SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Seroprevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in Stray Dogs in İstanbul and İzmir

Taraneh ÖNCEL
Gülay VURAL
Pages
785–789
Publication Date
2005-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no seropositivity among stray dogs in İzmir.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Three hundred eighty stray dogs (232 female and 148 male) from İstanbul and İzmir were tested with antigen detecting ELISA for Dirofilaria immitis infection.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Blood samples were collected between November 2002 and April 2003.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no seropositivity among stray dogs in İzmir.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Dirofilaria immitis · ELISA · dog

Abstract

Three hundred eighty stray dogs (232 female and 148 male) from İstanbul and İzmir were tested with antigen detecting ELISA for Dirofilaria immitis infection. Blood samples were collected between November 2002 and April 2003. D. immitis infection was found in 4 dogs tested. Seroprevalence among these dogs in İstanbul was 1.52%. Seroprevalence was the highest (2.22%) in the 3-6-year-old age group, followed by 1.02% in the 1-3-year-old age group. However, there was no significant difference between these age groups (P > 0.05). No significant difference between male and female dog groups was observed in İstanbul (P > 0.05). There was no seropositivity among stray dogs in İzmir.

Özet

Three hundred eighty stray dogs (232 female and 148 male) from İstanbul and İzmir were tested with antigen detecting ELISA for Dirofilaria immitis infection. Blood samples were collected between November 2002 and April 2003. D. immitis infection was found in 4 dogs tested. Seroprevalence among these dogs in İstanbul was 1.52%. Seroprevalence was the highest (2.22%) in the 3-6-year-old age group, followed by 1.02% in the 1-3-year-old age group. However, there was no significant difference between these age groups (P > 0.05). No significant difference between male and female dog groups was observed in İstanbul (P > 0.05). There was no seropositivity among stray dogs in İzmir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNCEL, T., VURAL, G. (2005). Seroprevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in Stray Dogs in İstanbul and İzmir. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 785–789. https://ajindex.com/articles/146346

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Güralp, N.: Helmintoloji. 2nd ed. Ankara.
  2. Üniv. Basımevi, Ankara. 1981; 505-510.
  3. Taflan, E.: Elazığ ve yöresindeki köpeklerde filaria’ların yayılıflı. Doğa Bilim Derg., 1983; 7: 63-70. Coflkun, fi.Z., Tınar, R., Akyol, Ç.V., Aydın. L., Demir, S.: Doğal enfekte köpeklerde ivermektinin etkisi. Uludağ Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 1992; 11: 121- 128. mikrofilerlerine Sarnıç, H., Alkan, M.: Köpeklerde dirofilariasis immitis olguları ve insan sağlığı yönünden önemi. T. Parazitol. Derg., 1986; 9: 169- 174. Zeybek, H.: Ankara yöresi köpeklerinde Dirofilaria immitis olguları. Etlik. Vet. Mikrob. Derg., 1989; 6: 1-9.
  4. Cantoray, R., Dik, B., Gülbahçe, S.: Konya’da dört köpekte saptanan Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy, 1856) olgusu. Veterinarium, 1990; 1: 32-34.
  5. Tınar, R., Coflkun, fi.Z., Doğan, H., Akyol, Ç.V., Aydın, L.: Bursa yöresi köpeklerinde görülen helmint türleri ve bunların yayılıflı. T. Parazitol. Derg., 1989; 13: 113-120.
  6. Taflan, E.: Elazığ kırsal yöre köpeklerinde helmintlerin yayılıflı ve insan sağlığı yönünden önemi. Doğa Bilim Derg., 1984; 8: 160- 167. Pamukçu, A.M., Ertürk, E.: 1933-1960 yılları arasında Ankara ve yöresinde köpeklerde görülen hastalıklara toplu bir bakıfl. Ankara. Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 1961; 8: 323-346.
  7. Öge, H., Doğanay, A., Öge, S., Yıldırım, A.: Prevalence and distribution of Dirofilaria immitis in domestic dogs from Ankara and vicinity in Turkey. Dtsch. Tierärztl. Wochenschr., 2003; 110: 69-72.
  8. Hoover, J.P., Campbell, G.A., Fox, J.C., Claypool, P.L., Mullins, S.B.: Comparison of eight diagnostic blood tests for heartworm infection in dogs. Canine Pract., 1996; 21: 11-19. Anon.: American Heartworm Society recommended procedures for the diagnosis, prevention and management of heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) infection in dogs (From the 1995 Heartworm Symposium Proceedings). Canine Pract., 1997; 22: 8-15.
  9. Weil, G.A., Malane, M.S., Powers, K.G., Blair, L.S.: Monoclonal antibodies to parasite antigens found in the serum of Dirofilaria immitis infected dogs. J. Immunol., 1985; 134: 1185-1191.
  10. Courtney, C.H., Zeng, Q.Y.: Comparison of heartworm antigen test kit performance in dogs having low heartworm burdens. Vet. Parasitol., 2001; 96: 317-322.
  11. Graham, J. M.: Canine filariasis in North Eastern Kansas. J. Parasitol., 1974; 60: 322-326.
  12. Thrasher, J.P., Gould, K.G., Lynch, M.J., Harris, C.C.: Filarial infections of dogs in Atlanta, Georgia. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 1968; 153: 1059-1062.
  13. Martin, T.E., Collins, G.H.: Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis and