KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 52

ASYA ÜLKELERİNİN OTOMOTİV SEKTÖRÜ REKABET GÜCÜNDE İNOVASYONUN ETKİSİ

THE IMPACT OF INNOVATION ON THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR IN ASIAN COUNTRIES

Ezgi Kopuk0000-0001-7242-1160
Hüseyin Naci Bayraç(ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9212-987X
Sayfa
277–303
Yayın Tarihi
2026-08-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Çalışmanın amacı OICA üyesi Asya ülkelerinde inovasyon değişkenlerinin ülkelerin otomotiv sektörüne ait AKÜ endeksi üzerindeki etkisi panel veri analizi ile sınanmıştır. 1995-2021 yılını kapsayan çalışmada panelin genelinde seçilmiş Asya ülkelerinin rekabet gücünde sanayi katma değerinin pozitif bir belirleyici olduğu saptanırken, ülke bazlı sonuçlarda Çin ve Tayland’da eğitim harcamalarının, Güney Kore’de ise petrol tüketiminin otomotiv sektörü rekabet gücünü lehte etkilediği tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Çalışmada otomotiv sektörünün rekabet gücünde hangi inovasyan değişkenlerinin daha etkili olduğunu tespit etmek amaçlanmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Çalışmanın amacı OICA üyesi Asya ülkelerinde inovasyon değişkenlerinin ülkelerin otomotiv sektörüne ait AKÜ endeksi üzerindeki etkisi panel veri analizi ile sınanmıştır. 1995-2021 yılını kapsayan çalışmada panelin genelinde seçilmiş Asya ülkelerinin rekabet gücünde sanayi katma değerinin pozitif bir belirleyici olduğu saptanırken, ülke bazlı sonuçlarda Çin ve Tayland’da eğitim harcamalarının, Güney Kore’de ise petrol tüketiminin otomotiv sektörü rekabet gücünü lehte etkilediği tespit edilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ulaşılan bu sonuçlar ülkenin otomotiv sektörü rekabetçiliğinde teknoloji, beşeri sermaye ve çevresel göstergelerini içiren inovasyon faaliyetlerinin başarı getirdiğini göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Otomotiv Sanayi · Asya · Rekabet

Özet

Çalışmada otomotiv sektörünün rekabet gücünde hangi inovasyan değişkenlerinin daha etkili olduğunu tespit etmek amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı OICA üyesi Asya ülkelerinde inovasyon değişkenlerinin ülkelerin otomotiv sektörüne ait AKÜ endeksi üzerindeki etkisi panel veri analizi ile sınanmıştır. 1995-2021 yılını kapsayan çalışmada panelin genelinde seçilmiş Asya ülkelerinin rekabet gücünde sanayi katma değerinin pozitif bir belirleyici olduğu saptanırken, ülke bazlı sonuçlarda Çin ve Tayland’da eğitim harcamalarının, Güney Kore’de ise petrol tüketiminin otomotiv sektörü rekabet gücünü lehte etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Ulaşılan bu sonuçlar ülkenin otomotiv sektörü rekabetçiliğinde teknoloji, beşeri sermaye ve çevresel göstergelerini içiren inovasyon faaliyetlerinin başarı getirdiğini göstermektedir.

Abstract

The study aims to identify which innovation variables are more effective in enhancing the competitiveness of the automotive sector. It investigates the impact of innovation variables on the revealed comparative advantage index of OICA member countries in Asia using panel data analysis covering the period from 1995 to 2021. The study finds that industrial value-added is a positive determinant of competitiveness across selected Asian countries. However, country-specific results indicate that education expenditures in China and Thailand, and oil consumption in South Korea, positively influence the competitiveness of the automotive sector. These findings suggest that innovation activities involving technological, human capital, and environmental indicators contribute to the sector's competitiveness.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kopuk, E., Bayraç, H. N. (2026). ASYA ÜLKELERİNİN OTOMOTİV SEKTÖRÜ REKABET GÜCÜNDE İNOVASYONUN ETKİSİ. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 52, 277–303. https://doi.org/10.18493/kmusekad.1653267

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (110)

  1. Aktaş, N. (2023). The Effect of Innovation on Competition in BRICS-T Countries: An Econometric Analysis. Eurasian Academy of Sciences Eurasian Econometrics. Statistics & Empirical Economics Journal, (23), 37-47.
  2. Altıntaş, F. F. (2020). Rekabet ve Inovasyon Boyutları İlişkisinin Çok Yönlü Değerlendirilmesine Yönelik Amprik Bir Araştırma: G20 Grubu Ülkeleri Örneği. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 3052-3096. http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1536.
  3. Antonıadıs, I. (2017). Exploring The Linkage Between Oil and Gas Sector and Competitiveness: A Panel Data Analysis for the Countries of the Black Sea Region. Scientific Bulletin – Economic Sciences, 16(1), 34-44.
  4. Arba, A. (2023a). “Automotive Industry in Japan”: Statistics & Facts.Hamburg Germany, (Online): https://www.statista.com/topics/3764/automotive-industry-in-japan/#topicHeader__wrapper, 28 Ocak 2023.
  5. Arba, A. (2023b). “Electric Vehicles in Japan”: Statistics & Facts. Hamburg, Germany (Online), https://www.statista.com/topics/5628/electric-vehicles-in-japan/#dossierKeyfigures, 30 Ocak 2023.
  6. Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometrik Analysis of Panel Data (3th ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J., ve Mestre, R. (1998). Error‐Correction Mechanism Tests for Cointegration in a Single‐ Equation Framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267-283.
  8. Bingfeng, F. (2022). Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow of China's New Energy Vehicles. Beijing, Çin, http://en.caam.org.cn/Index/show/catid/21/id/1934.html, 17 Ocak 2023.
  9. BP. (2022). Oil Consumption. Statistical Review of World Energy: https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html.
  10. Breusch, T. S. ve Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  11. CAAM. (2020). The General Office of the State Council Issued the New Energy Automobile Industry Development Plan (2021-2035). Beijing, China. http://en.caam.org.cn/Index/show/catid/21/id/1567.html, 17 Ocak 2023.
  12. CRS. (2019). China’s Economic Rise: History, Trends, Challenges, and Implications for the United States. USA: Congressional Research Service.
  13. Cordes, A., Gehrke, B., Römisch, R., Rammer, C., Schliessler, P., ve Wassmann, P. (2015). Identifying Revealed Comperative Advantiges in an EU Regional Context. Mannheim: ZEW-Gutachten und Forschungsberichte. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW).
  14. Cornell Universty, INSEAD and WIPO. (2013). The Global Innovation Index 2013: The Local Dynamics of Innovation. Geneva, Ithaca and Fontainebleau: WIPO-Confederation of Indian Industry.
  15. Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO. (2014). The Global Innovation Index 2014: The Human Factor in Innovation. Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva: WIPO-Confederation of Indian Industry.
  16. Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO. (2015). The Global Innovation Index 2015: Effective Innovation Policies for Development. Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva: WIPO.
  17. Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO. (2016). The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with Global Innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva.
  18. Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO. (2017). The Global Innovation Index 2017: Innovation Feeding the World. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva.
  19. Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO. (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva.
  20. Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO. (2019). The Global Innovation Index 2019: Creating Healthy Lives—The Future. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva.
  21. Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO. (2020). The Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance Innovation? Ithaca, Fontainebleau and Geneva.
  22. Çelik, H. (2020). Uluslararası Rekabet Gücünü Belirleyen Faktörler: OECD Ülkeleri İçin Panel Veri Analizi (Publication No. 638471) [Doctoral dissertation, T.C. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  23. Çetin, M. ve Erkişi, K. (2023). An Innovative Perspective on the Impact of Innovation on Global Competitiveness: Comparative Analysis of EU13 and EU15 Countries. Journel of Competitiveness,19-35.
  24. Distanont, A. ve Khongmalai, O. (2020). The Role of Innovation in Creating a Competitive Advantage. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, (41), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.009.
  25. Doğan, E. ve Turkekul, B. (2016). CO2 Emissions, Real Output, Energy Consumption, Trade, Urbanization and Financial Development: Testing the EKC Hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res, (23),1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5323-8.
  26. Ebert, R. R. ve Montoney, M. (2007). Performance of the South Korean Automobile Industry in the Domestic and United States Markets. The Baldwin-Wallace College Journal of Research and Creative Studies, 1(1),12-24.
  27. ECB Economic Bulletin. (2017b). China’s Economic Growth and Rebalancing and the Implications for the Global and Euro Area Economies. Frankfurt: Europenan Central Bank. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ebart201707_01.en.pdf.
  28. Elias, S. ve Noone, C. (2011). The Growth and Development of the Indonesian Economy. Reserve Bank Australia,33-44.
  29. Gamariel, G. ve Hove, S. (2019). Foreign Direct Investment and Export Competitiveness in Africa: Investigating the Channels. Journal of African Trade, 6(1-2),30-46. https://doi.org/10.2991/jat.k.191115.001.
  30. Gülmez, A. (2012). Gümrük Birliği Sonrası Türkiye Avrupa Birliği Otomotiv Sektörlerinin Rekabet Gücünün Balassa Endeksi ile Analizi. Mevzuat Dergisi, 15(173).
  31. Hakhverdyan, D. and Shahinyan, M. (2022). Competitiveness, Innovation and Productivity of the Country. Marketing and Management of Innovations, (1), 108-123.
  32. Hale, C. D. (2001). Indonesia's National Car Project Revisited. Asian Survey, 41(4),629-645.
  33. IBEF. (2022). Indian Automobile Industry Analysis. Delhi, Hindistan (Çevrimiçi), https://www.ibef.org/industry/automobiles-presentation, 05 Şubat 2023.
  34. INSEAD. (2011). The Global Innovation Index 2011: Accelerating Growth and Development. Fransa: INSEAD.
  35. INSEAD, and WIPO. (2012). The Global Innovation Index 2012: Stronger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth. Fransa: INSEAD.
  36. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., ve Shin, Y. (2013). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115,53-74.
  37. JICA. (2021). Data Collection Survey on Automotive Industry Development in the Republic of Indonesia. Tokyo: Japan International Cooperation Agency. https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12358107_01.pdf.
  38. Kang, H. (2021). How Does Price Competition Affect Innovation? Evidence from US Antitrust Cases. USC Marshall School of Business Research Paper,1-34. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3516974.
  39. Kar, M. ve Kar, B. B. (2019). OECD Ülkelerinde Mobil İletişimin Talep Esneklerinin Tahmini. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 15(4), 991-1009.
  40. Karakaya, A., Ağazade, S., and Perçin, S. (2018). Türk İmalat Sanayinde Performans, İnovasyon ve Rekabet Arasındaki İlişki. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 4(1), 39-59.
  41. Keskin, M. (2021). Kore Cumhuriyeti'nin (Güney Kore) Tarihsel Akış Kapsamında Endüstri İlişkileri ve Mevcut Durum Çalışma Hayatı Politikaları. Ekonomi, İşletme ve Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 1-16.
  42. Kimura, F. (2009). Japan’s Model of Economic Development: Relevant and Nonrelevant Elements for Developing Economies. UNU-WIDER, 1-17.
  43. Kocaman, M. (2019). MENA Ülkelerinde Ticari Dışa Açıklık ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Bootstrap Panel Granger Nedensellik Analizi. Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(3), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.643015.
  44. Koswatta, A., Guruge, M., ve Silva, S. (2019). Economy of India: Lessons and Priorities. The Catalyst- Journal of Management, 4(1), 8-27.
  45. Kuzmenko, E., Rumankova, L., Benesova, I., ve Smutka, L. (2022). Czech Comparative Advantage in Agricultural Trade with Regard to EU-27: Main Developmental Trends and Peculiarities. Agriculture, 12(217), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020217.
  46. Lee, C. Y. (2011). The rise of Korean Automobile Industry: Analysis and Suggestion. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(6),428-439.
  47. Liu, J. ve Xie, J. (2020). Environmental Regulation, Technological Innovation, and Export Competitiveness: An Empirical Study Based on China’s Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1427), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041427.
  48. Lotfi, B. ve Karim, M. (2016). Competitiveness Determinants of Moroccan Exports: Quantity-based Analysis. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(7),140-148.
  49. Ma, Y. (2022). Automotive Industry in China: Imports and Exports. Statistics & Facts. Hamburg, Germany, (Online), https://www.statista.com/topics/1013/car-imports-and-exports-in- china/#topicHeader__wrapper, 23 Ocak 2023.
  50. Manyaza, L. M. (2016). An Analysis of the Competitiveness of BMW and Mercedes Benz Car Brands in North Cyprus (Master's Thesis). Near East Universty, Nicosia.
  51. Mgaziner, I. C. (1981). Japanese İndustrial Policy: Source of Strenght for the Automobil İndustry. R. E. Cole (Eds). The Japanese Automotive Industry: Model and Challange for the Future. United States of America: Center for Japanese Studies the University of Michigan.
  52. Miglani, S. (2019). The Growth of the Indian Automobile Industry: Analysis of the Roles of Government Policy and Other Enabling Factors. In K.-C. Liu, & U. S. Racherla (Eds), Innovation, Economic Development, and Intellectual Property in India and China (439-463). ARCIALA Series on Intellectual Assets and Law in Asia.
