Thus, with this technique we offer an alternative solution method to dynamic general equilibrium models of sovereign default to improve upon their quantitative inference ability.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Using theŞxed-point theorem, sovereign default models are solved by numerical value function iterationand calibration methods, which due to their computational constraints, greatly limits the models'quantitative performance and foregoes its country-speciŞc quantitative projection ability.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:By applyingthe Hotz-Miller estimation technique (Hotz and Miller, 1993)- often used in applied microeconometricsliterature- to dynamic general equilibrium models of sovereign default, one can estimate the ex-antedefault probability of economies, given the structural parameter values obtained from country-speciŞcbusiness-cycle statistics and relevant literature.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, with this technique we offer an alternative solution method to dynamic general equilibrium models of sovereign default to improve upon their quantitative inference ability.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
Using theŞxed-point theorem, sovereign default models are solved by numerical value function iterationand calibration methods, which due to their computational constraints, greatly limits the models'quantitative performance and foregoes its country-speciŞc quantitative projection ability. By applyingthe Hotz-Miller estimation technique (Hotz and Miller, 1993)- often used in applied microeconometricsliterature- to dynamic general equilibrium models of sovereign default, one can estimate the ex-antedefault probability of economies, given the structural parameter values obtained from country-speciŞcbusiness-cycle statistics and relevant literature. Thus, with this technique we offer an alternative solution method to dynamic general equilibrium models of sovereign default to improve upon their quantitative inference ability.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
SOYTAŞ, M. A., VOLKAN, E. (2016). A new estimation technique of sovereign default risk. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 119–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/144373
Aguiar, M., Gopinath, G., June 2006. Defaultable debt, interest rates and the current account. J. Int. Econ. 69 (1), 64e83. Aguirregabiria, V., Mira, P., 2002. Swapping the nested fixed-point algorithm: a class of estimators for discrete markov decision models. Econometrica 70 (4), 1519e1543. Alessandro, M., September 2011. Three essays on sovereign debt and financial markets. Ph.d. dissertation, MIT. URL http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/ 1721.1/69475/775590057.pdf?sequence¼1. Arellano, C., June 2008. Default risk and income fluctuations in emerging economies. Am. Econ. Rev. 98 (3), 690e712. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/ v98y2008i3p690-712.html. Arteta, C., Hale, G., January 2008. Sovereign debt crises and credit to the private sector. J. Int. Econ. 74 (1), 53e69. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/ v74y2008i1p53-69.html. Bai, Y., Zhang, J., 2012. Duration of sovereign debt renegotiation. J. Int. Econ. 86 (2), 252e268. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/v86y2012i2p252-268.html.
Borensztein, E., Panizza, U., Oct. 2008. The costs of sovereign default. IMF working papers 08/238. International Monetary Fund. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/ imfwpa/08-238.html. Chatterjee, S., Eyigungor, B., October 2012. Maturity, indebtedness, and default risk. Am. Econ. Rev. 102 (6), 2674e2699. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/ v102y2012i6p2674-99.html. Cuadra, G., Sapriza, H., September 2008. Sovereign default, interest rates and political uncertainty in emerging markets. J. Int. Econ. 76 (1), 78e88. URL. http:// ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/v76y2008i1p78-88.html. Dias, D.A., Richmond, C., 2009. In: Duration of Capital Market Exclusion: an Empirical Investigation. SSRN Working Paper. Eaton, J., Gersovitz, M., April 1981. Debt with potential repudiation: theoretical and empirical analysis. Rev. Econ. Stud. 48 (2), 289e309. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/ a/bla/restud/v48y1981i2p289-309.html. Fuentes, M., Saravia, D., March 2010. Sovereign defaulters: do international capital markets punish them? J. Dev. Econ. 91 (2), 336e347. URL. http://ideas.repec. org/a/eee/deveco/v91y2010i2p336-347.html. Furceri, D., Zdzienicka, A., 2011. How Costly Are Debt Crises? MPRA Paper 30953. University Library of Munich, Germany. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/ mprapa/30953.html. Gelos, R.G., Sahay, R., Sandleris, G., March 2011. Sovereign borrowing by developing countries: what determines market access? J. Int. Econ. 83 (2), 243e254. URL. http://ideas.rep