Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

A comprehensive study on gas and particle emissions from laser printers:Chemical composition and health risk assessment

Sayfa
269–282
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result of the higher concentration of the VOCs, total CRhigher than 1.3×10−5was estimated, while total hazard quotient (HQ) value was noticed to be 9.9×10−2inthe office.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, a general evaluation of indoor air quality (IAQ) in an office room with intense printing activity wasinvestigated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Instantaneous peaks of PM2.5and O3were observed when the printer was working, and the con-centrations were decreased significantly on idle times.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result of the higher concentration of the VOCs, total CRhigher than 1.3×10−5was estimated, while total hazard quotient (HQ) value was noticed to be 9.9×10−2inthe office.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

In this study, a general evaluation of indoor air quality (IAQ) in an office room with intense printing activity wasinvestigated. Instantaneous peaks of PM2.5and O3were observed when the printer was working, and the con-centrations were decreased significantly on idle times. Size distribution of PM showed a remarkable contributionof quasi-ultrafine mode particles to the total aerosol mass. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and ele-mental carbon (EC) occupied an insignificant percent of the aerosol mass, while organic carbon (OC) togetherwith elements were noted to be significant. Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks due to the PMexposure were evaluated by using size-dependent deposition fractions in the respiratory tract. Hazard index (HI)was calculated as 5.5×10−5for the PAHs and 2.2×10−1for heavy metal exposure as the sum of inhalation,ingestion and dermal exposures. Cancer risk (CR) values were obtained to be 6.3×10−7and 6.4×10−6for theinhalation of PAHs and heavy metals, respectively. As a result of the higher concentration of the VOCs, total CRhigher than 1.3×10−5was estimated, while total hazard quotient (HQ) value was noticed to be 9.9×10−2inthe office.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARI, A. (2020). A comprehensive study on gas and particle emissions from laser printers:Chemical composition and health risk assessment. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 269–282. https://ajindex.com/articles/145943

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Arhami, M., Minguillon, M.C., Polidori, A., Schauer, J.J., Delfino, R.J., Sioutas, C., 2010.Organic compound characterization and source apportionment of indoor and outdoorquasi-ultrafine particulate matter in retirement homes of the Los Angeles Basin.Indoor Air 20, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2009.00620.x.
  2. Arı, A., Ertürk Arı, P., Yenisoy Karakaş, S., Gaga, E.O., 2019. Indoor air quality in abarbecue restaurant: particle organic composition and health risk assessment Proceedings of IV. In: Eurasian Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering,June 17-18, 2019.
  3. Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 988–997.
  4. Arı, A., Ertürk Arı, P., Gaga, E.O., 2020. Chemical characterization of size-segregatedparticulate matter (PM) by inductively coupled plasma-Tandem mass spectrometry(ICP-MS/MS). Talanta 208, 120350.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120350.
  5. Armendariz-Arnez, C., Edwards, R.D., Johnson, M., Rosas, I.A., Espinosa, F., Masera, O.R.,2010. Indoor particle size distributions in homes with openfires and improvedPatsari cook stoves. Atmos. Environ. 44, 2881–2886.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.049.
  6. Azuma, K., Uchiyama, I., Ikeda, K., 2007. The risk screening for indoor air pollutionchemicals in Japan. Risk Anal. 27, 1623–1638.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00993.x.
  7. Azuma, K., Uchiyama, I., Uchiyama, S., Kunugita, N., 2016. Assessment of inhalation toindoor air pollutants: screening for health risks of multiple pollutants in Japanesedwellings. Environ. Res. 145, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.11.015.
  8. Badaloni, C., Cesaroni, G., Cerza, F., Davoli, M., Brunekreef, B., Forastiere, F., 2017.Effects of long-term exposure to particulate matter and metal components on mor-tality in the Rome longitudinal study. Environ. Int. 109, 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.09.005.
  9. Baek, S.O., Kim, Y.S., Perry, R., 1997. Indoor air quality in homes, offices and restaurantsin Korean urban areas-indoor/outdoor relationships. Atmos. Environ. 31, 529–544.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00215-4.
  10. Baghani, A.N., Rostami, R., Arfaeinia, H., Hazrati, S., Fazlzadeh, M., Delikhoon, M., 2018.BTEX in indoor air of beauty salons: risk assessment, levels and factors influencingtheir concentrations. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safe. 159, 102–108.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.04.044.
  11. Bai, R., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Meng, L., Wang, L., Wu, Y., Li, W., Ge, C., Le Guyader, L., Chen,C., 2010. Pulmonary responses to printer toner particles in