  53. Ohno, K. (2018). The History of Japanese Economic Development: Origins of Private Dynamism and Policy Competence. New York: Routledge.
  54. OICA. (2023). Production Statistics. https://www.oica.net/production-statistics/.
  55. Özcan, G. ve Özmen, İ. (2018). Küreselleşme Yükselen Ekonomilerde Gelir Dağılımını Etkiler mi? Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 35-52.
  56. Park, Y. (2018). Modern Korean Economy: 1948-2008. Jin, S. J. (Trans.). Republic of Korea: The Academy of Korean Studies.
  57. Pesaran, M. H. ve Smith, R. (1995). Estimating Long-Run Relationships from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, (68), 79-13.
  58. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. Bonn, Germany: The Institute for the Study of Labor.
  59. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A. ve Yamagata, T. (2008). A Bias-Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross-section Independence. Econometrics Journal, 11, 105-127.
  60. Pesaran, M. H. ve Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 50-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010.
  61. Petti, C., Spigarelli, F., Lv, P., ve Biggeri, M. (2019). Globalization and Innovation with Chinese Characteristics: The Case of the Automotive Industry. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 1-20.
  62. Pollio, C. (2012). The Auto Industry in Thailand: Value Transfer, Technological Dependence and Relations Between Local and Foreign Capital. MET Working paper 2, pp. 1-31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241754247_The_auto_industry_in_Thailand_value_transfer_tec hnological_dependence_and_relations_between_local_and_foreign_capital.
  63. Richter, K. (2006). Thailand’s Growth Path: From Recovery to Prosperity. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3912.
  64. Saray, M. O. ve Hark, R. (2015). OECD Ülkelerinin İleri Teknoloji Ürünlerindeki Rekabet Güçlerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 347-372.
  65. Schaede, U. (2009). Globalization and the Reorganization of Japan’s Auto Parts Industry. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 1-24.
  66. Statista Research Department. (2022). Automotive Industry in Indonesia: Statistics & Facts. Hamburg, Germany (Online). https://www.statista.com/topics/3963/automotive-industry-in- indonesia/#topicOverview, 05 Şubat 2023.
  67. Statista Researc Depertmant. (2023). Automotive Industry in Thailand: Statistics & Facts. Hamburg, Germany (Online), https://www.statista.com/topics/6485/automotive-industry-in-thailand/#topicOverview, 07 Şubat 2023.
  68. Sun, S. (2022a). Export Volume of Passenger Vehicles from India FY 2015-2022. Hamburg, Almanya (Online), https://www.statista.com/statistics/269752/passenger-car-exports-from-india-since-2003/, 05 Şubat 2023.
  69. Sun, S. (2022b). Export Volume of Commercial Vehicles India FY 2015-2022. Hamburg, Almanya (Online), https://www.statista.com/statistics/269754/commcercial-vehicle-exports-from-india-since-2003/, 05 Şubat 2023.
  70. Sun, S. (2023a). Automotive Industry in India - Statistics & Facts. Hamburg, Almanya (Online), https://www.statista.com/topics/3771/automotive-industry-in-india/#topicOverview, 05 Şubat 2023.
  71. Sun, S. (2023b). Export Volume of Passenger Vehicles from India from Financial Year 2015 to 2023- Statistics & Facts. Hamburg, Almanya (Online), https://www.statista.com/statistics/269752/passenger-car-exports- from-india-since-2003/, 1 Kasım 2023.
  72. Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model. Econometrica, 38(2), 311- 323.
  73. Şen, A. ve Pehlivan, C. (2021). İnovasyon Göstergelerinin Dış Ticaret Üzerindeki Etkisinin Ekonometrik Analizi: BRICS-T Ülkeleri için Bir Araştırma. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19(4), 382-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.11611/yead.1026027.
  74. Thailand Automotive Institute. (2021). Thai Automotive Industry Facts and Figures 2021. Bangkok: Thailand Automotive Institute.
  75. The Government of The Republic of Korea (2020). 2050 Carbon Neutral Strategy of the Republic of Korea: Towards a Sustainable and Green Society. The Goverment of the Republic of Korea.
  76. The World Bank (2024). World Development Indicators: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world- development-indicators.
  77. Tiftikçigil, B. Y. ve Öztürk, A. C. (2021). Hindistan Otomobil Endüstrisinin Gelişiminde Devletin Rolü. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 11(2), 944-968.
  78. Toyoaki, N. (2022). Economic Activity, Prices, and Monetary Policy in Japan. Bank of Japan, pp. 1-33.
  79. Türkay, M. (2020). Kamu Borcu ve Büyüme İlişkisi: Heterojen Panel Veri Analizi. Journal of Yasar University, 15(60), 692-707.
  80. UNCTADSTAT. (2021). Relevead Comparative Advantage Index. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx.
