KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Indoor environmental quality classification of school environments bymonitoring PM and CO2 concentration levels

Luigi SCHİBUOLA
Chiara TAMBANİ
Sayfa
332–342
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore these chemical pollutants reduce theno health hazard exposure capacity of the children in the remaining part of the day.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Nowadays the control of indoor healthiness and comfort has become a key issue in school environments.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Indoorenvironment quality (IEQ) as regards indoor air quality (IAQ), ventilation requirement as well as health effectsassessed by Hazard Index and Cancer Risk were investigated in a naturally ventilated school by monitoringindoor/outdoor CO2concentrations and particulate matter (PM) levels.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore these chemical pollutants reduce theno health hazard exposure capacity of the children in the remaining part of the day.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Nowadays the control of indoor healthiness and comfort has become a key issue in school environments. Indoorenvironment quality (IEQ) as regards indoor air quality (IAQ), ventilation requirement as well as health effectsassessed by Hazard Index and Cancer Risk were investigated in a naturally ventilated school by monitoringindoor/outdoor CO2concentrations and particulate matter (PM) levels. This way, a CO2fluxes balance permittedto calculate actual ventilation rates used to classify the classrooms on the basis of the proposal contained in fpEN16,798 standard. The relationship between ventilation, CO2levels and PM was also studied. In absence of ap-preciable internal pollution sources, the indoor concentrations of chemical pollutants were correlated to thecorresponding outdoor concentrations by the comparison of indoor/outdoor PM whose differences in this casedepend only by indoor deposit and resuspension. Heavy metals (As, Cd, Ni, Pb) and PAHs were considered asrequired by CEN recommendations. A simple procedure was carried on to assess the potential health hazards ofpollutants on students. Hazard Index and the total Cancer Risk of the inhalation exposure were evaluated asproposed by United States Environmental Protection Agency. The calculated values resulted normally acceptableif related to daily school period, but not completely satisfactory because they highlighted that the indoor con-taminant concentrations were not acceptable for 24 h exposure. Therefore these chemical pollutants reduce theno health hazard exposure capacity of the children in the remaining part of the day.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SCHİBUOLA, L., TAMBANİ, C. (2020). Indoor environmental quality classification of school environments bymonitoring PM and CO2 concentration levels. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 332–342. https://ajindex.com/articles/145945

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Ad hoc, A.G., 2008. Gesundheitliche bewertung von Kohlendioxid in der Innenraumluft.2008. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 51, 1358–1369.
  2. Almeida, S.M., Canha, N., Silva, A., Do Carmo Freitas, M., Pegas, P., Alves, C., Margarita,E., Pio, C.A., 2011. Children exposure to atmospheric particles in indoor of Lisbonprimary schools. Atmos. Environ. 45, 7594–7599.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.052.
  3. Annesi-Maesano, I., Agabiti, N., Pistelli, R., Couilliot, M.F., Forastiere, F., 2003.Subpopulations at increased risk of adverse health outcomes from air pollution. Eur.Respir. J. 21 (Suppl. ment), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.03.00402103.
  4. Apte, M.G., Fisk and, W.J., Daisey, J.M., 2000. Associations between indoor CO2 con-centrations and sick building syndrome symptoms in U.S. office buildings: an analysisof the 1994-1996 BASE study data. Indoor Air 10, 246–257.https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010004246.x. ASHRAE, 2010. Standard 62.1 - Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality. ASHRAEStandard. (1041-2336).
  5. Bates, D.V., 1995. The effects of air pollution on children. Environ. Health Perspect. 103,49–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/3432345.Bb101, 2006. Building Bulletin 101 Ventilation of School Buildings. Department forEdcuation 011-2711642.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/building-bulletin-101-ventilation-for-school-buildings.
  6. Blondeau, P., Iordache, V., Poupard, O., Genin, D., Allard, F., 2005. Relationship betweenoutdoor and indoor air quality in eight French schools. Indoor Air.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00263.x.
  7. Brüggemann, E., Gerwig, H., Gnauk, T., Müller, K., Herrmann, H., 2009.
  8. Influence ofSeasons, Air Mass Origin and Day of the Week on Size-Segregated ChemicalComposition of Aerosol Particles at a Kerbside. Atmospheric Environmenthttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.054.
  9. Buonanno, G., Stabile, L., Morawska, L., Giovinco, G., Querol, X., 2017. Do air qualitytargets really represent safe limits for lung cancer risk? Sci. Total Environ.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.216.
  10. Canha, N., Mandin, C., Ramalho, O., Wyart, G., Ribéron, J., Dassonville, C., Hänninen, O.,Almeida, S.M., Derbez, M., 2016. Assessment of ventilation and indoor air pollutantsin nursery and elementary schools in France. Indoor Air.https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12222.
  11. Chaloulakou, A., Mavroidis, I., Duci, A., 2003. Indoor and outdoor carbon monoxideconcentration relationships at different microenvironments in the Athens area.Chemosphere 5