Dergiler / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 9

Sensor-based Wireless Air Quality Monitoring Network (SWAQMN) - A smart tool for urban air quality management

Sayfa
1589–1597
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The present analysis suggests that the sensor-based network (low/affordable cost) can be successfully operated to get the real time air quality levels in an urban area.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:An air quality monitoring network (AQMN) having the ability to provide high spatial resolution real-time information is one of the key tools for developing management strategies for air quality improvement.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (CSIR-NEERI) has deployed a Sensor-based Wireless Air Quality Monitoring Network (SWAQMN) to monitor real-time particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) concentrations in a highly urbanized megacity, Delhi, the capital of India.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The present analysis suggests that the sensor-based network (low/affordable cost) can be successfully operated to get the real time air quality levels in an urban area.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

An air quality monitoring network (AQMN) having the ability to provide high spatial resolution real-time information is one of the key tools for developing management strategies for air quality improvement. National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (CSIR-NEERI) has deployed a Sensor-based Wireless Air Quality Monitoring Network (SWAQMN) to monitor real-time particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) concentrations in a highly urbanized megacity, Delhi, the capital of India. The sensors are equipped in a device, called Polludrone and located at ten locations covering different land use and source activities in the city. The Polludrone monitored data was compared with another calibrated PM monitor (GRIMM) for PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations and found a similar trend with correlation coefficient (r2 ) values of 0.73 and 0.85, respectively. The hourly average concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 were found to be 446 and 242 μg/m3 by PM monitor, whereas the Polludrone recorded corresponding values as 314 μg/m3 and 176 μg/m3 , respectively. Daily, diurnal and seasonal variability in PM10 and PM2.5 levels are analyzed at 09 locations in Delhi city using SWAQMN. Further, sensor's monitored data were compared with nearest located Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations (CAAQMS) in the form of Air Quality Index (AQI) and found the AQI values are comparable in all the four seasons. The sensor monitored low AQI values as compared to CAAQMS during monsoon and summer seasons. The present analysis suggests that the sensor-based network (low/affordable cost) can be successfully operated to get the real time air quality levels in an urban area.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GULİA, S., PRASAD, P., GOYAL, S. K., KUMAR, R. (2020). Sensor-based Wireless Air Quality Monitoring Network (SWAQMN) - A smart tool for urban air quality management. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 9, 1589–1597. https://ajindex.com/articles/144919

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Aguiar, E.F.K., Roig, H.L., Mancini, L.H., de Carvalho, E.N.C.B., 2015. Low-cost sensors calibration for monitoring air quality in the federal district—Brazil. J. Environ. Protect. 6, 173–189. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.62019.
  2. Becker, T., Muhlberger, S., van Braunmuhl, C.B., Muller, G., Ziemann, T., Hechtenberg, K.V., 2000. Air pollution monitoring using tin-oxide-based micro-reactor system. Sensor. Actuator. 69, 108–119.
  3. Borrego, C., Ginja, J., Coutinho, M., Ribeiro, C., Karatzas, K., Sioumis, T., et al., 2018. Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: the EuNetAir Joint Exercise–Part II. Atmos. Environ. 193, 127–142.
  4. Castell, N., Dauge, F.R., Schneider, P., Vogt, M., Lerner, U., Fishbain, B., Broday, D., Bartonova, A., 2017. Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? Environ. Int. 99, 293–302.
  5. Choi, S., Kim, N., Cha, H., Ha, R., 2009. 1 micro sensor node for air pollutant monitoring: hardware and software issues. Sensors 9, 7970–7987. https://doi.org/10.3390/ s91007970. CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board), 2010.
  6. Air Quality Monitoring, Emission Inventory and Source Apportionment Study for Indian Cities, National Summary Report. The Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi, India, pp. 290. CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board), 2011. Guidelines for the Measurement of Ambient Air Pollutants Vol.II, Guidelines for Real Time Sampling & Analyses. Available on. http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/NAAQS %20ManualVolume%20II.pdf. CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board), 2012. Guidelines for the measurement of ambient air pollutants. Guidelines for Manual Sampling & Analyses. National Ambient Air Quality Series: NAAQMS/36/2012-13, vol. I Available on. http://cpcb.nic.in/ openpdffile.php?id= UmVwb3J0RmlsZXMvMjdfMTQ1ODExMDQyNl9OZXdJdGVtXzE5Nl9O QUFRTVNfVm9sdW1lLUkucGRm. CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board), 2014.
  7. National Air Quality Index, Central Pollution Control Board. New Delhi. Available on. http://www. indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Air%20Quality%20Index.pdf. De Vito, S., Esposito, E., Castell, N., Schneider, P., Bartonova, A., 2020. On the robustness of field calibration for smart air quality monitors. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 310, 127869. DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and RurAffairsal ), 2019. Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN). https://uk%20air.defra.gov.uk/networks/networkinfo?view=aurn.
  8. Dey, S., Tripathi, S.N., 2014. Remote