  81. Uslu, N. Ç. ve Kapkara, S. (2020). Borç Dolarizasyon İkliminde Seçilmiş İnovasyon Göstergelerinin İmalat Sanayi Rekabetine Etkisi. [Conference Presentation] International Conference on Economics (EconTR2020@Eskisehir) (1-24). Eskişehir: Eskişehir Osmangazi University.
  82. Ustaoğlu, M. (2013). Türkiye' de Uygulanan Döviz Kuru Politikalarının Türk Otomotiv Sektörünün Rekabet Gücü ve İhracatı Üzerindeki Etkileri: Ampirik Analiz (Publication No: 351065) [Doktoral dissertation, T.C. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  83. Vergil, H. ve Yıldırır, E. (2006). AB-Türkiye Gümrük Birliğinin Türkiye'nin Rekabet Gücü Üzerindeki Etkileri. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (26),1-21.
  84. WIPO. (2021). Global Innovation Index 2021: Tracking Innovation Through the COVID-19 Crisis. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
  85. WIPO. (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022: What is the Future of Innovation-Driven Growth? Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
  86. WIPO. (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the Face of Uncertainty. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
  87. Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistic, 69(6),709-748.
  88. Woo, L. K. (2015). The Role of aid in Korea's Development. T. Stangarone (Eds.), Korea's Economy (7-25). USA: KEI.
  89. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2006). The Global Competitiveness Report 2006–2007. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  90. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2008). The Global Competitiveness Report 2008-2009. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  91. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2009). The Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  92. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2010). The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  93. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2011). The Global Competitiveness Report 2011–2012. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  94. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2012). The Global Competitiveness Report 2012–20013. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  95. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2013). The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  96. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2014). The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  97. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2015). The Global Competitiveness Report 2015–2016. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  98. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  99. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  100. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  101. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  102. Yapraklı, S. (2011). Uluslararası Rekabet Gücünü Etkileyen Makroekonomik Faktörler: Türk İmalat Sanayi Üzerine Bir Uygulama. SÜ İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(22), 373 - 402.
  103. Yarime, M., Shiroyama, H., ve Kuroki, Y. (2008). The Strategies of the Japanese Auto Industry in Developing Hybrid and Fuel-cell Vehicles. L. K. Mytelka ve G. Boyle (Eds.), Making Choices about Hydrogen: Transport Issues for Developing Countries (193-217). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
  104. Yoon, J. S. (2022). Automotive industry in South Korea - Statistics & Facts. Statista. Retrieved February 3, 2023, from https://www.statista.com/topics/5249/automotive-industry-in-south-korea/
  105. Yoon, J. S. (2023). Automotive industry in South Korea: Statistics & facts. Statista. Retrieved October 31, 2023, from https://www.statista.com/topics/5249/automotive-industry-in-south-korea/
  106. Yücel, F. ve Ergin, A. (2015). Otomotiv Ürünleri İhracatında Staratejik Dış Ticaret Yaklaşımı: ABD ve Japonya Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(3), 101-110.
  107. Zhang, R., Tang, Y., Liu, G., Wang, Z. ve Zhang, Y. (2024). Unveiling the Impact of Innovation on Competitiveness Among Construction Projects: Moderating and Mediating Role of Environmental Regulation and Sustainability. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(3), 1-13.
  108. Zuhal, M. (2020). Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Ulusal Inovasyon Kapasitesinin Belirleyicileri: Ampirik Bir İnceleme. (Doktora Tezi). T.C. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  109. Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO. (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva.
  110. Miglani, S. (2019). The Growth of the Indian Automobile Industry: Analysis of the Roles of Government Policy and Other Enabling Factors. In K.-C. Liu, & U. S. Racherla (Eds), Innovation, Economic Development, and Intellectual Property in India and China (439-463). ARCIALA Series on Intellectual Assets and Law in Asia.