Dergiler / Ahi Evran Tıp Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Effect of Anesthesiologist Sex on Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Requirements in Breast Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study

Mustafa Kemal Şahin(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ANKARA DR. ABDURRAHMAN YURTASLAN ONKOLOJİ SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0003-2636-6548
Eda Cennet Caferoglu(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ANKARA DR. ABDURRAHMAN YURTASLAN ONKOLOJİ SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0002-3290-8262
Muhammed Burak Çalışıcı(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ANKARA DR. ABDURRAHMAN YURTASLAN ONKOLOJİ SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0009-0008-4592-107X
Arif Timuroğlu(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ANKARA DR. ABDURRAHMAN YURTASLAN ONKOLOJİ SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0003-4100-5505
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-08-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These findings suggest that provider-related factors may influence perioperative pain management; however, causal inference remains limited, and the results should be interpreted within the context of multidisciplinary care pathways.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: The potential impact of provider-related factors, including anesthesiologist sex, on postoperative pain and analgesic requirements remains an area of ongoing investigation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study included 127 female patients undergoing elective breast surgery under standardized general anesthesia.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These findings suggest that provider-related factors may influence perioperative pain management; however, causal inference remains limited, and the results should be interpreted within the context of multidisciplinary care pathways.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:onco-anesthesia · patient outcome assessment · perioperative care

Abstract

Purpose: The potential impact of provider-related factors, including anesthesiologist sex, on postoperative pain and analgesic requirements remains an area of ongoing investigation. While gender dynamics have been explored in various clinical settings, their role in perioperative pain outcomes has not been fully elucidated, particularly in breast surgery patients. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study included 127 female patients undergoing elective breast surgery under standardized general anesthesia. Patients were grouped according to anesthesiologist sex. Postoperative pain scores (VAS at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours), total opioid consumption within 24 hours (morphine equivalents), rescue analgesia requirements, and early postoperative complications were recorded. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of opioid consumption, including anesthesiologist years of experience as a potential confounder. Results: Patients managed by female anesthesiologists had higher postoperative opioid consumption compared with those managed by male anesthesiologists (mean difference: 2.54 mg, 95% CI [1.29 to 3.80], p<0.001). Pain scores over the first 24 hours were also higher in the female-provider group (p=0.031), and the need for rescue analgesia was more frequent (36.2% vs. 21.7%, p=0.042). No significant difference was observed in early postoperative complications (p=0.084). In multivariable analysis, anesthesiologist sex remained an independent predictor of opioid consumption after adjustment for age, BMI, operative duration, ASA status, and anesthesiologist experience (p<0.001) Conclusion: Anesthesiologist sex was independently associated with postoperative opioid consumption and pain outcomes in patients undergoing breast surgery, independent of anesthesiologist experience and other measured confounders. These findings suggest that provider-related factors may influence perioperative pain management; however, causal inference remains limited, and the results should be interpreted within the context of multidisciplinary care pathways.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Şahin, M. K., Caferoglu, E. C., Çalışıcı, M. B., Timuroğlu, A. (2026). Effect of Anesthesiologist Sex on Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Requirements in Breast Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study. Ahi Evran Tıp Dergisi, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.46332/aemj.1868984

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Lau ES, Hayes SN, Volgman AS, Lindley K, Pepine CJ, Wood MJ. Does Patient-Physician Gender Concordance Influence Patient Perceptions or Outcomes? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(8):1135-1138. doi:10.1016/J.JACC.2020.12.031
  2. Otte S V. Improved Patient Experience and Outcomes: Is Patient–Provider Concordance the Key? J Patient Exp. 2022;9:23743735221103030. doi:10.1177/23743735221103033
  3. Takeshita J, Wang S, Loren AW, et al. Association of Racial/Ethnic and Gender Concordance Between Patients and Physicians With Patient Experience Ratings. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(11):e2024583-e2024583. doi:10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2020.24583
  4. Ikesu R, Gotanda H, Russell TA, et al. Long-Term Postoperative Outcomes by Surgeon Gender and Patient-Surgeon Gender Concordance in the US. JAMA Surg. 2025;160(6):624-632. doi:10.1001/JAMASURG.2025.0866
  5. Wallis CJD, Jerath A, Ikesu R, et al. Association between patient-surgeon gender concordance and mortality after surgery in the United States: retrospective observational study. BMJ. 2023;383. doi:10.1136/BMJ-2023-075484
  6. Greenwood BN, Carnahan S, Huang L. Patient–physician gender concordance and increased mortality among female heart attack patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115(34):8569-8574. doi:10.1073/PNAS.1800097115
  7. Jerath A, Satkunasivam R, Kaneshwaran K, et al. Association Between Anesthesiologist Sex and Patients’ Postoperative Outcomes: A Population-based Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2024;279(4):569-574. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006217
  8. Conversion tables for iv analgesics. Accessed October 17, 2025. European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC). Conversion tables for IV and oral analgesics. 2023 Dec [cited 2025 Oct 17]. Available from: https://esaic.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/conversion-tables-for-iv-and-oral-analgesics.pdf
  9. Fillingim RB, Loeser JD, Baron R, Edwards RR. Assessment of Chronic Pain: Domains, Methods, and Mechanisms. Journal of Pain. 2016;17(9):T10-T20. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.010
  10. Bartley EJ, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in pain: A brief review of clinical and experimental findings. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(1):52-58. doi:10.1093/bja/aet127
  11. Grinberg K, Sela Y. A Literature Review on Pain Management in Women During Medical Procedures: Gaps, Challenges, and Recommendations. Medicina (B Aires). 2025;61(8):1352. doi:10.3390/MEDICINA61081352
  12. Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA. 2002;288(6):756-764. doi:10.1001/JAMA.288.6.756
  13. Hoffmann DE, Tarzian AJ. The girl who cried pain: a bias against women in the treatment of pain. J Law Med Ethics. 2001;29(1):13-27. doi:10.1111/J.1748-720X.2001.TB00037.X
  14. Samulowitz A, Gremyr I, Eriksson E, Hensing G. “Brave Men” and “Emotional Women”: A Theory-Guided Literature Review on Gender Bias in Health Care and Gendered Norms towards Patients with Chronic Pain. Pain Res Manag. 2018;2018. doi:10.1155/2018/6358624