogs. Canine Pract., 1996; 21: 11-19. Anon.: American Heartworm Society recommended procedures for the diagnosis, prevention and management of heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) infection in dogs (From the 1995 Heartworm Symposium Proceedings). Canine Pract., 1997; 22: 8-15.
  9. Weil, G.A., Malane, M.S., Powers, K.G., Blair, L.S.: Monoclonal antibodies to parasite antigens found in the serum of Dirofilaria immitis infected dogs. J. Immunol., 1985; 134: 1185-1191.
  10. Courtney, C.H., Zeng, Q.Y.: Comparison of heartworm antigen test kit performance in dogs having low heartworm burdens. Vet. Parasitol., 2001; 96: 317-322.
  11. Graham, J. M.: Canine filariasis in North Eastern Kansas. J. Parasitol., 1974; 60: 322-326.
  12. Thrasher, J.P., Gould, K.G., Lynch, M.J., Harris, C.C.: Filarial infections of dogs in Atlanta, Georgia. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 1968; 153: 1059-1062.
  13. Martin, T.E., Collins, G.H.: Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis and