Journals / Central Bank Review / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

A new estimation technique of sovereign default risk

Pages
119–125
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, with this technique we offer an alternative solution method to dynamic general equilibrium models of sovereign default to improve upon their quantitative inference ability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Using theŞxed-point theorem, sovereign default models are solved by numerical value function iterationand calibration methods, which due to their computational constraints, greatly limits the models'quantitative performance and foregoes its country-speciŞc quantitative projection ability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By applyingthe Hotz-Miller estimation technique (Hotz and Miller, 1993)- often used in applied microeconometricsliterature- to dynamic general equilibrium models of sovereign default, one can estimate the ex-antedefault probability of economies, given the structural parameter values obtained from country-speciŞcbusiness-cycle statistics and relevant literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, with this technique we offer an alternative solution method to dynamic general equilibrium models of sovereign default to improve upon their quantitative inference ability.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Using theŞxed-point theorem, sovereign default models are solved by numerical value function iterationand calibration methods, which due to their computational constraints, greatly limits the models'quantitative performance and foregoes its country-speciŞc quantitative projection ability. By applyingthe Hotz-Miller estimation technique (Hotz and Miller, 1993)- often used in applied microeconometricsliterature- to dynamic general equilibrium models of sovereign default, one can estimate the ex-antedefault probability of economies, given the structural parameter values obtained from country-speciŞcbusiness-cycle statistics and relevant literature. Thus, with this technique we offer an alternative solution method to dynamic general equilibrium models of sovereign default to improve upon their quantitative inference ability.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYTAŞ, M. A., VOLKAN, E. (2016). A new estimation technique of sovereign default risk. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 119–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/144373

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Aguiar, M., Gopinath, G., June 2006. Defaultable debt, interest rates and the current account. J. Int. Econ. 69 (1), 64e83. Aguirregabiria, V., Mira, P., 2002. Swapping the nested fixed-point algorithm: a class of estimators for discrete markov decision models. Econometrica 70 (4), 1519e1543. Alessandro, M., September 2011. Three essays on sovereign debt and financial markets. Ph.d. dissertation, MIT. URL http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/ 1721.1/69475/775590057.pdf?sequence¼1. Arellano, C., June 2008. Default risk and income fluctuations in emerging economies. Am. Econ. Rev. 98 (3), 690e712. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/ v98y2008i3p690-712.html. Arteta, C., Hale, G., January 2008. Sovereign debt crises and credit to the private sector. J. Int. Econ. 74 (1), 53e69. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/ v74y2008i1p53-69.html. Bai, Y., Zhang, J., 2012. Duration of sovereign debt renegotiation. J. Int. Econ. 86 (2), 252e268. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/v86y2012i2p252-268.html.
  2. Borensztein, E., Panizza, U., Oct. 2008. The costs of sovereign default. IMF working papers 08/238. International Monetary Fund. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/ imfwpa/08-238.html. Chatterjee, S., Eyigungor, B., October 2012. Maturity, indebtedness, and default risk. Am. Econ. Rev. 102 (6), 2674e2699. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/ v102y2012i6p2674-99.html. Cuadra, G., Sapriza, H., September 2008. Sovereign default, interest rates and political uncertainty in emerging markets. J. Int. Econ. 76 (1), 78e88. URL. http:// ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/v76y2008i1p78-88.html. Dias, D.A., Richmond, C., 2009. In: Duration of Capital Market Exclusion: an Empirical Investigation. SSRN Working Paper. Eaton, J., Gersovitz, M., April 1981. Debt with potential repudiation: theoretical and empirical analysis. Rev. Econ. Stud. 48 (2), 289e309. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/ a/bla/restud/v48y1981i2p289-309.html. Fuentes, M., Saravia, D., March 2010. Sovereign defaulters: do international capital markets punish them? J. Dev. Econ. 91 (2), 336e347. URL. http://ideas.repec. org/a/eee/deveco/v91y2010i2p336-347.html. Furceri, D., Zdzienicka, A., 2011. How Costly Are Debt Crises? MPRA Paper 30953. University Library of Munich, Germany. URL. http://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/ mprapa/30953.html. Gelos, R.G., Sahay, R., Sandleris, G., March 2011. Sovereign borrowing by developing countries: what determines market access? J. Int. Econ. 83 (2), 243e254. URL. http://ideas.rep